The Role of the Advanced Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) in the Management of Stage IV Colorectal Cancer
Elroy Patrick Weledji*
Department of Surgery, University of Buea, Cameroon
Submission: May 08, 2017; Published: August 09, 2017
*Corresponding author: Elroy Patrick Weledji, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, PO Box 126, Limbe, S.W. Region, Cameroon, Tel: 237 699922144; Email: elroypat@yahoo.co.uk
How to cite this article: Elroy P W. The Role of the Advanced Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) in the Management of Stage IV Colorectal Cancer. Adv Res Gastroentero Hepatol 2017; 6(4): 555692. 10.19080/ARGH.2017.06.555692
Abstract
A proficient advanced multidisciplinary team (MDT) in the management of stage IV colorectal cancer consists of a colorectal surgeon, liver surgeon, thoracic surgeon, medical and radiation oncologist, radiologist, nuclear medicine physician, pathologist and nurse counsellor. Its role in the management of stage IV colorectal cancer is reviewed.
Keywords: Advanced multidisciplinary team, Synchronous colorectal liver metastases, Surgery, Systemic therapy, Ablation
Abbreviations: CRCL: Colorectal Cancer; CRCLM: Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases; MDT: Multidisciplinary Team; Bcrlm: Bilobar Colorectal Liver Metastases; CT: Computed Tomography; Mrimagnetic Resonance Imaging; PET: Positron Emission Tomography; FOLFOX: Folinic Acid Plus Fluorouracil Plus Oxaliplatin; FOLFIRI: Folinic Acid Plus Fluorouracil Plus Irinotecan; XELOX: Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin SIRT: Selective Internal Radiotherapy; TACE: Transarterial Chemoembolization
Introduction
Colorectal cancer CRC has become the third most common malignancy world- wide and fourth for cancer mortality [1]. At CRC diagnosis, 20-25% of patients have stage IV disease in which synchronous CRC liver metastases CRCLM are present in 15-25% of cases. Metastases are confined to the liver in 7080% of these cases [2]. CRLM is defined as liver metastases detected at or before diagnosis of the primary CRC. Early and late metachronous metastases aredefined as those detected <12 months and >12months after surgery, respectively. The reported percentage of synchronous CRLM is increasing compared with metachronous metastases, probably due to improved imaging techniques leading to earlier diagnosis. The 5-year survival rates were shorter with synchronous than with metachronous metastases 3.3% vs 6.1% [3-6], but some studies showed no significant difference [7,8]. However, synchronous CRCLM have less favourable cancer biology and expected survival than metachronous corroborated by the latter being slow-growing and its later presentation [3,5,6]. The TNM staging system does not adapt to recent advances in metastatic treatment. For example, the survival of a patient with resectable solitary liver metastasis N0/N1 M1 is better than that of a patient with pericolictumour deposit with nodal N2/3 M0 disease [4]. Presumably, tumour lymphatic spread may be more disseminating than portal venous spread. Surgical resection is the most effective treatment approach for CRCLM with an overall survival of about 40% in 5 years, but only a minority of patients are suitable for upfront surgery [4,7-9,10]. In addition, up to 90% of patients with hepatic metastases have irresectable disease at the time of presentation [4,5-9].
Discussion
The advanced MDT
By bringing together all the relevant specialties involved in colorectal metastatic disease management in an advanced MDT meeting in a centralized high volume liver cancer surgery unit, the management of patients with stage IV colorectal cancer would be optimized [4]. The advanced MDT would avoid the delay in decision making and management and thus disease progression when these patients are otherwise referred to the appropriate subspecialty discipline involved with metastatic disease. It provides coordination, continuity of care, better patient care, cost effectiveness, decrease length of hospital stay, decrease postoperative mortality and a trend towards higher survival rates [4,11,12]. The utilization of protocols, appropriate preparation of patients, audit and trial recruitments are optimized [4]. The advanced MDT in stage IV colorectal cancer essentially consists of the liver surgeon, colorectal surgeon, thoracic surgeon, radiologist, medical oncologist, clinical oncologist, interventional radiologist, pathologist, nurse specialist, nurse counselor and the patient. To provide information on potential curability the use of high-quality contrast-enhanced computed tomography CT before chemotherapy is recommended. Magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly being used preoperatively to aid detection of sub-centimetric metastases, and alongside CT in difficult situations. To evaluate operability, radiology would provide information on nodule size and number, segmental localization and relationship with major vessels, response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, non-tumoral liver condition and anticipated remnant liver volume. Positron emission tomograophy PET and PET/CT may offer additive information in detecting extrahepatic disease which may either call the attention of other specialists particularly the thoracic surgeon for lung metastases which are usually amenable to ablative therapy after liver resection, being of more favourable biology than liver metastases, or suggest palliative treatment only [4,13,14]. Although the treatment strategy depends on the clinical scenario, the disease being systemic dictates for chemotherapy before surgery in most cases [15]. In patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases progression- free survival is increased with the addition of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy [16]. The addition of biologic agents, antibodies specific to the epidermal growth factor receptor important in cellular growth, proliferation and programmed cell death cetuximab and the key mediator of angiogenesis - vascular endothelial growth factor bevacizumab, enhance the response to conventional chemotherapy and have become the standard of care for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer They, however, lack proven benefit as adjuvant treatment of primary colon cancer [4,10,17-19]. The addition of cetuximab results in an overall survival advantage in patients with advanced disease who have the KRAS exon 2 wild-type tumour genotype [20,21].
Decision- making
The diagnosis and decision making on the management of resectable, borderline resectable or non-resectable disease is expedited in the advanced MDT. When the primary CRC is asymptomatic, liver surgery may be performed first in resectable liver metastases reverse approach after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy [4]. The borderline resectable disease will require induction chemotherapy and restaged whereas the non- resectable will usually undergo palliative or best supportive treatment. However, modern neoadjuvantoxaliplatin-based chemotherapy [16] and a combination with targeted biologic therapy [15-22] can downstage irresectable disease and enable surgery in up to 38% of patients [23]. There is, however, decreased overall survival in these patients [24]. Initial long-term results of 'rescue surgery' in the irresectable group compared favourably with those for patients with resectable metastases at the time of presentation [25-27]. However, the recurrence rate among patients who had neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for initially irresectable liver metastases was extremely high, although re-resection is attempted whenever feasible [27]. When offering multiple chemotherapy the medical oncologist decides which combination and sequence to use after full discussion of the side effects with the patient [4,10]. One of the following sequences is considered: FOLFOX folinic acid plus fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin as first line treatment then single agent irinotecan as second-line treatment or FOLFOX as first- line treatment then FOLFIRI folinic acid plus fluorouracil plus irinotecan as second-line treatment or XELOX capecitabine plus oxaliplatin as first-line treatment then FOLFIRI as second line treatment [28-30]. Radiological evaluation should assess response to preoperative chemotherapy for both the primary tumour and metastases, and provide information on the tumour, margin size and micrometastases. Hepatic resection is not denied to patients with stable disease after optimal chemotherapy, provided an adequate liver remnant with inflow and outflow preservation remains [27]. As a complete radiological response does not signify a complete pathological response liver resection should include all the sites of a tumour detected prior to systemic treatment [4,27].
Resection of the primary tumour in patients with stage IV cancer is often performed to deal with presenting primary tumour symptoms and to prevent further primary tumour complications such as obstruction, major bleeding, pain and side effects related to novel targeted therapy bleeding and perforation [4]. Conversely, the new-generation systemic therapy in combination with targeted therapy is associated with response rates of 40-60% [4-10]. By not only reducing the size of metastatic lesions, the shrinking of the primary tumour may reduce local complications, such as bowel obstruction. In addition, complications after resection of a primary tumour such as an anastomotic leak, may delay or prevent initiation of systemic therapy. Whether resection of the primary tumour improves disease control by reducing tumour bulk remains unknown [31-34]. Minor liver resections 2 segments or less may be safely performed at the same time as colorectal resection [35] Liver resection in slow responders requiring 12 or more chemotherapy cycles and portal vein occlusion to achieve respectability, is associated with poor short and long-term outcome [5,35,36]. This is due to the impaired general status of these patients, their damaged underlying parenchyma from prolonged chemotherapy chemotherapy-associated steatohepatitis and the technical challenge in obtaining adequate curative resection [37]. Thus the benefit of the more conservative parenchymal sparing approach especially with the background knowledge of the 20% recurrence rate even after anatomical resection in these patients [38]. The combined approach of resection and ablation techniques to bilobar colorectal liver metastases bCRLM results in less morbidity than two or more hepatic resections [39-41]. Recurrent liver metastases after resection are re-resected if technically feasible or ablated radiofrequency/microwave thermal, selective internal radiotherapy SIRT, transarterial chemoembolization TACE by the interventional radiologist, and have similar long-term survival as first liver resection [42]. Third time resection may also provide long-term benefit and so these patients can now live with their cancer if the tumour biology is favourable [27,43,44].
Conclusion
The management of stage IV colorectal cancer by the advanced MDT is considered from the diagnosis to the last treatment. From all the levels of evidence, the impact of the advanced MDT consensus on the management of the four clinical scenarios of stage IV colorectal cancer are as follows: 1 For the asymptomatic CRC and resectable synchronous CRLM, chemotherapy is first with or without radiotherapy, followed either by surgery in a one- stage procedure for patients with limited hepatic disease and easy to resect primary tumour or by staged surgery for other patients. Ongoing trials may provide evidence for chemotherapy first as opposed to colon resection first. 2 For asymptomatic CRC and non-resectable synchronous CRLM, the consensus is for optimal chemotherapy first, with the aim of making the liver metastasesresectable. This would then be followed by hepatic surgery and resection of the primary tumour; 3 For symptomatic CRC and resectable synchronous CRLM, recommendations are for resection of the primary tumour for perforated or occlusive tumours but not for tumours with bleeding causing anaemia, followed by chemotherapy and then surgery for liver metastases; 4 For symptomatic CRC and non-resectable synchronous CRLM, recommendations are for resection of the primary tumour for perforated or occlusive tumours , followed by chemotherapy and then surgery for liver metastases if tumour shrinkage is achieved. For tumours with bleeding causing anaemia, induction chemotherapy is recommended to downsize both the primary tumour and liver metastases, followed by surgery at the site with the most significant tumour load usually the liver; i.e. reverse approach. The advanced MDT thus optimizes the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases CRCLM.
Acknowledgement
I acknowledge the British Association of Surgical Oncology BASO Ronald Raven travelling fellowship 2016/17 award to the Aintree Hepatobiliarycentre which enabled the writing of this mini review. I also acknowledge Prof Graeme Poston of the Aintreehepatobiliarycentre for supervising my fellowship at the centre.
References
- World Health Organization Agency for Research on cancer (2012) GlOBOCAN 2012: Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012.
- Lykoudis PM, O'Reilly D, Nastos K, Fusai G (2014) Systematic review of surgical management of synchronous colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 101(6): 605-612.
- Manfredi S, Lepage C, Hatem C, Coatmeur O, Faivre J, et al. (2006) Epidemiology and management of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 244(2): 254-259.
- Adam R, de Gramont A, Figueras J, Kokudo N, Kunstlinger F, et al. (2015) Management synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer : A multidisciplinary international consensus. Cancer Treatment Reviews 49(1): 729-741."
- Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Nordlinger B, Arnold D (2014) Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 25(Suppl 3): iii1-9.
- Simmonds PC, Primrose JN, Colquitt JL, Garden OJ, Poston GJ, et al. (2006) Surgical resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review of published studies. Br J Cancer 94: 982-999.
- Wang X, Hershman DL, Abrams JA, Feingold D, Grann VR, et al. (2007) Predictors of survival after hepatic resection among patients with colorectal liver metastasis. Br J Cancer 97(12): 1606-1012.
- Yin Z, Liu C, Chen Y, Bai Y, Shang C, et al. (2013) Timing of hepatectomy in resectable synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCRLM): simultaneous or delayed ? Hepatology 57(6): 2346-2357.
- Cummings IC, Payes JD, Cooper GS (2007) Survival after hepatic resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Cancer 109(4): 718-726.
- Nordlinger B, Van Cutsem E, Gruenberger T, Glimelius B, Poston G, et al. (2009) Combination of surgery and chemotherapy and the role of targeted agents in the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases: recommendations from an expert panel. Ann Oncol 20(6): 985-992.
- Vigano I, Langella S, Ferrero A, Russolillo N, Sperti E, et al. (2013) Colorectal cancer with synchronous resectable liver metastases: monocentric management in in a hepatobiliary referral center improves survival outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 20(3): 938-945.
- Prades J, Remue E, van Hoof E, Borras JM (2015) Is it worth reorganising cancer services on the basis of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs)? A systematic review of the objectives and organisation of MDTs and their impact on patient outcomes. Health Policy 119(4): 464-474.
- Scharitzer M, Ba-Ssalamah A, Ringl H, Kolblinger C, Grunberger T, et al. (2013) Preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases: comparison between gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0-T MRI and contrast- enhanced MDCT with histopathological correlation. Eur Radiol 23(8): 2187-2196.
- Bipat S, van Leeuwen MS, Comans EF, PijiME,Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH, et al. (2005) Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis- meta-analysis. Radiology 237(1): 123-131.
- Lehmann K, Rickenbacher A, Weber A, Pestalozzi BC, Clavien PA (2012) Chemotherapy before Liver resection of colorectal metastases: friend or foe? Ann Surg 255(2): 237-247.
- Sanoff HK, Sargent DJ, Campbell ME, Morton RF, Fuchs CS, et al. (2008) Five-year data and prognostic factor analysis of oxaliplatin and irinotecan combinations for advanced colorectal cancer: N9741. J ClinOncol 26(35): 5721-5727.
- Primrose J, Falk S, Finch-Jones M, Valle J, O'Reilly D, Siriwardena A, et al. (2014) Systemic chemotherapy with or without cetuximab in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases/The New EPOC randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15(6): 601-611.
- McCahill IE, Yothers G, Sharif S, Petrelli NJ, Lai LL, et al. (2012) Primary mFOLFOX6 plus bevcizumab without resection of the primary tumor for patients presenting with surgically unresectable metastatic colon cancer and an intact asymptomatic colon cancer; definitive analysis of NSABP trial C-10. J Clin Oncol 30(26): 3223-3228.
- Nordlinger B, Poston GJ, Goldberg RM (2015) Should the Results of the New EPOC Trial Change Practice in the Management of patients with resectablemetastatic colorectal cancer confined to the liver? J Clin Oncil 3: 241-243
- Primrose J, Falk S, Finch-Jones M (2015) A randomized clinical trial of chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy in combination with cetuximab in k-RAS wild type patients with operable metastases from colorectal cancer: The new EPOC study. J Clin Oncol 31(Suppl 15): 3504.
- Kohne C-H, Bokemeyer C, Heeger S, Rougier P, Van Cutsem E (2011) Efficacy of chemotherapy pluscetuximab according to metastatic site in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of CRYSTAL and OPUS studies. Ann Oncol 4(6): 1017-1024.
- Bismuth H, Adam R, Levi F, Farabos C, Waechter F, et al. (1996) Resection of non-resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg 224(4): 509-522.
- Giachetti S, Itzzhaki M, Gruia G, Adam R, Zidani R, et al. (1999) Longterm survival of patients with unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases following infusional chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and surgery. Ann Surg 10(6): 663-669.
- Adam R, Delvart V, Pascal G, Valaenu A, Castaing D, et al. (2004) Rescue surgery for unresectable colorectal liver metastases downstaged by chemotherapy: a model to predict long-term survival. Ann Surg 240(4): 644-658.
- Adam R, Avisar E, Ariche A, Giachetti S, Azoulay D, et al. (2001) Five- year survival following hepatic resection after neoadjuvant therapy for nonresectable liver metastases. Ann SurgOncol 8: 347-353.
- Choti MA, Sitzmann JV, Tiburi MF, Sumetchotimetha W, Rangsinn R, et al. (2002) Trends in long-term survival following liver resection for hepatic colorectal metastases. Ann Surg 235(6): 759-766.
- Capussotti L, Muratore A, Mulas MM, Massucco P, Aglietta M (2006) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection for initially irresectable colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 93(8): 1001-1006.
- Sorbye H, Mauer M, GruenbergerT, Glimelius B, Poston GJ, et al. (2012) Predictive factors for the benefit of perioperative FOLFOX for resectable liver metastasis in colorectal cancer patientrs (EORTC Intergroup Trial 40983). Ann Surg 255: 237-247.
- Loupakis F, Cremolini C, Masi G, Lonardi S, Zagonel V, et al. (2014) Initial therapy with FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Eng J Med 371: 1609-16018.
- http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg131/chapter/guidance
- Rojas Llimpe FL, Di Fabio F, Ercolani G, Giampalma E, Cappelli A, et al. (2014) Imaging in resectable colorectal liver metastasis patients with or without preoperative chemotherapy: results of the PROMETEO-01 study. Br J Cancer 111(4): 667-673.
- Ahmed S, Shahid RK, Leis A, Haider K, Kanthan S, et al. (2013) Should noncurative resection of the primary tumourbe performed in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis. CurrOncol 20: 420-441.
- Damjanov N, Weiss J, Haller DG (2009) Resection of the primary colorectal cancer is not necessary in nonobstructed patients with metastatic disease. Oncologist 14(10): 11-24.
- Kim YW, Kim IY (2013) The role of surgery for asymptomatic primary tumours in unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer. Annals of Coloproctology 29 (2): 44-54.
- Adams RB, Aloia TA, Loyer E, Pawlik TM, Taouli B, et al. (2013) Selection for hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases: expert consensus statement. HPB 15(2): 91-103.
- Reddy SK, Pawlik TM, Zorzi D, Gleisner AL, Ribero D, et al. (2007) Simultaneous resections of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases: a multi-institutional analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 14(12): 3481-3491.
- Cauchy F, Aussilhou B, Dokmak S, Fuks D, Gaujoux S, et al. (2012) Reappraisal of the risks and benefits of major liver resection in patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Annals Surgery 256(5): 746-754.
- Gold JS, Are C, Kornprat P, Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, et al. (2008) Increased use of parenchymal-sparing surgery for bilateral liver metastases from colorectal cancer is associated with improved mortality without change in oncologic outcome: Trends in treatment overtime in 440 patients. Ann Surg 247(1): 109-117.
- Weledji EP, Ngounou E (2016) The impact of segmental anatomy on hepatic oncologic resection. Current Surgery Reports 4: 4.
- Pawlik TM, Izzo F, Cohen DS, Morris JS, Curley SA (2003) Combined resection and radiofrequency ablation for advanced hepatic malignancies: Results in 172 patients. Ann SurgOncol 10(9): 10591069.
- Elias DE, Santoro R, Quellet JF (2002) Simultaneous percutaneous right portal vein embolization and left liver tumour radiofrequency ablation prior to a major right hepatic resection for bilateral colorectal metastases. Hepatogastroenterology 51: 1788-1791.
- Stattner S, Jones RP, Yip VS, Buchanan K, Poston GJ, et al. (2013) Microwave ablation with or without resection for colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 39(8): 844-849
- Adam R, Pascal G, Azoulay D, Tanaka K, Castaing D, et al. (2003) Liver resection for colorectal metastases: the third hepatectomy. Ann Surg 238(6): 871-883.
- Wyld L, Audisio RA, Poston GJ (2015) The evolution of cancer surgery and future perspectives. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 12(2): 115-124.