A Colossal Analysis on Risk Assessment and HAZOP Studies in Petrochemical Industries
Sothivanan S1*, K Manikandan1 and D Elamparuthi2
1Department of Chemical Engineering, Annamalai University, India
2Department of Business Administration, Annamalai University, India
Submission: January 31, 2022; Published: February 24, 2022
*Corresponding author: Sothivanan S, Department of Chemical Engineering, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, India
How to cite this article: Sothivanan S, K Manikandan, D Elamparuthi. A Colossal Analysis on Risk Assessment and HAZOP Studies in Petrochemical Industries. Recent Adv Petrochem Sci. 2022; 7(2): 555707. DOI: 10.19080/RAPSCI.2022.07.555707
Abstract
Risk management and assessment method is utilized in petrochemical process to minimize the accidents through applying protective and preventive techniques. In this paper, the preventive approach called Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP) and risk assessment methods are reviewed. The HAZOP strategy is a Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) method that is used worldwide to think about the risks of the system and the problems of its operation, by examining the implications of any deviations from the configuration conditions. This paper is the primary HAZOP survey planned to accumulate HAZOP related writings from HAZOP related books, proceedings, conference, major journals, standards, and guidelines. It was decided to organize the studies over a long period of time and to better classify HAZOP in the class.
Keywords: Petrochemical industry; Risk management; Risk assessment; Process hazard analysis and equipment’s
Abbreviations: PHA: Process Hazard Analysis; FMEA: Failure Modes and Effects Analysis; IEA: International Energy Agency; HAZOP: Hazard and Operability Study
Introduction
Petrochemical plants and gasoline refineries have a wide variety of equipment, usually introducing complex designs and some parameters. In such plants, it is necessary to think about the dangers of various and basic types, for example, explosions, fire, and harmful distribution that can cause real harm to living souls or the climate. Flames and explosions in these industries cause significant accidents. In the petrochemical industry, the risk of explosion must be explored for each area in the plant and all equipment must be used to reduce this risk. Quantitative hazard investigation is, basically, to anticipate the size and growth of the gas cloud and to detect the excess pressure created by the cloud touch within the enclosed area [1].
Accidents can occur because the actual cycles do not work within the control range all the time since a strange situation has occurred, for example, pipe leakage, pump damage and valve damage. HAZOP is the recommended technique for recognizing the risks and problems that protect efficient operation. If risks and problems are identified, potential arrangements and changes can be proposed to avoid and eliminate these risks and problems, i.e., HAZOP is an antidote. Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) testing allows you to simultaneously confirm all failure models, causes and effects of each area and control the harm. As a result, it’s a way for HAZOP to provide an organized strategy for a group of experts to develop a risk test efficiently and fully. The HAZOP approach can be classified as an organized and systematic communication inquiry that can be used in the early stages of the endeavor, for example, from the origin and basic stages to the functional and post-operational stages.
This procedure is commonly used to identify and evaluate potential risks to employees involved in the process and gears involved, as well as to the frustrations involved in preventing the production process or being responsible for strange tasks. In this paper, we look at the petrochemical industry. The petrochemical industry of market share is analyzed and presented in the below (figure 1). The global petrochemical sector is growing dramatically as developing countries’ interest in petrochemicals / synthetics expands. In its “Oil 2018” report, the International Energy Agency (IEA) predicts an increase of about 25% in oil consumption by 2023 - approximately 1.7 MMbpd - from interest on petrochemical raw materials. The oil from the petrochemical area shows a significant amount of interest.
The IEA estimates that the petrochemical sector will represent 33% of oil demand growth by 2030, and will expand by almost half by 2050, according to the association’s final rule on petrochemicals. According to the report, the production of vital plastics will double somewhere. In the 2010 and 2050 range, Growing habitats in the Asia-Pacific region will meet the billiondollar new petrochemical development limit in Asia, the Middle East, and the United States. All three sites actively contribute to the support of petrochemical handling capabilities to meet demand [2].
Many non-OECD countries are seeing petrochemical demand rates expand faster than GDP growth. A few countries are subject to petrochemical imports, while others contribute to meet the demand for domestic synthetic compounds. Many variables will determine the fate of the petrochemical business: supply / demand factors, plastic reuse, guidance, raw material costs, associations / consolidations / acquisitions, digitalization, and many other countries actively contribute to domestic petrochemical demand and demand for petrochemical products. Products to generate income.
Scope of the Review
Our purpose is to examine most of the current literature on HAZOP studies, recognizing the current state of the work. This review is initiated by summarizing the major ideas from 166 published studies, expanding the specific features and classification of publication in different groups. From there, talk about the data collected and continue to determine the best classification of HAZOP in the class. HAZOP is the focal point of most studies pointed toward working on the well-being of the material, establishing its inevitability of operation at high temperatures and pressures, and involving more chaotic, complex cycles. Here, collected data largely from distributions in significant diaries and meeting practices, and in addition from books, rules, and guidelines. Additionally, thought it would be educational and enigmatic to determine the early stages of HAZOP and its relentless progress over the years, its prosperity and trade union most systematic, thorough, careful, and commonly used risk identification practice.
Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP)
The HAZOP study is an exceptional focus method that differentiates how a relationship deviates from its project expectation. It is characterized using a systematic, accurate basic assessment of the cycle and the design of targets for new or existing offices, to assess the failure potential of individual parts of a hardware, and to assess all significant impacts in the office. The prosperity of this current technique lies in its similarity in separating the Piping & Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs) of a structure, which breaks down the program into reasonable sections with clear boundaries, called hubs, to guarantee inspection of each equipment. A small multi-disciplinary committee accepts inquiries, and its individuals must have sufficient experience and information to respond to most inquiries on the spot. Individuals are carefully selected and given the power to recommend necessary changes to the plan [3-5].
Figure 2 shows the typical course of the Hazop analysis, seeing the relationship among process data in addition hazard detection evidence. Researchers follow this interaction and focus on the need for capacity in the office to create restructuring biology to help distinguish deviations in the basic elements. Due to the administrative prerequisites made by the Brazilian management bodies, the basic focus object for efficiency was functionality.
The description of the critical parameters for validation was analyzed which related to normal necessary that generated by Brazilian regulatory agencies. As stated, the proper use of the HAZOP practice needs a solid diversified group in addition conversation meetings are normally a difficult cycle. As mentioned herein, an organized procedure should be followed to observe the concentration and objectivity in the review [6-8].
Analysis Of Risk Management and HAZOP Technology
Subjective improvements to risk validation are not much; In detail, the researchers did not notice major improvement in writing except for the normal risk stages. Moreover, the researcher found which in most distributed writings risk matrices were considered a semi-quantitative technique and the authors settled on it. If subjective terms are created with some good luck to address the possibilities of the event and the harshness of the penalties, the risk matrix is described a subjective strategy since it is not measurable portrayal. The idea of a risk matrix was initially mooted in 1995 through the U.S. Air Force’s Electronic System Center [9-11].
Since then, it has been widely used in practically all companies for risk portrayal. Complete presentation of essential ideas and expansion of sustainable risk phase approach. HAZOP in addition its expansion. HAZOP in addition its different changes often work for the subjective analysis of cycle risks. Although the HAZOP exam is automated (HAZOP expert), it is still restricted to provide quantitative results [12]. Using accessible quantitative information on project, assignment and material characteristics, a semi-quantitative thinking process was designed towards rank the effects created through the HAZOP expert framework. Some of the risk management and risk assessment techniques are reviewed and presented in table 1. The different risk management in addition HAZOP study is presented in the petrochemical industry which elaborated in this section clearly.
Conclusion
The current paper is the primary HAZOP survey, which deals with all the attached characters to organize the basic exam areas and audit the state-of-the-art of the HAZOP approach. In this review, the studies are completed in chemical process facilities, reviewed approximately 166 documents covering the period from 2000 to the present, the year in which the primary systematic HAZOP paper was published. In these 35 years, many creators have focused on explicit HAZOP perspectives after further improvements, although most of the documentation has been distributed in the most recent 15 years. In the year 2001, the initial and only HAZOP standard is published. We hope that our audit and distribution arrangement will function with the further approval of data for those exploring and rehearsing HAZOP.
The HAZOP approach is one of the most important PHA machines in which professionals are involved in putting executives at risk management. As understood in this review, it would be used for long time in the process industry. However, to address the novel difficulties in the current process industry, it needs to improve the technology to go into its operation in highcomplexity services. Revisions of this theory would permit for its rapid adaptation to present or even future communication needs.
This paper is given required towards notice which utmost of the consulted researchers contemplate the HAZOP technique an efficient tool to detect changes in process variables. Additionally, its structured method carries the required support to make easier the identification of causes in addition properties utilizing as a normal the knowledge of a databases or multidisciplinary team from expert systems, Moreover, in complete cases the required of experts would be sustained to be necessary because of the limits of the expert schemes.
This review makes us think that most consulting authors view the HAZOP technique as a reliable tool for distinguishing deviations within process parameters. In addition, its structured technique provides basic assistance in identification of causes in addition effects utilizing a general knowledge of a databases or multidisciplinary team from expert system. Moreover, in complete cases the requirement of authorities will be sustained to be required because of the limits of the expert schemes.
References
- Jose LD, Montse M, Martí N, Marta S (2020) Health risks for the population living near petrochemical industrial complexes. 1. Cancer risks: A review of the scientific literature. Environmental research 186: 109495.
- Faisal IK, Paul RA, Md Tanjin A (2020) Advanced methods of risk assessment and management: An overview. Methods in Chemical Process Safety 4: 1-34.
- Azita ZH, Philip B, Lynda RM, Fazlollah G, Hormoz S, et al. (2021) Evaluating the Consistency Between Conceptual Frameworks and Factors Influencing the Safe Behavior of Iranian Workers in the Petrochemical Industry: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 7(5): e22851.
- Jalali SE, Noroozi M (2009) Determination of the optimal escape routes of underground mine networks in emergency cases. Saf. Sci 47(8): 1077-1082.
- Shariff AM, Leong CT (2009) Inherent risk assessment-a new concept to evaluate risk in preliminary design stage. Process Saf. Environ. Prot 87(6): 371–376.
- Si H, Ji H, Zeng X (2012) Quantitative risk assessment model of hazardous chemicals leakage and application. Saf. Sci. 50(7): 1452–1461.
- Liang W, Zhang L (2012) A wave change analysis (WCA) method for pipeline leak detection using Gaussian mixture model. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind 25(1): 60–69.
- Curcurù G, Galante GM, Concetta MLF (2012) Epistemic uncertainty in fault tree analysis approached by the evidence theory. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind 25(4): 667–676.
- Quigley J, Revie M (2011) Estimating the probability of rare events: addressing zero failure data. Risk Anal 31(7): 1120-1132.
- Faisal IK, Abbasi SA (2001) Risk analysis of a typical chemical industry using ORA procedure. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind 14(1): 43–59.
- Liaw HJ, Your CC, Lin YF (2000) A mathematical model for predicting thermal hazard data. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind 13(6): 499–507.
- Khan F, Abbasi SA (1999) TORAP-a new tool for conducting rapid risk assessment in petroleum refineries and petrochemical industries. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind 12(4): 299-313.