Agricultural Robots in Targeted Spraying: A mini State-of-the-Art review
George Adamides*
Agricultural Research Institute, Cyprus
Submission: November 22, 2017; Published: February 06, 2018
*Corresponding author: George Adamides, Agricultural Research Institute, Cyprus, Email: gadamides@ari.gov.cy
How to cite this article: George Adamides. Agricultural Robots in Targeted Spraying: A mini State-of-the-Art review. Robot Autom Eng J. 2018; 2(2): 555581. DOI: 10.19080/RAEJ.2018.02.555581
Abstract
This article presents the most recent contributions to the field of agricultural robotics, with a focus on robot sprayers. The objective is to demonstrate the latest developments, specifically on robot sprayer systems for precision spraying (e.g. for weed control). The summary of the review shows that feasibility has been demonstrated in a number of projects with significant results especially in pesticide use reduction, with good spraying coverage for this complex agricultural task
Keywords: Agriculture; Robotics and automation; Precision spraying; Human-robot interaction
Introduction
One of the most frequent and important task in agriculture is the application of fungicides, herbicides and insecticides.It is frequent because diseases are a common occurrence on plants which affect the plant production, and it is important because it can have a significant impact on crop yield and quality. Fungicides, herbicides and insecticides are all pesticides used in plant protection. Current methods, either mechanical or manual, used for pesticide application, include human involvement. Figure 1 illustrates the excessive amount of pesticides released to the surrounding environment and the exposure of the farmers to these dangerous chemicals during the spraying process.
Robotic technology is an alternative method for spraying in agriculture, which provides multiple benefits, such as safety, sustainability and environmental impact. In terms of safety, it removes the farmer from the exposure to dangerous chemicals [1]. In addition, less pesticides means healthier food products for the consumer [2]. In terms of agriculture sustainability, robotic technology can provide a way to reduce inputs (e.g. by reducing the quantity of pesticides used) and make the most efficient usage of pesticide controls (e.g. by targeted spraying). Furthermore, targeted spraying can have a significant reduction on environmental impact [3,4], since with the current methods a major fraction of the pesticides sprayed, accumulate in the soil (i.e. soil degradation).
Robotic systems for agriculture fall under the "umbrella” of precision agriculture [5]. Many systems have been developed for various agricultural tasks such as monitoring, harvesting, spraying, weeding, cultivation, and planting [6-9]. A comprehensive review of automation and robots in agriculture [10] identifies the challenges of robotic systems in agriculture, and describes the different automation systems with application examples.
State of the Art Review
Gonzalez-de-Soto et al. [11] presented the features of a precise spraying robotized patch sprayer. The system consists of an autonomous mobile robot based on a modified commercial tractor (e.g. equipped with high-tech perception and actuation systems), a real-time machine vision system which can detect weeds, and a rapid-response spraying system. The experiments both laboratory and field tests revealed that the system can treat approximately 99.5% of the detected weeds while achieving a significant herbicide savings.
Malneršič et al. [12] evaluated a new technique for close- range air-assisted precision spot-spraying end effector. The spraying end effector was designed to enable connection to emerging agricultural robotic technology. Evaluation results showed that the spraying of the front side of the leaves was good, however the spraying on the back side of leaves surfaces should be further improved.
Oberti et al. [13], implemented a selective targeting robotic system of grapevines. The system was equipped with a manipulator which was configured to six degrees of freedom and a precision-spraying end-effector for multispectral imaging disease detection. The test results indicated a significant reduction of pesticide use from 65% to 85% (when compared to a conventional mass spraying of the canopy). The robot was able to treat from 85% to 100% of the disease area, and to limit the healthy area that was unintentionally sprayed from 5% to 20% of the total canopy area.
Adamides et al. [14], presented the human-robot interaction (HRI) design aspects and development process to transform a general purpose mobile robotic platform into a semi-autonomous agricultural robot sprayer. The main focus of this work was on user interface design and usability evaluation for mobile field robot teleoperation. The system effectiveness (58%) for spraying success was in similar range to low performance of harvesting robots average 66%, however it must be noted that the system was a small size robot aiming to show feasibility of the HRI system. Comparisons of existing benchmark data for User Experience [15] showed that the system was perceived as “excellent” in terms of attractiveness, perspoicuity, efficiency, dependability and stimulation, and “good” in terms of novelty.
Berenstein & Edan [16] presented a human-robot collaboration for site-specific spraying robotic sprayer. The article provides details on the robotic platform design, the human-robot collaboration framework, and on the tools used for the robotic sprayer to collaborate with a remote human operator for target detection and spraying. The field experiment proved the feasibility of human-robot collaboration for spraying specific targets. Moreover, this collaborative systems shows a 50% reduction of sprayed material, leading to both economic and environmental impacts.
Conclusion
This paper has presented a mini review of the state-of the art of agricultural robot targeted sprayers (also referred as site-specific or spot-spraying), for the period 2016 to 2017. The conclusion is that agricultural robot sprayers is a feasible solution that can help tackle health and environmental impacts by reducing the amount of spraying material used for pest control. As technology is developing, various limitations affecting system effectiveness and efficiency, will improve, making robotics a suitable solution for sustainable agricultural development.
References
- Horrigan L, Lawrence RS & Walker P (2002) How sustainable agriculture can address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture. Environmental Health Perspectives 110(5): 445-456.
- Williams PR, Hammitt JK (2001) Perceived Risks of Conventional and Organic Produce: Pesticides, Pathogens, and Natural Toxins. Risk Analysis. 21(2): 319-330.
- Gill Harsimran K, Garg H (2014) Pesticides: Environmental Impacts and Management Strategies. In M. L. Larramendy & S. Soloneski (Eds.), Pesticides - Toxic Aspects Rijeka, Croatia, p. 08.
- Popp J, Peto K, Nagy J (2013) Pesticide productivity and food security. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 33(1): 243-255.
- Jensen K, Larsen M, Nielsen S, Larsen L, Kent O, et al. (2014) Towards an Open Software Platform for Field Robots in Precision Agriculture. Robotics. 3(2): 207-234.
- Bac CW, Henten EJ, Hemming J, Edan Y (2014) Harvesting Robots for High-value Crops: State of the art Review and Challenges Ahead. Journal of Field Robotics 31(6): 888-911.
- Guzman R, Navarro R, Beneto Mm Carbonell D (2016) Robotnik - Professional Service Robotics Applications with ROS Robot Operating System (ROS), pp. 253-288.
- Oberti R, Marchi M, Tirelli P, Calcante A, Iriti M, et al. (2013) Selective spraying of grapevine's diseases by a modular agricultural robot. Journal of agricultural engineering. 44: 149-153.
- Slaughter DC, Giles DK, Downey D (2008) Autonomous robotic weed control systems: A review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 61: 63-78.
- Edan Y, Shufeng H, Naoshi K (2009) Automation in agriculture Springer Handbook of Automation. Springer. pp. 1095-1128.
- Gonzalez-de-Soto, Mariano, Emmi L, Perez-Ruiz (2016) Autonomous systems for precise spraying - Evaluation of a robotised patch sprayer. Bio systems Engineering. 146: 165-182.
- Malneršič A, Matevž D, Širok B, Oberti R, Hočevar M (2016) Close- range air-assisted precision spot-spraying for robotic applications: Aerodynamics and spray coverage analysis. Biosystems Engineering 146: 216-226.
- Oberti R, Marchi M, Tirelli P, Calcante A, Iriti M, et al. (2016) Selective spraying of grapevines for disease control using a modular agricultural robot. Biosystems Engineering. 146: 203-215.
- George A, Christos K, Constantinous I, Christou G, Xenos M, Hadzilacos T, et al. (2017) Design and development of a semi-autonomous agricultural vineyard sprayer: Human - robot interaction aspects. Journal of Field Robotics 34(8): 1407-1426.
- Laugwitz B, Held T, Schrepp M (2008) Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire: Springer Berlin Heidelberg pp. 63-76.
- Berenstein R, Edan Y (2017) Human-robot collaborative site-specific sprayer. Journal of Field Robotics 34(8): 1519-1530.