Abstract

The ways that teachers learn to teach remain a significant challenge in education, particularly across different cultures and education systems. This study examines how beginning teachers develop their teaching capabilities through interconnected theories and introduces two new developmental frameworks. Using narrative analyses of semi-structured interviews with 44 East Jerusalem teachers during their first three years, we explore how they initially learned to teach and navigated between Western training and local teaching contexts. The findings revealed a dynamic development process illustrated in our Cultural Bridging Model, showing how teachers navigate through phases of cultural negotiation and adaptation, and the Multifaceted Model, demonstrating the interweaving of professional identity, cultural integration, community co-construction, and pedagogical practice. These teachers undergo transformative journeys where, through reflection on experiences and structured application of theory to practice, they progress from selective imitation to innovation and develop adaptive expertise for diverse classroom challenges. Emotional resilience, mentorship, and professional networks provide valuable support in this process. For teachers to succeed in today’s complex educational management environments, their training must emphasize cultural sensitivity, systematic reflection, and ongoing professional support within their organizational contexts.

Keywords:Cultural Bridging; Teacher Development; Adaptive Expertise; Professional Identity; Cross-Cultural Education; Emotional Resilience; Reflective Practice; Experiential Learning; Mentorship; East Jerusalem Education

Introduction

The acquisition of knowledge does not necessarily lead to effective teaching. This leads us to a key question for governments, researchers, and teachers: How do teachers learn to teach? Formal preparation programs begin theoretically but do not sufficiently prepare teachers for the complex realities of classrooms. According to the studies, fundamental teaching skills are acquired mainly experientially and through reflective practice during early-career teaching [1-6]. This allows inexperienced and early career teachers to overcome the gap between theories and practices and develop critical, adaptive, and responsive skills. Teachers improve their technical skills and understand pedagogy by dealing with real-world classroom problems. Teachers embed themselves firmly in education when they have experiential learning. So, they learn to be reflective and skilled educators. Further examinations are critical to understanding how this development process functions within organizational management structures and impacts broader social systems of educational practice. This research connects individual teacher development to institutional management approaches, viewing teachers not just as classroom practitioners but as key agents within complex social and administrative systems.

Research has revolutionized how we view the process of teaching practice. What we used to think of as a linear process of teaching practice from one level to another is now seen as a complex and maze-like journey [7-9]. Teachers do not only learn in seminars and workshops, but they grow in the course of their practice through interactions with colleagues and practical experience in the classroom [10]. This is because when educators discuss specific incidents that happened at school or share ways of solving specific problems, they gain more professional knowledge [11]. These informal exchanges and formal learning opportunities make a perfect platform for growth. For instance, when teachers get into action and develop a curriculum, they plan lessons and enhance skills that will enhance their practice [10]. Research has also emphasized the role of the school environment in this process, showing how the environment can either support or hinder professional development efforts and, in turn, affect the quality of teaching and [12].

Adaptive expertise means teachers are skilled in applying theory to practice and vice versa. Adaptive expertise is at the core of teaching. Practice-based models emphasizing responsive teaching help to bring together formal preparation and contextual demands through the activation of reflection. [13] Research shows that motivated teachers will proactively attempt to draw links between formal and informal learning opportunities to make learning more engaging for students [14].

The current research highlights the need for emotional and social support in teachers’ early career mentorship. Other supportive mechanisms, such as collaborative opportunities, help the new teachers build their self-efficacy and preparedness to handle the dynamics of teaching [15]. Group involvement in reflection, for example, through peer observation and exploratory projects, assists teachers in their personal growth and equips them to deal with challenges [16]. Also, teachers’ ability to manage classroom discourse and deal with diverse students’ needs is a key area for professional development, directly affecting students’ interests and achievement [17,18].

This research captures the natural complexity of teacher development through narrative analysis. Teachers’ stories may provide a unique glimpse into how they learn to teach. Semistructured interviews with 44 early-career teachers from East Jerusalem educated in Israeli colleges reveal commonalities in how teachers develop and surprising encounters with how they manage to negotiate various challenges in their teacher development journey.

The research explores several critical dimensions: How do teachers learn how to teach at first? How teachers manage the emotional demands of early-career teaching, how they transform challenging experiences into professional knowledge, and how they develop the adaptive expertise needed to meet diverse student needs. What emerged from our investigation was an understanding of these core aspects of teacher development and rich insights into how teachers naturally adapt their practice to bridge different educational approaches and meet their students’ needs.

The results of the study show how teachers develop their professional competence. They show universal patterns in teacher development as well as local variations. The research acts as a bridge between preparation and practice by exploring teachers’ lived experiences during their early years, which has implications for developing teacher education and support systems. Understanding these natural processes helps teachers succeed, and students learn more easily and efficiently. Additionally, the study illustrates that teachers are far more adaptable than expected.

Theoretical Background

Imitation and Natural Learning Theory

In order to explore how teachers learn how to teach, we must look at the fundamental learning mechanisms, particularly imitation. Imitation serves as the basis of human learning and plays a crucial role in cognitive, social, and cultural development. In our Natural Learning Theory, we introduced imitation, which is the process by which many individuals or learners gain skills and knowledge through observing and mimicking [19,20]. This framework is critical to consider for the development of beginning teachers in terms of their classroom practice.

The theory consists of direct replication and adaptive changes depending on the context, which is critical in novice teaching contexts [21]. The evidence shows that successful imitation entails advanced cognitive processing and deliberate application, not just reproducing and copying processes [22]. It helps to understand how early career teachers change what they see in their own teaching.

Feryok [23], by using Activity Theory, states that novice teachers model the behaviours of those they observe and experience challenges that require teaching. Micro-teaching sessions provide structured opportunities for novice teachers to put things they have learned into practice. This process is directly linked to how educators acquire the ability to bounce back and be good at their jobs by observing others. Zhou [24] illustrates that when newly qualified teachers imitate the teachers they work with, this can have a transformative effect. Additionally, they adapt their work to their own context. This improves the relationship between the students and the newly qualified teacher and can enhance classroom culture.

Nonetheless, the “mimicking circle” generates a powerful obstacle to teacher development, in which novices emulate behaviours without developing authentic teaching identities [25]. It has a special impact on early career teachers with less experience. To overcome this limitation, Markkanen et al. [26] suggest using, for example, Gibbs’ reflective cycle to engage imitative learning in such a dynamic process that aids professional identity formation.

Liu et al. [27] propose an integrated approach that combines expert guidance with reflection opportunities; meanwhile, Wexler [28] highlights how educative mentoring develops unique teaching styles. Teachers need structured support systems to move beyond imitation to adaptive expertise. According to Çakmak et al. [21], lessons on “bumpy moments” improved classroom performance. The findings suggest an alignment with Schön’s [29] reflective practice theory, which supports teachers’ emotional and professional growth.

Philip [22] mentions “principled improvisation,” which highlights the relational and ethical dimensions of teaching. This connects directly to how teachers develop adaptive expertise through experience. This idea explains how teachers are actually learning to balance structure, spontaneity, and authenticity.

Florian and Beaton [30] show how modeling practices create a supportive context for imitation-based learning in collaborative settings. Bakker, Vries, and Glopper [31] demonstrate lesson studies that enable novice teachers to observe peers, learn collaboratively, and professionalize both individually and collectively. This theory explains how novice teachers go from copying their mentors to developing their own practice with help, time, and mentoring. This suggests that reflection and adaptive expertise in learning and practice help in how people learn and how teachers learn to teach. New research highlighting the need for reflective practices combined with collaborative learning can provide important information on how to support skill development and the creation of one’s personal teaching style in the critical early years of teaching. This framework helps us to investigate how teachers navigate emotional demands, repurpose challenging experiences into professional knowledge, and develop adaptive expertise. Realizing how imitation functions in teacher development, where it is limited, and where the necessary support lies, is an important start. Then, one can focus on how teachers deal with the challenges they face at the start of their careers and how they develop into effective teachers.

Experiential Learning and Reflective Practice Theory

Experiential Learning and Reflective Practice Theory are linked to educational approaches that show how teachers transform experience into professional knowledge. According to these frameworks, which stem from Kolb [32,33] and Schön [29], professionals shape their knowledge through experiences they engage in and reflect on in their work.

According to Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory (ELT), learning is a four-stage cycle consisting of Concrete Experience, Reflective Observation, Abstract Conceptualization, and Active Experimentation. Teachers can respond to problems in the classroom, reflect on their experiences, build a theoretical understanding, and apply that understanding to new situations [34]. The model has been shown to be versatile through application to many different fields, including clinical placements in nursing [35] and music performance [36].

Schön’s Reflective Practice Theory fits into this framework; it defines reflection-in-action (during teaching) and reflectionon- action (after teaching). This difference helps to clarify how teachers develop professional judgment through consistent analysis of their decisions in the classroom. Research into studies in business education shows how dialogue about one’s reflection can translate experiential learning into concrete professional outcomes [37], while in social work education, that reflection can lead to cultural humility and self-awareness [38].

These approaches provide a comprehensive framework for teacher development and growth. Studies in STEM education have shown that the combination of experiential learning with guided reflection enhances understanding of complex concepts [6]. Preservice teacher education programs have also adopted reflective practices in a similar vein to facilitate adaptability in differing classroom environments [39].

Nevertheless, implementing those methods is challenging. In particular, generating meaningful “concrete experiences” for professional development is complex [34]. Recent Innovations are addressing these challenges thanks to structured frameworks like the Design-Instruction-Assessment-Learning (DIAL) model, which places the design of experience at the center and purposeful integration of reflection [40]. Digital tools have also emerged as valuable aids for reflective practice. Researchers have demonstrated how computerized environments contribute to a more profound engagement with professional experiences [41].

Successful implementation requires careful attention to experience design and reflection scaffolding. Research on paired internships demonstrates how structured collaborative experiences enhance professional learning [42], while studies of reflective writing practices show the importance of guided reflection tools (Kaçaniku). Group reflection sessions, particularly effective in nursing education, illustrate how collaborative dialogue enhances professional learning [35].

Technology has widened possibilities for reflection. Digital platforms can support asynchronous reflection. Additionally, they can support structured reflection guidance [41]. Colleges adopted reflective practices to help students. Studies directly cite faculty preparation as key to facilitating reflection activities [5].

This theoretical framework provides crucial insights into how teachers develop professional expertise by systematically integrating experience and reflection. It helps explain how earlycareer teachers transform classroom challenges into professional knowledge and develop adaptive expertise. The ongoing evolution of these approaches, supported by new technologies and frameworks, continues to enhance our understanding of teacher development and inform the design of effective professional learning experiences.

Professional Growth and Adaptive Expertise Theory

The theory of Expert Teaching and Adaptive Expertise is important in analyzing teachers’ professional growth and the impact of complex classroom contexts. This theory was first conceptualized by Hatano and Inagaki (1986). According to them, routine expertise is the ability to perform a task quickly and efficiently. At the same time, experts adapt to new situations through knowledge and problem-solving. This difference is important for understanding teacher development from basic competence to innovative practice.

Adaptive expertise is a level of professionalism that goes beyond regular performance. Adaptive experts differ from routine experts because they can create innovations and flexibly apply their knowledge to new situations, balancing efficiency and innovativeness [43]. This ability is important in education because teachers must be flexible for different needs and changing class conditions. In similar fields like healthcare, adaptive expertise helps practitioners to effectively manage unexpected situations, illustrating the benefits of taking an integrated approach to procedural and conceptual knowledge [44].

Research helps identify important aspects that affect adaptive expertise development. A meaningful analysis conducted by Kua et al. [45] has shown that adaptive expertise can be obtained through foundational knowledge, reflection, and feedback. These things allow professionals to smoothly shift green between routine practices and inventive solutions, which helps them grow and adapt. According to Taylor [46], this process is a complex interaction of purpose, opportunity, and response, individually and at the level of context.

In teaching, adaptive expertise is important for coping with classroom diversity and unpredictability. According to Von and Kavanagh [47], coaching helps teachers develop a repertoire of ideas and strategies by using scaffolded instructional practices and reflective dialogue. This method applies not only to an individual’s practice but also to the institution. Grunefeld et al. [48] demonstrated that structured professional development programs that stimulated creativity, enabling reflection and purposeful practice increased adaptive expertise at both the individual and organizational levels.

There are some obstacles to developing adaptive expertise, as teachers depend more on doing things efficiently rather than creatively. Farooq et al. [49] related this issue in their multicenter study of medical residents when adaptive skills needed to be assessed. The study conducted by Boshuizen et al. [50] showed how exposing students to complex cases engenders adaptations in cognitive functioning and in task reasoning.

Männikkö and Husu [51] show that when teachers think about and change their actions, they combine professional growth with adaptive expertise. The results are consistent with Betinol et al. [52] findings in healthcare settings, which underscore the value of authentic experiences for flexibility and problem-solving.

Research shows that effective proactive strategies can foster adaptive expertise. Mylopoulos et al. recommend including problem-solving professional development, while Pusic et al. [44] recommend that those involved in professional practice try balancing efficiency with innovation. These activities help professionals develop cognitive flexibility that allows them to deal with new situations effectively in their regular work.

This theory helps us understand how teachers may progress from novice practitioners to adaptive experts able to solve problems in a complex environment. It underlines the need for structured professional development opportunities that encompass reflection, innovation, and learning. Knowing how to promote adaptive expertise is vital to teacher development and effectiveness in different classrooms as educational demands change.

Methodology

Research Approach and Design

This study employed a qualitative research methodology rooted in the phenomenological-interpretive tradition as the phenomenological-interpretive approach is well-suited for studying teachers navigating between different educational contexts [53-55], specifically chosen to address our research questions about how teachers develop their professional practice through lived experiences. The narrative interview approach was particularly suited to exploring our key research aim: understanding how teachers learn to teach at first. How teachers manage the emotional demands of early career teaching, examining how they transform challenging experiences into professional knowledge, and investigating the development of adaptive expertise. This methodology allows for a deep exploration of how teachers construct meaning from their experiences [56] and was specifically chosen for its ability to capture the complex interplay between emotional growth, practical learning, and reflective practice [57].

Participants

The study included 44 early-career teachers (40 females, four males) from East Jerusalem who completed their teacher education at Israeli colleges of education and returned to teach in their local East Jerusalem schools. All participants had completed their first two years of teaching in various educational settings across East Jerusalem schools. This sample enabled an exploration of how cultural and contextual factors influence teacher development across various educational environments while navigating between Western training and local community needs [58]. Participants were selected using purposive sampling, aligning with qualitative research best practices for identifying individuals with specific expertise and experiences related to the study focus [59]. The sample size adhered to the principle of data saturation, ceasing recruitment when no new themes or insights emerged from additional data collection [60].

Data Collection

In-depth narrative interviews provided the data for this study, which is consistent with qualitative research protocols for educational studies [61]. The interview structure was created with prior narrative research in mind. The questions included the following: the early teaching experiences and emotions, the challenges they faced and coping strategies to overcome them, what support system (people or materials) they used, and how these helped (or did not help) them, what critical incidents helped them evolve as a teacher, how have their practice changed over the period, what cultural and contextual factors shape their teaching practice, how do they navigate the cultural differences between their training in the West to context, and the community expectations and professional integration experiences, and what strategies do they use to adapt to different educational paradigms.

To encourage the participants to speak freely, all interviews were conducted in Arabic, their language. It allowed them to express their experiences with richer detail and emotional nuance. Interviews were held at selected locations convenient for the participants, and audio recording was arranged with their consent and transcribed verbatim throughout the process [62]. This method ensured that all cultures and languages were considered, resulting in a richness and depth of the data. All data were produced in Arabic and translated into English by Claude (https;//www.anthropic.com), an AI-driven language tool.

Data Analysis

The thematic analysis used narrative analysis principles [61], enabling an understanding of the teacher’s growth development. The process had several stages related to modern qualitative analysis frameworks [53]:
i. Initially immersing in the data through repeated reading of the transcripts
ii. Identifying significant statements and critical incidents concerning emotional, pedagogical, and adaptive development
iii. Drawing up initial codes capturing key aspects of teacher development that occurred in different contextual settings
iv. Organizing codes into broader thematic categories reflecting the aims of the research
v. Refining themes through iterative analysis and peer review
vi. Integrating themes into a coherent narrative framework that captures the developmental journey of the teachers [61,63].

The researchers systematically coded transcripts through careful reading to analyze the impact of contextual factors on teacher development across different settings [63]. The researchers thoroughly reviewed the transcripts, read them, and coded them systematically using a manual approach.

To ensure reliability and minimize bias, colleague researchers independently coded the data and worked together to reach a consensus on emerging themes. In qualitative research, themes and concepts should be derived from the data rather than imposed on it. A researcher-led analysis approach ensures that a code or label is not automatically accepted as a ‘theme’ even if multiple researchers agree [61]. Qualitative researchers use a reflexive approach to data analysis, which involves constantly moving back and forth between the various forms of data collected [64].

Quality Assurance

To ensure the study’s credibility, several quality assurance mechanisms were implemented following qualitative research standards. One of the most important qualitative research quality assurance strategies used in this study was peer debriefing, whereby colleagues assessed the coding frameworks and interpretations to ensure the findings were data-driven and unbiased [61]. To improve the trustworthiness of the analysis, we added external perspectives to the study.

To limit bias from individuals, triangulation was used to compare the work of different researchers on the same data. The findings became more valid [65,66]. Furthermore, the decisionmaking processes were recorded in an audit trail for transparency and trustworthiness [65,67]. Revisiting, reviewing, reconsidering, and recreating through a continuous iterative process actively engages researchers in interpreting social phenomena in qualitative studies [61].

To support transferability, findings were reported using thick descriptions that provided rich, detailed accounts of participants’ experiences and contexts, allowing readers to assess their applicability to other settings [61,68]. By integrating these strategies, the study upholds high standards of qualitative research, ensuring its findings are credible, dependable, and contextually meaningful.

Ethical Considerations

This research follows qualitative research principles. It was done keeping ethical code, cultural sensitivity, and cultural context [61]. All the required approvals were obtained from the institutional ethics committee to ensure ethical compliance and participants’ rights protection. Participants were informed about this, agreed to provide their consent, and confirmed confidentiality. This was aligned with best practices for qualitative research in education contexts [63,69]. The transcripts were also modified in a manner that did not t reveal any identifying features of the participants [62]. Also, participants were informed of their right to withdraw anytime they chose, ensuring compliance with ethical standards on autonomy and the absence of coercion [70].

Findings

The research results throw light on the complex and multilayered journey of early-career teachers as they connect pre-service training and professional practice. Becoming a teacher is not about learning how to teach. It is a sensitive interaction that requires dealing with your emotions, acting, and reflecting accordingly. Teachers learn to teach by confronting and overcoming challenges like emotional upheaval, classroom management, and connecting theory to practice. Whatever the learning is, professional identity is formed by imitation, mentoring, experience, and developing adaptive expertise [71-74].

An analysis of stories from 44 beginning teachers revealed 10 interrelated themes of teacher growth. The themes illustrate the depth of emotional, professional, and technical learning to teach. This shows how new teachers draw on support, reflections, and experiences to make sense of uncertainties and difficulties and learn from these very moments. While teaching is not a linear process, teachers undergo emotional labor, bridging theory and practice and developing sustainable professional practices for long-term survival.

The Evolution from Initial Crisis to Professional Identity

Teaching can be an emotional and professional rite of passage. Teachers in the early stages of their careers reported being overwhelmed during their first classroom encounters. Even though there is uncertainty, it often contributes to developing a teacher and professional identity.

One participant described her first encounter with their classroom.

“When I first stood in front of the class, it was a mixture of emotions - fear, hesitation, responsibility, and feelings full of pride and love. It felt like being thrown into deep water. Every minute felt like an hour, and I was hyperaware of every gesture, every word. This initial period, though challenging, was actually the beginning of my real teacher training.”

It was not comforting and motivating for many to feel the weight of emotion.

Another teacher reflected:
“My first time in front of the class, I felt the enormous weight of responsibility on my shoulders and the magnitude of the teaching profession. I realized I would be shaping generations who would take on various roles in life... I felt like I was crafting lives in one way or another.”

Over time, these emotions of fear and responsibility were replaced with connection and purpose. One teacher captured this transformation:
“At first, everything seemed strange and frightening despite my love for children. However, after the first week, as I got to know the students who would be my pupils, I began to love them with all my heart. The classroom began to feel like my natural environment. What started as fear gradually transformed into deep connection and purpose.”

A fourth teacher described the complex mix of emotions and aspirations in early teaching:
“My initial experience was a mixture of tension and a great desire to fulfill myself and create a positive impact on students as their teacher for the first time. Simultaneously, I felt anxiety and worry about not achieving this and fear about facing new challenges that would be completely new to me. Each day brought both excitement and uncertainty.”

Learning to teach involves a complex emotional journey as educators develop their professional identity. Early career teachers typically face initial crises that promote growth. Through this process, teachers move from survival-mode thinking to developing a stable, confident professional identity. These early emotional challenges provide essential foundations for teachers to establish secure, purposeful educational practices.

Building Professional Competence Through Support Networks

A repeated issue throughout the stories was the importance of mentoring and peer assistance in helping teachers cope with the unpredictability of their early careers. These relationships helped teachers overcome self-doubt by offering them emotional support and practical advice.

One teacher described the transformative impact of structured mentorship:
“My mentor helped me with a lesson on Arabic letters, demonstrating a model lesson in front of me and showing me how to start with a story to capture students’ attention. I practiced the lesson in front of her, and she gave me several observations that I followed…”

Another teacher stresses the support from her colleagues:
“There was constant support from my colleagues in the kindergarten through lessons and questions I would bring to them. This ongoing guidance transformed my teaching practice.”

Another participant emphasized how multiple forms of support contributed to her development:
“From the beginning, I sought help from experienced teachers in the same field and shared my challenges with them. They provided various kinds of support, and I discovered that I learn best through modeling. They integrated me into their lessons, and the mentor teacher played a crucial role in developing aspects where I faced problems or weaknesses, whether in planning, worksheets, or exam papers… My personal experience also significantly helped me overcome some problems.”

The importance of collaborative learning emerged strongly in another teacher’s account:
“I relied heavily on my colleague’s experience and insights. One helpful colleague showed me how to break down complex concepts in ways students could understand, which I still use today. Our weekly team meetings became valuable learning opportunities where we could share challenges and solutions. These informal conversations often taught me more than formal training sessions.”

A fourth teacher described how comprehensive support systems facilitated his professional growth:
“When I began teaching, I was fortunate to work with a skilled and highly creative teacher. She helped me by providing a ‘new teacher portfolio’ containing all the essential information I needed. She conducted individual sessions with me to explain everything related to teaching, especially the subjects I would be teaching. I would sometimes observe her teaching classes to learn from her methods. This systematic support was crucial for my development.”

The data shows that teacher development works if it is situated in a net of professional relationships that meet emotional and technological challenges. These relationships help in many ways, like giving useful advice, emotional backing, role models, and learning together. The support systems play a major role in professional development by helping novice teachers to detail their feelings, improve teaching methods, and gain confidence. A combination of formal mentorship and informal peer support forms one of the most effective support structures for teachers to negotiate the complexities of their work.

The Integration of Theory and Practice Through Experience

Data revealed a substantial disconnect between classroom theory and practice. Teachers explain how experiential learning creates links between academic preparation and classroom realities, allowing teachers to hone skills and cultivate practical wisdom.

One participant provided a detailed description of this learning process:
“After each lesson, I would evaluate myself - thinking about how I could have presented this information differently and what activities might have better served the learning objective. With each iteration, my teaching improved through this selfassessment. I learned to rely on both my own reflective practice and the guidance of experienced teachers in my field.”

Another teacher described how theoretical knowledge gained meaning through practical application:
“Everything I learned in my education courses seemed abstract until I stood in front of my first class. That’s when real learning began. Each lesson taught me something new about what actually works in practice. The gap between theory and classroom reality was enormous, but gradually, through daily experience and reflection, I began to develop practical wisdom about teaching.”

The role of experiential learning in developing teaching competencies was highlighted by another participant:
“There was a breakthrough moment when I realized that no two teaching situations are exactly alike. A veteran teacher told me, “Teaching is like jazz, not classical music, you need to know the basics but be ready to improvise.” At first, I didn’t understand, but now I see how teaching requires constant adaptation while maintaining fundamental principles.”

Practical experience contributes substantially to teaching competence as it is an iterative process of experimentation and reflection. Teachers test strategies, analyze outcomes, and improve strategies to connect learning with theory and practice. Thoughtful evaluation of wins and challenges provides new opportunities for learning experiences each day. As the process repeats, teachers become more confident, develop useful techniques, and learn to deal with classroom complexities.

Developing Adaptive Expertise Through Classroom Challenges

Teachers develop adaptive expertise and the ability to adapt to varied and non-stereotypical classroom interactions, which was the main focus of teachers’ challenges at the beginning of their teaching. Teachers develop the adaptability to make calculated changes in their lessons based on how students are responding to the ongoing class. This process is vital in learning to teach since it enables teachers to perform a reading of their assembly. They attempt to better adapt to the children’s needs.

One teacher described her progression from rigid planning to adaptive teaching:
“At first, I wanted clear rules for everything, such as how to respond to misbehavior, structure lessons, and grade. I was terrified of making the wrong decision. Now, I understand that teaching requires constant judgment calls based on understanding deeper principles. One particularly challenging class taught me to monitor and adjust based on subtle cues constantly. It is like developing a sixth sense for what will work in a particular moment.”

Another participant shared her journey toward developing classroom awareness:
“My biggest learning curve wasn’t about content or methods. It was developing what I call “classroom radar.” Initially, I was so focused on my lesson plan that I missed obvious signs of confusion or disengagement. My experience taught me that teaching is like conducting an orchestra; you must read and respond to multiple signals simultaneously. A veteran teacher told me, “The students will tell you everything you need to know. You just have to learn their language.” That advice transformed my teaching.”

Another teacher stated that adaptive expertise develops through experience and challenge.
“Working with a student with severe learning difficulties completely changed my approach to teaching. Nothing in my formal training had prepared me for this challenge. Through trying different approaches, consulting with colleagues, and carefully observing the student’s responses, I learned more about differentiation and personal connection than from any professional development session. This experience taught me that effective teaching is not about delivering perfect lessons, it’s about being responsive to student needs.”

A fourth teacher described the transition from rigid to flexible teaching approaches:
“The hardest lesson was learning that there is rarely one “right” way to handle a situation. Early on, I was always looking for perfect solutions. Experience taught me that effective teaching is about making informed judgments based on multiple factors, student needs, class dynamics, and learning objectives. Now I can adapt my teaching style in real-time based on how students respond.”

Adaptive expertise is an important aspect of teacher development, shifting from inflexible prescriptive approaches to more sophisticated, context-based teaching methods. According to the data, this capability is developed through a combination of challenging classroom experiences, reflective practice, and supportive professional environments. They support the ability of teachers to change strategies in real-time to meet the needs of diverse students by helping them navigate complex dynamics. In particular, challenging situations play a key role in professional adaptability development, causing teachers to develop sophisticated approaches that include both structure and flexibility.

The Role of Emotional Learning in Professional Development

Another significant theme was the critical role of emotional competence in teaching. This dual responsibility highlights the development of emotional competence as a fundamental component of professional growth, enabling teachers to maintain an authentic and effective presence in the classroom. Teachers described the demanding process of learning to manage their own emotions while simultaneously supporting the emotional needs of their students.

One participant described this emotional dimension of professional development:
“No one told me how emotional teaching would be. I had to learn to manage my own feelings while supporting thirty students with their emotions. Through dealing with students who had learning difficulties, I discovered that reaching the student’s heart is as important as reaching their mind. Without emotional connection, even the best teaching techniques may not succeed.”

Another teacher shared her journey of emotional growth:
“Early in my career, I took everything personally, student misbehavior, lack of engagement, poor test results. Through experience and reflection, I learned to separate my personal feelings from professional responses. My mentor taught me something invaluable about emotional boundaries - she said, “Care deeply about your students, but don’t carry their struggles home every night.” It took me months to understand what she meant and even longer to implement it.”

A third teacher described how emotional awareness transformed her teaching practice:
“There was this breakthrough moment when I realized that my emotional state directly affected the classroom atmosphere. If I was anxious, the students became anxious. If I was confident and calm, they responded similarly. Learning to manage my emotional presence became a crucial teaching skill. One particularly challenging student made me completely rethink my approach. Through many difficult interactions, I learned that understanding and responding to emotional needs is often the key to unlocking learning potential.”

A fourth participant reflected on the development of emotional competence:
“I remember feeling overwhelmed by the emotional demands of teaching - thirty different personalities, various emotional needs, conflicts to resolve. What helped me most was developing what I call “professional emotional resilience,” the ability to stay emotionally present for my students while maintaining professional boundaries. My training did not teach this; it came through experience and conscious reflection.”

The emotional dimension of professional development is important for teacher growth. It includes personal emotional management and setting up supportive learning environments. Through experience, mentorship, and reflection, emotional competence is developed to enable teachers to maintain their well-being while promoting positive classroom dynamics.

From Imitation to Innovation in Teaching Practice

Often early in their careers, teachers begin by modeling the behaviors of others they know, like their mentor or some teachers from their school days, before moving toward a more veracious, original, and creative teaching practice. As they begin to experiment with and reflect on their practices, it is important to move away from imitating a known model toward developing a more authentic personal style based on their strengths and classroom needs.

One teacher described this progression:
“Initially, I found myself unconsciously mimicking my favorite high school teacher’s mannerisms and teaching style. It felt safe, like wearing someone else’s well-worn shoes. However, gradually, I began understanding which elements worked for me and which didn’t. Through experimenting with different approaches, I started developing my own authentic teaching style that incorporated the best of what I’d observed while remaining true to my personality.”

Another participant reflected on the transition from imitation to innovation:
“I realized I was teaching math exactly how my own teacher had taught it, even using the same phrases. Over time, I learned to take what worked from that model but adapt it to my personality and my students’ needs. The turning point came when I stopped trying to be a perfect teacher and started being authentic with my students. I began integrating technology and interactive methods that weren’t part of my own learning experience but that I knew would engage my students better.”

A third teacher described the development of an authentic teaching approach:
“My mentor told me something crucial: “You can learn others’ techniques, but you have to deliver them in your own voice.” At first, I didn’t understand, but after trying to imitate what I thought a perfect teacher should be, I realized authenticity is what really connects with students. I found that my background in theater, which I initially thought was irrelevant to teaching, could actually enhance my teaching style. Once I embraced my natural storytelling abilities, my lessons became more engaging and memorable.”

A fourth participant shared her journey toward innovative practice:
“In my early days, I relied heavily on traditional teaching methods I had experienced as a student. However, I soon realized that today’s students have different needs and learning styles. I began incorporating more interactive approaches, technology, and creative activities. What started as imitation evolved into innovation as I gained confidence to experiment with new teaching methods. Now I find myself creating original approaches that blend traditional techniques with contemporary learning strategies.”

The shift from imitation to innovation is a fundamental aspect of teacher professional growth. It reflects increasing professional confidence and the ability to adapt teaching approaches to ongoing educational needs. This illustrates the shift from external dependence on modeled practices to internal personal creativity, where teachers gain the confidence and autonomy to plan authentic, personalized teaching strategies that fit their students and classroom environment.

The Development of Student-Centered Teaching Approaches

The data reflects a major change from teacher-centered methods to student-centered methods. Teachers report that this process happened slowly. Teachers were hard-working and devoted to catering to their students’ necessities and learning styles. Differentiated instruction was a significant strategy that helped teachers adjust their teaching to include and support all learners.

One teacher described this fundamental shift in perspective:
“When I started teaching, I thought it was about delivering content perfectly. Now I understand it’s about reading and responding to what’s happening in the room. I had to learn to see learning through my students’ eyes. Working with students of different abilities taught me that there isn’t one right way to teach - there are as many ways as there are students in the room. This realization completely transformed my approach to planning and teaching.”

Another participant reflected on his process toward differentiated instruction:
“At first, I taught the same way to everyone. Now, I understand that each student learns differently. During my first year, I discovered how a student who struggled with traditional instruction lit up when we introduced visual and hands-on learning activities. This experience taught me to prepare multiple ways to explain the same concept, using visual aids for some students, hands-on activities for others, and technology for others. It’s more work, but the results are worth it.”

A third teacher shared her journey toward inclusive teaching:
“I began to understand that creating truly inclusive classrooms requires more than just good intentions. Through working with diverse learners, I learned to create multiple entry points for every lesson, ensuring that each student could engage with the material at their own level. One particularly challenging class taught me that what looks like resistance to learning often signals a need for a different teaching approach.”

A fourth participant described her growing understanding of responsive teaching:
“The biggest shift came when I stopped seeing teaching as a performance and started seeing it as a conversation. I learned to pay attention to the small signals students give about their understanding and engagement. When a usually active student becomes quiet, or when I see confusion in their eyes, these are moments that call for immediate adaptation of my teaching approach. This kind of responsive teaching has become the heart of my practice.”

This shift in instruction to student-centered teaching emphasizes the need for responsibility and flexibility to promote inclusivity. Teachers engage in professional learning to understand their students and create effective learning opportunities that enhance students’ capabilities and understanding.

Building Professional Authority and Classroom Management Skills

Teachers emphasized the relationship between the teacher’s emotional presence and classroom management of professional authority. The teacher had to merge personal presence and management. They had to find the right balance between being strict and demonstrating caring for their students.

One teacher shared his journey:
“Building authority in the classroom isn’t about being strict or controlling. I learned that real authority comes from being consistent and fair and showing students that you genuinely care about their learning. It took me several months to find the right balance between maintaining high expectations and being supportive. The breakthrough came when I realized that effective classroom management grows from strong relationships, not just rules.”

A second teacher described her evolving approach to classroom management:
“Initially, I concentrated too much on enforcing rules and maintaining control. Over time, I discovered that creating an engaging learning environment naturally reduced behavior issues. One particularly challenging class taught me that when students are genuinely involved in meaningful learning activities, many management issues simply disappear. Now I focus on creating structured but engaging lessons that keep students actively involved.”

A third participant reflected on developing a professional presence:
“Learning to project confidence while feeling uncertain was one of my biggest challenges. A mentor advised me, “Command the room with purpose, not power.” This helped me understand that professional authority comes from being well-prepared, responsive to student needs, and consistent in expectations. When students sense that you’re genuinely invested in their success, they naturally respond with respect.”

A fourth teacher shared her insights about relationship-based authority:
“The turning point in my classroom management came when I stopped trying to control students and started focusing on building relationships. I learned that students respond better to a teacher who they know cares about them as individuals. This does not mean being their friend. It means being a consistent, supportive adult who holds them accountable while believing in their potential.”

The development of professional authority is rooted in a sophisticated integration of personal presence, pedagogical skills, and relationship-building capability. These accounts highlight that building solid relationships with students is central to effective classroom management, enabling teachers to establish authority while fostering a supportive and respectful learning environment.

Technology Integration and Modern Teaching Methods

Teachers reported a tremendous change in their use of technology and modern teaching strategies, which has changed their practice. Using technology helped them build more efficient and differentiated experiences, get kids involved in class, and make things easier to learn.

One participant shared:
“When I first started teaching, I saw technology as just an add-on to traditional methods. Now it’s integrated into how I think about lesson design. I learned to use digital tools not just for presentation but for active student engagement. Creating interactive lessons using various platforms has transformed how my students interact with the material and each other.”

A second teacher reflected on her journey with educational technology:
“I had to overcome my own hesitation about using technology in the classroom. Through experimentation and professional development, I discovered how digital tools could support differentiated learning and student engagement. The key was learning to select technology that genuinely enhances learning rather than just using it for its own sake.”

third participant described her approach to blending traditional and modern methods:
“The biggest lesson was learning to integrate technology meaningfully while maintaining the human element of teaching. I found that combining digital tools with traditional teaching methods created powerful learning experiences. For example, using collaborative online platforms for group projects while maintaining face-to-face discussions and personal interaction.”

A fourth teacher shared her experience with modern teaching methods:
“I learned to balance innovation with effectiveness. While exploring new teaching methods and technologies, I always ask myself: “How does this enhance student learning?” Sometimes, the most effective approach combines new technology with traditional teaching strategies. The key is being flexible and responsive to what works best for different learning objectives.”

This theme focuses on the teacher who constantly creates a 21^st -century teaching style to improve the learning experience by modernizing it with technology without losing the human touch. It shows how important it is for the teacher to use discretion to get maximum educational utility from innovation.

Building Resilience and Long-term Professional Sustainability

Teachers shared that they needed to develop a culture of resilience to continue to be passionate teachers. This theme focuses on how teachers build the flexibility and emotional strength that enable them to succeed for the long haul. As they deal with ongoing struggles, they are still committed and effective.

One teacher described her development of professional resilience:
“The most important lesson I learned was how to maintain my passion for teaching while managing the demands of the profession. Early in my career, I would take every challenge personally and exhaust myself trying to be perfect. Through experience, I learned that sustainable teaching requires pacing yourself, celebrating small victories, and building emotional resilience.”

A second participant shared her journey toward sustainable practice:
“Building resilience wasn’t just about managing stress, it was about developing a sustainable approach to teaching. I learned to set realistic expectations for myself, prioritize what matters most for student learning, and maintain professional boundaries. Most importantly, I discovered that taking care of my own wellbeing directly impacts my effectiveness as a teacher.”

A third teacher reflected on developing professional adaptability:
“The biggest challenge was learning how to adapt to constant change without losing sight of my core purpose as a teacher. Through various educational reforms and changing requirements, I learned to stay focused on what matters most - student learning and wellbeing. This ability to adapt while maintaining core principles has been crucial for my professional sustainability.”

A fourth participant described her approach to long-term professional growth:
“Sustainability in teaching comes from finding the right balance between growth and stability. I learned that continuous professional development doesn’t mean constantly changing everything, but rather thoughtfully integrating new approaches while maintaining what works well. Building a supportive professional network and maintaining a growth mindset has been key to my long-term resilience.”

This theme highlights the importance of self-care and boundaries to teacher success. When teachers prioritize their well-being and sustainability, they remain adaptable and efficient throughout their careers in this profession.

Discussion

The results of this study illustrate the clear and multidimensional nature of early-career teachers learning how to teach. their path as educators is more than writing out the best they can do in front of their students. It is a profound, enriching, and meaningful mixture of emotional maturation, professional networking, and personal growth. All this informs their teaching, their self-awareness, and their relationships with students, a mosaic of growth all along the way. In their first years, new teachers grapple with emotional highs and lows, doubts about their sense of self, and the challenges of orchestrating complicated scenarios in their classrooms. Such challenges might also serve as opportunities for growth, enabling us to become more resilient and adaptable while forming a strong professional identity.

One of the main observations coming from the data is the transformative potential of emotional crises in teaching. These moments of vulnerability are not seen as roadblocks but rather as motivators for self-exploration and career growth. While building emotional competence, a vital but generally ignored aspect of teaching, teachers learn how to navigate acute experiences of fear, anxiety, and self-doubt. This process reflects the emotional labor involved in the profession, teachers’ emotional management, and the emotional support that the profession offers students.

Learning to teach also addresses its relational dimensions. The results underscore the essential importance of mentorship and collaborative networks for both emotional grounding and practical insight. Formal and informal support systems enable teachers to process experiences, try out new strategies, and feel like the professionals we know they are. Such networks provide belonging and shared learning, key for combating isolation and burnout.

Through reflective and experiential learning, teachers connect theory with practice while teaching their students. This iterative process helps them build adaptive expertise, a key characteristic of effective teaching. They evolve from the rigid following of preset plans to intelligent, opportune decision-making in context. This shift from imitation of traditional models to authentic, innovative practices is a major milestone in their professional growth.

Moreover, the data further restates the need for resilience and sustainability. It is not so easy for teachers to balance the expectations of a constantly changing job with their satisfaction and well-being. Essentially, this emphasizes the importance of teacher preparation programs having a holistic compass with a view to teacher education that prepares multi-dimensional aspects of the social, emotional, technical, and reflective for educators as they emerge into dynamic, complicated classrooms in current times. So, above all, learning to teach is a human practice, one of integrating knowledge and heart in order to evolve as an individual and cultivate student success.

Unpacking how it is to learn to teach reveals the depth of human experience, resulting in emotional development, professional maturation, and cultural inclusion. These are global findings on how teachers maneuver through the complexities of all of these elements to develop their professional competence, which gives rise to a set of connected and global models: The Cultural Bridging Model and the Multifaceted Model of Teacher Development.

The Cultural Bridging Model of Professional Development unveils and evolves a three-step, non-linear view of teacher developmental and growth processes. In the first stage, teachers are drunk on Western pedagogy and theory as they get trained in college. While important, this foundation creates a subtle challenge when teachers launch their practice in culturally distinct settings. As one participant said, “Anything I learned had to be reenvisioned when I had my actual classroom.” Such experience is consistent with Zhou’s [24] exploration into cross-cultural reciprocal learning and its potential transformational character.

The second phase of active cultural negotiation and adaptation follows this. Teachers engage in what Wexler [28] describes as educative mentoring but with one “cultural” component. They learn to combine contemporary pedagogical approaches with local educational traditions, one participant described as “a bridge between worlds.” Negotiation of these pathways is often an emotionally and professionally vulnerable process but essential for the development of adaptive expertise [43].

The third stage represents professional integration, which is the stage in which teachers reach what Taylor [46] characterized as the “purposeful synthesis.” Instead of a binary choice between varying philosophies of teaching, teachers create nuanced practices that honor new pedagogy and local knowledge. This integration is found in what the Multifaceted Model identifies as four interrelated dimensions: Professional Identity, Cultural Integration, Community Support, and Pedagogical Practice.

Beyond traditional theoretical frameworks, the Multifaceted Model of Teacher Development highlights the dynamic interaction of these dimensions. According to Kua et al., Professional Identity evolves [45], referred to as “adaptive expertise development,” in which both formal training and cultural context factor into the process. Cultural Integration Professional development allows teachers to navigate an array of educational paradigms supported by structured reflection and mentorship [35]. As a resource and challenge, Community Support necessitates balancing professional growth with cultural sensitivity. According to Betinol et al. [52], this support system is critical in ascertaining goal competencies in cultural scenarios. Pedagogical Practice, the fourth dimension, is where the integration becomes concrete, and teachers show what Boshuizen et al. [50] refer to as “knowledge reconstruction via case processing.

The interconnection between these models provides important information about what to include in teacher education and professional development programs. First, it establishes the need for what Morris [34] calls “structured experiential learning opportunities” that incorporate cultural complexity. Second, it stresses the need for emotional support systems during cultural transitions and is consistent with Heinrich and Green’s [40] identification of the role of guided reflection in professional development.

These findings have significant implications for policy and practice. Teacher preparation programs must move away from the technical skill development model and, as Liu et al. [27] have outlined, shift towards what they term “active adaptive expert involvement.” This includes creating space for cultural dialogue, building emotional resilience, and developing adaptive expertise through structured reflection and mentorship, among other things. Furthermore, the research shows that there is a need for long-lasting professional support systems that both recognize universal principles of teacher development and cultural nuances. Männikkö and Husu [51] maintain that for teacher development to be effective, standardization and cultural responsiveness are both necessary. This calls for transforming professional development into a culturally informed, emotionally intelligent process that lets teachers move through different educational worlds.

It explains the relationship between these models and provides a new perspective on how teachers are trained to teach in crosscultural settings. It indicates that successful teacher professional development will need to consider both the commonality and specificity of professional growth and more localized cultural negotiations. Such understanding may contribute to more nuanced, culturally responsive work in teacher education and professional development.

Implications

This study recommends teacher education regarding the content of preparation programs, cultural communication, and reflection. Teachers need systematic approaches to cultural communication and self-reflection, especially when transitioning from Western to local educational traditions. These reflective spaces enable critical engagement with cultural differences and help reconcile competing pedagogical frameworks within the school management structures.

For early career teachers who often face emotional distress, emotional support systems, including mentoring and peer networks, assist these teachers in managing their emotional labor in a culturally diverse classroom. In addition, guided experiential learning must be used to develop adaptive expertise to help teachers bridge theory and practice through reflection and experimentation cycles. The joint cross-pollination of different mentoring models can foster collaborative practice that promotes informed reflection and critical dialogue within educational organizations.

Teacher preparation should first focus on culturally responsive practices so that educators can meet the needs of diverse students in a way that respects local cultural values while working in institutional constraints. Mixed approaches of cultural and traditional teaching methods, such as remixed approaches, as Heinrich and Green [40] suggest, should be integrated into professional development to support the development of hybrid professional identities that effectively merge the local and the global. For education management systems dealing with crosscultural contexts, this means creating structure that honor both universal teaching principles and local cultural needs.

Conclusion

Learning to teach is a profound journey of personal and professional transformation, particularly in cross-cultural contexts. The Cultural Bridging Model and the Multifaceted Model of Teacher Development are complementary frameworks for understanding this complex process. These models collectively highlight how teachers have to move between different educational paradigms, all while developing emotional resilience, adaptive expertise, and cultural sensitivity that are required for teaching in varied organizational settings.

This study contributes to developing the theory of the teacher development process through an analysis of how emotional growth and cultural integration are intertwined with professional competence. It makes recommendations for experiential learning, community support, and adaptive expertise as critical elements of the developmental trajectory of teachers within educational organizations. The findings support the need for a shift in the conception of teacher education that recognizes the universal principles of professional development and the importance of cultural navigation in management contexts. In this way, teacher education programs can most appropriately educate educators to be successful in various and constantly changing educational environments, while also addressing the social science aspects of cultural adaptation in professional settings.

Limitations and Future Research

There are several limitations to this study on teacher development in cross-cultural contexts. The focus on East Jerusalem teachers is constrained from generalizing to other cultural settings and focusing on early career development leaves unaddressed questions about long-term professional growth. In addition, relying on self-reported interview data methodologically may introduce bias, and some aspects of teacher development may not be captured. There may be aspects of participant experiences in East Jerusalem, given its unique political and social context, which differ from other educational environments.

For further research, the cultural bridging and Multifaceted Models should be tested for generalizability across diverse cultural contexts. Longitudinal studies help outline long-term professional development trajectories, and including observational data and reflective journals might offer a more nuanced view of the teacher development process. Cultural bridging and cross-cultural teacher development should also be seen in how technology affects institutional contexts, and such investigations would be useful for enhancing the understanding of teaching in diverse educational settings, especially in politically sensitive regions.

References

1. Girvan C, Conneely C, & Tangney B (2016) Extending experiential learning in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education 58: 129-139.
2. Yu Y, & Hunt J (2016) A connected space for early experiential learning in teacher education. Global Education Review 3(4): 33-53.
3. Radulescu C (2013) Reinventing reflective learning methods in teacher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 78: 11-15.
4. Roland K (2017) Experiential learning: Learning through reflective practice. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education 8(1): 2982-2989.
5. Veine S, Anderson MK, Andersen NH, Espenes TC, Søyland TB, et al. (2020) Reflection as a core student learning activity in higher education. International Journal for Academic Development 25(2): 147-161.
6. Elsayary A (2021) Using a reflective practice model to teach STEM education in a blended learning environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, p. 17.
7. Clarke D, & Hollingsworth H (2002) Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education 18(8): 947-967.
8. Phantharakphong P, & Liyanage I (2021) Teacher professional learning and development: Linear discourses and complexities of teacher learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 50(3): 311-323.
9. Raduan NA, & Na S (2020) An integrative review of the models for teacher expertise and career development. European Journal of Teacher Education 43(3): 428-451.
10. Anto AG, & Coenders F (2019) Teacher learning in collaborative professional development: Changes in teacher and student practices. In Collaborative curriculum design for sustainable innovation and teacher learning. Springer, pp. 229-247.
11. Jones W, & Dexter S (2014) How teachers learn: The roles of formal, informal, and independent learning. Educational Technology Research and Development 62(3): 367-384.
12. Fischer C, Fishman BJ, Dede C, Eisenkraft A, Frumin K, et al. (2018) Investigating relationships between school context, teacher professional development, teaching practices, and student achievement in response to a nationwide science reform. Teaching and Teacher Education 72: 107-121.
13. Kavanagh S, Metz M, Hauser ME, Fogo B, Taylor M, et al. (2020) Practicing responsiveness: Using approximations of teaching to develop teachers’ responsiveness to students’ ideas. Journal of Teacher Education 71(1): 107-94.
14. Huang X, & Lai C (2020) Connecting formal and informal workplace learning with teacher proactivity: A proactive motivation perspective. Journal of Workplace Learning 32(6): 437-456.
15. Hooper A, Potts C, & Walton M (2022) Novice early childhood teachers’ perceptions of their professional development experiences: An interpretive phenomenological approach. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education 44(3): 310-329.
16. Soomro AF (2018) Evaluating the significance of exploratory practice as an approach to teacher development. Reflective Practice 19(4): 461-473.
17. McDevitt SE (2020) Teaching immigrant children: Learning from the experiences of immigrant early childhood teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education 42(2): 123-142.
18. Romo-Escudero F, LoCasale-Crouch J, & Hamre B (2022) Early childhood teachers’ noticing skills in the context of an intervention: Supporting teachers to effectively reflect on practice. Teacher Development 26(5): 683-705.
19. Bandura A (1977) Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs.
20. Meltzoff AN, & Moore MK (1997) Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model. Infant and Child Development 6(3‐4): 179-192.
21. Çakmak M, Gündüz M, & Emstad AB (2018) Challenging moments of novice teachers: Survival strategies developed through experiences. Cambridge Journal of Education 49(2): 147-162.
22. Philip T (2019) Principled improvisation to support novice teacher learning. Teachers College Record 121(1): 1-32.
23. Feryok A (2009) Activity theory, imitation and their role in teacher development. Language Teaching Research 13(3): 279-299.
24. Zhou J (2012) The effects of reciprocal imitation on teacher-student relationships and student learning outcomes. Mind, Brain, and Education 6(2): 66-73.
25. Rieker J (2022) Escaping the ‘mimicking circle’ in the teaching practicum. Language and Sociocultural Theory 9(1).
26. Markkanen P, Välimäki M, Anttila M, & Kuuskorpi M (2020) A reflective cycle: Understanding challenging situations in a school setting. Educational Research 62(1): 46-62.
27. Liu XH, Xu F, Zhang X, et al. (2023) How to guide your learner: Imitation learning with active adaptive expert involvement. ArXiv.
28. Wexler L (2020) ‘I would be a completely different teacher if I had been with a different mentor’. Professional Development in Education 46(2): 211-228.
29. Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
30. Florian L, & Beaton M (2018) Inclusive pedagogy in action: Getting it right for every child. International Journal of Inclusive Education 22(8): 870-884.
31. Bakker C, Vries SD, & Glopper KD (2023) Exchange on subject pedagogy during lesson study in initial teacher education. International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies.
32. Kolb DA (1984) Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
33. Kolb DA (2014) Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT Press.
34. Morris T (2020) Experiential learning – A systematic review and revision of Kolb’s model. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(7): 1064-1077.
35. Rodríguez-García M, Medina-Moya JL, González-Pascual J, & Cardenete-Reyes C (2018) Experiential learning in practice: An ethnographic study among nursing students and preceptors. Nurse Education in Practice 29: 41-47.
36. Benjamins L, Roland S, & Bylica K (2021) The complexities of meaningful experiential learning: Exploring reflective practice in music performance studies. International Journal of Music Education 40(2): 163-176.
37. Perusso A, Blankesteijn M, & Leal R (2020) The contribution of reflective learning to experiential learning in business education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45(7): 1001-1015.
38. Sanchez N, Norka A, Corbin ML, & Peters C (2019) Use of experiential learning, reflective writing, and metacognition to develop cultural humility among undergraduate students. Journal of Social Work Education 55(1): 75-88.
39. Zavadskienė L, & Bubnys R (2017) Exploring the concept of reflective practice in the context of student-centered teacher education. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference 1: 91-103.
40. Heinrich W, & Green PM (2020) Remixing approaches to experiential learning, design, and assessment. Journal of Experiential Education 43(3): 205-223.
41. Kingkaew C, Theeramunkong T, Supnithi T, Chatpreecha P, Morita K, et al. (2023) A learning environment to promote awareness of the experiential learning processes with reflective writing support. Education Sciences 13: 64.
42. Oh LB (2019) Goal setting and self-regulated experiential learning in a paired internship program. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Global Computing Education, pp. 239.
43. Mylopoulos M, Kulasegaram K, & Woods N (2018) Developing the experts we need: Fostering adaptive expertise through education. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 24(3): 674-677.
44. Pusic M, Santen S, Dekhtyar M, et al. (2018) Learning to balance efficiency and innovation for optimal adaptive expertise. Medical Teacher 40(8): 820-827.
45. Kua J, Lim W, Teo W, & Edwards R (2020) A scoping review of adaptive expertise in education. Medical Teacher 43(3): 347-355.
46. Taylor P (2020) The complexity of teacher professional growth – Unravelling threads of purpose, opportunity and response. Professional Development in Education 49(1): 16-29.
47. Von Esch KS, & Kavanagh S (2018) Preparing mainstream classroom teachers of English learner students: Grounding practice-based designs for teacher learning in theories of adaptive expertise development. Journal of Teacher Education 69(3): 239-251.
48. Grunefeld H, Prins F, van Tartwijk J, & Wubbels T (2021) Development of educational leaders’ adaptive expertise in a professional development programme. International Journal for Academic Development 27(1): 58-70.
49. Farooq F, Mahboob U, Ashraf R, & Arshad S (2022) Measuring adaptive expertise in radiology residents: A multicenter study. Health Professions Educator Journal 5(2): 9-14.
50. Boshuizen H, Gruber H, & Strasser J (2020) Knowledge restructuring through case processing: The key to generalize expertise development theory across domains? Educational Research Review 29: 100310.
51. Männikkö I, & Husu J (2019) Examining teachers’ adaptive expertise through personal practical theories. Teaching and Teacher Education 77: 126-137.
52. Betinol E, Murphy S, & Regehr G (2022) Exploring the development of adaptive expertise through the lens of threshold concepts. Medical Education 57(2): 142-150.
53. Alase A (2017) The interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): A guide to a good qualitative research approach. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies 5(2): 9-19.
54. Smith J, & Nizza IE (2022) Essentials of interpretative phenomenological analysis. American Psychological Association.
55. Elliott R, & Timulak L (2021) Essentials of descriptive-interpretive qualitative research: A generic approach. American Psychological Association.
56. Muñoz-Salinas Y, & Salinas Á (2021) What do preservice teachers learn by reflecting upon their emotional experiences during their training? A qualitative approach into four emotions. Reflective Practice 22(6): 844-859.
57. Radhakrishnan D, Capobianco B & DeBoer J (2021) Kenyan engineering teachers building reflective practice. Reflective Practice 22(5): 697-711.
58. Mabasa-Manganyi RB, Mamabolo JM, Sepadi M, Kgopa F, Ndlhovu SM, et al. (2022) Enabling environments that South African teachers create to accommodate diversity in their classrooms: A case study on the Limpopo Province. South African Journal of Education.
59. Ghorbani S, Mirshah Jafari SE, & Sharifian F (2018) Learning to be: Teachers’ competences and practical solutions: A step towards sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability 20(1): 20-45.
60. Entezari MS, & Sharifi A (2020) Provide a model for the establishment of the school in accordance with the indicators and requirements of the education transformation document. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 3(3): 108-121.
61. Creswell JW, & Poth CN (2018) Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4^th). SAGE Publications.
62. Tulyakul P, & Meepring S (2020) Ethical issues of informed consent: Students as participants in faculty research. Global Journal of Health Science 12(3): 86.
63. Merriam SB, & Tisdell EJ (2015) Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Wiley.
64. Snyder C (2012) A case study of a case study: Analysis of a robust qualitative research methodology. The Qualitative Report 17: 1-21.
65. Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, & Moules NJ (2017) Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16(1): 1-13.
66. Raskind IG, Shelton RC, Comeau DL, Cooper H, Griffith D, et al. (2018) A review of qualitative data analysis practices in health education and health behavior research. Health Education & Behavior 46(1): 32-39.
67. Carcary M (2020) The research audit trail: Methodological guidance for application in practice. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 18(2): 44-54.
68. Morse J (2015) Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research 25(9): 1212-1222.
69. Farrugia L (2019) WASP (Write a scientific paper): The ongoing process of ethical decision-making in qualitative research: Ethical principles and their application to the research process. Early Human Development 133: 48-51.
70. Ederio N, Inocian EP, Calaca NI, & Espiritu JGM (2023) Ethical research practices in educational institutions: A literature review. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review 6(5): 2709-2724.
71. Galli F, & New C (2022) Gibbs’ cycle review: Emotions as a part of the cycle. e-Motion: Revista de Educación, Motricidad e Investigació
72. Kaçaniku F, Gjelaj M, & Saqipi B (2019) Context-guided instruction to develop reflection competence of education professionals. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies 41(1): 48-67.
73. Opfer V, & Pedder D (2011) Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research 81(3): 376-407.
74. Thacker E (2017) “PD is where teachers are learning!” High school social studies teachers' formal and informal professional learning. The Journal of Social Studies Research 41(1): 37-52.