Valuation of Nutrient Utilization, Protein Requirement and Proximate Assessment of an Ecotype Tilapine ‘Wesafu’ Fingerlings Reared in Earthen Pond
Ayofe M Hammed1, Albert O Amosu2*, Hakeem A Fashina Bombata1 and Folalu A Awe1
1Department of Fisheries, Lagos State University, Nigeria
2Department of Agricultural Science, Lagos State University of Education, Nigeria
Submission:May 02, 2022; Published:May 30, 2022
*Correspondence author: Albert O Amosu, Department of Agricultural Science, Lagos State University of Education, Nigeria
How to cite this article: Ayofe M Hammed, Albert O Amosu, Hakeem A Fashina-Bombata, Folalu A Awe. Valuation of Nutrient Utilization, Protein Requirement and Proximate Assessment of an Ecotype Tilapine ‘Wesafu’ Fingerlings Reared in Earthen Pond. Oceanogr Fish Open Access J. 2022; 15(1): 555902. DOI: 10.19080/OFOAJ.2022.15.555902
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the nutrient utilization, protein requirement and proximate analysis of Wesafu from fry to fingerlings in an earthen pond. The experimental fish were monitored for comparative analysis and growth performance using commercial feed (Coppens® 0.2mm) and wheat flour in formulating feed with 30%, 35%, 40% and 45% crude protein levels. Fry were fed thrice daily at 8am, 12 pm and 4pm with 5% body weight for 8 weeks. Samples of experimental diet and fingerlings were analyzed for proximate composition while growth performance and nutrient utilization of diet were evaluated using growth indices such as Weight Gain (WG), Percentage Weight Gain (%WG), Specific Growth Rate (SGR), Food Conversion Ratio (FCR), Gross Feed Conversion Efficiency (GFCE), Protein Intake (PI), Protein Efficiency Ratio (PER). The results revealed that the highest cumulative weight gain (10.58 ± 0.12) was recorded in fry fed 45% crude protein diet while the lowest (6.58 ± 0.21) was observed in the 30% crude protein diet .There were no significant differences (p>0.05) in specific growth rate, food intake, food conversion ratio, gross food conversion efficiency and protein efficiency ratio while there were significant differences (DNMRT; ANOVA; df = (n-1); p < 0.05) in weight gain, protein intake. This study indicated that a diet containing 45% crude protein appear to be suitable for rearing Wesafu fry to fingerlings in earthen ponds.
Keywords: Aquaculture; Cichlids; Diet; Ecotype; Fingerlings; Growth; Nutrient; Wesafu
Abbreviations: WG: Weight Gain; FCR: Food Conversion Ratio; GFCE: Gross Feed Conversion Efficiency; PI: Protein Intake; PER: Protein Efficiency Ratio; SGR: Specific Growth Rate; LSD: Least Significance Difference; DNMRT: Duncan’s New Multiple Range Test; SE: Standard Error
Introduction
As the global population continues to rise, the need for sustainable alternative sources of protein also increases [1]. Research estimated that the worldwide requirement for food will increase up to 50 % by 2030 [2]. Juxtaposing the production input efficiencies of aquaculture versus several of fisheries and terrestrial agriculture systems shows that aquaculture is among the world’s most efficient mass producer of protein [3]. Protein is the most important constituents of fish and also the most expensive constituent of fish feed and global expenditure exceeds (7.05 million MT) €1bn per annum [4,5]. Aquaculture production is growing at a rate of nearly 9% per annum [3,6]. As wild fish stocks decline, the aquaculture industry faces a massive challenge to identify cost-effective and environmentally friendly alternatives to fish production on which it is so heavily reliant [1,7]. Cichlid aquaculture has the potential to provide a solution to this problem as it is relatively underexploited in Nigeria and can be cultured in a sustainable manner [8]. Cichlids are one of the most diverse fish species and widely cultivated fish families in the world, though their natural distribution was confined to North America, Central America, South America, Africa and the Mid East [9]. The family has been introduced into various continents including Australia [10]. Wesafu is an indigenous ecotype cichlid, very important specie of the fisheries of Lagos coastal waters in Nigeria [11-12]. The diversity of an unidentified cichlid of great abundant in Epe Lagoon commonly referred to as Wesafu and the large size cum weight it attains in the wild influence the drive for possible domestication, culture and exact identification and naming of this specie [13-14]. Several research studies have been conducted on this indigenous specie such as Age and growth, Aquaculture system, Characterization, food and feeding habits, nutrition, meristic and morphometric characters among others [11-22].
Tilapines are Cichlids with fast growth, resistant to diseases and handling, easy to reproduce and are able to tolerate a wide range of environmental conditions. They are widely cultured in tropical and subtropical regions of the world and constitute the third largest group of farmed fin fish with an annual growth of about 11.5% [3,23-25]. Proper feeding management is therefore a necessary tool for successful tilapia culture. Nutrition and feeding play important role in sustainable cichlid aquaculture therefore, feed resources as well as costs continue to dominate aquaculture needs. Feed accounts for 40-60% of the total production costs in aquaculture, with protein sources accounting for a significant proportion of this cost [1,3,22-24]. Frys and fingerlings require diets higher in protein, lipids, vitamins, minerals and lower in carbohydrate as they are developing muscles, internal organs and bones with rapid growth. Adult fish needs more calories of fats and carbohydrate for basal metabolism and a smaller percent of protein for growth [19]. The energy needs of the fish can be met by less expensive lipid and carbohydrate sources. The protein requirement of tilapia was estimated to be from 25% to 45% of diet [26,29-34]. Under natural condition, Tilapia is predominantly an herbivore and a detritus feeder. This means that they can provide high quality protein, suitable for human consumption from less protein sources [35]. Inabilities to develop suitable commercial and improved strain of tilapias that will grow to table size in good time are few of the problems militating against a viable tilapia industry in Nigeria [14]. The problem of precocious sexual maturity and unwanted reproduction has long been accepted as a major constraint to further development and expansion of tilapia culture in Nigeria. In addition, unwanted reproduction which leads to excessive recruitment (overpopulation), particularly in ponds, resulting in competition for available food and space resources as well as the ease of reproduction represents the principal problem in the optimization of yield in tilapia culture. Therefore, this research was geared towards determining the growth performance, dietary protein requirement and nutrient utilization of this economic important ecotype cichlid. The increased intensification of culture method for warm water fish such as tilapia has necessitated the provision of balance ration to satisfy the dietary requirement. Despite the commercial values of Wesafu, a tilapia highly priced fish in Lagos, Nigeria due to its tasty flesh and large size of over 1500g in the wild, little information exists on its nutritional requirements, in cultural practices yet it has culture potential in the country.
Materials and Methods
Experimental fish
One thousand four hundred and forty (1440) fry of average weight of 0.93 ± 0.16 were used in determining the protein requirement of Wesafu. The fish was raised from fry to fingerlings stage at Seg farm a private aquaculture farm in Topo village (6°25’0’’ N; 2°55’59’’ E) (Figure 1) on the West Coast of Badagry, Lagos, Nigeria. Fry were weighed and stocked in hapas. Prior to feeding trials, the experimental fish were starved for a day (24h) to ensure that their guts were emptied.
Experimental Design
Twelve (12) hapas (1 × 2 ×1.5m) were placed in earthen pond were used which was conducted in four stages:
a) Fry fed with 30% crude protein represent A in triplicate
b) Fry fed with 35%crude protein represent B in triplicate
c) Fry fed with 40% crude protein represent C in triplicate
d) Fry fed with 45% crude protein represent D in triplicate The fish were divided into one hundred and twenty (120) fry, stocked per in twelve different hapas in three replicates of 30%, 35%, 40% and 45% crude protein level and fed at 5% body weight. The 5 % the daily ratio was divided into 3 equal parts and fed at 8a.m, the second portion at 12p.m and the third portion at 4p.m. Each unit of experiment lasted for 8 weeks. Coppen 0.2mm feed was used with a protein content of 56% (Manufactured by Alltech Coppens Aqua Center, Germany) and wheat flour of 12% to formulate the diets using Pearson square method. All these hapas were placed in earthen pond in the farm and were covered with net to prevent the fish from escaping.
Determination of growth performance and nutrient utilization
Weight gain (wg)
The weight gain by fish was calculated from the differences between the final mean and the initial mean weight that is the final mean weight of fish at week eight subtracted from the initial mean weight of fish at week zero [36].
Weight gain (WG) = final weight (W2) – initial weight (W1) WG = (W2) – (W1)
Where:
W2 = Final mean body weight (g)
W1 = Initial mean body weight (g)
Percentage Weight Gain (%WG)
The percentage weight gain was calculated from the formula according to [14].
% weight gain = (X2 ) – (X1)×100 / (X1)
where:
X2 = Final mean body weight (g)
X1 = Initial mean body weight (g)
Specific Growth Rate (SGR)
Specific growth rate was calculated according to [36] as
SGR = Loge W2 – Loge W1 / T2 – T1
where:
W2 = Weight of fish at time T2 in days
W1 = Weight of fish at time T1 in days
Loge = Natural log of base e
Food Conversion Ratio (FCR)
Food conversion ratio according to[36] as FCR, expressed as the proportion of dry food fed per unit live weight gain of fish:
FCR =Weight of dry fed (g) / Live weight gain (g)
Gross Food Conversion Efficiency (GFCE)
The gross food conversion efficiency was calculated according to [36] as the percentage of the reciprocal of feed conversion ratio.
gFCR = 1×100 / FCR
Protein Intake (PI ) = Total feed intake × % protein in the diet Protein Efficiency Ratio (PER) = weight gain / Protein intake
Nutrient Evaluation of Experimental feed and fish
Samples of experimental feeds and fish were analyzed for their proximate composition according to the methods of [37].
Moisture content
The moisture content of the different fry samples were determined
% Moisture content = M1 − M2 / M1 − M0 × 100
where
M0 = Weight in g of fish and lid
M1 = Weight of g of dish, lid and sample before drying
M2 = Weight in g of dish, lid and sample after drying
M1 − M0 =Weight of sample prepared for drying
% dry matter content = 100 − % moisture content
Crude protein
Determination of crude protein was done using total kjeldahl nitrogen method.
% Nitrogen = 0.0075× A / B ×C
where
A = Mg /L reading displayed
B = g – sample digested
C = ML digest analysed
Determination of crude fat or lipid
The measure fat content of all the soluble materials present was determined according to [38].
% Fat = W3 –W2 /W1
where
W3= Weight of the cup with the extracted oil.
W2 =Weight of the empty cup
W1 =Weight of the sample.
Determination of the total ash
The percent of ash was calculated as follows:
Percentage (%) of ash = (weight of ash / weight of sample)×100 % Ash = (W2 /W1)×100
where,
W1 = Weight of sample (g)
W2 = Weight of ash (g)
Determination of crude fibre
The amount of the crude fibre content in the sample was determined using the acid/base digestion process [39].
% Crude fiber =Weight A −Weight B / Sample Weight
Where
Weight A = Weight of crucible + dried residue
Weight B = weight of Crucible + residue ashed
Statistical Analysis
All data collected were presented as mean values of each determination ± standard error (SE). Analysis of variance was performed using one way ANOVA procedure. Differences between the mean values of the treatments were determined by the least significance difference (LSD) test and the Duncan’s New Multiple Range Test (DNMRT). The significance was defined at p < 0.05.
Results
The result of the experiment shows that there was increase in the weekly growth rate, weekly feed intake, and food conversion ratio, protein intake while there was decrease in the weekly Specific Growth Rate, Gross Food Conversion Efficiency and the Protein Efficiency Ratio. It was observed that the weekly feed intake consumed increased per week in the following sequence Diet 1 > Diet 2 > Diet 3 > Diet 4 (Table 1). The weekly mean of total feed consumed showed a progressive increase throughout the experiment and there was significance (p<0.05) difference throughout the experiment. The weekly mean weight in Figure 1 shows increase trend from week one to week eight and there was significance difference (p< 0.05) between the crude protein levels throughout the experiment.
The weekly mean of total feed consumed showed a progressive increase throughout the experiment and there was significance (p<0.05) difference throughout the experiment.
No significance difference (p > 0.05) observed in weight gain for week 6 and 7 and significance difference was observed throughout the remaining weeks. Also, there was no significance difference (p > 0.05) observed between specific growth rates of the dietary protein level in week five and seven and there was significance in the rest of the week. The weekly specific growth rate decreases throughout the duration of the experiment (Figure 2).
No significance difference occurred (p > 0.05) in week 3, 6, 7 and 8 and significance difference was observed in week 1, 2, 4 and 5 (Figure 3). The food conversion ratio increases throughout the experiment. It was reveal that Gross Conversion Efficiency decreases throughout the duration of the experiment and significance difference (p < 0.05) was observed from week seven to week 8 whereas no significance difference observed from week 1 to week 6 (Figure 3).
There was significance difference (p < 0.05) throughout the experiment and the protein intake increases throughout the experiment. Significance difference (p < 0.05) was observed in the protein efficiency ratio expect for week four where there is no significance difference in the fry fed with the four experimental diet (Figure 4). No significant differences (p > 0.05) in specific growth rate, food intake, food conversion ratio, gross food conversion efficiency and protein efficiency ratio while significant difference (p < 0.05) in the weight gain, protein intake (Table 2).
Table 3 shows proximate analysis of feed Percentage crude protein had the highest mean value in each Diet 34.37 ± 0.12, 28.47 ± 0.25, 26.86 ± 0.26, 24.04 ± 0.48, the lowest value was observed in Fat content for Diet 1, Diet 2, Diet 3 and Diet 4 had 7.31± 0.12, 5.22± 0.05, 5.16 ± 0.05 and 4.81 ± 0.07 respectively. The proximate analysis of fish sample in each Diet; the percentage crude fiber had the highest mean value of 40.18 ± 4.79, 47.52±0.55, 45.76±0.08, and 43.95±0.39 and fat content has the lowest Diet of 2.91 ± 0.04, 2.69 ± 0.04, 2.19 ± 0.08 and 2.24 ± 0.09 (Table 3). The experimental earthen pond water temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen and total alkalinity ranged from 27-28.5°C, 6.8-7.5, 5.8- 6.4ppm and 120-128ppm, respectively during the entire rearing period.
Discussion
The highest cumulative weight gain was recorded in fry fed on Diet 1(45%) with 10.58 ± 0.12 while the lowest was observed in fry fed with diet 4(30%) with 6.58 ± 0.21, similar findings have been reported by different authors for different tilapia species that the dietary protein requirements of several species of tilapia have been estimated to range from 20% to 56% [33,34,40-42]. The specific growth rate decreased throughout the duration of the experiment. The highest food conversion ratio was observed in the fry feeds with Diet 2 crude protein with the value of 0.32 ± 0.57 cumulative. The other feeds 30%, 35% and 45% crude protein recorded 0.25 ± 0.04, 0.32 ± 0.57 and 0.25 ± 0.04 respectively which were similar to [43]. The highest cumulative gross food conversion efficiency was recorded in the fry fed with 532.14 ± 131.12 and the lowest gross food conversion efficiency was recorded in fry fed with 35% crude protein with the value of 412.48 ±105.57 corresponding to the observations of [41,42]. The fry fed on Diet 2 crude protein recorded the highest protein efficiency ratio and fry fed with Diet 1 crude protein diet recorded the lowest protein efficiency ratio. PER, in the present study, was significantly affected by protein levels and manifests that protein utilization was obtained at low protein level. The decrease of PER with increasing dietary protein level have also been reported by different authors for different tilapia species [44,45]. This was mainly because more dietary protein is used as energy when high protein Diets are fed to fish [30,40]. The highest cumulative protein intake was recorded in the fry fed on on Diet1, having a value of 8.75 ± 1.43, this was followed by Diet 2 with the value of 7.40 ± 1.34. Frys fed with diet 3 with the value of 5.17 ± 0.91 and this was observed to the lowest experimental Diet which was fry fed with Diet 4 which recorded 3.74 ± 0.71. The proximate analyses of sample feed fed fry of Wesafu showed that the percentage crude protein was highest in the feed with 45% having a value of 34.37 ± 0.12 and the lowest was observed in feed with 30% with value of 24.04 ± 0.48. The formulated experimental feed with 40% recorded 28.47± 0.25 while 35% recorded 26.86 ± 0.26. Fry on proximate analysis recorded better productive protein values in the 45% feed with the value of 19.99 ± 0.35, 35% feed with value of 18.26 ± 0.12 followed by 40% feed with 17.61 ± 0.08 and 30% with 17.71 ± 0.17.
Conclusion
This study clearly indicated that diet containing 45% crude protein bodes well for cichlid aquaculture industry and appear to be suitable for rearing Wesafu fry to fingerlings in earthen pond with the potential to be a successful feed and alternative replacement for coppens in tilapine feed formulation.
References
- Hua K, Jennifer MC, Andrew C, Kelly C, Dean RJ, et al. (2019) The Future of Aquatic Protein: Implications for Protein Sources in Aquaculture Diets. One Earth 1(3): 316-329.
- Alexandratos N, Bruinsma J (2012) World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. ESA Working paper Rome, FAO p. 12-03.
- FAO (2020) The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. Sustainability in action. Rome.
- Cashion T, Manach LF, Zeller D, Pauly D (2017) Most fish destined for fishmeal production are food-grade fish. Fish and Fisheries 18(5): 837-844.
- (2018) Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) – Economic Report of the EU Aquaculture sector (STECF-18-19). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
- Naylor RL, Hardy RW, Buschmann AH, Bush SR, Cao L, et al. (2021) A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture. Nature 591(7851): 551–563.
- Troell MRL, Naylor MM, Beveridge M, Tyedmers PH, Folke C, et al. (2014) Does aquaculture add resilience to the global food system. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(37): 13257-13263.
- Ansah YB, Frimpong EA, Hallerman EM (2014) Genetically Improved Tilapia Strains in Africa: Potential Benefits and Negative Impacts. Sustainability 6(6): 3697-3721.
- Magalhaes I, Ford A (2022) The Amazing Diversity of Cichlid Fishes. Front. Young Minds.
- Arthington AH (1986) Introduced Cichlid Fish in Australian Inland Waters. In: De Deckker P, Williams WD (eds) Limnology in Australia. Monographiae Biologicae, Springer, Dordrecht p. 61.
- Hammed AM, Fashina BHA, Fajana OO (2010) Tissue and blood Amino acids composition of an Ecotype Cichlid ‘Wesafu’, Tilapia zillii and Oreochromis niloticus using paper Chromatography. Pakistani Journal of nutrition 9(7): 724-727.
- Hammed AM (2012) Aspects of Biology, Biochemical Characterization and Nutrient Requirements of a Cichlid species ‘Wesafu’ from Epe Lagoon, Lagos, Nigeria. PhD. Thesis Dissertation, Lagos State University, Nigeria.
- Assan D, Huang Y, Mustapha UF, Addah MN, Li G, et al. (2021) Fish Feed Intake, Feeding Behavior, and the Physiological Response of Apelin to Fasting and Refeeding. Front Endocrinol 12: 798903.
- Famoofo OOW, Abdul O (2020) Biometry, condition factors and length-weight relationships of sixteen fish species in Iwopin fresh-water ecotype of Lekki Lagoon, Ogun State, Southwest Nigeria. Heliyon 6(1): e02957.
- Jawad LA, Ibáñez AL, Kiki M, Gnohossou P (2020) Determination of body shape and meristic characters variations in wild and cultured populations of cichlid fish, Oreochromis niloticus, from the Republic of Benin, West of Africa. Fish Aquat Life 28(3): 186-194.
- Akalu B (2021) The Main Factors Affecting Growth Performance of Oreochromis niloticus L. (1758) in Aquaculture System. J Fisheries Livest Prod 9(8): 310.
- Omoike, A (2021) The Food and Feeding Habits of Asejire Reservoir Fish Species Diversity in South Western Nigeria. European Journal of Scientific Research 159(2): 40-56.
- Flipos E (2014) Morphometric relations, diet composition and ontogenetic dietary shift of Labeobarbus intermedius (Rüppell, 1836) in Lake Tana gulf of Gorgora, Ethiopia. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture 6(11): 124-132.
- El Sayed AM, Teshima S (1992) Protein and energy requirements of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, fry. Aquaculture 103(1): 55-63.
- El-Sayed AM (2003) Effects of stocking density and feeding levels on growth and feed efficiency of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fry. Aquac Res 33(8): 621-626.
- Olaoye OJ, Ojebiyi WG (2018) Marine Fisheries in Nigeria: A Review. In: Türkoğlu M, Önal U, Ismen A (Eds.), Marine Ecology - Biotic and Abiotic Interactions. IntechOpen.
- Lay N, Hieu D, Allen DD (2020) Efficacy of reduced protein diets and the effects of indispensable amino acid supplements for Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Animal Feed Science and Technology 268: 114593.
- Boyd CE, McNevin AA, Davis RP (2022) The contribution of fisheries and aquaculture to the global protein supply. Food Sec.
- Arisekar U, Shakila RJ, Shalini R, Jeyasekaran G, Padmavathy P, et al. (2022) Accumulation potential of heavy metals at different growth stages of Pacific white leg shrimp, Penaeus vannamei farmed along the Southeast coast of Peninsular India: A report on ecotoxicology and human health risk assessment. Environmental Research 212: 113105.
- Hasan MR (2001) Nutrition and feeding for sustainable aquaculture development in the third millennium. In: Subasinghe RP, Bueno P, Phillips MJ, Hough C, McGladdery SE, et al. (eds.), Aquaculture in the Third Millennium. Technical Proceedings of the Conference on Aquaculture in the Third Millennium, Bangkok, Thailand, 20-25 February 2000. NACA, Bangkok and FAO, Rome pp. 193-219.
- Konnert GDP, Martin EWJJ, Gerrits SWS, Gussekloo K, Masagounder J, et al. (2022) Interactive effects of protein and energy intake on nutrient partitioning and growth in Nile tilapia. Animal 16(4): 100494.
- Modibbo U, Raji A (2020) Effects of Different Carbohydrate Sources on the Growth Performance, Feed Utilization and Body Composition of Nile Tilapia Fingerlings (Oreochromis niloticus) in an Indoor Culture System. Dutse Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences (DUJOPAS) 6(2): 169-181.
- De Silva SS, Subasinghe RP, Bartley DM, Lowther A (2004) Tilapias as Alien Aquatics in Asia and the Pacific: A Review. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper pp. 453-458.
- Omar EA (1994) Optimum protein to energy ratio for tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Alex J Agric Res 1: 73-93.
- Omar EA (1994) Supplementary feeding of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) cultured in earthern ponds.1. Effect of dietary protein levels and sources. Alex J Agric Res 39: 109-128.
- Njiru MJB, Okeyo O, Muchiri M, Cowx IG (2004) Shifts in the food of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.) in Lake Victoria, Kenya. African Journal of Ecology 42(3): 163-170.
- Hammed AM (2012) Aspects of Biology, Biochemical Characterization and Nutrient Requirements of a Cichlid species ‘Wesafu’ from Epe Lagoon, Lagos, Nigeria. PhD. Thesis Dissertation, Lagos State University, Nigeria.
- Mohamed H, Bahnasawy (2009) Effect of Dietary Protein Levels on Growth Performance and Body Composition of Monosex Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus L. Reared in Fertilized Tanks. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 8(5): 674-678.
- Abdel TM (2004) Comparative growth performance and feed utilization of four local strains of nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) collected from different localities in Egypt. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Tilapia in Aquaculture, Manila, Philippine.
- Khattab YAE, Ahmad MH, Shalaby AME, Abdel TM (2000) Response of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) from different locations to different dietary protein levels. Egypt J Aquat Biol Fish 4: 295-311.
- Shaw C, Knopf K, Kloas W (2022) Fish Feeds in Aquaponics and Beyond: A Novel Concept to Evaluate Protein Sources in Diets for Circular Multitrophic Food Production Systems. Sustainability 14: 4064.
- Yang C, Jiang M, Lu X, Wen H (2021) Effects of Dietary Protein Level on the Gut Microbiome and Nutrient Metabolism in Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Animals (Basel) 11(4): 1024.
- Xue XW, Meng YC, Kun W, Ji DY (2017) Growth and metabolic responses in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) subjected to varied starch and protein levels of diets. Italian Journal of Animal Science 16(2): 308-316.