Open Access Journal of Neurology & Neurosurgery |Neurology Journals Impact Factor List

Short Communication

Neurophysiological Study of Traumatic Brain Injury: To Slice or Not to Slice

Jianli Sun and Kimberle M Jacobs*

Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA

Submission: March 04, 2017; Published: March 20, 2017

*Correspondence author: Kimberle M Jacobs, PhD Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology Virginia Commonwealth University, PO Box 980709 Richmond, VA 23298, USA, Tel: 804-827-2135; Fax: 804-828-9477; Email: kmjacobs@vcu.edu

How to cite this article: Jianli S, Kimberle M J. Neurophysiological Study of Traumatic Brain Injury: To Slice or Not to Slice. Open Access J Neurol Neurosurg. 2017; 2(5): 555600. DOI: 10.19080/OAJNN.2017.02.555600

Abstract

Diffuse axotomy is characteristic of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) both clinically and in experimental models. Axotomy also occurs during preparation of acute brain slices for physiological recordings. Brain slices have been used for decades and have many advantages, including the ability to select cells within particular locations or with specific morphologies for study. The question addressed here is whether creating additional axotomy by preparing brain slices introduces additional injury that is already typical of TBI. We have previously demonstrated alterations in both intrinsic membrane and synaptic properties recorded in brain slices after mTBI. Here we examined whether axotomized neurons differ from intact neurons in slices made from naïve mouse pups. There was no significant difference in either excitatory synaptic postsynaptic currents or in any measures of intrinsic membrane and cellular properties. These results suggest that creating the brain slices does not induce alterations similar to that observed within two days of mTBI induced by fluid percussion injury. Thus ex vivo slices are an appropriate methodology to study the effects of TBI.

Keywords: Ex vivo slice; Electrophysiology; Axotomy; EPSC; Membrane properties; Neurotrauma

Abbreviations: AHP: After Hyperpolarization; APP: Amyloid Precursor Protein; DAI: Diffuse Axonal Injury; DAP: Depolarizing After Potential; DTI: Diffusion Tensor Imaging; TBI: Traumatic Brain Injury

Introduction

One of the most critical neuropathological features of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is axotomy [1-5]. Even in mild (m) TBI, diffuse axotomy is easily and consistently observed as axons that end in swellings and dislocation from the distal part of the axon [6-8]. Integrity of axons can be measured in the clinical population with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) [9-12]. Patient outcome has been correlated with DTI results, [13-16] although subacute imaging may be most effective in this regard [17,18]. Correlations may also be stronger for severe and moderate as opposed to mild injuries [19]. DTI results have also been shown to correlate with the degree of diffuse axonal injury (DAI) as measured with amyloid precursor protein (APP) staining that accumulates in the axonal swelling [20,21]. Treatment assessments have typically been focused on reduction of this axonal injury [22-29], although it has also been recognized that some measures of DAI improve over time while cognitive dysfunction persists [30].

Because axotomy also occurs during preparation of ex vivo brain slices, it could be argued that this methodology should not be used for study of mechanisms associated with TBI. Vibratome-axotomized neurons can certainly be identified at the surface of acute slices (Figure 1A & 1B). This is one reason most investigators performing recordings in slices choose neurons that are at least one cell layer deep to surface neurons, and typically 40-60 m into the tissue. Creation of ex vivo slices for study of normal physiological function has been a staple of neuroscience research for decades [31,32]. The benefits of stability, visualized access to specific cell types and placement of electrodes, as well as feasibility of drug application have been previously described [33-35]. However, the idea that slicing produces pathology has also been used to create a model of post-traumatic epilepsy utilizing organotypic hippocampal slices that survive for weeks [36-40]. In this model, interictal- like epileptiform activity is first observed after 14 days in vitro, while ictal-like activity is seen by 21 days [38]. The fact that this abnormal activity develops in days and not hours suggests that it may be due to synaptic reorganization that is secondary to the axotomy and thus unlikely to play a role in the physiology of acute slices.

We recently chose to use the acute slice to study physiological effects of trauma, specifically in order to target the axotomized neurons which are in the minority and located diffusely within the cortex after a mild injury, [6,41-43]. Identification of the neuron as either axotomized or intact prior to the recording was made simple by the use of YFP-h mice, in which YFP is localized to a subset of layer V pyramidal neurons [44]. The ability to identify the status of the axon prior to the recording is a benefit over post-recording attempts to identify dye-filled neurons, which can have a low recovery rate [45]. In our studies a mild central fluid percussion injury was performed and acute slices were made 1 or 2 days after injury or sham-injury or in age-matched naïve mice. Care was taken to create coronal sections by blocking the brain with a brain slicer matrix (Zivic Instruments). While even a coronal block can still produce transection of dendrites or axons for neurons within rostral parts of the cortex, in our TBI studies, neurons selected for recordings were more caudally located, within somatosensory cortex.

In addition, chosen neurons were deep to the surface and thus were not vibratome-axotomized. Despite the initial focus on TBI-axotomized neurons, we found that in traumatized brain, pyramidal neurons with axons intact to the subcortical white matter also differed from control neurons. Although both intact and axotomized neurons of the injured brains were different from non-injured controls, their time course and properties were often also different from each other [46,47]. We suggest that this may be due to feedback selectively from the intact neurons that may then influence homeostatic processes [47]. Because intact neurons of the injured brain were different from intact neurons of the control brain, this suggests that the injury is at least creating additional abnormalities to any that might be induced by vibratome slicing.

If axotomy due to vibratome slicing does indeed alter cellular properties within the 6-8 hours of recording time after preparation, then these properties would be expected to differ between intact and vibratome-axotomized neurons in cortex from naïve mice. Slices prepared from YFP-h mice were used to test this idea. Here again we made careful coronal blocks using the brain slicer matrix. When done with brains from naïve mice, this results in the majority of the layer V pyramidal neurons within primary somatosensory cortex having both axons that can be followed to the subcortical white matter and dendrites that can be followed to their natural termination in superficial layers (Figure 1A). Near the surface of the living slice, some vibratome-axotomized neurons can also be seen (Figure 1B) in the same slices from which intact neurons are also present (Figure 1C). Axotomy can occur both near the soma (Figure 1D) and several hundred microns distant (Figure 1E).

Whole cell patch clamp recordings were made from axotomized and intact layer V pyramidal neurons from the same slice, using previously described methods [46,47]. Spontaneous (s-) EPSCs did not differ in frequency, amplitude, rise time nor decay time between intact and axotomized neurons from naïve brain (Figure 1 G-K, t-tests, p>0.05 for 14 intact and 15 axotomized neurons). A series of hyperpolarizing and depolarizing step currents (400msec, -200 to 490 pA in 10 pA steps) was applied to assess intrinsic properties [33]. We have previously shown that the YFP-labeled population in these mice consists of some neurons with intrinsically-bursting (Figure IB) and some with regular-spiking (RS) firing patterns [33]. Here we found that again both of these firing patterns were observed in axotomized as well as intact neurons (IB were: 2 of 15 intact and 3 of 17 axotomized neurons). For other intrinsic measures, only the RS neurons were considered (in all cases t-tests were used to compare intact and axotomized groups with significance set to p<0.05). The lowest current to produce an action potential (rheobase) was not different for intact compared to axotomized neurons in slices from naïve animals (Figure 2A). The time to the first action potential at rheobase, and the input resistance were also not significantly different between these two groups (Figure 2B & 2C).

A home-written java program was used to automatically detect every action potential, after-hyperpolarization (AHP) and depolarizing-after-potential (DAP) recorded from each neuron in the depolarization step series. Measures were then averaged for all action potentials or AHPs or DAPs recorded from that neuron (typically several hundred action potentials per neuron). Action potential threshold was measured as the interpolated membrane potential at which the first derivative of the membrane potential crossed the threshold of 10 V/s. Total adaptation was measured as the frequency of the first two action potentials divided by the frequency of the last two action potentials responding to the 400msec long depolarizing step current. Late adaptation was measured as the frequency of the 4th and 5th action potential divided by the frequency of the last two action potentials. For both total and late adaptation measurements were only made in sweeps with 8 or more action potentials. Nine measures of action potential, AHP and DAP characteristics are shown (Figure 2D-2L). None of these were significantly different in intact compared to vibratome-axotomized neurons recorded in slices from naïve brain. Also on more than 100 additional measures including action potential halfwidth, rise and decay time, there was no significant difference between these groups. When these same measures are examined in sham-injured YFP-h mice, there is also no significant difference between axotomized and intact neurons on any of these measures (Sun & Jacobs, unpublished observations). When these same synaptic and intrinsic property measures are examined in naïve cyclophilin-D knockout mice or separately in sham-injured cyclophilin-D knockout mice, there is also no difference between vibratome-axotomized and intact neurons (Sun & Jacobs, unpublished observations). These findings suggest that the abnormalities previously observed after trauma are not induced by the creation of brain slices.

Certainly any experimental preparation and even the act of observing will have some effect on the observations [48-50]. Under conditions of normal artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) that baths the slices, it is well known that neuronal activity is reduced compared to that observed in vivo even under anesthesia [51]. The best ionic composition of the slicing solution and aCSF, as well as the best chamber conditions for maintaining slice health continue to be sought [32,34]. While some axotomy in the preparation of cortical slices cannot be eliminated, the effects of it on the data can be reduced by making coronal slices, choosing sections that are posterior enough to have layer V pyramidal neurons with dendrites reaching the pia and axons reaching the white matter, and recording from neurons deep to the slice surface. Under all of these conditions, only after TBI are axotomized neurons observed deep to the slice surface. In the YFP-h mice, the axotomized and intact neurons appear in live slices similar to those observed in sections made after fixation of the intact brain (compare Figure 1 here to Figure 1 of Greer 20116). We conclude that acute ex vivo slices are valid and useful for characterizing cellular physiological abnormalities in the study of TBI.