Abstract
This paper aims to provide a summary of recent insights from the empirical literature on business commitment to the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda and corporate reporting on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), with a particular focus on the European region.
Keywords:Sustainable development goals; SDGs, Reporting; 2030 agenda
Abbreviations:SCSRD: Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive; NFRD: Non-Financial Reporting Directive; ESG: Environmental Social Governance; GRI: Global Reporting Initiative
Introduction
Adopted by all United Nations (UN) Member States in September 2015, the 2030 agenda outline 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with a total of 169 targets, aiming to end poverty, protect the planet, and ensure prosperity for everyone by promoting peace, justice, and strong institutions. This agenda is characterized by a commitment to leaving no one behind, providing a comprehensive framework for global cooperation and action to create a better world by the year 2030.
Companies play a crucial role in achieving sustainable development by adopting the SDGs. This adoption is becoming an integral aspect of sustainability corporate reporting, serving as a tool to disclose information about companies’ sustainability actions, in line with the recommendation of the target 12.6.
This paper summarizes recent empirical insights on business commitment to the UN’s 2030 Agenda and corporate reporting on SDGs, focusing particularly on the European region.
SDGs Commitment and Reporting
In the years following the implementation of the 2030 Agenda, a method to assess the commitment to this Agenda and the adoption of the SDGs was to identify the presence of SDG-related information in company reports. Empirical literature shows an overall increase in the commitment of companies towards the SDGs, after 2030 Agenda approval [1,2]. SDG 8, SDG 13, and SDG 12 appear as the top three priorities goals for companies [3-7]. However, several companies worldwide still remain silent on how to incorporate SDGs in their business strategies and operation floor, suggesting that SDG reporting remains a symbolic gesture [4,8,9].
Legal and cultural systems can act as influential institutional factors on SDG business commitment and reporting [10]. Companies from civil law countries (the legal system aimed stakeholder orientation) and those operated in countries characterized by a collectivist and femininity culture (which prioritize the pursuit of the common good), such as Southern European countries, exhibited stronger involvement in the commitment to the 2030 Agenda [11]. Additionally, these countries place greater emphasis on social and environmental issues [11,12], and companies are more likely to engage in responsible corporate social responsibility (CSR) actions and demonstrate a strong interest in reporting their behaviors [13].
The 2019 UN report “The Future is Now: Science for Sustainable Development” identified the top 10 most sustainable countries, all within the European Union (EU). European countries, such as Portugal and Spain have some religious, cultural and legal characteristics, that may encourage specific commitments to the 2030 Agenda [14]. Therefore, they stood out with the highest levels of SDG commitment, within Europe region [3].
Regarding organizations factors that influence SDG reporting, [15,16] identified some main categories of determinants of SDG reporting: a) firm-level (e.g., firm size, performance, sector, etc.), b) report-level (e.g., report type, reporting framework, external assurance, etc.), governance-level (e.g. board of directors, sustainability committees, gender diversity, etc) and d) regulatory level (i.e., reporting regulations).
SDGs And European Sustainability Reporting Regulations
The EU has been notably proactive in championing sustainability and transparency in business through the establishment of a regulatory framework for the disclosure of sustainability information [17]. On December 2022, the EU introduced the Directive (EU) 2022/2464, also known as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). The CSRD builds upon the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD)- Directive 2014/95/EU, and is part of the broader EU strategy to promote sustainable finance and corporate social responsibility. The CSRD aims to align sustainability reporting with financial reporting, establishing a cohesive framework for disseminating sustainability information throughout the financial value chain in the EU. It broadens the scope to encompass all large companies and those listed on regulated EU markets, excluding micro entities. Sustainability reporting specifics will adhere to mandatory EU standards (ESRS) based on ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) criteria.
The CSRD is a regional initiative focused on improving sustainability reporting within the EU, its principles and reporting standards can be aligned with the broader global goals outlined in the 2030 Agenda.
[18] show that under the previous European reporting directive on non-financial reporting (NFRD), companies were progressively embracing SDG reporting. The CSRD stands out that “sustainability reporting standards should also take account of internationally recognized principles and frameworks on responsible business conduct, corporate social responsibility, and sustainable development, including the SDGs (par. 45, 2030 Agenda). Therefore, an increase in the disclosure of SDG-related information is expected under the new CSRD.
[18] show that under the previous European reporting directive on non-financial reporting (NFRD), companies were progressively embracing SDG reporting. The CSRD stands out that “sustainability reporting standards should also take account of internationally recognized principles and frameworks on responsible business conduct, corporate social responsibility, and sustainable development, including the SDGs (par. 45, 2030 Agenda). Therefore, an increase in the disclosure of SDG-related information is expected under the new CSRD.
Aligning SDG reporting with the ESRS requirements provides companies a key opportunity to enhance sustainability reporting, align with global goals, engage stakeholders effectively, and gain a competitive advantage in a sustainability-focused world.
Acknowledgement
The authors acknowledge the financial support of FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P., within the scope of multi-annual funding UIDB/04043/2020.
References
- Loureiro A, Monteiro S, Ribeiro V (2023) Exploring the SDGs in the Non-Financial Reporting Practices by the Largest Portuguese Companies: A Longitudinal Analysis Since the 2030 Agenda Approval. IGI Global Enhancing Sustainability Through Non-Financial Reporting, pp: 19.
- Pagès FC, Rivera, EO, Durán MC, Llopis EJ (2021) Coming in from the cold: A longitudinal analysis of SDG reporting practices by Spanish listed companies since the approval of the 2030 agenda. Sustainability 13(3): 1-27.
- Monteiro S, Esteban VA, Lemos K, Ribeiro V (2023) Are we doing the same? A worldwide analysis of SDG business practices. AIMS Environmental Science 10(4): 446-466.
- Nicolò G, Zanellato G, Tudor AT, Polcini PT (2023) Revealing the corporate contribution to sustainable development goals through integrated reporting: a worldwide perspective. Social Responsibility Journal 19(5): 829-857.
- KPMG (2022) Big shifts, small steps: The KPMG Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2020.
- Hummel K, Szekely M (2022) Disclosure on the Sustainable Development Goals–Evidence from Europe. Accounting in Europe 19(1): 152-189.
- Nichita E, Nechita E, Manea C, Manea D, Irimescu A (2020) Reporting on Sustainable Development Goals. A score-based approach with company-level evidence from Central-Eastern Europe economies. Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems 19(3): 502-542.
- Emma G, Jennifer M (2021) Is SDG reporting substantial or symbolic? An examination of controversial and environmentally sensitive industries. Journal of Cleaner Production 298: 126781.
- Waal JWHVD, Thiessens T (2020) Corporate involvement in Sustainable Development Goals: Exploring the territory. Journal of Cleaner Production 252: 119625.
- Rosati F, Faria L (2019) Addressing the SDGs in sustainability reports: The relationship with institutional factors. Journal of Cleaner Production 215: 1312-1326.
- Esteban VA, Villardón MV, Sánchez IM (2017) Cultural values on CSR patterns and evolution: A study from the biplot representation. Ecological Indicators 81: 18-29.
- Esteban VA, Villardón MG, David F (2018) Study of the Importance of National Identity in the Development of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices: A Multivariate Vision. Administrative Sciences 8(3): 50.
- Esteban VA, Sánchez IG, Villardón MG (2018) Analysing the effect of legal system on corporate social responsibility (CSR) at the country level, from a multivariate perspective. Social Indicators Research 140(1): 435-452.
- Sánchez IMG, Esteban VA, Álvarez DG (2020) Communication strategies for the 2030 agenda commitments: A multivariate approach. Sustainability 12(24): 10554.
- Datta S, Goyal S (2022) Determinants of SDG Reporting by Businesses: A Literature Analysis and Conceptual Model. Vision : The Journal of Business Perspective 30(2).
- Pizzi S, Rosati F, Venturelli A (2021) The determinants of business contribution to the 2030 Agenda: Introducing the SDG Reporting Score. Business Strategy and the Environment 30(1): 404-421.
- Sánchez IMG, Martínez EO, Hernández SM, Guzmán BA (2023) How does the European Green Deal affect the disclosure of environmental information. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 30(6): 2766-2782.
- Gazzola P, Pezzetti R, Amelio S, Grechi D (2020) Non-financial information disclosure in Italian public interest companies: A sustainability reporting perspective. Sustainability 12(15): 6063.

















