A Green Misconception: The Real Impact and Role of Ruminants on Greenhouse Gases
Güler Yenice*
Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Ataturk University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Turkey
Submission:July 09, 2024; Published:July 24, 2024
*Corresponding author: Güler Yenice, Ataturk University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey
How to cite this article: Güler Y. A Green Misconception: The Real Impact and Role of Ruminants on Greenhouse Gases. Dairy and Vet Sci J. 2024;16(5): 555948DOI: 10.19080/JDVS.2024.16.555948
Abstract
Carbon emissions, primarily from burning fossil fuels, deforestation, industrial processes, agriculture, and waste management, are the main drivers of climate change, air pollution, and ecosystem disruption. Energy production is the largest contributor, followed by agriculture, forestry, and land use changes. Ruminants significantly contribute to methane emissions. However, the contribution of methane emissions to global greenhouse gases is relatively low, and the share of ruminants within this is also minimal. Methane has a much shorter atmospheric lifetime than carbon dioxide. Certainly, research on the effective and continuous reduction of methane production in ruminants must persist. Achieving this goal will enhance livestock productivity and mitigate the environmental impact of methane emissions from ruminants.
Keywords:Global warming; Greenhouse gases; Methane Emission; Ruminant
Abbreviations:EPA: Environmental Protection Agency; IPCC: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; FAO: Food and Agriculture Organization; GHG: Greenhouse Gas
Introduction
Global warming, one of the most critical and concerning repercussions of climate change worldwide, is presently on the agenda as a natural calamity. Global warming refers to the increase in temperature on Earth’s surface induced by the greenhouse effect caused by gases emitted into the atmosphere due to numerous activities. The greenhouse gas (GHG) effect is a natural phenomenon that maintains the planet’s temperature. As the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere increases, they reach levels higher than natural processes can handle and trap more heat than safe levels, causing climate change [1,2]. These gases, known as greenhouse gases, include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), ozone (O3), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrous oxide (N2O), water vapor (H2O), and halocarbons (such as chlorofluorocarbons-CFCs) [3]. These gases’ contribution to global warming varies according to their atmospheric concentration and ability to absorb infrared light [4]. The climate impacts of products/services are generally expressed as CO2-equivalents using 100-year global warming potentials [5]. According to the breakdown of global emissions, measured based on carbon dioxide-equivalents (CO2e) in 2022, CO2 accounts for 75.01% of greenhouse gas emissions, followed by CH4(19.47%) and N2O (5.51%) [4,6].
However, methane is a significantly more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide in terms of its warming potential. Over a 100-year timescale, one ton of methane causes 28 times more warming than one ton of CO2. Also, N2O causes 273 times more warming. With this, methane is a short-lived greenhouse gas, with an average atmospheric lifetime of around 12 years, in contrast to CO2, which can persist for centuries or even millennia. [4] Carbon dioxide emissions have increased substantially during the last 70 years. According to reports, fossil CO2 emissions in 2021 are 5.1% higher than in 2020. However, they are expected to stay stable, albeit at a relatively high level, during the following decades [7,8]. Carbon emissions refer to releasing carbon, especially CO2, into the atmosphere. This process primarily occurs due to the burning of fossil fuels, deforestation, industrial processes, agriculture, and waste management [5,6]. Carbon emissions led to significant environmental and health issues, including climate change with severe weather events, melting polar ice, and rising sea levels; air pollution causing respiratory and cardiovascular diseases; ocean acidification harming marine life; and ecosystem disruptions affecting biodiversity, agriculture, and food security [9,10,11]. Methane emissions primarily originate from agriculture, fossil fuel production, and waste management. Ruminant livestock, such as cattle, goats, and sheep, produce methane through enteric fermentation. Rice cultivation contributes to methane emissions through methanogenesis in waterlogged paddy fields. Biomass burning, including the incomplete combustion of woodlands, savannas, and agricultural waste, also produces methane. Additionally, methane is released from the decomposition of organic waste in landfills and during oil and gas extraction, often termed ‘fugitive emissions’ [12,13]. Ruminant animals contribute about 16% of the world’s total methane emissions. Beef cattle are responsible for 35% of the total methane emissions from livestock, while dairy cattle account for 30% [14].
Global GHG emissions originate from a wide range of sectors, with energy production leading the way. Energy production accounts for 73.2% of greenhouse gas emissions, with industry at 24.2%, transportation at 16.2%, buildings at 17.5%, other fuel combustion at 7.8%, fugitive emissions from energy production at 5.8%, and agriculture and fishing at 1.7%. The share of industry in greenhouse gases is 5.2% (chemicals 2.2% and cement 3%), the share of waste is 3.2%, and the share of agriculture, forestry, and land use is 18.4%. The share of livestock and manure is only 5.8% worldwide [15].
Methane emissions from ruminants
Ruminant animals, including cattle, sheep, and goats, contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions with CH4 and CO2 [5]. Ruminants produce methane during their digestive process through fermentation, which is primarily expelling via eructation (belching). Additionally, the decomposition of ruminant manure further contributes to greenhouse gas emissions by producing CH4 and N2O. Emissions intensities are defined as the GHG emissions per unit weight of product (kg CO2eq/kg product). Monogastric animals have far lower emissions than ruminants. For example, for pork, it is around 2 kg CO2eq/kg, and for chicken, it is less than 1 kg CO2eq/kg, while for beef, it is 32 kg CO2eq/kg. This high value is due to methane production through ruminant fermentation) [16]. It is reported that ruminant animals are responsible for threequarters of the total CO2 equivalent (CO2-eq) emissions from the livestock sector [17]. It is estimated that cattle farming accounts for approximately 4% of global greenhouse gas emissions through methane production [18].
Numerous factors influence greenhouse gas emissions from cattle farming. The most critical elements in this regard are dietary content, feeding procedures, animal genetics, and management strategies. Enteric methane (CH4) emissions from cattle vary based on factors such as region, age, breed, and productivity. For dairy cattle, key determinants of emissions include animal size and milk production, whereas for other cattle, factors such as animal size, population structure, and production systems are crucial. For instance, the lowest emission values are observed in the smallest cattle, while the highest values are found in highly productive, commercialized dairy systems [19,20]. The type and nutritional value of the forage or feed consumed by ruminants significantly impacts the methane (CH4) they release. Methane production in ruminants is a significant concern not only due to its environmental impact but also because it leads to energy loss. The production of methane in ruminants results in the loss of 2-12% of the gross energy contained in feed [14].
A meta-analysis indicated that methane emissions from beef and dairy cattle could be mitigated through dietary (such as fat supplementation, higher starch diets, exogenous enzymes, and the use of direct fed microbials) and farm management modifications without adversely affecting production levels [26]. It is reported that total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions directly associated with livestock production in South Africa remained constant over 20 years, with the intensity of these emissions (per kilogram of animal product) decreasing by 40%, likely due to increased livestock productivity and selective breeding [18].
The contribution of ruminants to methane emissions is indisputable. However, could the role of livestock farming in greenhouse gas emissions, and hence its impact on climate change, be exaggerated? According to FAO data for 2020, due to much faster growth in other emissions, the share of agrifood system emissions in all sectors decreased from 38 to 31 percent in 2020. According to data from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), farm-gate emission intensities have exhibited a significant long-term declining trend across all commodities since 2000, with the most substantial reduction observed in cow milk, which decreased by 24 percent (1 kg CO2eq/kg) [16]. According to the data from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the annual CH₄ emission per dairy cow ranges from 58 to 128 kg. The CO2 equivalent of this amount is 1450–3200 kg annually. For other cattle, the CH₄ emission level is 27–60 kg/year, with a CO₂ equivalent of 675–1500 kg/year [27]. According to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) data, the CO2 emission of a typical passenger vehicle is 4600 kg/year [28]. Additionally, the contribution of the internet and technology sectors to greenhouse gas emissions is not negligible. It is believed that artificial intelligence technology, which has developed rapidly in recent years, can be utilized in efforts to mitigate global warming. Reports indicate that artificial intelligence has lower carbon emissions compared to humans in certain areas [29]. Nevertheless, Google reported in its 2023 sustainability report that its total greenhouse gas emissions amounted to 14.3 million metric tons of CO₂ equivalent (tCO₂e), representing a 13% increase compared to the previous year and a 48% increase relative to the baseline year of 2019[30]. Ironically, this increase is attributed to the rising energy demand driven by artificial intelligence.
Conclusion
The contribution of methane emissions to global greenhouse gases is relatively low, and the share of ruminants within this is also minimal. Although methane has a higher global warming potential compared to CO2, it is removed from the atmosphere much more quickly. Effective strategies exist to reduce methane production in ruminants, aiming to decrease energy waste and increase productivity. Considering all this, methane emissions from livestock should be viewed as the trade-off for efficiently converting high-fiber diets, unsuitable for direct human consumption, into valuable human food sources such as meat and dairy products.
References
- Jain N, Bhatia A, Pathak H, Gupta N, Sharma DK, Kaushik R (2015) Greenhouse gas emission and global warming. Introduction to Environmental Sciences 379-411.
- Wallington TJ, Srinivasan J, Nielsen OJ, Highwood EJ (2009) Greenhouse gases and global warming. Environ Ecol Chem 1: 36.
- Galashev AE, Rakhmanova OR (2013) Emissivity of the main greenhouse gases. Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry B 7: 346–353.
- Ritchie H, Rosado P, Roser M (2020) Greenhouse gas emissions. Our World in Data.
- del Prado A, Lynch J, Liu S, Ridoutt B, Pardo G, et al. (2023) Animal board invited review: Opportunities and challenges in using GWP* to report the impact of ruminant livestock on global temperature change. Animal 17(5).
- Singh H, Prasad PVV, Northup BK, Ciampitti IA, Rice CW (2023) Strategies for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural ecosystems. In Global agricultural production: Resilience to climate change. Springer pp: 409-440.
- Friedlingstein P, O’sullivan M, Jones MW, Andrew RM, et al. (2022) Global carbon budget 2022. Earth System Science Data, 14(11): 4811-4900.
- Yolcan OO (2023) World energy outlook and state of renewable energy: 10-Year evaluation. Innovation and Green Development 2(4): 100070.
- Bolan S, Padhye LP, Jasemizad T, Govarthanan M, Karmegam N, et al. (2023) Impacts of climate change on the fate of contaminants through extreme weather events. Science of The Total Environment 168388.
- Li J, Irfan M, Samad S, Ali B, Zhang Y, et al. (2023) The relationship between energy consumption, CO2 emissions, economic growth, and health indicators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20(3): 2325.
- Onoh UC, Ogunade J, Owoeye E, Awakessien S, Asomah JK (2024) Impact of Climate Change on Biodiversity and Ecosystems Services. International Journal of Geography and Environmental Management (IJGEM) 10(1): 77-93.
- Jackson RB, Saunois M, Bousquet P, Canadell JG, Poulter B, et al. (2020) Increasing anthropogenic methane emissions arise equally from agricultural and fossil fuel sources. Environmental Research Letters 15(7): 71002.
- Karakurt I, Aydin G, Aydiner K (2012) Sources and mitigation of methane emissions by sectors: A critical review. Renewable Energy 39(1): 40-48.
- Tseten T, Sanjorjo RA, Kwon M, Kim S-W (2022) Strategies to mitigate enteric methane emissions from ruminant animals. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 32(3): 269.
- Ritchie H, Roser M (2024) Sector by sector: where do global greenhouse gas emissions come from? Our World in Data.
- FAO (2022) Greenhouse gas emissions from agrifood systems Global, regional and country trends, 2000-2020. FAOSTAT Analytical Brief Series, 50: 1-12.
- Singaravadivelan A, Sachin PB, Harikumar S, Vijayakumar P, Vindhya MV, et al. (2023) Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emission from the dairy production system. Tropical Animal Health and Production 55(5): 320.
- Scholtz MM, Jordaan FJ, Thuli Chabalala N, Pyoos GM, et al. (2023) A balanced perspective on the contribution of extensive ruminant production to greenhouse gas emissions in southern Africa. African Journal of Range and Forage Science 40(1): 107-113.
- Parmesan C, Morecroft MD, Trisurat Y (2022) Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. GIEC.
- Wang Y, de Boer IJM, Persson UM, Ripoll-Bosch R, Cederberg C, et al. (2023) Risk to rely on soil carbon sequestration to offset global ruminant emissions. Nature Communications 14(1): 1-9.
- Benchaar C, Greathead H (2011) Essential oils and opportunities to mitigate enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166: 338-355.
- Mathison GW, Okine EK, McAllister TA, Dong Y, Galbraith J, et al. (1998) Reducing methane emissions from ruminant animals. Journal of Applied Animal Research 14(1): 1-28.
- Ungerfeld EM (2018) Inhibition of rumen methanogenesis and ruminant productivity: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 5: 113.
- Grainger C, Beauchemin KA (2011) Can enteric methane emissions from ruminants be lowered without lowering their production? Animal Feed Science and Technology 166: 308–320.
- Kamyab H, Saberi Kamarposhti M, Hashim H, Yusuf M (2024) Carbon dynamics in agricultural greenhouse gas emissions and removals: a comprehensive review. Carbon Letters 34(1): 265-289.
- Króliczewska B, Pecka-Kiełb E, Bujok J (2023) Strategies Used to Reduce Methane Emissions from Ruminants: Controversies and Issues. Agriculture Switzerland. 13(3).
- IPCC (2019) Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Ipcc-Nggip.Iges.or.Jp.
- EPA UEPA (2023) Emissions, Tailpipe Greenhouse Gas Vehicle, from a Typical Passenger.
- Tomlinson B, Black RW, Patterson DJ, Torrance AW (2024) The carbon emissions of writing and illustrating are lower for AI than for humans. Scientific Reports 14(1): 3732.
- Google (2024) Google 2024 Environmental Report - Google Sustainability-Targets and progress summary.