Mini Review

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Tropical Ecosystems: Towards its Management?

Laura Yesenia Solís-Ramos¹* and Antonio Andrade-Torres²

¹Biotecnología de Plantas, Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, Sede Rodrigo Facio, San Pedro, Costa Rica

²Biotecnología y Ecología de Organismos Simbióticos, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz México

Submission: July 04, 2020; Published: July 13, 2020

*Corresponding author: Laura Yesenia Solís-Ramos, Biotecnología de Plantas, Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, Sede Rodrigo Facio, San Pedro, Costa Rica

How to cite this article: Laura Y S-R, Antonio A-T. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Tropical Ecosystems: Towards its Management?. Agri Res & Tech: Open Access J. 2020; 24(4): 556279. DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2020.24.556279

Abstract

The hygroscopic balance of castor bean seeds (Ricinus communis L.) assists the proper handling of the product to preserve its water content at the levels recommended for safe storage. The objective of this work was to determine the water adsorption isotherms of castor bean seeds (EVF103 and EVF106) to obtain information on the amount of water that this product adsorb at temperatures of 10, 20, 30, 40oC and water activities between 0.20 and 0.89, as well as adjusting different mathematical models to the experimental data. To obtain the hygroscopic equilibrium, the indirect static method was used, using Hygropalm Model Aw 1 equipment, analyzing castor bean seeds of the genotypes EVF103 and EVF106. The Copace model (for the EVF103) and Modified Oswin model (for the EVF106), according to the statistical parameters and Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) and Schwarz’s bayesian information criterion (BIC) information criteria, represent the hygroscopicity of castor bean seeds in the temperature range of 10 to 40oC. In a same water activity, the water content of the castor bean seeds of the genotypes EVF103 and EVF106 reduces with increasing temperature.

Keywords: Equilibrium moisture content; Adsorption isotherms; Mathematical modeling

Introduction

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) are root bound symbiotes that are present in most terrestrial ecosystems. AMF belong to the Phylum Glomeromycotan, with more than 300 species, which have suffered classification changes in the last 10 years, currently endorsed as Phylum by Tedersoo [1]. The most recent classification of Glomeromycotan is based on the consensus of ribosomal RNA gene regions: 18S (SSU: Small Unit), ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 (internal transcribed spacers) and 28S (LSU: Large Subunit). Glomeromycotan fungi that produce globoid spores in unorganized sporocarps with a peridium probably have a worldwide distribution and they likely occur not only in undisturbed high-humidity habitats that are rich in organic matter, but also in highly degraded soils Jobim [2]. Taxonomic identification of AMF is traditionally based on spore morphology, a technique that requires a lot of time and considerable experience, and recently on DNA-based methods that are also expensive Crossay [3], however, DNA-based methods analyze the active composition of AMF populations within roots. Both should be considered as complementary. The AMF provides benefits to the host within them, facilitates the absorption of nutrients that are not bioavailable in the soil, mainly phosphorus, nitrogen, calcium, copper, zinc, magnesium, facilitates water intake, increases photosynthesis, and it also provides to the plant: resistance to biotic, abiotic stress and promote growth Kumar [4]. The plant gives it carbon in the form of amino acids, sugars in the form of hexoses, mainly glucose and polyols, which allow the maintenance of the microbiome of the mycorrhizosphere. Symbiotes store carbon from the plant in the form of vesicles (lipids) and use it as an energy source when the plant is not photosynthetically active Bach [5].

Tropical Ecosystems: mycorrhizal colonization in tropical ecosystems is affected by biotic and abiotic factors such as soil pH, water stress, light availability, ability to obtain carbon produced by plants, plant species, level of contamination, degree of soil disturbance, practices of agriculture and agrochemical application. Transfer of resources through shared fungal symbiotes, often called Common Mycorrhizal Networks (CMNs) could alter competitive ability and alter coexistence of plant species. It is possible that shared symbiotes can mediate plant-plant interaction through changes in the density or composition of the symbiotic community Harley & Smith [6]. Mycorrhizal fungi are commonly the key determinant of plant population and community dynamics, with differences between mycorrhizal types Tedersoo [7]. Experimental data has shown that plants are able to select certain fungi that supply most phosphates and reward them with more return carbohydrates Kiers [8]. On the other hand, different species may have different requirements, which could be the reason why different AMF dominate some forest species Haug [9]. An alternative explanation for the stability of mutualism is that both, plants, and fungi are able to detect the variation in resources supplied by their partner, allowing them to adjust to their own resources. As a type of “biological market”, there is a shift from the host to more cooperative species or changes in the competitive dynamics between fungi Kiers [8]. However, once colonization is established, plants cannot discriminate between fungal mixtures Kiers [8]. The same mycorrhizal fungal species do not deliver the same proportion of total phosphorus to different plant species Smith [10]. In AMF systems, fungal diversity increases plant diversity and vice versa, by providing species specific benefits and suppressing superior competitors Tedersoo [7]. Among the most abundant AMF are the genera Glomus and Acaulospora, which could indicate that they have the greatest ability to adapt to different environments, in addition to having tolerance to a wide pH range and producing numerous spores of small diameter. Glomus is more associated with grasses than forests, and Acaulospora and Scutellospora species may be more effective symbiotes for slow-growing plants, such as timber species in resource-limited environments Lovelock [11]. It is important to emphasize that the number of spores does not always correlate with the proportion of root length colonized by most AMF genera Merryweather & Fitter [12], mainly Acaulospora and Glomus Lovelock [11]. According to Lovelock [11], the causes

of the different community structure could be that

1) not all species in the community may be sporulating in the sample at the same time.

2) sporulation may not proportionally represent all species of colonized roots.

3) Tree species differ in growth rate and phenology. these species can differentially alter fertility and other physical and chemical characteristics of the soil. AMF have different colonization strategies, for example Glomus and Acaulospora colonize from all types of inocula. While Gigaspora and Scutellospora colonize mainly by spores and very limited by root fragments Klironomos [13]. Scutellospora does not produce vesicles because the infection can be by intra-radical or extraradical hyphae associated with root fragments and Gigaspora lacks runner hyphae. The vesicles can be infective segments of living or dead roots that can be an inoculum resource for the development of new roots Klironomos [13]; however, spores are the preferred method of propagation. Spore abundance may be the result of seasonal changes in inoculum potential or changes in the AMF community for which seeds are exposed to germinate which could impact recruitment. Variation in relative abundance of the few dominant species may be able to differentially alter seedling recruitment and growth Lovelock [11]. The niches of AMF species have been proposed to be a function of nutrient supply and plant growth rate, which is affected by environmental factors including light Lovelock [14]. HMAs secretes substances that influence the immediate environment (amino acids and complete proteins) that can have a direct selective effect on the microbial community of the rhizosphere. Furthermore, they can induce changes in the plant physiology, such as root exudation and carbohydrate metabolism of the plant that can indirectly affect the microbial community Aggagant [15].

The abundance and diversity of AMF decreases when having degraded soils and contamination produced by agricultural and agrochemical practices. Pesticide application and tillage are practices that impose strong ecological and evolutionary selection on AMF in ecosystems, decreasing diversity and affecting community composition Roy [16]. Previous studies have demonstrated the deleterious effects of conventional agriculture on the diversity of AMF and the selection of specific taxa of AMF Roy [16]. Progressively, there is a loss of AMF taxa throughout the years of conventional agriculture until less wealth is obtained in old agricultural crops. Available P: N stoichiometry is the most important predictor of AMF richness and community composition. The establishment of the native soil community is a limiting factor in restoring native plant diversity and composition. However, inoculation with native soil microbes has shown to increase the rate of establishment of native plants Bever [17]. AMF were previously considered to have asexual reproduction only. But the mycelium of AMF contains from hundreds to thousands of nuclei within a continuous cytoplasm, which is reported to have internuclear recombination in the dikaryotic life-stage, which varies in frequency between strains, despite the recombination of all nuclear genomes that have an average similarity of at least 99.8% Chen [18]. Therefore, AMF have a high plasticity to colonize a wide range of hosts and environments, by rapidly producing variable progeny, increasing their probability of producing offsping with different fitness than their parents Angelard [19]. Given the forced biotism of AMF, it makes the production of inoculants difficult, so the fungus requires metabolically active roots to complete its life cycle Souto [20]. Transformed root cultures are used to massproduce in vitro propagules of AMF. Moses and Hepper (1975) were the first to use the dual culture system for the growth of Glomus moseae in root crops in clover; monoaxenic crops are used in research, agriculture, and ecological restoration Kokkoris & Hart [21]. To develop an in vitro culture system for newly isolated AM fungi, a great deal of optimization needs to be performed, such as the selection of appropriate culture systems and symbiotic host root partners, as well as the determination of appropriate culture conditions Akbar & Widianto [22]. Because the plant (host shift) directs the genetics of the fungus since it has high nuclear activity. Nuclei migrate favoring one type nucleus or another (changes in the frequencies of type nuclei). Therefore, it is not convenient to only make monosporic cultures, since it claims to have a tax on, but information is lost (types of nuclei). It is important to have a shelter in the greenhouse with different monocot and dicot hosts to avoid selection (Fracchia personal communication). The native consortium is a more feasible alternative to use as growth promoters in some species and may be a good option as biofertilizers under greenhouse conditions Quiñones-Aguilar [23]. AMF-based biofertilizers that can reduce production losses at both the nursery, and transplant and established plantation levels, since they increase the root surface and improve plant nutrition, which is reflected survival increments at the nursery level and transplantation, biomass production capacity and the quality of the final product, which, for the forest producer, it becomes more competitive and sustainable, with reductions in production costs and improved income. The mycorrhizal industry is very promising, challenges though remain and there are numerous bottlenecks to solve Vosatka [24]. Fundamental and applied research, farmers and industry must be conducted to provide consisting evidence for benefits of mycorrhiza in the real conditions of plant production Vosatka [24]. The in vitro propagation of AMF alters the morphology, genetics and functioning given the domestication of the strains. It is important to further examine the effects of domestication on AM fungi and predict how changes could highly affect the environment following inoculation with such strains Kokkoris & Hart [21]. Future research should determine whether region specific genomic recombination is linked to an isolated phenotype (eg, increased spore production, hyphal density, or mycorrhization rate) or to the suitability of economically important plants and crops Chen [18]. Future progress prelude to the development of a future ‘ecological engineering of AMF and their associated microorganisms’ and its integration into modern plant breeding while taking care of the ecosystem services rendered by these valuable fungi [25, 26].

References

1. Tedersoo L, Sánchez-Ramírez S, Kõljalg U, Bahram M, Döring M, et al. (2018) High-level classification of the Fungi and a tool for evolutionary ecological analyses. Fungal Divers 90: 135-159.
2. Jobim K, Błaszkowski J, Niezgoda P, Kozłowska A, Zubek S, et al. (2019) New sporocarpic taxa in the phylum Glomeromycota: Sclerocarpum amazonicum gen. et sp. nov. in the family Glomeraceae (Glomerales) and Diversispora sporocarpia sp. nov. in the Diversisporaceae (Diversisporales). Mycological Progress 18: 369-384.
3. Crossay T, Antheaume C, Redecker D, Bon L, Chedri N, et al. (2017) New method for the identification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi by proteomic-based biotyping of spores using MALDI-TOF-MS. Sci Rep 7(1): 14306.
4. Kumar A, Sharma S, Mishra S (2010) Influence of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal (AM) Fungi and Salinity on Seedling Growth, Solute Accumulation, and Mycorrhizal Dependency of Jatropha curcas J Plant Growth Regul 29: 297-306.
5. Bach E, Narváez-Rivera GM, Bauer JT, Hofmockel KS (2018) The dynamic life of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal symbiosis. The Scientific Naturalis. Ecology by the Ecological Society of America 99(4): 978-980.
6. Harley JL, Smith SE (1983) Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Academic Press, Toronto.
7. Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Zobel M (2020) How mycorrhizal associations drive plant population and community biology. Science 367(6480): eaba1223.
8. Kiers ET, Duhamel M, Beesetty Y, Mensah JA, Franken O, et al. (2011) Reciprocal rewards stabilize cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Science, 333(6044): 880-882.
9. Haug I, Setaro S, Suárez JP (2013) Reforestation Sites Show Similar and Nested AMF Communities to an Adjacent Pristine Forest in a Tropical Mountain Area of South Ecuador. Plos One 8(5): e63524.
10. Smith SE, Smith FA (2011) Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant nutrition and growth: new paradigms from cellular to ecosystem scales. Annu Rev Plant Biol 62: 227-250.
11. Lovelock CE, Andersen K, Morton JB (2003) Arbuscular mycorrhizal communities in tropical forests are affected by host tree species and environment. Oecologia 135(2): 268-279.
12. Merryweather J, Fitter A (1998) The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi of Hyacinthoides non-scripta: I. Diversity of fungal taxa. New Phytol 138(1):117-129.
13. Klironomos JN (2002) Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417(6884): 67-70.
14. Lovelock CE, Ewel J (2005) Links between tree species, symbiotic fungal diversity an ecosystem functioning in simplified tropical ecosystems. New Phytologist. 167(1): 219-228.
15. Aggangan NS, Albano AB, Kasahara ES, Ragragio EM (2013) Survival, Growth and Cu Accumulation by Non-Mycorrhizal and Mycorrhizal Jatropha curcas Seedlings or Cuttings in a Grassland and in Mine Tailing Soils. 2013. Journal of Environmental Science and Management 16 (2): 74-87.
16. Roy J, Reichel R, Brüggemann N, Hempel S, Rillig MC (2017) Succession of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi along a 52-year agricultural recultivation chronosequence. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 93(9).
17. Bever JD, Dickie IA, Facelli E, Facelli JM, Klironomos J, et al. (2010) Rooting Theories of Plant Community Ecology in Microbial Interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 25(8): 468-478.
18. Chen A, Gu M, Wang S, Chen J, Xu G (2018) Transport properties and regulatory roles of nitrogen in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 74: 80-88.
19. Angelard C, Tanner CJ, Fontanillas P, Niculita-Hirzel H, Masclaux F, et al. (2014) Rapid genotypic change and plasticity in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is caused by a host shift and enhanced by segregation. International Society for Microbial Ecology the ISME Journal 284-294.
20. Souto SA, Cavalcante UMT, Sampaio EVSB, Maia LC (2014) Production, storage and costs of inoculum of arbuscularmycorrhizal fungi (AMF). Braz J Bot 37(2): 159-165.
21. Kokkoris V, Hart M (2019) In vitro Propagation of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi May Drive Fungal Evolution. Frontiers in Microbiology 10(2420).
22. Akbar N, Widianto D (2006) Molecular identification and in vitro propagation of arbuscular mycorrhiza from tea plant rhizosfere. Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology 9(1): 92-102.
23. Quiñones Aguilar EE, Montoya Martínez AC, Rincón Enriquez G, Lobit P, López Pérez L (2016) Effectiveness of native arbuscular mycorrhizal consortia on the growth of Agave inaequidens. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 16(4): 1052-1064.
24. Vosátka M, Látr A, Gianinazzi S, Albrechtová J (2012) Development of arbuscular mycorrhizal biotecnnology and industry: current achievements and bottenecks. Symbiosis 58: 29-37.
25. Wipf D, Krajinski F, Van Tuinen D, Recorbet G, Courty PE (2019) Trading in the arbuscular mycorrhiza market: from arbuscules to common mycorrhizal networks. New Phytol 223(3): 1127-1142.
26. Mosse B, Hepper C (1975) Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infections in root organ cultures. Physiological Plant Pathology 5(3): 215-223.