Abstract

Conventional alloy systems tend to exhibit limited performance at extreme environments usually due to limited compositional diversities and resultant mechanical properties. High-entropy alloys, characterized by their multi-principal element composition, hold the promise of overcoming such limitations by offering a broad new spectrum of mechanical, thermal, and chemical properties. This review features recent advances related to synthesis, characterization, and potential applications of HEAs in numerous industries. The review initiates with an overview of the advanced synthesis methodologies-appropriately arc melting, powder metallurgy, and additive manufacture-capable of producing HEAs with desired properties. Thereafter, it discusses advanced XRD, SEM, and TEM characterization techniques that provide insight into the underlying complex microstructure accountable for the exceptional properties in HEAs. These significant advantages are still countered by challenges in cost, manufacturing scalability, and predictability of properties in HEAs. The paper concludes by highlighting future research directions, with emphasis on the integration of computational modeling and machine learning to sharpen the design and optimization of HEAs. The evolving HEAs field could be a promising future of material science, which will probably eventually outperform conventional alloys for so many technological applications.

Keywords:High-entropy alloys; Synthesis methods; Characterization techniques; Thermal stability; Advanced applications

Abbreviations:HEAs: High-Entropy Alloys; FCC: Face-Centered Cubic; BCC: Body-Centered Cubic; HCP: Hexagonal Close-Packed

Introduction

High-entropy alloys represent a paradigm shift in the field of materials science-a challenging conventional concepts of alloy design because five or more metallic elements are integrated in equimolar or near-equiatomic proportions. Such an approach not only serves to extend the limits of design but also aims to exploit the entropy toward the stabilization of the resultant phases, hence its nomenclature. Indeed, high-entropy configuration alloys can boast of outstanding mechanical properties: excellent strength combined with very good ductility [1,2]. High corrosion resistance and thermal stability are further intrinsic properties, with which these features combine to make HEAs fit for a large area of high-demand applications [3].

The development of HEAs has prompted significant research interest due to their potential to achieve property combinations that were previously unattainable with traditional alloys. Initial studies focused on the understanding of fundamental aspects of their formation, such as the formation of simple solid solution phases versus complex intermetallic compounds. Recent studies have demonstrated that by changing the constituent element ratios, type, the microstructural features can be tuned precisely in HEA, which directly influences its mechanical properties [4,5]. For example, it came into notice that the fractured toughness for HEAs could retain with good property even at an elevated temperature and also at cryogenic temperatures, which is considered a great interest for application in both aerospace and automobiles [6,7].

In addition, the workability of HEAs under extreme conditions has been a motivating factor in researching their properties concerning oxidation and wear resistance. It has been reported that such materials exhibit superior performance when compared with traditional alloys under mechanical stress and oxidizing environmental conditions; thus, they demonstrate their amenability for use under severe operating conditions [8,9]. This is attributed to the dense, stable oxide layers formed on HEA surfaces, protecting the underlying metal from further degradation [10]. Besides, such heterogeneous nature in the microstructure of HEAs contributes significantly to their strength and durability by scattering dislocations impeding the flow of defects [11,12].

However, despite such promising attributes and a huge number of application possibilities, various technical challenges are associated with the manufacturing of HEAs. Scalable synthesis with consistent properties remains mainly a challenge. Though arc melting and casting have conventionally been used in smallscale production, these techniques often introduce compositional inhomogeneities and unwanted secondary phases in larger batches [13,14]. In addition to this, high melting points of some of the constituent elements add more complications in getting a uniform melt and subsequent solidification [15,16].

The future of HEs thus would seem to keep: one of rapid growth ahead, especially with advances going on in computational materials science and manufacturing technologies, including so-called AM. In fact, AM offers special opportunities over conventional methods in creating complex HEO components with precision tuning of composition and microstructure. This will overcome some of the scaling issues of the conventional casting route and create new pathways for the use of HEAs in custom parts and tools [17,18]. Besides, machine learning and high-throughput experimentation are under active investigation nowadays for accelerating the discovery and optimization of HEAs. These computational tools can also provide the estimate on phase stability and property based on the composition by elemental fraction, and identify the potential HEA system with greatly reduced experimental effort [19,20].

In practically every day that passes by, as research on highentropy alloys becomes more advanced, the field will disclose how these materials can revolutionize most industrial segments. It is probable that a different set of properties for HEAs will be advanced within segments such as renewable energy, aerospace, and biomedical devices. However, for HEAs to make the step from the laboratory into complete implementation within industries, there is continued innovation that needs to be perpetrated in both the design of the material and its processing techniques. These will need to be channeled toward the optimization of alloy composition for specific applications, improvement in production methodologies, and understanding of the long-term performance of HEAs under operational conditions.

Theoretical Background

High-entropy alloys (HEAs) have become a material class that questions conventional metallurgically-based principles by emphasizing the importance of configurational entropy in alloy stabilization. Whereas conventional alloy systems are usually based on one or two principal elements with minor additions, HEAs are composed of five or more elements in equimolar or near-equimolar ratios. This unique composition increases the configurational entropy ΔS_config config of the system, which is given by the equation:

where 𝑅 is the gas constant, c_i is the atomic fraction of the 𝑖-th element, and 𝑛 is the total number of components [21]. When 𝑛 is high, ΔS_config config significantly contributes to the Gibbs free energy (Δ𝐺) of the system, influencing phase stability. This is often expressed as:

where Δ𝐻 is the enthalpy of mixing and 𝑇 is the temperature. In HEAs, the high entropy term (TS_config) can outweigh the enthalpy of mixing, stabilizing simple solid solution phases such as facecentered cubic (FCC), body-centered cubic (BCC), or hexagonal close-packed (HCP), rather than complex intermetallic phases [22].

The “core effects” of HEAs are high entropy, sluggish diffusion, severe lattice distortion, and cocktail effect, which further distinguish them from the conventional alloys. The highentropy effect will promote the formation of a disordered phase, while the sluggish diffusion effect may retard atomic movement, which benefits the improvement in creep resistance and hightemperature stability [23]. Large lattice distortion due to atomic size mismatch among constituent elements introduces a high Peierls barrier for dislocation movement that contributes to high strength and hardness [24]. The cocktail effect refers to an extraordinary interaction of multiple elements producing unique properties that are often unpredictable [25].

Phase selection and stability in HEAs are also influenced by enthalpy of mixing (ΔH_mix) and atomic size mismatch (𝛿). Empirical criteria such as the ratio of these parameters, expressed as

where 𝑟𝑖 is the atomic radius of the 𝑖-th element and r ̅ is the average atomic radius, have been used to predict phase formation [26]. Values of Ω and 𝛿 help in determining whether an alloy will form a single-phase solid solution, multi-phase mixture, or intermetallic compounds [27]. Recent advances in computational materials science have dramatically improved the understanding of the phase behavior of HEAs. Theoretical methods, such as DFT and CALPHAD modeling, enable the calculation of phase stability and mechanical properties with high accuracy from their elemental composition [28,29]. Machine learning approaches also include a pathway to investigate the huge compositional space for HEAs, thus enabling the rapid identification of promising alloy systems [30]. In summary, the formation principle or theory for HEAs was based on unique thermodynamic and structural features determined by high configurational entropy and complex interaction among multi-components. Such a principle will give not only the guidelines in the design of new HEAs but also explanations for their excellent mechanical, thermal, and chemical properties.

Experimental Methods

The synthesis and characterization of HEAs are done by a number of experimental techniques to precisely control the composition and to explain the complex microstructure and properties. This section describes the most commonly used methods in the fabrication and analysis of HEAs, pointing out their specific roles and contributions to the field.

Synthesis techniques

Arc melting: Arc melting is one of the very fundamental synthesis techniques in HEAs. In this process, the metallic elements of the alloy are melted together in an inert atmosphere by an electric arc and then rapidly solidified. This technique is preferred since it is simple and quite efficient at attaining homogeneity with high purity in the final alloy [31,32]. However, further refinement is yet required on aspects of the cooling rates and compositional inhomogeneities that result.

Powder metallurgy: Powder metallurgy represents another alternative method, and it is particularly useful in the fabrication of HEAs with controlled microstructures. It involves the blending of elemental powders, followed by compaction and sintering. This technique allows better control over the composition of the alloy and avoids some segregation problems characteristic of other techniques. Furthermore, powder metallurgy is scalable and suitable for industrial production [33,34].

Additive manufacturing: More recently, the AM, or more accurately, selective laser melting, and electron beam melting have been increasingly employed as an advanced fabrication technique for HEAs. These processes enable the fabrication of components from HEA powders in a layer-by-layer manner with unprecedented control over the geometry and internal structures of the material. The additive manufacturing technique is particularly useful in view of the fabrication of complex geometries that cannot be achieved by conventional techniques of manufacture [35, 36].

Characterization techniques

XRD is a powerful technique for the characterization of phase composition and crystal structure in HEAs. The diffraction patterns of X-rays scattered by atoms in the alloy allow the researchers to identify the presence of solid solution phases, intermetallic compounds, and any amorphous features. XRD results are helpful in understanding stabilization mechanisms of different phases within HEAs [37,38].

SEM/EDS: It can characterize the microstructure at high resolution, which will shed light on the grain size, morphology, and phase distribution in the HEAs. When coupled with EDS, the SEM can also perform an elemental analysis, which will be very important in confirming the uniformity of elemental distribution across the synthesized alloy [39,40].

Mechanical testing: Mechanical properties of HEAs are studied using various mechanical tests such as tensile testing, hardness testing, and fracture toughness measurements. In fact, these tests have important implications for the choice of practical applications of HEAs in various industries. For example, tensile tests deliver information on strength and ductility, whereas hardness tests define the resistance of HEAs against deformation and wear [41,42].

Advanced Techniques

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM): It is done to investigate the detailed structure at an atomic level that explains dislocation structures, phase boundaries, and other defects within HEAs. The described technique is quite helpful in understanding the fundamental mechanisms contributing to their unique properties, such as enhanced strength and ductility [43,44].

Thermal analysis: DSC and TGA are some of the techniques applied for the thermal property studies of the HEAs. These analyses helped in understanding melting behavior, phase transformation, and stability under various conditions in HEAs [45, 46].

Conclusion

This review gives insight into the transformational role that high-entropy alloys are likely to play in the field of materials science. Their multicomponent composition indeed presents, through HEAs, unprecedented mechanical strength and durability with improved thermal stability for advanced applications in the aerospace, automotive, and defense sectors. Advanced synthesis methodologies, such as arc melting, powder metallurgy, and additive manufacturing, along with characterization techniques, have enriched knowledge about HEAs and improved their property tailoring for applications. While considerable progress has been made, cost, scalability, and property prediction remain challenges that call for further research and integration of computational tools for the efficient optimization of HEA systems. As the field goes forward, HEAs are bound to lead new developments in material science, promising giant leaps in technology and engineering. In a nutshell, high-entropy alloys are important not only on the level of academic studies but also in prospective areas of application; they have comprehensively rearranged the limits and have opened new frontiers of material science.

References

1. Li Z, Zhao S, Ritchie RO, Meyers MA (2019) Mechanical properties of high-entropy alloys with emphasis on face-centered cubic alloys. Progress in Materials Science 102: 296-345.
2. Li W, Xie D, Li D, Zhang Y, Gao Y, etal. (2021) Mechanical behavior of high-entropy alloys. Progress in Materials Science 118: 100777.
3. Zhang Y, Zuo TT, Tang Z, Gao MC, Dahmen KA, et al. (2014) Microstructures and properties of high-entropy alloys. Progress in materials science 61: 1-93.
4. Mishra RS, Haridas RS, Agrawal P (2021) High entropy alloys–Tunability of deformation mechanisms through integration of compositional and microstructural domains. Materials Science and Engineering 812: 141085.
5. Froes FH (1994) Advanced metals for aerospace and automotive use. Materials Science and Engineering 184(2): 119-133.
6. Harvey FM (2012) High performance materials in aerospace. Springer Science & Business Media.
7. Feltrin AC, Xing Q, Akinwekomi AD, Waseem OA, Akhta F (2022) Review of novel high-entropy protective materials: wear, irradiation, and erosion resistance properties. Entropy 25(1): 73.
8. Deepak K (2023) Recent advances in tribology of high entropy alloys: A critical review. Progress in Materials Science 136: 101106.
9. Ananiadis E, Lentzaris K, Georgatis E, Mathiou C, Poulia A,et al. (2020) AlNiCrFeMn equiatomic high entropy alloy: a further insight in its microstructural evolution, mechanical and surface degradation response. Metals and Materials International 26: 793-811.
10. Praveen S, Seop Kim H (2022) High-entropy alloys with heterogeneous microstructure: processing and mechanical properties. Progress in Materials Science 123: 100709.
11. Dingfeng X, Wang X, Lu Y (2024) Heterogeneous‐Structured Refractory High‐Entropy Alloys: A Review of State‐of‐the‐Art Developments and Trends. Advanced Functional Materials 34(49): 2408941.
12. Traditional metallurgical techniques such as arc melting and casting are often used for small-scale production, but they may introduce compositional inhomogeneities and unwanted secondary phases in larger batches.
13. Taylor, Mark JD (2017) Processing of porous high melting temperature metals using a removable second phase. Diss. University of Sheffield, England.
14. Bruce C (1964) Principles of Solidification. Applied solid state physics. Boston, MA: Springer US, pp. 161-170.
15. Jonathan DA, Michel Rappaz (2016) Solidification: -Revised & Expanded. EPFL press.
16. LA A, Sachdev AK, Apelian D (2022) Alloy development and process innovations for light metals casting. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 306: 117606.
17. Gao W, Zhang Y, Ramanujan D, Ramani K, Chen Y et al. (2015) The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Computer-aided design 69: 65-89.
18. Fang J, Xie M, He X, Zhang J, Hu J (2022) Machine learning accelerates the materials discovery. Materials Today Communications 33: 104900.
19. Stevens Rick (2020) Ai for science: Report on the department of energy (doe) town halls on artificial intelligence (ai) for science. No. ANL-20/17. Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States).
20. Yeh JW, Chen SK, Lin SJ, Gan JY, Chin TS, et al. (2004) Nanostructured high‐entropy alloys with multiple principal elements: novel alloy design concepts and outcomes. Advanced engineering materials 6(5): 299-303.
21. Miracle DB, Senkov ON (2017) A critical review of high entropy alloys and related concepts. Acta materialia 122: 448-511.
22. Zhang Y, Ting ZT, Tang Z, Gao MC,Dahmen KA, et al. (2014) Microstructures and properties of high-entropy alloys. Progress in Materials Science 61: 1-93.
23. Otto F, Yang Y, Bei H, George EP (2013) Relative effects of enthalpy and entropy on the phase stability of equiatomic high-entropy alloys. Acta Materialia 61(7): 2628-2638.
24. Hung TM, Yeh JW (2014) High-entropy alloys: a critical review. Materials Research Letters 2(3): 107-123.
25. Sheng GUO, Liu CT (2011) Phase stability in high entropy alloys: Formation of solid-solution phase or amorphous phase. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International 21(6): 433-446.
26. Senkov ON, Senkova SV, Woodward C (2014) Effect of aluminum on the microstructure and properties of two refractory high-entropy alloys. Acta Materialia 68: 214-228.
27. Feng R, Zhang C, Gao MC, Pei Z, Zhang F, et al. (2021) High-throughput design of high-performance lightweight high-entropy alloys. Nature Communications 12(1): 4329.
28. Xianglin L, Zhang J, Pei Z (2023) Machine learning for high-entropy alloys: Progress, challenges and opportunities. Progress in Materials Science 131: 101018.
29. Chang H, Tao Y, Liaw PK, Ren J (2022) Phase prediction and effect of intrinsic residual strain on phase stability in high-entropy alloys with machine learning. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 921: 166149.
30. Arun S, N Radhika, Saleh B (2024) Advances in Vacuum Arc Melting for High Entropy Alloys: A Review. Vacuum: 113314.
31. Tong CJ, Chen YL, Yeh JW, Lin SJ, Chen SK, et al. (2005) Microstructure characterization of Al x CoCrCuFeNi high-entropy alloy system with multiprincipal elements. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 36: 881-893.
32. Torralba, José M, Paula Alvaredo, Andrea García-Junceda (2020) Powder metallurgy and high-entropy alloys: update on new opportunities. Powder Metallurgy 63(4): 227-236.
33. Moghaddam AO, Shaburova NA, Samodurova MN, Abdollahzadeh Ac, Trofimov EA (2021) Additive manufacturing of high entropy alloys: A practical review. Journal of Materials Science & Technology 77: 131-162.
34. Zhang C, Zhu J, Zheng H, Li H, Liu S, et al. (2020) A review on microstructures and properties of high entropy alloys manufactured by selective laser melting. International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing 2(3): 032003.
35. Mahale, Tushar Ramkrishna (2009) Electron beam melting of advanced materials and structures. North Carolina State University, US.
36. Dirras G, Gubicza J, Heczel A, Lilensten L, Couzinié JP, et al. (2015) Microstructural investigation of plastically deformed Ti20Zr20Hf20Nb20Ta20 high entropy alloy by X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. Materials Characterization 108: 1-7.
37. Pratap SM, Srivastava C (2015) Synthesis and electron microscopy of high entropy alloy nanoparticles. Materials Letters 160: 419-422.
38. Easo GP, Curtin WA, Tasan CC (2020) High Entropy Alloys: A focused review of mechanical properties and deformation mechanisms. Acta Materialia 188: 435-474.
39. Xu XD, Liu P, Tang Z, Hirata A, Song SX et al. (2018) Transmission electron microscopy characterization of dislocation structure in a face-centered cubic high-entropy alloy Al0. 1CoCrFeNi. Acta Materialia 144: 107-115.
40. Oñate SA, Salgado AS, Niño EB (2020) Thermodynamic analysis of high entropy alloys and their mechanical behavior in high and low-temperature conditions with a microstructural approach-a review. Intermetallics 124: 106850.
41. Dolique V, Thomann AL, Brault P, Tessier Y, Gillon P (2010) Thermal stability of AlCoCrCuFeNi high entropy alloy thin films studied by in-situ XRD analysis. Surface and Coatings Technology 204(12-13): 1989-1992.
42. Meimei W, Li Z, Raabe D (2018) In-situ SEM observation of phase transformation and twinning mechanisms in an interstitial high-entropy alloy. Acta Materialia 147: 236-246.
43. Rao JC, Diao HY, Ocelík V, Vainchtein D, Zhang C, et al. (2017) Secondary phases in AlxCoCrFeNi high-entropy alloys: An in-situ TEM heating study and thermodynamic appraisal. Acta Materialia 131: 206-220.
44. Mészáros SK, Holló BB (2023) Simultaneous DSC techniques. The Handbook of Differential Scanning Calorimetry. Butterworth-Heinemann 659-791.
45. Einat S, Hayun S (2021) Comprehensive study of phase transitions in equiatomic AlCoCrFeNi high-entropy alloy. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 856: 158220.