Excessive Surgery and Palliative Medicine: Report from Russia
Sergei V Jargin1*
Jargin SV, Department of Pathology, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN), 117198 Moscow, Russia
Submission:June 16, 2025; Published: June 27, 2025
*Corresponding author:Jargin SV, Department of Pathology, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN), 117198 Moscow, Russia, E-mail: sjargin@mail.ru
How to cite this article: Sergei V Jargin. Excessive Surgery and Palliative Medicine: Report from Russia. Palliat Med Care Int J. 2025; 4(5): 555650.DOI: 10.19080/PMCIJ.2025.04.555650
Abstract
The main topic of this review is excessive use of invasive procedures in Russian healthcare. More details, images and documentary evidence are in a recently published book. Clinical recommendations are generally avoided here. Topics related to the themes of this journal are discussed: overtreatment of malignant glioma, of thyroid lesions; overuse of radical mastectomy with removal of pectoral muscles in disseminated breast cancer. Factors contributing to the persistence of suboptimal practices in Russia include a partial isolation from the international professional community, shortages of medical education, unavailability of many internationally used handbooks. Admittedly, foreign literature is available on the Internet today, many guidelines being adjusted to international standards.
Keywords:Healthcare; Russia, Medical Ethics; Glioblastoma; Thyroid Cancer; Breast Cancer
Introduction
The author has gathered information on the excessive use of invasive procedures in the Russian healthcare, summarized in the recently published book with images and documentary evidence [1]. Some human factors and guidelines have not substantially changed since the Soviet time, so that persistence or comeback of outdated methods is not excluded. Suboptimal practices are used as per instructions by healthcare authorities and leading experts’ publications. The lacking professional autonomy has been a contributing factor [2]. Manipulation of statistics has been not unusual [3]. In conditions of paternalism, misinformation of patients, persuasion and compulsory treatments are deemed permissible [4]. Justifications of surgical hyper-radicalism could be heard in private conversations among medics, for example: “The hopelessly ill are dangerous” i.e. may commit reckless acts undesirable by the state. One of the motives to overuse invasive procedures was personnel training, among others, with the purpose of readiness for war. Some invasive methods with questionable indications have been advocated by military surgeons [1]. In this connection, the limitations of medical education in the former Soviet Union (SU) should be mentioned. The Soviet period brought about an expansion of admission numbers to universities and medical educational institutions, sometimes with insufficient regard for the quality of the academic preparation of students [5]. Of note, military and medical ethics are not the same. The comparatively short life expectancy is a strategic advantage as it necessitates less healthcare investments and pensions. Military functionaries and their relatives will become more dominant thanks to the Ukraine war. Those participating in it, factually or on paper, are obtaining the veteran status and privileges over fellow citizens. Some of them will occupy leading positions at universities, scientific and healthcare institutions, without adequate preparation and selection.
Certain outdated practices have persisted since the Soviet time. For example, the negative appendectomy rate has been relatively high thanks to the widely used histopathological descriptions of “simple”, catarrhal and chronic appendicitis not requiring acute inflammation for the diagnosis. Appendices histologically indistinguishable from the norm or surgery-related histological changes have been described by pathologists as compatible with appendicitis, surgeons receiving no proper feedback. Various invasive methods have been applied without indications in people diagnosed with alcohol-related disorders [6]. Furthermore, cauterization of cervical ectropions (called erosions or pseudo-erosions) have been used without preceding Pap-smears. As before, the cauterization of cervical ectopy is claimed to prevent cervical cancer. There is a shortage of trained laboratory technicians for the primary screening of gynaecological and other smears [7]. A series of studies with the overuse of cystoscopy and biopsy in connection with the overdiagnosis of malignant and premalignant bladder lesions [8] has been commented [9]. We don’t know whether cystectomies followed the overdiagnosis but there have been cystoscopies and “mapping biopsies” without sufficient indications. Further examples from surgery, endoscopy and paediatrics are in the book [1].
Breast cancer
According to a review, the incidence of breast cancer (BC) in Russia is considerably lower than in the rest of Europe, North and South America, while mortality thereof is approximately on the same level. This has been interpreted as indication to low reliability of registration and efficiency of diagnostics [10]. The mean diameter of cancers in surgical specimens was larger in Moscow university clinics than at West European hospitals according to the author’s estimation following repeated practice of pathological anatomy in other countries (1990 to 2008). This indicated a higher efficiency of cancer diagnosis in Europe. Another distinction is that virtually all mastectomy specimens abroad were without muscle. Leading specialists recognized the fact that Russian senology did not follow for decades the global trend toward a more sparing BC management [11]. In several 21stcentury papers, textbooks, and monographs, the Halsted procedure with resection of both Pectoralis muscles was designated as the main or single treatment option for BC [12-15]. In a handbook reedited 2018, the Halsted operation is defined as the “most typical and commonly used radical mastectomy” [16]. In the oncology textbook published 2020, the Halsted procedure is defined as the “standard radical mastectomy” without further commentary [17]. Articles dated 2011 and later designated Halsted procedure as one of the main operations for BC. This method has been used and recommended also as a palliative procedure in disseminated BC [12,18,19], which is hard to comprehend physiologically. The radical mastectomy of Patey with the removal of pectoralis minor muscle prevailed until recently; details and references are in the book [1].
Glioblastoma
In 1980-1981 the author worked as a nurse at an intensive care unit of a neurosurgery department of the Botkin hospital in Moscow. Patients with glioblastoma (Gbl) were routinely operated on, while it was believed by some staff that the treatment was generally useless, just constraining many patients to spend the rest of their lives in bed. The directive to apply the largest possible radical operations for gliomas was issued at the 1959 and especially 1966 Conferences of Neurosurgeons [20]. Advanced age was not regarded to be an obstacle to the radicalism [21]. Later on, microsurgery, intra-operative imaging and other novel methods lead to a reduction in the surgical morbidity. However, despite extensive research, prognosis has not changed significantly in the last decade [22]. Arguments against resection are based on the invasiveness of Gbl, which cannot be totally removed as a rule; in addition, there might be a tumour cell spreading due to the operation, additional neurological deficits and other complications [23]. Resection using microsurgical techniques is considered standard of care, although the role of surgery has been difficult to define in controlled clinical trials [24]. The evidence is weak in terms of both the number of trials and their robustness [25]. The retrospective design of the studies has raised concerns about selection bias [26]; that is, some tumours are more resectable than others, the latter having on average better prognosis. Accordingly, the impact of surgery may be an epiphenomenon [27]. It is often argued that a prerequisite of glioma diagnosis is resection or biopsy, both methods being invasive and associated with risk. Of note, intracranial malignancy can be diagnosed in some cases by imaging and “liquid biopsy” [28]. Improvements of preoperative diagnostics must limit indications for the trepanation.
The volume of residual tumor after surgery correlates negatively with the outcome; however, it it is unclear whether the extent of surgery improves the outcome or whether tumours amenable to resection have on average more favorable prognosis [24]. If even the outcomes of surgical treatment are rated as good, some patients remain with neurocognitive deficiency or otherwise deterioration of the life quality [29]. Although evidence suggests that surgical excision improves the outcome in most cases, it is often associated with morbidity [30]. There are indications that standard therapy including surgery may be not always in patients’ best interest [31]. Without surgery, some patients receiving symptomatic therapy could use remaining months to complete their life’s work. Reportedly, the palliative care increases the number of patients who survive more than two years approximately 3-fold compared with those declining the treatment in whole or in part [32]. Existing methods of therapy are not questioned here. It is important that patients (and/or caregivers if the patient’s thinking capacity is impaired) must be objectively informed about potential benefits and risks of different treatments. Informed consent is mandatory for all surgical candidates [33]. Tacit consent should not be supposed, in particular, regarding end-of-life decisions [34]. All the above is of particular importance for the elderly. For aged patients with newly diagnosed Gbl, current recommendations include surgery; however, some studies indicated that in patients aged ≥65 years, median overall survival is only modestly improved or that there is no improvement with resection compared to biopsy [26,35]. Treatment strategies should be balanced against patient-specific factors and quality-of-life concerns [36].
Many patients and their relatives access information on the Internet. The information available online is not monitored [37]. In Russia, media tend to trivialize risks and discomfort associated with surgeries and other invasive procedures. Some medical men on YouTube claim that new techniques enable to radically remove deep-seated Gbl without damaging brain structures. Unlike other countries, public libraries are rarely used in Russia and generally contain no professional literature. Medical libraries are hindered from using by the general public [38]. Some professional publications recommending invasive procedures apply misquoting, for example: “The average life expectancy for malignant gliomas in patients receiving only conservative therapy was 9 weeks - 6.6 months” [39] with references [40-42]. However, in the quoted sources the survivals were longer. Other examples of misquoting are discussed below and elsewhere [2,43]. Surgeries are often presented by media as something a priori beneficial, conductive to good convalescence; while side effects, risks and procedural quality are not mentioned. It has been reasonably recommended that medical institutions and professionals must work to produce more reliable content in order to improve the availability of credible health information for patients [37].
Thyroid nodules
Overtreatment of thyroid nodules after the Chernobyl accident has been overviewed in the book [1]. Several considerations related to the themes of this Journal are delineated here. In a recent study, total thyroidectomy was conducted in 405 from 465 (87.1%) thyroid microcarcinoma [emphasis added] patients. Recurrences were diagnosed in 1.3% of the cases only (average observation 5.2 years) [44]. According to the recent research, decennial follow-up of “Non-invasive Follicular Thyroid Neoplasms with Papillary-like Nuclear Features” (NIFTP), partly overlapping with microcarcinoma, demonstrated a mortality risk ≤1%. Papillary microcarcinoma had a cancer-related mortality 0-4% [45]. Obviously, total thyroidectomy is an overtreatment for many cases of NIFTP and/or microcarcinoma diagnosed preoperatively. In a large-scale study, no survival advantage has been found to be associated with total thyroidectomy over lobectomy for papillary TC ≤4 cm [46]. The frequency of regret about chosen treatment in microcarcinoma patients after thyroidectomy was 24.2% compared to 3.4% among those under active surveillance [47].
Some experts from the former SU recommended radioiodine therapy for patients with thyroid microcarcinoma [48] or TC in general [49]. High-dose (40 Gy) external radiotherapy of Chernobyl-related TC, combined with radical surgery, was recommended as well [50]. Considering potential adverse effects, the American Thyroid Association (ATA) and other guidelines supported selective approach to the radioiodine treatment, in particular, for younger individuals having intrathyroidal papillary carcinoma with no or limited metastasizing [51,52]. Radiotherapy has sometimes been overused in the former SU especially after radical surgery for well-differentiated cancer with no detectable lymph node involvement.
Another study encompassed the period 1990-2005 and 936 TC patients from Belarus (600 females and 336 males, mean age at the time of surgery 14.4 years). During the observation period (12.4 years on average), 17 patients died. The causes of death included 7 suicides and 5 trauma/accident cases; only two patients died of advancing cancer (pulmonary metastases) [53]. Especially for young females, the esthetic aspect would be of importance. The neck scar, stigma as a cancer patient, hypothyroidism as well as anxiety over effects of radiation may contribute to depression [54,55]. Both intentional and unintentional underreporting of suicides may occur; reported suicide rates being 2-3 times lower than actual figures. Policymakers, authorities, medics and families may cover up suicides [56]. The sources [57-59] were misquoted to support the recommendation: “The most prevailing opinion calls for total thyroidectomy regardless of tumor size and histopathology” [60]. In the cited publications the subtotal resection is discussed. Along the same lines, the sources [58,61,62] were misquoted in [49].
Conclusion
There is a hypothesis that one of the motives to apply invasive procedures with questionable clinical indications has been personnel training, among others, with the objective of readiness for war. Military and medical ethics are not the same. Ethical and legal basis of medical practice and research has not been sufficiently known and observed in Russia. The term “deontology” is often used for medical ethics. Textbooks and monographs on deontology explained the matter somewhat vaguely, with not much practical guidance. In this connection, more international cooperation and mutual trust is needed these days. Practical recommendations must be based on reliable and reproducible research. Only such research should be included into reviews and meta-analyses.
References
- Jargin SV (2024) Selected Aspects of Healthcare in Russia. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
- Danishevski K, McKee M, Balabanova D (2009) Variations in obstetric practice in Russia: a story of professional autonomy, isolation and limited evidence. Int J Health Plann Manage 24: 161-171.
- Jargin SV (2020) Misconduct in medical research and practice. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
- Mikirtichan GL, Kaurova TV, Pestereva EV (2022) Vvedenie v bioetiku [Introduction to bioethics]. St. Petersburg: Pediatric Medical University.
- Jargin SV (2024) Medical education and postgraduate training in Russia: an update. J Integrative Med Ther 7(1): 1.
- Jargin SV (2024) Alcohol and alcoholism in Russia: An update. J Addiction Prevention 12(1): 1.
- Jargin SV (2024) Cervical ectopy: selected aspects of diagnostics and therapy. Clinical Research and Reports, BioRes Scientia Publishers 3(1): 1-7.
- Romanenko A, Kakehashi A, Morimura K, Wanibuchi H, Wei M et al. (2009) Urinary bladder carcinogenesis induced by chronic exposure to persistent low-dose ionizing radiation after Chernobyl accident. Carcinogenesis 30(11): 1821-1831.
- Jargin SV (2018) Urological concern after nuclear accidents. Urol Ann 10(3): 240-242.
- Merabishvili VM (2011) Breast cancer: morbidity, mortality, survival (population study). Vopr Onkol 57(5): 609-615.
- Kharchenko VP, Reddi TG, Kuz'min IV (1997) Problems of organ-preserving treatment of breast cancer. Khirurgiia (Mosk) (4): 8-14.
- Ostapenko V, Ostapenko A (2011) Significance and specifics of surgical treatment in locally advanced breast cancer. Vopr Onkol 57(5): 578-583.
- Kazachenok VM, Baryash VV (2005) Zabolevaniia molochnoi zhelezy [Breast diseases]. Minsk: Belarusian Medical University.
- Kovanov VV, Perelman MI (2001) Surgery on the chest wall and organs of the thoracic area [Operations on the chest and thoracic cavity organs]. In: Kovanov VV, editor. Operativnaia hirurgia i topograficheskaia anatomy [Operative surgery and topographic anatomy]. Moscow: Meditsina. p. 297-321.
- Semiglazov VV, Topuzov EE (2009) Rak molochnoi zhelezy [Breast cancer]. Moscow: Medpress-inform.
- Trufanov GE (2018) Luchevaia terapia (radioterapia). 3rd Moscow: Geotar-Media.
- Davydov MI, Gantsev ShKh (2020) Onkologiia. Moscow: Geotar-Media.
- Portnoi SM (2011) Locally advanced breast cancer (methods of treatment).Vopr Onkol 57(5): 553-558.
- Portnoy SM, Srebny AIu (2014) Hirurgicheskii metod lecheniia raka molochnoi zhelezy [Surgical method of breast cancer treatment]. In: Kampova-Polevaya EB, Portnoy SM, editors. Aktualnye aspekty klinicheskoi mammologii [Actual aspects of clinical mammology]. Moscow: Avtorskaia Academia. p. 74-109.
- Zozulya IuA, Rudchenko VV, Shcheglov VI (1968) Hirurgicheskoe lechenie supratentorialnyh gliom metodom rezekcii dolei mozga vmeste s opuholiu (Surgical treatment of supratentorial gliomas by resection of the brain lobes along with the tumour). In: Hirurgicheskoe lechenie opuholei golovnogo mozga. Problemy neirohirurgii. Respublikanskii mezhvedomstvennyi sbornik (Surgical treatment of brain tumours. Problems of neurosurgery. Republican interdepartmental collection). Vol. 1. Kiev: Zdorov’ia. p. 50-59.
- Taleisnik SL (1968) Nekotorye osobennosti hirurgicheskih vmeshatelstv pri opuholiah golovnogo mozga u lic starshe 50 let (Some features of surgical interventions for brain tumours in people over 50 years of age). In: Hirurgicheskoe lechenie opuholei golovnogo mozga. Problemy neirohirurgii. Respublikanskii mezhvedomstvennyi sbornik (Surgical treatment of brain tumours. Problems of neurosurgery. Republican interdepartmental collection) 1: 174-180.
- Oberheim Bush NA, Hervey-Jumper SL, Berger MS (2019) Management of glioblastoma, present and future. World Neurosurg 131: 328-338.
- Iacob G, Dinca EB (2009) Current data and strategy in glioblastoma multiforme. J Med Life 2(4): 386-393.
- Weller M, Le Rhun E, Preusser M, Tonn JC, Roth P et al. (2019) How we treat glioblastoma. ESMO Open 4(Suppl 2): e000520.
- Volovici V, Vogels VI, Dammers R, Meling TR (2022) Neurosurgical Evidence and Randomized Trials: The Fragility Index. World Neurosurg 161: 224-229.
- Fogg D, Gersey ZC, Pease M, Mallela AN, Andrews E et al. (2023) Outcomes and treatment algorithm in glioblastoma patients 80 years and older. World Neurosurg 178: e540-e548.
- Schiff D, Van den Bent M, Vogelbaum MA, Wick W, Miller CR, Taphoorn M, et al. (2019) Recent developments and future directions in adult lower-grade gliomas: Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus. Neuro Oncol 21(7): 837-853.
- Balana C, Castañer S, Carrato C, Moran T, Lopez-Paradís A et al. (2022) Preoperative diagnosis and molecular characterization of gliomas with liquid biopsy and radiogenomics. Front Neurol 13: 865171.
- Bonosi L, Marrone S, Benigno UE, Buscemi F, Musso S et al. (2023) Maximal safe resection in glioblastoma surgery: a systematic review of advanced intraoperative image-guided techniques. Brain Sci 13(2): 216.
- Youngblood MW, Stupp R, Sonabend AM (2021) Role of resection in glioblastoma management. Neurosurg Clin N Am 32(1): 9-22.
- Walker DG, Kaye AH (2001) Diagnosis and management of astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas and mixed gliomas: a review. Australas Radiol 45(4): 472-482.
- Pando A, Patel AM, Choudhry HS, Eloy JA, Goldstein IM, Liu JK (2023) Palliative care effects on survival in glioblastoma: Who receives palliative care? World Neurosurg 170: e847-e857.
- Manrique-Guzmán S, Herrada-Pineda T, Revilla-Pacheco F (2017) Surgical Management of Glioblastoma. In: De Vleeschouwer S, editor. Chapter 12. Glioblastoma. Brisbane: Codon Publications.
- Berthold D, Carrasco AP, Uhl E, Müller H, Dumitrascu R, Sibelius U et al. (2022) Palliative care of older glioblastoma patients in neurosurgery. J Neurooncol 157(2): 297-305.
- Minniti G, Lombardi G, Paolini S (2019) Glioblastoma in elderly patients: current management and future perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 11(3): 336.
- Nunna RS, Khalid SI, Patel S, Sethi A, Behbahani M et al. (2021) Outcomes and patterns of care in elderly patients with glioblastoma multiforme. World Neurosurg 149: e1026-e1037.
- ReFaey K, Tripathi S, Yoon JW, Justice J, Kerezoudis P et al. (2018) The reliability of YouTube videos in patients education for glioblastoma treatment. J Clin Neurosci 55: 1-4.
- Murphy J, Jargin S (2017) International trends in health science librarianship part 20: Russia. Health Info Libr J 34(1): 92-94.
- Martynov BV, Kholiavin AI, Parfenov VE, Nizkovolos VB, Trufanov GE et al. (2011) Technique of stereotactic cryodestruction in management of patients with cerebral gliomas. Vopr Neirokhir Im NN Burdenko 75(4): 17-24.
- Fazeny-Dörner B, Wenzel C, Veitl M, Piribauer M, Rössler K et al. (2003) Survival and prognostic factors of patients with unresectable glioblastoma multiforme. Anticancer Drugs 14(4): 305-312.
- Kreth FW, Warnke PC, Scheremet R, Ostertag CB (1993) Surgical resection and radiation therapy versus biopsy and radiation therapy in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurosurg 78(5): 762-766.
- Simpson JR, Horton J, Scott C, Curran WJ, Rubin P et al. (1993) Influence of location and extent of surgical resection on survival of patients with glioblastoma multiforme: results of three consecutive Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) clinical trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 26(2): 239-244.
- Jargin SV (2010) Plagiarism in radiology: A substitute for importation of foreign handbooks. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 54(1): 50-52.
- Bogdanova T, Chernyshov S, Zurnadzhy L, Rogounovitch TI, Mitsutake N et al. (2022) The relationship of the clinicopathological characteristics and treatment results of post-Chornobyl papillary thyroid microcarcinomas with the latency period and radiation exposure. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 13: 1078258.
- Janiak MK, Kamiński G (2024) Thyroid cancer in regions most contaminated after the Chernobyl disaster. J Biomed Phys Eng 14: 299-308.
- Adam MA, Pura J, Gu L, Dinan MA, Tyler DS et al. (2014) Extent of surgery for papillary thyroid cancer is not associated with survival: an analysis of 61,775 patients. Ann Surg 260(4): 601-605.
- Li G, Li R, Zhong J, Chen W, Shuai J et al. (2025) A multicenter cohort study of thyroidectomy-related decision regret in patients with low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Nat Commun 16(1): 2317.
- Gamolina LI, Achinovich SL, Pyshnyak VL (2008) Mikrokarcinoma shhitovidnoi zhelezy. Taktika lecheniia i dispansernogo nabliudenia [Thyroid microcarcinoma. Treatment tactics and follow-up] In: Thyroid cancer: current concepts of diagnostics and treatment. Proceedings of the International Scientific Forum, St. Petersburg, June 12-13, 2009. St. Petersburg University. p. 40-41.
- Demidchik IE, Kontratovich VA (2003) Repeat surgery for recurrent thyroid cancer in children. Vopr Onkol 49(3): 366-369.
- Mamchich VI, Pogorelov AV (1992) Surgical treatment of nodular goitre after the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power station. Klin Khir (12): 38-40.
- Francis GL, Waguespack SG, Bauer AJ, Angelos P, Benvenga S et al. (2015) Management guidelines for children with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 25(7): 716-759.
- Matrone A, Campopiano MC, Nervo A, Sapuppo G, Tavarelli M et al. (2020) Differentiated thyroid cancer, from active surveillance to advanced therapy: toward a personalized medicine. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 10: 884.
- Fridman MV, Man'kovskaia SV, Kras'ko OV, Demidchik IuE (2014) Clinical and morphological features of papillary thyroid cancer in children and adolescents in the Republic of Belarus: analysis of 936 post-Chernobyl carcinomas. Vopr Onkol 60(2): 43-46.
- Bay IA, Oughton DH (2005) Social and economic effects. In: Smith J, Beresford NA, editors. Chernobyl - Catastrophe and Consequences. Chichester: Springer. p. 239-266.
- Kim H, Kim Y, Shin MH, Choi KW, Chung MK et al. (2021) Risk of suicide attempt after thyroidectomy: A nationwide population study in South Korea. Psychiatry Investig 18(1): 39-47.
- Holinger PC, Offer D (1984) Toward the prediction of violent deaths among the young. In: Sudak HS, Ford AB, Rushforth NB, editors. Suicide in the young. Boston: John Wright. p. 15-30.
- Arici C, Erdogan O, Altunbas H, Boz A, Melikoglu M et al. (2002) Differentiated thyroid carcinoma in children and adolescents: clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome of 15 patients. Horm Res 57(5-6): 153-156.
- Danese D, Gardini A, Farsetti A, Sciacchitano S, Andreoli M et al. (1997) Thyroid carcinoma in children and adolescents. Eur J Paediatr 156(3): 190-194.
- Giuffrida D, Scollo C, Pellegriti G, Lavenia G, Iurato MP et al. (2002) Differentiated thyroid cancer in children and adolescents. J Endocrinol Invest 25(1): 18-24.
- Demidchik YE, Demidchik EP, Reiners C, Biko J, Mine M et al. (2006) Comprehensive clinical assessment of 740 cases of surgically treated thyroid cancer in children of Belarus. Ann Surg 243(4): 525-532.
- La Quaglia MP, Corbally MT, Heller G, Exelby PR, Brennan MF et al. (1988) Recurrence and morbidity in differentiated thyroid carcinoma in children. Surgery 104(6): 1149-1156.
- Segal K, Arad-Cohen A, Mechlis S, Lubin E, Feinmesser R et al. (1997) Cancer of the thyroid in children and adolescents. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 22(6): 525-528.