Global Warming Caused by Man “Reality or
Global Political Strategy”
Nelino Florida Rofner*
Universidad Nacional Agraria de la Selva, Peru
Submission: March 25, 2019; Published: April 24, 2019
*Corresponding author: Nelino Florida Rofner, Profesor Investigador - Universidad Nacional Agraria de la Selva. Facultad de Recursos Naturales Renovables. Av. Universitaria Km 1, 5 carretera Tingo María -Huánuco, Peru
How to cite this article: Nelino F R. Global Warming Caused by Man “Reality or Global Political Strategy”. Agri Res& Tech: Open Access J. 2019; 21(2):556161. DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2019.21.556161
This article proposes a personal opinion on the publication of the magazine polytika 1 (2008), on an extensive analysis that Jaworowski carried out with the article “The Sun, Not Man, Still Rules Our Climate”. The article points out that the global environmental movement, which raises an Ecologist philosophy, with its almost irrefutable motto “Sustainable development” is nothing more than the application of a political strategy on a global scale. He bases his analysis on scientific advances, they clearly explain that climatic variations can be produced naturally by internal phenomena of the earth-atmosphere system and not by human action. However, the theory of warming caused by ourselves and initiate an entire ecology stream, psychologically is possible, the human being is able to accept a collective guilt and at the same time shows willingness to participate in mitigation. Apparently, the strategy points to interests at scale where a global tax on carbon, imposed on humanity for its supposed role in anthropogenic global warming (AGM), would be a cornerstone. Finally, the supposed global warming brings its own interests on a global scale, which for the moment keeps us polarized with two discordant philosophical approaches and distracts us from the real problems that affect the human being at present “air, water and soil pollution”, which put the health and food security of future generations at risk.
Keywords:Global warming; Pollution; Sustainable development; Tax on humanity
Abbrevations: AGM: Anthropogenic Global Warming; EPA: Environmental Protection Agency; PDSI: Palmer Drought Severity Index; IPCC: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
a. The Malthusian current, Thomas Malthus. The theory held that the population growth in the world was in geometric shape, food production in arithmetic progression .
b. The Iron Mountain report (proposes the creation of a new quasi-religious myth about planetary risks and exaggerated environmental protection).
c. One of the 119 famous quotes of the biologist Thomas Henrry Huxley “the surplus population must be eliminated in some way” .
a. Maurice Stron, Advisor to Kofi Anan (Secretary General of the ONU).
b. The oceanographer Jacques Cousteau “to stabilize the world population, we must eliminate 350 thousand people daily”.
c. Prince Felipe “his intention to return to another life as a virus”.
d. The Club of Rome.
e. Political figures such as Al Gore, etc.
The creation of institutions, such as the Environmental Protection Agency of the USA (EPA) and the United Nations Development Program, among others, drivers of the new proposal.
The implementation of the IPCC as an organization to scientifically validate the political strategy.
Jaworowski  states that the joint and synchronized action of these, without considering the veracity or falsity of the information used as a basis for their claims, has promoted the appearance and positioning of ecologists. Therefore, there is scientific evidence to elucidate, based on objective research, whether global warming is real and whether it is caused by man or is a political strategy that
encompasses other interests on a large scale (Figure 1).
First, we will try to understand in a general way the causes of
the global climate. Staines  Explains very clearly that climatic
variations can be produced naturally by internal phenomena of
the Earth-atmosphere system or can be caused by external forcing
a. Changes in solar radiation (The amount of energy that
the Sun emits is not constant, due to sunspots on its surface).
b. Changes in Earth’s orbit (Variations in the geometry of
the orbit that the earth describes around the sun determine where
and when the earth receives more solar energy, affecting the net
c. The greenhouse effect (part of the longwave energy
emitted by the earth’s surface is retained by greenhouse gases
water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide, without
affecting the entry of UV rays from the Sun).
d. Aerosols (particles and droplets are so small from 10mm
to 100μm in diameter that they remain suspended in a gas, in this
case the atmosphere, for considerable periods.
Changes in land use, in cultivation areas or replacing vegetation
cover with asphalt or concrete have altered the way in which the
earth reflects sunlight and radiates heat. These changes affect the
regional patterns of evaporation, rainfall and infiltration of water
into the subsoil, affecting the distribution of energy on the planet.
Staines  concludes that the increase in temperature is
attributed to different causes that can be summarized in:
a. The climate system is reacting after a negative anomaly
caused by a diminished solar contribution, which was followed
by a constant increase in solar energy.
b. The system is reacting after a negative anomaly caused
by an increase in global volcanic activity
c. The system is not reacting but is being forced into
warmer temperatures by an increase in the concentration
of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, a product of human
activity. Of course, there is a fourth and more plausible
d. The increase in temperature is the product of a
combination of the three causes mentioned above.
Staines , does not blame man and rather attributes to
the sum of other factors that sound more conservative and
scientifically correct. Then, we are able to accept the theory of
warming caused by ourselves and start a whole current (Ecologist)
to control it. Psychologically is it possible? The human being would
be able to accept a lie of such magnitude and what would be his
attitude towards it, in this respect Ferguson and Branscombe 
investigated the notion that collective guilt mediates the effects
of beliefs about the cause and effect of global warming on the
willingness to participate in mitigation. It concludes that when
people believe that their group is responsible for damaging the
natural world and that the damage can be repaired, it is likely that
their feelings of collective guilt provoke behavior to repair the
damage caused. That is, it can encourage environmental behavior.
As such a scenario is psychologically possible, is global warming
real? The article by Dai et al.  can give us a more objective
explanation, they used the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI)
considering historical data on precipitation and soil temperature
(up to 1m of soil depth) from 1870 to 2002. Concludes that 1950
to 2002, precipitation increases in Argentina, the southern United
States and most of western Australia, resulting in more humid
conditions (i.e. higher PDSI) in these regions. However, most of
Europe, Africa, Canada, Alaska and eastern Australia became drier
from 1950 to 2002, in part due to the large warming of the soil
surface since 1950 in these regions. It is clear that this article
shows that the changes produced are the product of a variation
in precipitation and changes in temperature on the surface, tacitly
understood to be generated by agricultural production. It is clear
that Dai et al. , although it accepts the theory of warming, it
does not indicate that CO2 is responsible and coincides slightly
with Staines .
But what arguments are found to deny the claim sponsored
by the IPCC, is cooling perhaps a mere invention of counterattack.
Wayne Hall  published in Global Research (January 3, 2017),
demystifying the debate on climate change. I point out that forty
years ago, it was the new ice age and not global warming that was
at the center of official and media concern. Quote some of them:
a. The “New York Times” of July 18, 1970 reported that
“The United States and the Soviet Union are mounting largescale
investigations to determine why the Arctic climate is
getting colder, why parts of the Arctic sea ice are they have
become ominously thicker and if the reach of that ice sheet
contributes to the beginning of the glaciations. “All major
climate organizations of the time supported the theory of
b. A 1974 report by oceanographer and paleontologist
James D. Hays revealed that “The suspicion that winters are
getting colder and colder is no more than a mere suspicion
among climatologists.” In the last 30 years, permanent snow in
the Baffin Island has expanded the ice accumulated in Iceland
during the winter is increasing and is becoming a serious
danger to navigation.
c. “The Canberra Times” of November 1974 reported: “A
new ice age could conquer the world within the life of present
d. An important television documentary (BBC) shows that
international scientists have changed their minds about the
speed with which the “weather machine” of the world can
Then we ask ourselves when the CO2 monster and global
warming is created, Wayne Hall , affirms that the doctrine that
the increase of carbon dioxide emissions is heating up the planet
became “official” for consumption of media in 1966 when Gordon
Mac Donald - President of the new Select Panel on Climate and
Climate Change of the ICAS (Institute for Climate and Atmospheric
Science) stated: “Carbon dioxide placed in the atmosphere since
the beginning of the industrial revolution has produced an
increase in the average temperature of the lower atmosphere of a
few tenths of a degree Fahrenheit “.
For Wayne, it is clear that the issue lies in the ignorance of a
global strategy, carried out by the climate mafia (as proposed in
the Iron Mountain report in 1967). Where, a global tax on carbon,
imposed on humanity for its supposed role in anthropogenic
global warming (AGM), would be a cornerstone. Whoever has the
monopoly of truth has a monopoly of deception. What has finally
been achieved is the last trick of confidence, managing to corral
people from all over the world in two camps and turn them against
The paradox is that global warming transcended and
hypnotized the scientific world, as shown by the article by the
researcher Oreskes ; who made the review of 928 scientific
publications on the subject, from peer-reviewed journals from
1993 to 2003, to see if there was a consensus among the scientific
community regarding the influence of human activity on climate,
more particularly on global warming. What she found was that
each and every one of the authors of these articles agrees with
the fact that there is evidence that shows a human impact in the
changes observed during the last decades, although the opinions
vary with regard to the magnitude of said impact.
It is clear that in order to disseminate the idea, they needed an
authoritative voice and that is where the IPCC fits, which for Arcos
 indicates that the main objective for the IPCC is to reduce the
Climate Change of anthropogenic origin. Although, there is a social
and political debate on the question of whether there is enough
scientific consensus to justify concerted international action
to lessen its effects (true intention of the supposed warming as
Wayne maintains). Arcos  mentions that on March 21, 2004,
the IPCC reported that the concentration reached 376ppm. This
concentration is considerably higher than at any time in the last
420 thousand years, during which period reliable data could be
obtained from ice cores. It is believed that the CO2 values were
at this height for the last time 40 million years ago. So, I wonder,
should not the planet be on fire? If the IPCC attributes the heating
to the CO2 increase.
The IPCC then lies, because no author has refuted that the
planet has presented warming and cooling rates for the causes
pointed out by Staines  and there are more numerous authors
who scientifically demonstrate that the slight warming shown by
the earth is reaching its final stage and it gives way to a cooling
stage, as Jaworowski  maintains. Then its foundations (global
cooling trend, influenced by sunspots), are testable or are simply a
counter-attack to the IPCC position. In this regard, Wang Shaowu
et al.  explains that the last cycle of 11 years of solar activity,
called cycle 23, was very different from any previous cycle. It
lasted 12.4 years, while most of the previous cycles lasted only
10 years, until March 2010. This represents an exceptional
solar minimum, beginning in 1913, from cycle 15 to cycle 22.
In addition, the weakening of the Magnetic fields and sunspots,
evidence weakening of current solar activity. It concludes that the
current great solar maximum, which began in 1920, will soon end.
It is very possible that a new large solar minimum will begin in the
next 100-200 years and we need to closely monitor the number
of sunspots in the next solar cycle 24, to confirm whether solar
activity tends to continuous weakening.
In this context, the proposal of man-made global warming, well
supported by the IPCC, is not an impromptu invention, it is finely
designed, and to understand the solids of its philosophy, Staines
 explains the factors that cause variations. climatic and man
is a factor and the magnitude of their participation is unknown.
Then, as the vast majority I accept such a theory. Ferguson and
Branscombe  explain that psychologically collective guilt is
created, about the cause and effect of global warming, in response
the will to participate in mitigation is generated.
In addition, Wayne Hall  denies the IPCC, showing evidence
that forty years ago, it was the new ice age and not global warming
that was at the center of official and media concern and that the
real purpose is to create imposed on humanity for its supposed
role in anthropogenic global warming (AGM). The worrying thing
is that global warming transcended and hypnotized the scientific
world, as shown by the article by the researcher Naomi Oreskes
 and we are blinded by what the IPCC says and apparently do
not want to accept that the weakening of the fields is taking place.
magnetic fields and decrease in sunspots, weakening current solar
activity, which governs the global climate as affirmed by Wang
Shaowu et al. .
Finally, Arcos  mentions that on March 21, 2004, the IPCC
reported that the concentration of CO2 reached 376ppm and that
the CO2 values were at this height for the last time 40 million years
ago. I ask myself again, should not the planet be on fire? and if the
warming is so true why then we do not give tribune and diffusion
to alternatives and technologies that allow the transformation of
CO2 from industrial emission. As Faruque  proposal, a chemical
reactor is installed in the tower of industrial CO2 emissions, to
capture it and allow a heat release reaction in the bioreactor in the
presence of Li3N to convert it into lithium cyanamide (Li2CN2) and
use as fertilizers.
The supposed global warming generates its own interests on a
global scale, which at this moment keep us occupied and polarized
with two discordant philosophical approaches (Ecological-
Industrial) and distract us from the real environmental problems
that affect the human being in the present “air pollution”, water
and soil. “that put at risk the health and food security of future