Journal of Otolaryngology | Open Access Journals

Research Article

Clinicoepidemiological Pattern of Rhinosinusitis in a University Hospital in Ekiti, Nigeria

Adegbiji Atilade Waheed¹, Aremu Shuaib Kayode²*, Akanbi Ganiyu Olusola³, Olatoke Fatai⁴ and Ajite Kayode Olumide⁵

¹ENT Department, Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Africa

²ENT Department, Federal Teaching Hospital, Ido-Ekiti, Africa

³Radiology Department, Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Africa

⁴ENT Department, Federal Medical Centre,Lokoja,Kogi State.Nigeria

⁵Opthalmology Department Ekiti state university teaching hospital, Ado-Ekiti.Nigeria

Submission: January 02, 2018; Published: January 09, 2018

*Corresponding author: Shuaib K Aremu, ENT Department, Federal Teaching Hospital, Ido-Ekiti, Africa, Tel: +23480333583842;Email: shuaib.aremu@gmail.com

How to cite this article: Adegbiji Atilade Waheed, Aremu Shuaib Kayode, Akanbi Ganiyu Olusola, Olatoke Fatai, Ajite Kayode Olumide. Clinicoepidemiological Pattern 005 of Rhinosinusitis in a University Hospital in Ekiti, Nigeria. Glob J Oto 2018; 12(4): 555847. DOI:10.19080/GJO.2018.12.555847

Abstract

Background: Rhinosinusitis is a common sinonasal disease worldwide. This study aimed at determining the epidemiological and clinical patterns of rhinosinusitis among Ekiti community in Nigeria.

Materials and Methods: This is a prospective hospital based study of rhinosinusitis in Ekiti state university teaching hospital, Ado Ekiti, Nigeria. The study was carried out in our ear, nose and throat clinic over a period two years. Detailed clinical history, examination and investigation. In this study, the symptoms-based diagnosis of rhinosinusitis was made to diagnosed and classified the participants into acute or chronic rhinosinusitis using interviewers assisted questionnaire. Data obtained were collated and analyzed using SPSS version 18.

Results: There were 523 consented patients with rhinosinusitis enrolled into the study. Prevalence in this study was 8.3%. There were 51.6% males and 48.4% females. Male to Female ratio was 1:1. Major presenting complaints were nasal discharge 79.7%, nasal obstruction/stuffiness 76.9%, and bouts of sneezing in 47.6%. Clinical findings were eodematous nasal mucosa 72.8%, enlarged turbinate 67.1% and reduced nasal patency 52.9%. Majority 77.6% were chronic rhinosinusitis while 22.4% were acute rhinosinusitis at presentation.

Quality of life is affected in 81.0% of the total studied population. They were further analyzed as sleep disturbances 37.4%, bodyache 24.5%, general health 16.1%, anxiety 12..6%, fatigue 4.8% and sexual dysfunction 7.2%. Major comorbid illnesses were nasal polyps24.8% and asthma 19.5%. Associated complications of the rhinosinusitis were mainly pharyngitis 35.1% and otitis media 31.9%. Microscopic, culture and sensitivity revealed growths of streptococcus 24.1% and Staphylococcus aureus 18.5%. The radiological (CT scan and plain x ray) findings on the paranasal sinuses revealed 86.3% different forms of abnormalities in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. These were mostly maxillary sinus. Medical therapy was offered to 76.3% while surgical therapy was offered to 23.7%. Remarkable improvement was noticed by 87.2% of the participants.

Conclusion: Rhinosinusitis is a common sinonasal disease with prevalence of 8.4% in Ekiti. The commonest type is allergic rhinosinusitis. However, this diseases impact upon the quality of life such as sleep, work, school, and so on.

Keywords: Rhinosinusitis; Allergic rhinitis; Co-morbidities; Quality of life; Lund-Mackay ct scoring

Introduction

Nose and paranasal sinuses are uppermost component of air passage encased in facial bone. The paranasal sinuses, four paired developed as out-pouches of the nasal cavities into facial bone which they bare their names. The mucosa lining of the paranasal sinuses, air filled was continuous with that of the nasal cavities through their ostia [1-3]. Rhinosinusitis is defined as inflammation of the mucosa lining of the nose and the paranasal sinuses. This disease is strictly restricted to the mucosa lining but once this mucosa lining is bridged it is said to be complicated rhinosinusitis [4,5]. This condition arises from reactive or infective agents. Reactive condition such as allergy and infective condition such as viral, bacterial and fungal [6,7]. Epidemiologically rhinosinusitis is a common household's disease worldwide. However, the prevalence varies depending on the studied population. Studies in developed countries show different prevalence of rhinosinusitis results. It is important to note that rhinosinusitis occurs worldwide and affects about 16% of the adult American population annually significantly impairing their quality of life [8,9].

Rhinosinusitis is also a very common disease in Southeast Asia and also in Latin American countries [8,9]. In the pathogenesis of rhinosinusitis the most common precursor to bacterial rhinosinusitis is the viral infection of upper respiratory tract. Rhinosinusitis may also arise from sinus obstruction from mucosal oedema following inhalation of allergens [6-8]. Superimpose bacterial or fungal infection may follows. Poor or delayed treatment, virulent microorganisms or low immune status of infected person leads to bridge of sinonasal mucosa and extension to contiguous structures. Complications such as orbital, cranial, pharyngeal, otological extension may arise. Rhinosinusitis clinical features depend on factors such as duration of illness, offending organism, associated complication. Rhinosinusitis typical clinical presentations includes nasal discharge, facial pain, nasal obstruction, itching (nose, eyes, throat, ear), excessive sneezing, smell abnormalities, headache, halitosis, hawking and symptoms of the complications [6-9].

Adequate evaluation of patients with rhinosinusitis is very crucial before treatment. It is important to identify implicating microorganisms such viral, bacterial or fungal infection. This studies determined appropriate antibiotics to be administered [10,11]. The extent and level of extension of the rhinosinusitis in the nose and paranasal sinuses with their surrounding organ can be determined by appropriate imaging. They range from simple, cheap, and less diagnostic value plain x ray to most expensive, and more diagnostic value such as computerized tomographic (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [12]. Radiological examination is of great importance in surgical planning of the patients. To determine extent and type of sinonasal surgery to be employed. Rhinosinusitis despite been common in our environment like other parts of the world, there is paucity of literature on this subject in Nigeria from Ekiti, South West Nigeria. The otorhinolaryngologist must note that more advanced rhinosinusitis cases are likely to present to the primary care physician before referral to the specialist in bad shape. This study aimed at determining the epidemiological and clinical patterns of rhinosinusitis among the Ekiti community, south west Nigeria.

Materials and Methods

This is a prospective study of the patients with clinical diagnosis of rhinosinusitis seen, reviewed and managed in the Ear, Nose and Throat department of the Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ado Ekiti, Nigeria. This is the only state owned tertiary health facility serving over two millions populations. The study was carried out over a period of two years (from February 2015 to January 2017). All consecutive patients who presented to the department were enrolled into the study. Ethical clearance was sought for and obtained from the ethical committee of the hospital. Informed consent was obtained from patients/guardian/parents before patients were enrolled into the study. These consented patients were then prospectively studied. Interviewer assisted questionnaire were given to consented patient to obtain detailed history on biodata, and occupation. Detailed otorhinolaryngological history was taken from the patient/guardian/parents. Detailed history on possible aetiological and predisposing factor for rhinosinusitis was taken. Past medical, surgical, family and social history were taken. General physical and systemic examination was performed.

Thorough nose, ear, throat, head and neck examination were done and documented. Thorough rhinological examination includes anterior rhinoscopy, nasal cavity and posterior rhinoscopy with nasoendoscopy. Oropharyngeal examination performed and findings were documented. Sinonasal discharge was aseptically taken examined and sent for microscopy, culture, and sensitivity. Further investigations such as x ray, computerized tomographic scan of the paranasal sinuses were requested based on clinical findings. Lund-Mackay ct Scoring was applied on rhinosinusitis on the paranasal sinuses CT scans for the disease severity or presurgical evaluation. The right or left sinuses were respectively divided into six portions, including maxillary sinus, anterior ethmoid sinuses, posterior ethmoid sinuses, sphenoid sinus, frontal sinus, and ostiomeatal complex. The severity of sinus mucosal inflammation or fluid accumulation for the above six portions were unilaterally and bilaterally summed to respectively give separate unilaterally and bilaterally total Lund-Mackay ct Scoring values.

All the patients were educated based on the findings and the line of management of rhinosinusitis. Patient were then managed medically, surgically or combined. The patient's treatments were determined by the findings. Participant was followed up in the ear, nose and throat clinic for possible outcome and complications. In this study we adopted the symptoms-based diagnosis of rhinosinusitis was made. Whenever the patients had 2 major symptoms or 1 major and 2 minor symptoms diagnosis of rhinosinusitis was made.. The 4 major rhinosinusitis symptoms were nasal obstruction/blockage/congestion, nasal discharge (anterior/posterior or postnasal drip, which may be purulent), facial pain/pressure (forehead/nasal/eye), and reduction or loss of smell. The minor rhinosinusitis symptoms were headaches, fever (other than acute rhinosinusitis), halitosis, fatigue, dental pain, cough, and ear pain/pressure/fullness, besides nasal endoscopy and/or computerized tomographic scan 6. All data obtained were documented, collated and analysed. The data analysis was done by using SPSS version 18. The analyzed data were expressed by simple descriptive methods, tables, bar chart and pie chart.

Results

A total 4341 patients were seen in ear, nose and throat clinic over same period. There were 523 consented patients with diagnosis of rhinosinusitis that met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled into the study. The prevalence of rhinosinusitis in this study was 8.3%. There were 270 (51.6%) males and 253 (48.4%) females. Male to Female ratio was 1:1. Table 1 showed the age group distribution of the patients. They are evenly represented with peak age group at third decade (21-30). Major presenting complaints were 417 (79.7%) catarrh/rhinorrhea/nasal discharge, 402 (76.9%) nasal obstruction/stuffiness and 249 (47.6%) bouts of sneezing. Less common presenting complaints were 58 (11.1%) halitosis and 92 (17.6%) snoring. This is illustrated in Figure 1. On clinical examination of the nose the major findings were bluish edematous nasal mucosa 381 (72.8%), enlarged turbinate 351 (67.1%) and reduced nasal patency 277 (52.9%). Figures 2 & 3 illustrated the presenting signs of the patients.

Majority 406 (77.6%) of the patients presented at hospital as chronic rhinosinusitis after three months of onset of symptoms. Then 117 (22.4%) others presented as acute rhinosinusitis before three months usually less than 6 weeks for acute. Rhinosinusitis in this study has resulted in affectation of quality of life in 424 (81.0%) of the studied population. This is showed in Tables 2 & 3. The pattern of quality of life affected were: sleep disturbances 196 (37.4%), bodyache 128 (24.5%), general health 84 (16.1%), psychological disorders 32 (6.2%), social functioning 169 (32.4%), changes in mood 71 (13.5%), depression 41 (7.8%), anxiety 66 (12.6%), fatigue 25 (4.8%) and sexual dysfunction 38 (7.2%). Major comorbid illnesses among the studied population were nasal polyps 130 (24.8%) and asthma 102 (19.5%). Less common comorbid illnesses were diabetes mellitus 9 (1.7%) and hypertension 7 (1.4%) (Table 2).

Associated complications of the rhinosinusitis among the studied population were mainly pharyngitis 184 (35.1%) and otitis media 167 (31.9%) Less common complications seen were orbital complication (cellulitis) 35 (6.7%) and bronchopneumonia 38 (7.2%). This is illustrated in Table 4. Microscopic, culture and sensitivity was requested for participants when based on patient's condition. There was no growth in 9 (1.7%) of the nasal mucous taken. There were growths of streptococcus so 126 (24.1%), Staphylococcus aureus 97 (18.5%) and Hemophilus influenzae 61 (11.7%) were recorded. In this study of rhinosinusitis radiologic request were made based on the patient's condition. This included x-rays and CT scan only 353 (67.4%) had radiological examination done, while 170 (32.6%) could not. The radiological findings on the paranasal sinuses were normal in 72 (13.7%) while the remaining 451 (86.3%) revealed different form of abnormalities in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses.

Nasal cavity shown enlarged turbinate and septal deviation. Paranasal sinuses revealed haziness, air-fluid levels, mucosal thickening, and polyps and so on. The orders of paranasal sinuses affectation were maxillary, ethmoid, frontal and sphenoid sinuses. This is illustrated in Table 5. Treatment offered to rhinosinusitis patients were medical, surgical or combined therapy. Medical therapy in form of was offered to 399 (76.3%) while 124 (23.7%) had surgical treatment types. Combined therapy given to 118 (22.6%) of the participants. Remarkable improvement was noticed by 456 (87.2%) of the studied population while the remaining do not noticed remarkable improvement following one week therapy.

Discussion

Rhinosinusitis is a very common sinonasal disease seen in Otorhinolaryngological practice worldwide, and Ekiti community is not excluded. This disorder is characterized by inflammation of the mucosa of the nose and paranasal sinuses. The prevalence of rhinosinusitis of 8.3% is very low compared to findings among Caucasians [13,14]. Rhinosinusitis has no predilection for age but the peak age group was 21 to 30 years age group. This modal age group for rhinosinusitis coincides with active and very productive age group. It was also noticed that the lowest prevalence in this study was at the extreme of age groups. This may likely be due to underdevelopment of the sinuses in ages 1 to 10 years. Elderly adaptation to chronic rhinosinusitis may be a factor to their low presentation in this study. In clinical presentation of rhinosinusitis the major presentation in this study was rhinorrhea over other presenting complaints. This finding is different from findings in other research work [15].

On nasal examination, oedematous nasal mucosa was also the commonest nasal findings. This is as a result of inflammatory reaction of sinonasal mucosa to the offending agent. This study revealed allergic rhinosinusitis as the commonest, followed by infective rhinosinusitis as the cause of rhinosinusitis in this study. Allergic rhinosinusitis is recurrent, chronic, runs in the family and non-communicable as in previous study [16]. This study further revealed chronic rhinosinusitis to be commoner than acute rhinosinusitis as found in previous study. This may be due to common cases of poorly treated acute rhinosinusitis, high prevalence of allergic. Commonest comorbid illnesses associated with rhinosinusitis in this study were asthma and nasal polyps. Asthma may be as a result of similar IgE hypersensitivity reaction like allergic rhinosinusitis. Nasal polyp's cause's mucous stasis with subsequent infection leads to or worsen rhinosinusitis. Pharyngeal extension of rhinosinusitis leads to the commonest pharyngeal complication seen in this study and previous study [17].

This study revealed affectation of quality of life of rhinosinusitis sufferers with affectation of all aspect of life. Majority of the studied population had sleep disturbances and social functioning. This is resultant effect of the symptomatology of nasal blockage/stuffiness, nasal discharge and bout of sneezing. Some studies revealed similar findings [17-24]. The commonest microorganism's growth recorded in this study was Streptococcus sp. This is different from growth recorded in other studies [25-30]. Radiological findings on nasal cavity revealed erection and enlargement of turbinate's leading to blockage of the ostia of the paranasal sinuses. Furthermore maxillary sinus was found to be the most commonly affected of the four sinuses. This is similar to findings in previous studies [31-38].

In this study all patients had initial medical treatment to eliminate infection or any offending agent and restoration of function. Medical management involves the use of steam inhalation, systemic antibiotics, nasal steroid spray, systemic decongestant, topical nasal decongestants, and analgesics. When medical intervention failed to cure or there was residual pathology, surgical management is indicated. The surgery involves removal of the pathology and restoration of sinuses drainage. Majority of the studied population responded to medical treatment while few had surgical intervention and this finding is similar to the results of other studies [39-47].

Conclusion

In rhinosinusitis majority of cases present as chronic diseases in the study population. This condition usually has comorbid illnesses, complications and affects quality of life of the patients at presentation. Difficult or complicated cases should be promptly referred to Otorhinolaryngologist for early intervention.