Asian Soybean Rust: Breeding Program for Resistance or Tolerance?
Fernanda Aparecida Castro Pereira*
Department of Genetics, University of São Paulo, Brazil
Submission: December 20, 2016; Published: December 21, 2016
*Corresponding author: Fernanda Aparecida Castro Pereira, Rua Sargento Osório, 78, Centro, 37200-000, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil, Tel:+5503538217621; Email:fernandacpereira01@gmail.com
How to cite this article: Fernanda A C P. Asian Soybean Rust: Breeding Program for Resistance or Tolerance?. Adv Biotech & Micro. 2016; 2(1): 555576. DOI: 10.19080/AIBM.2016.02.555576
Introduction
Asian soybean rust is the disease that has most worried farmers and researchers in the area of plant breeding since its first evidence in the 2000/01. The Asian rust found extremely favorable conditions for its dissemination in Brazil [1], for example the climatic conditions, the great extension of some crops and the continued monoculture [2]. Thus, in the 2002/03 the fungus had already contaminated almost all the producing areas [3].
This disease is caused by the fungus Phakopsora pachyrhizi Syd. & P. Syd, belongs to the phylum Basidiomycota, class Urediniomycetes, order Uredinales and family Phakopsoraceae [4]. This fungus is a biotrophic pathogen, therefore it needs alives tissues of the plant to develop and it is not transmitted by seeds. Thus, it survives on soybean plants or alternative hosts.
To the germination of the fungus, it is necessary optimal temperatures between 15ºC and 25ºC. The ideal conditions for the occurrence of infection are 10 to 12 hours (minimum of six hours) of foliar wetness, relative humidity of 75% to 80% and temperatures between 18ºC and 28ºC [5].
The most characteristic symptom appears in the leaves, initially on the adaxial side of the leaf, with small angular points less, with a diameter of less than one millimeter, along with the gray-colored uredospores (spores). In the course of sporulation, the leaf tissue around the lesions changes color according to the reaction of the host to the presence of the pathogen, on both sides of the leaf. If the host is susceptible it acquires light tan or beige color (called a TAN lesion) and if the host is resistant the lesion becomes dark brown (called RB lesion, or reddish brown), being a reaction signal of hypersensitivity [6-8].
The Asian soybean rust cycle consists of the dispersion of uredospores, from infected plants, through the wind. When deposited on a viable host and with favorable climatic conditions the uredospores germinate emitting a germinative tube and then the appressory one. This specialized structure pierces the cuticle and the cell wall, infecting the host [9]. The plant is more attacked in the lower third of the plants, where the microclimate is favorable to the development of the disease. Early leaf defoliation occurs, which can reduce the cycle in up to 15 days, also causing a reduction in grain yield [10].
The control is a set of practices that guarantees the good coexistence between the plant and the pathogen, without significant damage to the crop [11]. The control methods include the use of fungicides recommended for the crop and the management of the off-season called «sanitary empty», which corresponds to the period of absence of live host plants in the field [12]. As well as other strategies: the cultivation of premature cultivars at the time recommended for each region, in order to escape from the period of greatest potential of the inoculum; the less dense planting and the continuous monitoring of the crop, in order to obtain the best control in the best season [13].
The genetic resistance of soybean cultivars to Asian rust is a key component of integrated management for disease control. It is a host defense reaction, resulting from the sum of factors that tend to decrease the aggressiveness of the pathogen. There is already been identified six dominant genes, Rpp1 [14], Rpp2 [6], Rpp3 [15], Rpp4 [16], Rpp5 [7] and Rpp6 [17]. However, some of these genes are no longer effective against the race present in Brazil, since the fungus has high variability and the climatic conditions in the country are favorable for its development [18]. The accuracy of selection of plants with vertical genetic resistance is increased by performing artificial inoculation in controlled environments. However for Asian rust the occurrence of the pathogen in the field is homogeneous since the spores are disseminated through the air, and thus can be evaluated, for example, by a diagrammatic scale containing a set of notes.
Due to the instability of vertical resistance and difficulties in quantifying horizontal resistance, the tolerance study has been used as a breeding strategy to minimize the impact of rust on soybean. Tolerance is the ability of a plant support the attack of the pathogen without the damage being significant in its production, with the visible symptoms of the disease. Thus, generational breeding programs have sought alternatives for field tolerance assessment [19]. A interesting strategy is the use of managements with different types of fungicides aiming the evaluation genotypes in the presence and the absence of Asian rust (losses caused by rust) based on the grain yield and the seed size [20,21].
Based on the above considerations, is it possible that the cultivation of rust-tolerant cultivars can be launched and succeed among producers? Genetic breeding programs for pathogen tolerance have been poorly explored, especially if conducted without considering the resistance. Can the association of resistance and tolerance evaluation be a more promising selection strategy for soybean cultivars? It is necessary to check whether the disease can be controlled by vertical resistance or whether the horizontal resistance must also be associated. And if selection based on rust-tolerant genotypes is reliable. The importance of obtaining tolerant cultivars stems from the fact that they support the disease without drastically affecting productivity compared to non-tolerant plants, requiring a lower number of fungicide application [22].
References
- Yorinori JT, Paiva WM, Frederick RD, Costamilan LM, Bertagnolli PF, et al. (2005) Epidemics of soybean rust (Phakopsora pachyrhizi) in Brazil and Paraguay from 2001 to 2003. Plant Disease St Paul 89(6): 675-677.
- Henning AA, Godoy CV (2006) Situação da ferrugem da soja no Brasil e no mundo. In: Zambolim L (Ed.), Ferrugem Asiática da Soja. Viçosa, pp. 140.
- Embrapa (2006) Sistemas de Produção 11 - Tecnologias de Produção de Soja - Região Central do Brasil 2007. Embrapa Soja, Londrina-PR, Brazil, pp. 225.
- Goellner K, Loehrer M, Langenbach C, Conrath U, Koch E, et al. (2010) Phakopsora pachyrhizi, the causal agent of Asian soybean rust. Mol Plant Pathol 11(2): 169-177.
- Sinclair JB, Hartman GL, Rupe JC (1999) Soybean Rust. In: Hartman GL, Sinclair JB, Rupe JC (Eds.), Compendium of Soybean Diseases. (4th edn), St Paul, The American Phytopathological Society, p. 3-4.
- Bromfield KR, Hartwig EE (1980) Resistance to soybean rust and mode of inheritance Crop Science 20(2): 254-255.
- Garcia A, Calvo ES, Kiihl RAS, Harada A, Hiromoto DM, et al. (2008) Molecular mapping of soybean rust (Phakopsora pachyrhizi) resistance genes: discovery of a novel locus and alleles. Theor Appl Genet 117(4): 545-553.
- Miles MR, Bonde MR, Nester SE, Berner DK, Frederick RD, et al. (2011) Characterizing resistance to Phakopsora pachyrhizi in soybean. Plant Disease 95(5): 577-581.
- Amorim L, (1995) Infecção. In: Bergamin Filho A, Kimati H, Amorim L (Eds.), Manual de Fitopatologia, 3rd (edn), São Paulo, Agronômica Ceres 1: 295-307.
- Kawuki RS, Tukamuhabwa P, Adipala E (2004) Soybean rust severity, rate of rust development, and tolerance as influenced by maturity period and season. Crop Protection, 23(5): 447-455.
- Hartman GL, Miles MR, Frederick RD (2005) Breeding for resistance to soybean rust. Plant Disease 89(6): 664-666.
- Seixas CDS, Godoy CV (2007) Vazio sanitário: panorama nacional e medidas de monitoramento. SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE FERRUGEM ASIÁTICA DA SOJA. Embrapa Soja, Anais Londrina-PR, Brazil, p. 99.
- Godoy CV, Utiamada CM, Meyer MC, Campos HD, FORCELINI CA, et al. (2015) Eficiência de fungicidas para o controle da ferrugem-asiática da soja, Phakopsora pachyrhizi, na safra 2014/15: resultados sumarizados dos ensaios cooperativos. Embrapa Soja, Londrina -PR, Brazil.
- McLean RJ, Byth DE (1980) Inheritance of resistance to rust (Phakopsora pachyrhizi) in soybeans. Australian Journal Agricultural of Research 31(5): 951-956.
- Hartwig EE, Bromfield KR (1982) Relationship among three genes conferring specific resistance to rust in soybean. Crop Science 23(2): pp. 237-239.
- Hartwig EE (1986) Identification of a fourth major gene conferring resistance to soybean rust. Crop Science 26(6): 1135-1136.
- Li S, Smith JR, Ray JD, Frederick RD (2012) Identification of a new soybean rust resistance gene in PI 567102B. Theor Appl Genet 125(1): 133-142.
- Calvo ES, Kiihl RAS, Garcia A, Harada A, Hiromoto DM (2008) Two major recessive soybean genes conferring soybean rust resistance. Crop Science 48(4): 1350-1354.
- Hartman GL, Pawlowski ML, Chang HX, Hill CB (2016) Successful technologies and approaches used to develop and manage resistance against crop diseases and pests. In: Madramootoo C (Ed.), Emerging Technologies for Promoting Food Security. Elsevier, p. 43-66.
- Schafer JF (1971) Tolerance to plant disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology. Palo Alto 9: 235-252.
- Levy C (2004) Zimbabwe - a country report on soybean rust control. In: VII WORLD SOYBEAN RESEARCH CONFERENCE, VI INTERNATIONAL SOYBEAN PROCESSING AND UTILIZATION CONFERENCE, III CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE SOJA, 3, 2004, Foz do Iguassu, PR. Proceedings… Londrina: Embrapa, p. 340-348.
- Bromfield KR, Melching JS, Kingsolver CH (1980) Virulence and aggressiveness of Phakopsora pachyrhizi isolates causing soybean rust. Phytopathology, Lancaster 70(1): 17-21.