Introduction

Kutaber has the largest livestock population in South Wollo zone including more than 69 720 cattle, 65 727 sheep, 53 304 goats, 18 005 Equines and 104 737 chickens [1]. In Kutaber sheep are among the dominant livestock species providing as source of cash income and food subsistence value. Despite the number of sheep, the contribution of this sub sector to the woreda’s economy is relatively low. Endoparasitic infection and management problems are known to be the main factors that affect productivity. Among endoparasitic infection Fasciolosis is one of the difficult problems in helminthology [2]. Fasciolosis is caused by Fasciolidae trematodes of the genus Fasciola; Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica which migrate in the hepatic parenchyma and establish themselves and develop in the bile ducts. It causes significant morbidity and mortality [3,4]. The clinical features of fasciolosis can have acute, sub-acute and chronic forms [5]. In Ethiopia F. gigantica is found at altitude below 1800 meter above sea level. While F. hepatica is found at altitude between 1200-2560 meter above sea level [6]. Mixed infection by both species of Fasciola may occur where the ecology is conducive for replication of both intermediate hosts [2]. The snails of genus Lymnaea are mainly involved as an intermediate host in the life cycle of Fasciola [7]. Lymnaea truncatula is the most common intermediate host for F. hepatica in different parts of the world [8]. The most important intermediate host for F. gigantica is L. natalensis and L. auriallaria [9]. The economic impact of Fasciolosis may vary greatly from year to year depending on the climate, management, level of infection, host immunity status and the age of animals [10]. Annual economic loss caused by the disease is mainly due to mortality (mild to heavy), cost of diagnosis treatment and condemned livers [11], reduced milk yield, fertility disorders and reduced meat production [12,13]. Several control methods against ruminant Fasciolosis such as avoiding the predisposing risk factors like marshy areas, grazing the animals in the irrigation points and drained water bodies. Other methods include a reduction in the number of intermediate snail host by chemical or biological means and strategic application of antihelmintics [14].

Therefore, the objective of this study is

a. To know the prevalence of ovine Fasciolosis in selected rural kebeles, b. To generate base line data for future research, c. To indicate control strategies of Fasciolosis

Materials and Methods

Study area

The study was conducted from November 2018 to April 2019 in selected rural districts of Kutaber to study the prevalence ofovine fasciolosis. Geographically the area is found in South Wollo zone, Amhara region. It is located at 11012 ‘36 -11018 ‘36 N latitude and 390 31’ 12-390 34’ 12 E longitude. Kutaber area poses highland and lowland areas. The average minimum and maximum rainfall ranges between 500 and 955ml in short and long rainy season. The average annual temperature is 22°C, [15]. Mixed agriculture is the main occupation of the population of the area. The major livestock reared in the area are sheep, goat, cattle, poultry and equine. According to statistical data, Kutaber Woreda has livestock population of 69 720 cattle, 65 727sheep, 53 304goats, 18 005 Equines and 104 737 chickens [1].

Study animals

The study was conducted on local breeds of sheep which were selected by simple random sampling technique in the study area. A total of 392 sheep were randomly examined following coproscopic procedures. All these animals were privately owned by smallholder farmers. The management system was traditional extensive system with minimum supplementary feed and veterinary care.

Sample size determination

To determine the sample size, a prevalence rate of 50% was taken into consideration since there was no research performed on ovine fasciolosis in the area. The desired sample size for the study was calculated by using the formula given by [16] with 95% Confidence interval and 5% absolute precision.

Study Design and Sampling Techniques

A cross sectional study was conducted from November 2018-April 2019 in Kutaber district to determine the prevalence of fasciolosis. Simple random sampling method was employed to select the study population. During sample collection; all necessary risk factors related to ovine fasciolosis were properly recorded such as; age, sex, body condition and districts of sheep.

Study Design and Sampling Techniques

A cross sectional study was conducted from November 2018-April 2019 in Kutaber district to determine the prevalence of fasciolosis. Simple random sampling method was employed to select the study population. During sample collection; all necessary risk factors related to ovine fasciolosis were properly recorded such as; age, sex, body condition and districts of sheep.

Coroscopic Examination

Fecal materials were collected directly from the rectum of each sheep. Sheep of all age groups and either sex were included in this study. All samples were obtained prospectively for the purpose of study from different sheep flock in each district mainly kept on traditional grazing of weeds, trees and seasonal green fodder. Each sample was clearly labeled with animal identificationplace of collection, body condition, sex and age. Based on their dental eruption formula the age of the animal was determined and they were classified as young (less than two years) and adult (greater than two years). Then the sample was transported to Kutaber Livestock Development Office, Veterinary Clinic, parasitology laboratory, for detailed coproscopic examination. To detect fasciola eggs, sedimentation technique was used as described by [17]. For quantitative microscopic examination of Fasciola eggs, all fecal samples were processed by fecal centrifugal sedimentation method as described by [18]. Fecal examination for fasciola egg was carried out using the sedimentation method described by [19] (Table 1).

Data analysis

The result obtained were recorded and this data were entered into Microsoft excel worksheet. The data fed in to excel sheet were analyzed by using SPSS statistics 20 software. Descriptive statistics and pearson chi square test were employed to determine the prevalence of fasiciolosis and association of risk factors with the disease respectively. Level of significance was considered at p<0.05.

Results

Fecal examination conducted from November 2018 to April 2019 showed that from a total of 392 fecal samples examined, 133 (33.9%) was found to be positive for fasciola eggs. The prevalence among different age groups was adult (35.2%) and young 29.8%. Prevalence of fasciolosis in sheep was not significant (p=0.331) in young (29.8.0%) and adult (35.2%). The statistical analyses indicated that 33.3 % of males and 34.2% of females were positive for the infection. Statically analysis showed that there was not statistically significant (p=0.871). On the present study area prevalence of fasciolosis were found to be higher in sheep with poor body condition than those with medium and good body condition with prevalence of 50.7%. 24.3% and 21.5% respectively. The prevalence of ovine fasciolosis in 5 district of Kutaber districts were 41.9%, 29.0%, 30.0%, 45.6% and 20.0% respectively. The prevalence variation between studies District showed the highestand the lowest were 45.6%& 20% in Lewcho and Elsa respectively (Table 2 & 3).

Discussion

Hepatic fluke infections cause considerable economic loss in livestock due to condemnation of organs and reduction of milk and meat production. Fasciolosisis one of the most prevalent helminthes infectious of ruminants in the different part of the world. It causes significant morbidity and mortality [4]. Ovine Fasciolosis exist in almost all regions of Ethiopia [20]. The present finding was in harmonies with previous reported prevalence by [21-25], (32.7%), in Wadela (33.85%), in Gondar (36.2%), in North shoa (35.94%), and in South Wollo (35.68%,). The present finding was higher than in Alamata, Ethiopia, in around Bahir-Dar, in Hirna town with the prevalence of 24.2%, 15.8% and 14.6% respectively. This difference might be due to aggro ecological different, the favorable intermediate snail habitat in the area. The present study was relatively lower than the other reports like in Debre Birhan (50.8%), in Dawa Cheffa, Kemissie (49%) and in Yilmana Densa District West Gojjam (42.44%). This variation might be in different geographical location or management system variation of the smallholder farmers or lack of awareness about seasonal deworming of small ruminants in these areas. Climatic variations of supreme importance influencing factors for the epidemiology of fasciolosis (Table 4).

The prevalence of fasciolosis in male and female sheep was recorded as 33.3% and 34.2% respectively. The results showed that prevalence of ovine fasciolosis was similar in female and male animals in the study areas. According to reports both sexes have been equally affected with fasciolosis and a higher prevalence of parasitic infection was not associated with sex (p> 0.05). The fact that prevalence of fasciolosis between male and female are not significantly difference, sex of sheep has not impact on theprevalence of fasciolosis. They exposed to graze and parasitic infection with equal rate. Sex did not show significant variation on the prevalence of Fasciola, similar finding was shown by. This might also be due to grazing of both sex groups in similar Fasciola contaminated pasture land. The prevalence between different age groups of animals were found to be statistically not significant (p=0.028). This might be due to grazing of young animals with the adults early after some days of parturition. The somewhat higher prevalence was recorded in the adults and relatively lowers in the young animals. This might be young animals are not usually allowed to go far with adults for grazing as reported by. In the present study result indicated that relatively higher infection rate of fasciolosis were observed in sheep with poor body condition than medium and good body conditions. It indicates that fasciolosis disease causes reduction of body weight gains. The prevalence between different districts was found to be statistically not significant (p=0.028). The Highest infection rate of fasciolosis were observed in Lewcho (45.6%) followed by Alansha (41.9%). This is due to the absence of veterinary attention and existence of favorable intermediate snail habitat, in Lewcho and Alansha district respectively, exposed to parasitic hazards [26-32].

Go to

• Mini Review
• Abstract
• Introduction
• Conclusion
• References

Conclusions and Recommendations

Fasciolosis is a major obstacle for sheep productivity by imposing direct and indirect losses in Kutaber District. The study has investigated the prevalence of ovine fasciolosis in sheep reared under extensive farming system in Kutaber district of the Amhara regional state, central Ethiopia. The result of the present study indicated that fasciolosis is a higher prevalent sheep disease in the study area. This parasitic disease is distributed in every district and considered as one of the major setbacks to sheep product utilization causing direct and indirect losses. The findings of the current study revealed that fasciolosis is still a health problem in the study area. Presence of favorable conditions like swampy area, stagnant water bodies, scarcity of feed, poor management practices and other concurrent diseases can facilitate the infectivity of the parasite in the area.

The present Study states that

Enlightenment campaigns on periodic dosing of sheep with anthelmintics prior/after rainy season, a. Avoid grazing of sheep at swampy area, b. Draining of stagnant water, c. Improve herd health management practices Avoid scarcity of feed

Go to

• Mini Review
• Abstract
• Introduction
• Results
• Disscusion
• Conclusion and Recommendations
• References

References

1. KLRDO (2018) Kutaber Woreda Livestock Resource Development Office. South Wollo, Amhara Region. BJSTR 21(2): 1-5.
2. Taylor MA, Coop RL, Wall RL (2007) Veterinary Parasitology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, England, UK, pp. 85-90.
3. Okewole EA, Ogunipe GA, Adejinmi JO, Olaniyasi AO (2000) Clinical evaluation of three chemoprophylactic regimes against ovine helminthiasis in Fasciola. Endemic farm in Ibadan, Nigeria. Israel J Vet Med 56: 15-28.
4. WHO (World health organization) (1995) Control of food borne trematode infections. Technical Report series 849.
5. Radostits OM, Gray CC, Hichcliff KW, Constable PD (2007) Disease Associated with trematodes and cestodes. In: Veterinary Medicine, Textbook of the diseases of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs and goats, 10th eds, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 1576-1580.
6. Yilma JM, Malone JB (1998) A Geographic information system forcast model for strategic control of fasciolosis in Ethiopia. Vet Parasitol 78(2): 103-127.
7. Kahn CH (2005) The Merck Veterinary Manual. (9th eds), Fluke infection in Ruminants, Merck and Co, White House Station NJ, USA, pp. 273-276.
8. Nijau BC, Scholtens RG (1991) The role of traditional harvested hay in the Transmission of ovine fasciolosis in the Ethiopian highland. Veterinary Research Communication 15: 369-372.
9. Urquhart GM, Armour J, Duncan JL, Dunn AM, Jennings FW (1996) Veterinary parasitology. Oxford, Longman Scientific and Technical Press, UK, pp. 100-109.
10. XBowman DD (2003) Parasitology for veterinarians. (8th eds) Elsevier, pp. 115-122.
11. Ahmadi NA and M Meshkehkar, (2010) Prevalence and long-term trend of Liver fluke infections in sheep, goats and cattle slaughtered in Khuzestan, southwestern Iran. J Paramed Sci 2: 26-31.
12. Rokni MB, M Mirhendi, M Behnia, MF Harandi, N Jalalizand (2010) Molecular characterization of Fasciola hepatica isolates by RAPDPCR and ribosomal ITSI sequencing. Iran Red Cres Med J 12: 27-32.
13. Hossain MM, S Paul, MM Rahman, FMA Hossain, MT Hossain (2011) Prevalence and economic significance of caprinefascioliasis at Sylhet district of Bangladesh. Pak Vet J 31: 113-116.
14. Mitchell GB (2003) Treatment and control of liver fluke in sheep and cattle. Technical Notes. West main roads, Edinburgh, UK.
15. KADO (2018) Kutaber Woreda Agriculture Development Office, South Wollo, Amhara Region.
16. Thrustfield M (2005) Veterinary epidemiology. (3rd eds). Blackwell Science, pp. 230-233.
17. Hanson J, Perry B (1994) The epidemiology, diagnosis, and control of helminth parasites of ruminants. A handbook of animal production and health division, FAO, Rome.
18. Zajac AM, GA Conboy (2006) Veterinary Clinical Parasitology, (7th ed). Blackwell Publishing, Iowa, USA, p. 11-12.
19. Urquhart GM, J Armour, Duncan JL, Dunn AM, Jennings FW (1996) Veterinary Parasitology, (2nd eds). Blackwell Science, London, pp. 110.
20. Ahmed EK, Marcvitchtr K, Jumwasorn S, Koonawoot, Rittriron S (2007) Prevalence of Fasciola species infection in middle Awash river Basin, Ethiopia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med. Public Health 38: 51-57.
21. Dinka A (1996) Preliminary study on prevalence of fasciolosis in small ruminants in and around Assela (Arsi). DVM Thesis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Addis Ababa University, Debre zeit, Ethiopia.
22. Ansari-lari M, Moazzen M (2006) A retrospective survey of liver fluke disease in livestock based on abattoir data in Shiraz, south of Iran. Prev Vet Med 73(1): 93-96.
23. Asrede T, Shifaw A (2015) Coprological Study on the Prevalence of Ovine Fasciolosis in Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia. European Journal of Biol Sci 7(3): 103-107.
24. Basaznew BM, Abeje, Mersha C (2012) Pervasiveness of Fasciolosis in Sheep in Yilmana Densa District, West Gojjam Zone, Amhara Region, North western Ethiopia.
25. Chekol B, Girma Y (2018) Study on the Prevalence of Ovine Fasciolosis in Wadla Woreda, North Wollo, Ethiopia.
26. Demil E, Mekonnen A, Adugna T, Assefa W, Bialfew T (2017) Prevalence of Ovine Fasciolosis in and around Motta Town, North-West Ethiopia. Europ J Biol Sci 9(2): 79-84.
27. Gupta SK, Singla LD (2012) Diagnostic trends in parasitic diseases of animals. In: Veterinary Diagnostics: Current Trends. Satish Serial Publishing House, Delhi, India, pp. 81-112.
28. Henok M, Mekonnen A (2011) Study on prevalence and risk factors of fasciolosis in small ruminants in and around Hirna Town, Ethiopia. Global Veterinaria 7: 497-501.
29. Ibrahim A, Nölkes D, Gezahegn E, Taye M (2017) Prevalence of Ovine Fasiolosis in Jimma and Selected Rural Kebeles Near Jimma, Southwest Ethiopia. J Vet Sci Technol 8: 424.
30. Kasanesh Destaw, Wakuma Mitku, Muhammed Hamid, Bethelehem Alemu, Tarekegn Tintagu (2017) Prevalence of ovine fasciolosis in selected Kebeles of Wogera District, North Gondar zone, Ethiopia. Int J Adv Res Biol Sci 4(8): 78-84.
31. Melkamu S, Mulat A (2015) Study on the Prevalence of Ovine Fasciolosis in Ambasel Woreda, South Wollo Zone, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia. J Ani Res 5(3): 437-441.
32. Molalegn B, Nuradis I, Nahili A (2010) Study on the prevalence of ovine, fasciolosis in around Dawa Cheffa, Kemissie, Ethiopia. African Journal of Agriculture Reaserch 5(21): 2981-2985.