Gastroenterology Open Access Journals | Gastroenterology Journals

Research Article

Importance of Superior Rectal Artery Preservation in Videolaparoscopic Rectosigmoidectomy for Benign Disease

Doryane Maria dos Reis Lima¹*, João Paulo de Bortolli², Gustavo Kurachi³ and Univaldo Etsuo Sagae ⁴

¹Coleta de dados: João Paulo de Bortolli, Brazil

²ExecuÇão de pesquisa: Gustavo Kurachi e Univaldo Etsuo Sagae, Brazil

³RedaÇão de texto e análise estatística: Doryane Maria dos Reis Lima, Brazil

⁴Professor of the Discipline of Gastroenterology, Brazil

Submission: March 27, 2017; Published: April 07, 2017

*Corresponding author: Doryane Maria dos Reis Lima, Coieta de dados: João Pauio de Bortoiii, Univaido Etsuo Sagae Centro Universitário, FAG - Hospital São Lucas, Brazii, Tei: (45)2101-7700; Email: doryane@gmail.com

How to cite this article: JDoryane M d R L, Jo�o P d B, Gustavo K, Univaldo E S. Importance of Superior Rectal Artery Preservation in Videolaparoscopic Rectosigmoidectomy 004 for Benign Disease. Adv Res Gastroentero Hepatol 2017; 4(3): 555640.DOI:10.19080/ARGH.2017.04.555640

Abstract

Objective: Demonstrate the importance of superior rectai artery preservation in videoiaparoscopic rectosigmoidectomy for benign disease and determine the incidence of dehiscence.

Methods: Prospective study conducted by the coiorectai surgery team at Gastrociinica Cascavei on 28 patients (mean: 45.4 years) submitted to video iaparoscopic rectosigmoidectomy for benign disease between January 2010 and June 2012. The patients were treated for diverticuiar disease (n=15) and endometriosis (n=13). The surgicai approach was mediai, starting by iigating the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) in most cases. Then the IMV was dissected and the superior branch of the ieft coiic artery was iigated with a ciip, preserving the inferior branch and the SRA. Oniy the sigmoid vesseis of the area to be resected were iigated using an uitrasonic scaipei. The rectum was sectioned with a iinear stapier after dissection of the mesorectum, with care taken not to injure the SRA. After verifying the integrity of the arc of Rioian, the anastomosis was performed intra-abdominaiiy and reinforced with a doubie-iayered suture.

Results: None of our patients developed anastomotic fistula. Two patients were reoperated in the early postoperative period for other reasons. In addition, one patient presented impotence in the iate postoperative period, three patients had constipation, and one reported tenesmus for three months.

Conclusion: We demonstrated that SRA preservation during videoiaparoscopic rectosigmoidectomy for benign disease possibie to preserve the innervation and vascuiarization in the remaining coion and rectum, contributing to a iower incidence of anastomotic dehiscence.

Keywords: Coiorectai surgery; Superior rectai artery; Anastomotic dehiscence

Introduction

Videoiaparoscopic colorectal surgery has gained wide acceptance, especially in the treatment of benign conditions such as diverticular disease. Several techniques and modifications have been proposed to improve morbidity and mortality associated with left hemicolectomy, rectosigmoidectomy and sigmoidectomy [1]. Colorectal anastomotic dehiscence following these procedures significantly impact morbidity and mortality as well as treatment costs, especially in patients with benign conditions [2]. Ischemia or poor irrigation in the anastomosis is a major cause of dehiscence. Another complication worthy of mention, anterior rectal resection syndrome (ARGHS) is characterized mainly by incontinence and/or fecal urgency, soiiing, aiternating bowei function and fragmented stoois. Denervation of the distai coion segment is the main cause of ARGHS foiiowing sigmoid resection [3-6].

The risk of dehiscence may be reduced by adopting a range of techniques (e.g. protective ostomy, mechanicai stapiing, doubie-iayered suture, compression anastomosis ciips, endoiuminai compression anastomosis rings and bioabsorbabie Seamguard® rings). One such technique, superior rectai artery (SRA) preservation, has been described for patients with proximai sigmoid and descending coion cancer with adequate iymphadenectomy [7-9], aithough it is inadvisabie in oncoiogicai surgery as it reduces chances of satisfactory iymphadenectomy. SRA preservation can reduce the risk of colon denervation, favoring postoperative bowel function and avoiding ARGHS [4,5,10-13]. The superior, middle and inferior rectum is irrigated mainly by the SRA. SRA preservation also preserves pelvic circulation and innervation, with reduced risk of functional impairment (sexual, urinary, evacuatory and fertility), but in addition to prolonging surgery, the procedure requires surgical skill and detailed knowledge of local anatomy to dissect the correct layer and ligate the sigmoid branches.

Objective

To demonstrate the importance of SRA preservation in video laparoscopic recto sigmoidectomy for benign disease and determine the incidence of dehiscence.

Methods

This prospective study was conducted by the colorectal surgery team at Gastroclínica Cascavel (Paraná, Brazil) on 28 patients (23 women and 5 men) aged 28-67 years (mean: 45.4) submitted to video laparoscopic rectosigmoidectomy for benign disease between January 2010 and June 2012. The patients were treated for diverticular disease (DDC) (n=15) and endometriosis (END) (n=13). The sample did not include patients with malignancy or patients submitted to ostomy, laparotomy or conversion to laparotomy. Twelve hours prior to surgery, the patients were prepared with a phospho soda solution p.o. (3 bottles). Following surgery under general anesthesia, the patients were given ceftriaxone and metronidazole for 2 days (as prophylaxis), common pain killers, anti-inflammatory medication and heparin s.c. Five trocars were used in all procedures (3x5mm, 1x10mm, 1x10-12mm), but the configuration was different for DDC ( Figure 1 ) and END ( Figure 2 ).

The surgical approach was medial, starting by ligating the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) near the pancreas and identifying and detaching the trunk of the IMV from the descending colon and sigmoid. Then the SRA was identified as far as the branch (on the posterior rectal and mesorectal wall). Care was taken to segregate and preserve the hypogastric nerves (on the posterior wall of the image) ( Figure 3 ). Subsequently, the SRA was skeletonized and the sigmoid branches were ligated using an ultrasonic scalpel ( Figure 4 ). The IMV was not ligated due to the small size of the resection; thus, the vascular integrity of the SRA was preserved. The rectum was sectioned at the desired level, followed by double-stapled anastomosis performed intra- abdominally with a 45mm linear stapler with 1-3 cartridges and a 31 or 33mm circular stapler. This was done after verifying the integrity of the arc of Riolan, which in turn was done after sectioning the colon and during the ligation of the mesocolon when the blood flow of the terminal branches of the arc and bleeding from the colon borders to be anastomosed were verified ( Figure 5 ). An ultrasonic scalpel was used during surgery. In all patients, a double-layered suture with PDS 3.0 thread was used for reinforcement. The integrity of the anastomosis was verified with methylene blue testing and gas in sufflation, and the cavity was drained through the right iliac fossa with a Penrose drain #3.

Results

Surgery lasted 136.25min on the average, with an estimated blood loss of ~20mL (3 gauzes). Liquid diet was introduced 24 hours after the procedure and gradually changed to solid, depending on acceptance. The mean time of hospitalization was 4 days (range: 3-7) and the mean follow-up time was 30 months. The transoperative complication rate was 3.5%. In one patient the stapling of the anastomosis failed (the circular stapler was applied to the anterior quadrant), but this was immediately corrected with a manual suture using vicryl thread size 3.0. Two patients displayed paralytic ileus: one improved with clinical treatment, the other was reoperated due to a pelvic abscess without dehiscence of the anastomosis. Another early complication, enteric liquid in the Penrose drain due to accidental punctiform perforation of the small bowel with a Veress needle, required reoperation on the third postoperative day. In addition, one patient presented impotence in the late postoperative period, three patients experienced a change in bowel habit (constipation), and one complained of tenesmus for three months.

Discussion

Dehiscence or fistula of the anastomosis is a postoperative complication with severe implications for treatment, especially in patients with benign conditions such as END and DDC. In the literature, the incidence of dehiscence is 8-38% [14-16]. Dehiscence is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, time and cost of hospitalization, in addition to higher rates of reoperation, occasionally requiring stoma formation. Risk factors for dehiscence of colorectal anastomosis include comorbidities (e.g. hypertension, diabetes, nephropathy, pneumopathy), neoadjuvant therapy (chemo and/or radiotherapy) [17-21] and the surgical technique used to make the anastomosis [22-24].

ARGHS appears to be associated with descending colon denervation and sphincter dysfunction caused by hypogastric plexus lesions during rectal mobilization or direct lesions during the introduction of the circular stapler [3,4,25,26]. Such lesions have been reported with up to 90% frequency after colon and distal rectal resection [4,10,26].

The risk of dehiscence and related complications may be reduced by adopting any of several strategies, including SRA preservation. The superior, middle and inferior rectum is irrigated mainly by the SRA. By maintaining irrigation, SRA preservation significantly protects the integrity of low anastomoses in benign disease. In addition, pelvic innervation is preserved, minimizing the risk of sexual, urinary and evacuatory dysfunction. The preservation of the SRA near the colon wall also reduces the risk of colon denervation, favoring postoperative bowel function and potentially avoiding ARGHS [4,13].

In our series of patients, as a result of the extensive experience of the surgical team, dissection and ligation of the sigmoid branches were achieved successfully and the SRA was preserved. The duration of surgery matched that reported by Bergamaschi et al [27], but was shorter than that of Lehmann et al [2]. The rate of dehiscence and impotence (0.035% each) was lower in our series than in any published so far. The rates of the remaining complications, including constipation and tenesmus, were similar to those reported in the literature [2,27]. According to some authors, SRA preservation is associated with longer surgery and increased transoperative blood loss; however, in our study blood loss was similar to that reported for surgery without SRA preservation [2].

The low rate of dehiscence may be attributed to surgical skill or to the use of double-layered suture to reinforce the anastomosis. On the other hand, failure to evaluate the physiology of the pelvic floor at baseline and assign a functional score to each patient made it impossible to make inferences regarding the preservation of the innervation of the pelvic floor

Conclusion

In this study we demonstrated that SRA preservation in video laparoscopic rectosigmoidectomy for benign disease (such as DDC and END) possible to preserve the innervation and vascularization in the remaining colon and rectum, contributing to a lower incidence of anastomotic dehiscence.