The Headache of Back Pain
Dick J Zeilstra*
Nedspine Ede and Bergman Spine Clinics, Netherlands
Submission: September 12, 2017; Published: October 17, 2017
*Corresponding author: Dick J Zeilstra, MD, PhD, Retired Spine practice at Nedspine Ede and Bergman Spine Clinics, Naarden, Netherlands, Email: djzeilstra@gmail.com
How to cite this article: Dick J Z. The Headache of Back Pain. J Head Neck Spine Surg. 2017; 1(4): 555567.
Short Communication
Patients presenting with pure low back pain are among the most challenging problems to deal with for a spine surgeon. In many cases it already becomes clear that there are no surgical options for a particular patient and they are referred to (often once again) physical therapy, cognitive training, pain clinics etc. But in a small number of patients the spine surgeon’s attention gets caught by some characteristic features in the patient’s history and images. These are usually patients of around 40 years of age presenting with a single level discopathy and a history of “mechanical back pain”. Discogenic pain is assumed to originate from nerve in growth into the innermost disc mediated by proinflammatory cytokines [1,2].
Although surgery in these patients is still under heavy debate there are many surgeons who would consider a surgical option. These options usually consist of a fusion using one of the many available techniques or a disc replacement. There has been an enormous surge in fusion surgery where the proper indication can raise doubt.
The key to a good result lies in proper patient selection. And it is exactly this feature that makes dealing with the problem so challenging. First of all there is the patient’s history of “mechanical” back pain. This is understood as pain arising during activities and subsiding when resting or lying flat. The daily course of complaints and the influence of rest, mobility, and posture have been identified as relevant indicators [3,4]. In a recent study the presence or absence of a positive “loading factor” was unrelated to outcome [5].
Imaging usually shows a single level discopathy (“black disc”) with signs as described by Modic [6]. The etiology of these changes is under debate [7-10]. In our recent study we could not find a clear predictive value of Modic changes for outcome, as also reported by Lautsen et al. and Ohtori et al. [5,11,12].
Other than MRI one of the still more or less standard investigations is a discography of the affected level, often combined with an adjacent level for reference [13]. The evidence for the usefulness is however weak and it has been suggested that the injection may even lead to accelerated degeneration [14-18]. This is especially critical when investigating non symptomatic discs. In our study the test was of no value [5]. Not so widespread is the application of a pantaloons cast, covering the lumbar region up to about T10 and one thigh of the patients choice. This is worn as long as feasible or till a clear result in the form of pain reduction of > 50% has been achieved. In our study the test proved to be valuable in a subset of patients without prior surgery [5]. We suggest that other than physical properties in undergoing this cumbersome test there is also an assessment of the patients mind set and determination for a good outcome.
So, after all these difficulties in determining the right patient, how do we find the best treatment? In a retrospective analysis of 262 patients with a follow up of up of 2 to 9 years the result was satisfactory in about 80% [19]. The cohort included patients with different types of fusion as well as total disc replacement (TDR). In an overview Berg concluded that TDR was at least as good as fusion especially on the short term [20]. This is in keeping with my own experience over 15 years. Many recent trials however show that fusion surgery does not produce better results than conservative treatment [21,22]. Where this may hold true for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) in the general population there are subsets of patients that will truly benefit more from surgical treatment. Research should focus on identifying parameters that have a good predictive value for outcome.
References
- Ohtori S, Inoue G, Miyagi M, Takahashi K (2015) Pathomechanisms of discogenic low back pain in humans and animal models. Spine J 15(6): 1347-1355.
- Vergroesen PP, Kingma I, Emanuel KS, Hoogendoorn RJW, Welting TJ, et al. (2015) Mechanics and biology in intervertebral disc degeneration: a vicious circle. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 23(7): 1057-1070.
- van Hooff ML, van Loon J, van Limbeek J, de Kleuver M (2014) The Nijmegen decision tool for chronic low back pain. Development of a clinical decision tool for secondary or tertiary spine care specialists. PLoS One 9(8): e104226.
- Ohtori S, Orita S, Yamauchi K, Eguchi Y, Aoki Y, et al. (2016) Do Physical Symptoms Predict the Outcome of Surgical Fusion in Patients with Discogenic Low Back Pain? Asian Spine J 10(3): 509-515.
- Staartjes VE, Vergroesen PA, Zeilstra DJ, Schröder ML (2017) Identifying subsets of patients with single-level degenerative disc disease for lumbar fusion: the value of prognostic tests in surgical decision making. Spine J.
- Modic MT, Steinberg PM, Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Carter JR (1988) Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology 166(1 Pt 1): 193-199.
- Dudli S, Fields AJ, Samartzis D, Karppinen J, Lotz JC (2016) Pathobiology of Modic changes. Eur Spine J 25(11): 3723-3734.
- Zhang YH, Zhao CQ, Jiang LS, Chen XD, Dai LY (2008) Modic changes: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 17: 1289-1299.
- Kerttula L, Luoma K, Vehmas T, Grönblad M, Kääpä E (2012) Modic type I change may predict rapid progressive, deforming disc degeneration: a prospective 1-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J 21(6): 1135-1142.
- Luoma K, Vehmas T, Kerttula L, Grönblad M, Rinne E (2016) Chronic low back pain in relation to Modic changes, bony endplate lesions, and disc degeneration in a prospective MRI study. Eur Spine J 25(9): 2873- 2881.
- Laustsen AF, Azeddine RB (2016) Do Modic changes have an impact on clinical outcome in lumbar spine surgery? A systematic literature review. Eur Spine J 25(11): 3735-3745.
- Ohtori S, Yamashita M, Yamauchi K, Inoue G, Koshi T, et al. (2010) Change in Modic type 1 and 2 signals after posterolateral fusion surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(12): 1231-1235.
- Eck JC, Sharan A, Resnick DK, Watters WC, Ghogawala Z, et al. (2014) Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 6: discography for patient selection. J Neurosurg Spine 21(1): 37-41.
- Putzier M, Streitparth F, Hartwig T, Perka CF, Hoff EK, et al. (2013) Can discoblock replace discography for identifying painful degenerated discs? Eur J Radiol 82(9): 1463-1470.
- Manchikanti L, Glaser SE, Wolfer L, Derby R, Cohen SP (2009) Systematic review of lumbar discography as a diagnostic test for chronic low back pain. Pain Physician 12(3): 541-559.
- Margetic P, Pavic R, Stancic MF (2013) Provocative discography screening improves surgical outcome. Wien Klin Wochenschr 125(19- 20): 600-610.
- Cuellar JM, Stauff MP, Herzog RJ, Carrino JA, Baker GA, et al. (2016) Does provocative discography cause clinically important injury to the lumbar intervertebral disc? A 10-year matched cohort study. Spine J 16(3): 273-280.
- Carragee EJ, Don AS, Hurwitz EL, Cuellar JM, Carrino JA, et al. (2009) 2009 ISSLS Prize Winner: Does discography cause accelerated progression of degeneration changes in the lumbar disc: a ten-year matched cohort study. Spine 34(21): 2338-2345.
- Zeilstra DJ, Schröder ML (2014) Results of Surgery in Back Pain in 262 Patients with Two to Nine Years of Follow-Up. The Spine 14(11 Suppl): S104.
- Berg S (2011) On total disc replacement. Acta Orthop Suppl 82(343): 1-29.
- Mannion AF, Brox JI, Fairbank JC (2016) Consensus at last! Long-term results of all randomized controlled trials show that fusion is no better than non-operative care in improving pain and disability in chronic low back pain. Spine J 16(5): 588-590.
- Mannion AF, Brox JI, Fairbank JC (2013) Comparison of spinal fusion and nonoperative treatment in patients with chronic low back pain: long-term follow-up of three randomized controlled trials. Spine J 13(11): 1438-1448.