The Effect of Chicken Manure and Corn Cob Biochar on Soil Fertility and Crop Yield on Intercropping Planting Pattern of Cassava and Corn
Yuniwati ED*
Agriculture Faculty, Indonesia
Submission: November 11, 2018; Published: November 26, 2018
*Corresponding author: Yuniwati ED, Agriculture Faculty, Indonesia.
How to cite this article: Yuniwati ED. The Effect of Chicken Manure and Corn Cob Biochar on Soil Fertility and Crop Yield on Intercropping Planting Yuniwati ED. The Effect of Chicken Manure and Corn Cob Biochar on Soil Fertility and Crop Yield on Intercropping Planting Pattern of Cassava and Corn. Int J Environ Sci Nat Res. 2018; 15(2): 555910. DOI:Pattern of Cassava and Corn. Int J Environ Sci Nat Res. 2018; 15(2): 555910. DOI: 10.19080/IJESNR.2018.15.555910.
Abstract
The use of chicken manure and corn cob Biochar is proven to be able to improve soil quality, plant growth crop yield of cassava and corn. This study also aims to show that different types of biochar applications (chicken manure and corncob biochar) are able to improve soil physical and chemical properties, the yield of cassava and corn kernels biomass. This study was conducted in a farmer field in Batu, about 15 km southeast of Malang, East Java, Indonesia. The study was conducted on alfisol land having 8% surface slope. The method used was field experiment using Randomized Block Design (RBD) with the following treatment:
a. Monoculture (without soil enhancer, M)
b. Monoculture with Chicken Biochar Pump (MMcB)
c. Monoculture with Corncob Biochar (MCcB)
d. Intercropping of cassava and corn (CS)
e. Intercropping of cassava and corn with chicken manure biochar (CSMcB),
f. Intercropping of cassava and corn with Corn Cobs biochar (CSCcB)..
The observations included measurements of plant height, soil sampling for observation of soil physical and chemical properties and crop yield of cassava and corn kernels. The results showed that biochar application can improve soil quality, physical and chemical properties of soil, and crop yield on intercropping system. The management of plants in land husbandry becomes a symbiotic mutualism between cassava and corn. C organic soil, total pore, drainage, water availability and soil aggregate stability increased after being treated using chicken manure biochar (MMcB). The increase on pH and N, P, K, Ca, Mg and cation exchange capacity showed good soil quality in MMcB treatment, and CSMcB treatment on intercropping planting pattern. After harvesting the corn, the chemical properties of soil after being treated using biochar has increased in term of its high pH into 6.26, 0.14% nitrogen content, 6.13ppm P content, 0.26 (me / 100g) K content, 12.7 KTK, 2.38 (cmol / 100g) Ca, and 1.40 (cmo /100g) Mg. The application of both chicken manure and corn cob biochar is proven to be able to improve yield of cassava and corn both in monoculture system and intercropping. The highest yield of cassava is obtained from monoculture planting system with chicken manure biochar (MMcB) for 33,14ton/ha and intercropping of chicken manure biochar (CSMcB) for 30.16ton/ha, and corn seed yield for 4.89ton/ha.
Keywords: Biochar; Chicken manure; Corncobs; Soil fertility; Crop yield; Intercropping pattern
Introduction
The production of cassava in Indonesia still has not reached its maximum level for its cultivation has not received priority handling yet. Cassava cultivation can be done by monoculture or using intercropping pattern combined with corn applied both on dry land and on critical land. Actually, the potential of production of cassava is still high because cassava is easy to plant in any land condition. However, the development of cassava cultivation still encountered many obstacles one of which is there is an assumption that the cultivation of cassava accelerates the degradation of soil and land. In addition, some people assume that high cassava production depletes nutrient needs in the soil, thus reducing soil health [1]. Soil quality factor becomes an important aspect in maintaining the quality of soil fertility, including soil organic matter content, which is characterized by soil nutrient retention. Soil organic matter greatly determines soil fertility and is very important in affecting the physical, chemical and biological properties of the soil [2]. The addition of biochar from various types of materials has been practiced in increasing soil fertility for a long time [3]. Some facts on biochar research show that there are organic amendments contained in the soil for a longer time compared to other organic fertilizers and it will increase soil carbon uptake. The research results [4-6]. show that an organic soil amendment is a technology to improve soil fertility and cassava productivity and can stabilize crop yields, especially on degraded land. The addition of repeated organic soil amendment annually to land conditions will improve soil fertility and result in improved soil health [7].
One of the technologies to improve soil health is corncob biochar, [8-9] Corncobs biochar had a positive effect between C and N, increased nutrients and soil acidity, and improved the growth of corn crops with significant results [8] While chicken manure biochar contains 7.9 pH, 255.5g / kg organic C content, 7.8g/ kg nitrogen, 8.5g / kg; K 7.9g / kg Pospat and 17.7 cmol cation exchange capacity (CEC) [10]. Biochar application improves soil fertility status, especially soil organic C, CEC, available P, K, Ca, and Mg, and increased nutrient uptake and yield of corn. C organic soil increased from 0.9% (before treatment) to 1.20% (after being treated using biochar and CM ) Soils treated with biochar consistently have higher organic C content, which also remains more stable than those treated with CM, implying a higher biochar potential for soil carbon uptake [11] Biochar applications increase porosity and aggregate size by as much as 16% and increase the water content available significantly on soil. It also significantly boosts the macropore. Biochar application could availably raise soil quality and physical properties for tilth increasing in the degraded mudstone soil [12] The highest yield of corn during the rainy season was recorded for CM, followed by CDB and CSB (5.98, 5.87, and 5.71Mg ha-1 respectively). However, the second crop yield in a single CM application treatment decrease. This is not the case for corn yields on soil fed biochar [2]. Other results indicate that biochar stimulates the amount of lettuce leaves and total biomass, improving total soil amounts of nitrogen and phosphorus, as well as total carbon, and enhancing related microbial communities. Combinations of compost and biochar can enhance and maintain soil biophysical and chemical characteristics and increase crop productivity over time [13]. The results showed that Biochar application increased the growth of cassava in monoculture and intercropping system. The growth of cassava in intercropping system is slower than monoculture system. Corn yield, in both planting systems increased with biochar application, but not significantly influenced by planting system [5]. The highest yield of corn (4.62 t.ha-1) was obtained with monoculture corn applied to biochar. The lowest corn yield was obtained from monoculture maize without biochar (3.87 tha- 1) but not significant in intercropping crop without biochar (3.96 t.ha-1) [14].
Materials and Methods
Location
The field experiment was carried out in eroded soil at Junrejo, Batu, East Java, Indonesia. Laboratory analysis was done at the Soil Science Department, Brawijaya University, Malang. The field experiment was conducted from March 2 to October 25 2017. Biochar was made from chicken manure and corncobs collected from farmers’ poultry and farmers surrounding the field and done according to the method described by Masulili et al. [11] at the temperature of 300 °C. Some properties of soil and biochar used for the experiment were presented on Table 1.

Experimental Treatments and Management
The tested treatment consisted of two factors, namely: biochar application (without biochar, with chicken manure biochar, corncob biochar) and planting system (cassava monoculture, corn monoculture, and intercropping of cassava and corn). The design of this study was a Randomized Block Design with three replications. The experimental plot has a size of 2.0mx 5.0m having 15% slope The used cassava in this study was the Faroka variety, planted at a distance of 1.0m x 1.0m, and corn, a hybrid varieties of Pioneer, planted at a distance of 1.0mx0.3m In the intercropping treatment, corn is planted among cassava. Cassava monoculture is fertilized using 300kg Urea.ha-1; 100kg Super Phosphate 36. ha-1; and 100kg of KCl.ha-1. Monoculture of corn is grown with 200kg Urea.ha-1; 100kg Super Phosphate 36.ha-1; and 50kg KCl.ha-1. Intercropping cassava + corn in fertilizer with 300kg Urea.ha-1; 100kg Super Phosphate 36.ha-1; and 200kg of KCl.ha-1. All phosphate fertilizers and super KCl are given at planting time, and urea is given 3 times: 1/3 at planting; 1/3 at 45 days after planting, and 1/3 at 110 days after planting.
The data are soil pH, weight of soil content, aggregate stability, soil organic C, soil nitrogen, macro nutrient content, growth and yield of cassava and corn. The observation of soil physical and chemical properties was done before planting and after biochar application and after harvest. Soil samples were collected before harvesting corn for soil physical properties, soil nitrogen, soil aggregates and the availability of soil nutrient content. The soil organic matter was measured with Walkley and Black method, The Kjeldhal method was employed for soil nitrogen determination with the Kjeldhal method. The soil aggregate water stability was determined by wet sieving method according to the description by Utomo and Dexter, and the results were expressed as the mean weight diameter (MWD) of stable aggregate with an equation of:
Here di is the mean diameter of any particular size ranges of aggregates separated by sieving, and iwi is the weight of aggregates in that size range as a fraction of the total dry weight of soil used. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with 95% degree of confidence was used for data analysis. When there was a significance, the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test was employed to further analysis the significant difference between treatment.
Results and Discussion
Soil Physical Properties
From Table 2, it can be seen that the data showing the weight of soil volume (BV) and pore on the best treatment drainage was obtained from the treatment of intercropping of corn and cassava with additional Biochar (CSMcB), which obtained 0.91g/cm3 and 32.41%. meanwhile, the total pityity is 59.32% and 1.56 mm of aggregate stability in MMcB treatment, and 7.91% on pore space availability in Monocultur corn with corncob (MCcB) biochar. In accordance to that opinion [2]. it is stated that biochar application improves soil physical properties and soil quality, especially in soil weight, total porosity, drainage and soil aggregate stability. Chicken manure biochar is better than corn cob biochar both on monoculture planting pattern and in intercropping pattern. This is in accordance to Islami’s opinion [3]. regarding intercropping planting pattern which is stated that chicken manure biochar improves soil quality in intercropping planting pattern. In accordance to that opinion [9]. it is stated that biochar can be applied on intercropping planting pattern of cassava and corn. This will become a model of sustainable agriculture in the future and prepare the productivity of soil quality in the long term [16]. This is in accordance with the result of that study [17]. Biochar applications increase porosity and aggregate size by as much as 16% and increase the water content available significantly on soil. It also significantly boosts the macropore.

Soil Chemical properties
On (Table 3), the soil chemical properties, especially pH, N, P, K and CEC, are significantly different. The pH was significantly different in biochar treatment of manure, MMcB (pH 6.26), N was significantly different for the monoculture pattern of biochar manure MMcB (0.14%) and cropping pattern of intercropping biochar manure (CsMcB) (0.14%), P was significantly different for cropping patterns Monoculture of manure biochar (6.27ppm) and cropping pattern of intercropping of biochar manure (6.27ppm), K is significantly different for planting method for intercropping of biochar manure (0.31me/100g). CEC is significantly different for the biochar monoculture pattern of MMcB manure (12.7) and the cropping pattern of biochar manure (CsMcB) (12.1).

The same is true of soil chemical properties. It is stated that chicken manure biochar can significantly improve soil pH, Nitrogen content, Pospor, potassium, Ca, Mg and CEC. It is in accordance to the opinion [3,14]. Hana Hlavacikova et al. [17] stating that chicken manure biochar increases nutrient availability of land, either on monoculture or intercropping cropping pattern. While on intercropping cropping pattern, corncob biochar improves soil chemical properties, although not as good as chicken manure biochar. This is in accordance to the opinion Widowati et al. [18]. This is similar in pointed out by Dalila Trupiano et al. [13]. Combinations of compost and biochar can enhance and maintain soil biophysical and chemical characteristics and increase crop productivity over time.
Crop Yield
Figure 1 explained chicken manure biochar (MMcB) and (CSMcB) both on monoculture and intercropping patterns providing the highest yield for the amount of biomass which is 3.85tons/ha, and 4.89tons/ha for corn kernels. From the yield of corn biomass and weight it showed that the application of chicken manure biochar was higher that is 3,85ton/ha for biomass and 4,89 ton/ha for corn kernel. This happens after being treated using chicken manure biochar so it resuts on the improvement of nutrient availability and the effect of improved soil physical properties and soil quality which is better compared to corncob biochar on intercropping cropping pattern. This is similar to what is mentioned by Sukartono et al. [2] & Islami et al. [19] (Figure 2) explains biochar chicken manure (MMcB) and (CSMcB) both on monoculture and intercropping patterns providing the highest yield for cassava biomass amount of 35.45tons/ha and 33.14tons/ha for cassava harvest. The results of assava on intercropping cropping pattern is still high for 30.16ton ha after being treated using chicken manure biochar and 28.82ton/ha for those treated using corn cob biochar. For monoculture cropping pattern, the yield of cassava is higher for 33.14ton/ha after being treated using chicken manure biochar and 29.56ton/ha after being treated using corn cob biochar. Overall, after adding biochar as land amendment, it is very significant to improve soil quality, nutrient availability and there is no population competition in intercropping cropping pattern. This opinion is consistent with the results of sukartono et al. [2], Islami et al. [6], Yuananto et al. [18] and Yuniwati et al. [19] research.


Conclusion
From the research results, it can be concluded that the type of biochar (chicken manure and corncob) determines the changes in soil quality, both physical properties, chemical and plant yield on intercropping system. The management of plants in land husbandry becomes a symbiotic mutualism between cassava and corn. C organic soil, total pore, drainage, water availability and soil aggregate stability increased, in the treatment of chicken poultry biochar (MMcB). Increased pH and N, P, K, Ca, Mg and cation exchange capacity showed good soil quality in MMcB treatment, and CSMcB treatment on intercropping cropping pattern. After harvesting corn, the soil chemical after being treated using biochar has an increase of pH, 6.26, nitrogen content of 0.14%, P content of 6.13ppm, K 0.26 (me/100g), KTK 12.7, Ca 2.38 (cmol/100g and Mg 1.40 (cmo / / 100g). The aplication of both chicken manure and corn cob biochar is proven to be able to improve the yield of cassava and corn to higher number, both in monoculture system and intercropping. The highest yield of cassava is obtained from monoculture cropping system with chicken manure biochar (MMcB) 33,14ton/ha and cropping of chicken manure biochar (CSMcB) 30.16ton/ha, and corn kernel yield for 4.89ton/ha.
Acknowledgement
This research was conducted by the researcher at Faculty of Agriculture, University of Wisnuwardhana Malang. The researcher got support from Research Grant of Primary Research of Higher Education (PDUPT) research scheme in 2018, with number SP-DIPA contract 042.06.1.401516/2018 dated December 5, 2017, From Directorate of Research and Development, Ministry of Research and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia, entitled: Land Husbandry: the use of biochar to control degraded land and increase the yield of cassava plants Disclamer: Land Husbandry: The Role of Biochar As a Soil Enhancer in Cassava Cropping System Proceeding International Conference on Environment and Technology (IC-Tech) 2017 IOP Publishing IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 97 (2017) 012013 do i :10.1088/1755-1315/97/1/012013 Lancang Kuning University.
References
- Yuniwati ED (2017) Land husbandry: the role of biochar as a soil enhancer in cassava cropping system. International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research 3(5): 3727-3735.
- Sukartono I, Utomo WH, Kusuma Z, Nugroho WH (2011) Soil fertility status, nutrient uptake and maize (Zea mays L) yield following biochar application on sandy soils of Lombok, Indonesia. Journal of Tropical Agriculture 49: 47-52.
- Nur T, Islami T, Handayanto E, Nugroho WH, Utomo WH (2014) The use of biochar fortified compost on calcareous coil of East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia: 2 Effect on the yield of maize (Zea Mays L) and phosphate absorption. American Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 8(5): 105-111.
- Amanullah MM, Vaiyapuri K, Sathyamuoorthi K, Pashanivelan S, Alagesan A (2007) Nutrient Uptake, Tuber Yield of Cassava (Manihot Esculenta Cranzt) and Soil Fertility as Influenced by Organic Manures. Journal of Agronomy 6(1): 183-187.
- Islami T, Guritno B, Utomo WH (2011) Performance of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) based cropping systems and associated soil quality changes in the degraded tropical uplands of East Java, Indonesia. Journal of Tropical Agriculture 49: 31-39.
- Islami T, Guritno B, Basuki N, Suryanto A (2011) Maize yield and associated soil quality changes in cassava+maize intercropping system after 3 years of biochar application. Journal of Agriculture and Food Technology 1: 112-115.
- Yuniwati ED, Basuki N, Wisnubroto EI, Utomo WH (2012) Combating land degradation in cassava field by crop yield improvement. Journal of Basic Applied Science Research 2(5): 4975-4982.
- Njurumana GND, Hidayatullah M, dan Butarbutar T (2008) Soil conditions in Kaliwu and Mamar systems in Timor and Sumba. Forest Info 5(1): 45-51.
- Gleser B (2001) The terra preta phenomenin: a model for sustainable agriculture in the humic tropic. Die Naturwissenschaften 88(1): 37- 41.
- Islami T, Wisnubroto EI, Utomo WH (2017) Effect of Chemical and Mechanical Weed Control on Cassava Yield, Soil Quality and Erosion under Cassava Cropping System. Journal of Advanced Agricultural Technologies 4(1): 57-66.
- Masulili A, Utomo WH, Syekhfani MS (2010) Rice husk biochar for rice based cropping system in acid soil: 1. The characteristics of rice husk biochar and its influence on the properties of acid sulfate soils and rice growth in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Journal of Agriculture Science (Canada) 3: 25-33.
- Zeng Yei Hseu, Shih HJ, Wei Hsin C, Ruei Cheng L (2014) Impacts of Biochar on Physical Properties and Erosion Potential of a Mudstone Slopeland Soil. The Scientific World Journal, Article ID 602197, 10 pages.
- Dalila T, Claudia C, Silvia B, Carla A, Francesco P, et al. (2017) The Effects of Biochar and Its Combination with Compost on Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L) Growth, Soil Properties, and Soil Microbial Activity and Abundance. International Journal of Agronomy, Article ID 3158207, 12 pages.
- Yuniwati ED, Utomo WH (2017) Effect of biochar application on the growth of cassava and maize, maize yield and soil erosion in cassava+maize intercropping system. International Conference on Food Crops and Enviroment Proceding (in press).
- Howeler RH (1991) Long term effect of cassava cultivation on soil productivity. Field Crops Research, 26(1): 1-18.
- Widowati, Asnah A, Utomo WH (2014) The use of biochar to reduce nitrogen and potassium leaching from soil cultivated with maize. Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management 2: 211-218.
- Hana H, Viliam N, Koji K, Katarína B, Marek R et al. (2018) Two types of biochars: one made from sugarcane bagasse, other one produced from paper fiber sludge and grain husks and their effects on water retention of a clay, a loamy soil and a silica sand. the Czech Republic. Soil and Water Research, 15. (in press)
- Yuananto H, Utomo WH (2018) The effect of biochar application of tomatoes enriched nitric acid on the levels of c-organic, nitrogen and growth of corn plants at various levels of soil acidity. Land and land Resources Journal 5(1): 655-662.
- Yuniwati ED, Utomo WH, Howeler RH (2015) Farmers based technology development for sustainable cassava production system. International Journal Agriculture Research 10(2): 54-64.