Toxicity as a Function of Structure: Organophosphorus Flame Retardants
Bob A. Howell*
Science of Advanced Materials, Center for Applications in Polymer Science, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant
Submission:June 27, 2024;Published:July 09, 2024
*Corresponding author:Bob A. Howell, Science of Advanced Materials, Center for Applications in Polymer Science, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, Email: bob.a.howell@cmich.edu
How to cite this article:Bob Howell A. Toxicity as a Function of Structure: Organophosphorus Flame Retardants. Open Acc J of Toxicol. 2024; 6(1):555678. DOI: 10.19080/OAJT.2024.06.555678.
Abstract
The rapidly increasing development of new organophosphorus flame retardants presents a need for toxicity assessment. To date, toxicity studies have included compounds of very heterogeneous structure which has led to the generation of muddled results. Careful studies which focus on compounds of similar structure, e.g., linear alkyl phosphates, branched alkyl phosphates, aryl phosphates, substituted aryl phosphates, phosphonates, phosphonates, phosphine oxides, are needed to provide data to support the synthesis and use of new effective nontoxic organophosphorus flame retardan.
Keywords:Organophosphorus flame retardants; Heterogeneous structure; Bioaccumulator; Nontoxic bio-sources; Synthesis
Need for Organophosphorus Flame Retardants
The development of polymeric materials during the mid-twentieth century has permitted huge enhancement of the standard of living of peoples in most areas of the world [1,2]. Despite their many attractive features these materials are, in the main, quite flammable and must be flame retarded for most applications [3]. Over the decades, many substances have been utilized as flame retardants, most often as additives that could be introduced into a polymer matrix during processing. Among a wide range of potential flame-retarding agents, two have been most prominent. Both are organic: organo-halogen, particularly brominated aryl ethers, and organophosphorus compounds [4-6]. Traditionally, organo-bromine flame retardants have been industrial favorites. On an elemental basis alone, bromine is much more available, and much less expensive than phosphorus. Phosphorus compounds are also in high demand for other applications such as fertilizer and food additives [7,8]. The popular, decabromodiphenyl ether, is derived from a byproduct of phenol production [9]. Cost alone does not account for the widespread use of bromo-aromatics. They function as very effective flame retardants. They undergo decomposition in the temperature range for degradation of a range of polymers to liberate hydrogen bromide to the gas phase where it serves as an effective scavenger for combustion propagating radicals.
Unfortunately, despite the effectiveness of these compounds, they display several features which negatively impact their use [4]. Decomposition at high temperature is accompanied by the formation of volatile, very toxic dioxins [10]. More importantly, they tend to migrate from a polymer matrix into which they have been incorporated. This is particularly a problem for items discarded in a landfill [11]. These materials enter the environment, tend to bioaccumulate and may enter the human food chain. Human exposure to organo-halogen flame retardants can lead to a range of disease states, most associated with endocrine disruption [12]. For this reason, both regulatory and societal pressure have stimulated a reduction in the use of these materials. Organophosphorus compounds have risen to prominence as replacements. In particular those derived from renewable, readily available, low-cost nontoxic bio-sources have gained attention [13,14]. Those that may be covalently incorporated into the polymer structure or that are highly branched oligomeric compounds seem to hold great promise [15,16]. Not only do these materials provide efficient flame retardancy but are not prone to migration and loss to the surroundings.
Phosphorus Compounds
Phosphorus compounds have long had a prominent impact on society. From the earliest establishment of organized communities, phosphorus compounds have been utilized as nutrients for crop production [17]. They have also been widely used as additives in both animal feed and food for human consumption. Huge amounts of these compounds are consumed annually. Phosphorus compounds are required for both plant and animal growth and development.
Phosphorus compounds have been hugely impactful in other areas as well. While the volumes have been much smaller than that in the nutrient area, they nonetheless have had major societal influence. At one extreme lie the organophosphorus warfare agents [18,19]. These compounds often contain a P-F bond. More important, of lesser but significant toxicity, are the pesticides [20]. Many of these compounds contain a P=S bond. Hugely significant has been the development of herbicides [21]. Glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] has been the most widely used and effective of the organophosphorus herbicides. It acts on a pathway not available in mammals and therefore displays little human toxicity. It has been extremely successful when used with herbicide-resistant crops [22]. The development of effective pesticides and herbicides has revolutionized agriculture and permitted the production of food to sustain an ever-increasing world population. An important, but still smaller in production volume, class of organophosphorus compounds are flame retardants. These have permitted the utilization of many materials that, while displaying several desirable features, are highly flammable without modification.
Toxicity of Organophosphorus Flame Retardants
The development and use of organophosphorus flame retardants is currently of great interest. These materials provide great potential for polymer modification to reduce flammability. This without the toxicity problems associated with the use of organo-bromine counterparts. This is particularly true for organophosphorus compounds derived from renewable, readily-available, nontoxic biobased precursors. Now that organophosphorus flame retardants are becoming more prominent, human exposure to these materials and potential toxic effects have begun to be of concern [23-27]. Thus far toxicity assessment results are not definitive. The earliest organophosphorus flame retardants were simple phosphate esters. In general, these display low toxicity, most usually adverse neurodevelopment in children. However, toxicity is strongly structure dependent. Often sets of compounds for toxicity assessment contain esters of varied structure - linear alkyl, branched alkyl, variously substituted aryl or even haloalkyl [27,28]. Not surprisingly, haloalkyl phosphorus esters display greater toxicity than do nonhalogenated analogs (these compounds should more properly be treated as organo-halogen flame retardants containing a phosphorus atom). Systematic studies, with appropriate attention to dose level, of independent classes of organophosphorus esters-linear alkyl esters of varying chain length, branched akyl esters, aryl esters containing various substituents-should be conducted to provide meaningful data to guide the synthesis and use of these compounds.
It has been noted that organophosphorus flame retardants with low levels of oxygenation at phosphorus, particularly DOPO (9,10-dihydro-9-oxa-10-phosphaphenathrome-10-oxide) esters, display little toxicity [29,30]. This observation needs to be examined in detail. Can toxicity of these compounds be correlated with the level of oxygenation at phosphorus. A systematic, careful study of toxicity versus level of oxygenation at phosphorus could provide, not only guidelines for selection of the most appropriate compounds for use but also direction for the synthesis of effective, nontoxic organophosphorus agents.
Conclusion
Organophosphorus flame retardants for polymeric materials are rapidly replacing traditional organo-halogen compounds which are persistent in the environment and display significant toxicity. In the main, organophosphorus flame retardants exhibit low toxicity. However, toxicity studies have yielded mixed results. This has largely arisen from the inclusion of compounds of quite varied structure within sample sets of compounds to be evaluated. Careful studies with attention to structure and dose level are needed to provide useful data. This information is needed to provide meaningful guidelines for the synthesis and use of new organophosphorus flame retardants.
References
- Furukawa Y (1998) Inventing Polymer Science, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Hounshell DA, Smith JK (1988) Science and Corporate Strategy: DuPont R&D, 1920-1980, Cambridge University Press, New York.
- Lyons JW (1970) The Chemistry and Uses of Fire Retardants, Wiley Inter Science, Inc., New York, USA.
- Alaee M, Arias P, Sjodin A, Bergmer A (2003) An Overview of Commercially Used Brominated Flame Retardants, their Application, their Use Patterns in Different Countries/Regions and Possible Modes of Release. Environ Int 29(6): 683-689.
- Granzow A (1978) Flame Retardation by Phosphorus Compounds. Acc Chem Res 11: 177-183.
- Velencoso MM, Battif A, Markwart J, Schartel B, Wurm FR (2018) Molecular Firefighting - How Modern Phosphorus Chemistry Can Help Solve the Challenge of Flame Retardancy. Angew Chem Int Ed 57(33): 10450-10467.
- Sigmon LR, Vaidya SR, Thrasher C, Mahad S, Dimkpa CO, et al. (2023) Role of Phosphorus Type and Biodegradable Polymer on Phosphorus Fate and Efficacy in a Plant-Soil System. J Agric Food Chem 71(44): 16493-16508.
- Lempila LE (2013) Applications and Functions of Food-grade Phosphates. Ann NY Acad Sci 1301: 37-44.
- Wittcoff HA, Reuben BB, Plotkin JS (2012) Industrial Organic Chemicals, (3rd), John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.
- Zhang M, Duekens A, Li X (2016) Brominated Flame Retardants and the Formation of Dioxins Furans in Fires. J Hazard Mater 304: 26-39.
- Cristale J, Bele TGA, Lacorte S, de Marchi MRR (2019) Occurrence of Flame Retardants in Landfills: A Case Study in Brazil. Environ 168: 420-427.
- Darnerud PO (2008) Brominated Flame Retardants as Possible Endocrine Disruptors. Int J Androl 31(2): 152-160.
- Howell BA, Daniel YG (2020) Isosorbide as a Platform for the Generation of New Biobased Organophosphorus Flame Retardants. Insights Chem Biochem 1(1): 2020.
- Sag J, Goeddere D, Kubla P, Griener L, Schonberger F, et al. (2019) Phosphorus-containing Flame Retardants from Biobased Chemicals and their Application in Polyesters and Epoxy Resins. Molecules 24: 3746.
- Howell BA, Daniel YG (2019) Incorporation of Comonomer exo-5-(Diphenylphosphato)isosorbide-2-endo-acrylate to Generate Flame Retardant Poly(styrene). Polymers 11(12): 2038.
- Howell BA (2023) Efficient Biobased Oligomeric Plasticizers From the Renewable Biomonomers, Glycerol and Adipic Acid. Polym Renew Resour 14(3): 207-214.
- Schlutz F, Hofmann R, del Corso M, Pashkevych G, Dreibrodt S, et al. (2023) Isotopes Prove Advanced, Integral Crop Production, and Stockbreeding Strategies Nourished Trypillia Mega-Populations. PNAS 120: e2312962120.
- Mukherjee S, Gupta RD (2020) Organophosphorus Nerve Agents: Types, Toxicity, and Treatments. J Toxicol 2020: 3007984.
- Chai PR, Hayes BD, Erickson TB, Boyer EW (2018) Novichok Agents: A Historical, Current and Toxicological Perspective. Toxicol Commun 2(1): 5-48.
- Umestu N, Shirai Y (2020) Development of Novel Pesticides in the 21st J Pestic Sci 45(2): 54-74.
- Vets S (2015) Herbicides: History, Classification and Genetic Manipulation of Plants for Herbicide Resistance, in Lichtfouse E, Ed., Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland 15: 153-192.
- Green JM, Owen MDK (2011) Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Utilities and Limitations for Herbicide-Resistant Weed Management. J Agric Food Chem 59(11): 5819-5829.
- Bekele TG, Zhao H, Yang J, Chegen RG, Chen J, et al. (2021) A Review of Environmental Occurrence, Analysis, Bioaccumulation, and Toxicity of Organophosphorus Esters. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(36): 49507-49528.
- Gbademosi MR, Abdallah MAE, Harrad S (2021) A Critical Review of Human Exposure to Organophosphate Esters with a Focus on Dietary Intake. Total Environ 771: 144752.
- Xu F, Eulaers I, Alves A, Papadopoulou E, Padilla-Sanchez JA, et al. (2019) Human Exposure Pathways to Organophosphate Flame Retardants: Associations Between Human Biomonitoring and External Exposure. Environ Int 127: 462-472.
- Hou R, Sun C, Zhang S, Huang Q, Liu S, et al. (2020) The Metabolism of Novel Flame Retardants and the Internal Exposure and Toxicity of their Major Metabolites in Fauna-A Review. J Environ Expo Assess 2: 10.
- Hall AM, Keil AP, Choi G, Ramos AM, Richardson DB, et al. (2023) Prenatal Organophosphate Ester Exposure and Executive Function in Norwegian Preschoolers. Environ Epidemiol 7(3): e251.
- Howell BA (2023) Toxicity of Organophosphorus Flame Retardants. J Fire Sci 41(3): 102-104.
- Hirsch C, Striegl R, Mathes S, Adhart C, Edelmann M, et al. (2017) Multiparameter Toxicity Assessment of Novel DOPO-based Organophosphorus Flame Retardants. Chemosphere 91(1): 407-425.
- Liu M, Yin H, Chant X, Yang J, Liang Y, et al. (2018) Preliminary Ecotoxicity Hazard Evaluation of DOPO-HQ as a Potential Alternative to Halogenated Flame Retardants. Chemosphere 193: 126-133.