Orthopedics and Rheumatology open access journal (OROAJ)

Case Report

New Surgical Approach to Common Digital Neuroma with Combined Technique of Nerve Decompression, Dorsal Nerve Transposition and Nerve Wrap in the Foot

Edgardo Rodriguez-Collazo, Carl M. Jean* and Gerard A. Leotaud

DPM, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, USA

Submission: April 24, 2017; Published: May 12 , 2017

*Corresponding author: Carl Jean, DPM, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, 506 6th Street Brooklyn, NY 11216, USA, Tel: 646-453-9331; Email: c007jean@aol.com

How to cite this article: Edgardo R-C, Carl M. Jean , Gerard A. Leotaud. New Surgical Approach to Common Digital Neuroma with Combined Technique of Nerve Decompression, Dorsal Nerve Transposition and Nerve Wrap in the Foot. Ortho & Rheum Open Access 2017;7(1): 555702. DOI: 10.19080/OROAJ.2017.07.555702

Abstract

A prospective study was done to evaluate the treatment of neuromas in the foot with a combined technique of neurolysis or decompression of the common digital nerve, dorsal nerve transposition and nerve wrap in the foot. Patient success was based on extent of pain after surgery, ability to wear regular shoes, and ability to return to work.

Introduction

A common digital neuroma in the foot, commonly known as Morton’s Neuroma is a well-established entity. It is thought to be related to an area of high pressure or movement. As a result, clinical symptoms of neuralgia and metatarsalgia can often result. It is widely believed that the common digital neuroma in the foot is caused by increased pressure on the nerve [1-2 -3]. Injury may be caused by the metatarsal heads, pressure by the deep transverse metatarsal ligament or an intermetatarsal bursa. Over time, if the compression/injury continues, the nerve repairs itself with fibrous tissue that leads to enlargement and thickening of the nerve. Current mainstream surgical techniques include decompression, neurolysis and neurectomy.

The specific case highlighted in this article is that of a 63-year-old female who presented with radiating pain to the left third and fourth digits. Patient had positive paresthesias to the left third and fourth digits. The patient also had a positive Mulder’s click. Patient failed conservative techniques which included, wrapping/strapping, cortisone injections, shoe gear modification and orthotics. On March 3, 2015, an MRI of the left foot was performed. The MRI noted that, "There is a 1.2 cm signal abnormality within the third interspace. This area is fairly isointense to muscle on T1 and proton density and is compatible with a Morton’s neuroma." Patient underwent this newly described surgical procedure on June 16, 2015.

Method

A linear or lazy-S type of line is draw along the skin overlying the corresponding interspace where the neuroma is located (Figure 1). A skin incision is now made. It should be noted that careful dissection is to be performed in this area as one can readily encounter crossing veins and lymphatic vessels. We do recommend using loupe magnification (Figure 1).

Avoiding injury to the dorsal venous arch will often help prevent post operative forefoot edema. In some cases, these vessels can be simply retracted, if not, they should be tied off or cauterized. Meticulous hemostasis is off the utmost importance. We do recommend using a pneumatic tourniquet [14] (Figures 2 & 3).

A Weitlaner self-retaining retractor can be inserted in between metatarsal heads and gently opened (Figure 2). Senn retractors or lamina spreader can also be used. Blunt dissection is performed. Upon further dissection of subcutaneous tissue, one will eventually encounter the deep transverse metatarsal ligament (Figure 3). It can be confirmed with use of a curved hemostat. This ligament should be cauterized then incised [14]. The common digital nerve will be found just inferior to this ligament. If not readily visualized, apply moderate pressure along the plantar aspect of the foot. When pressure is applied to the web space, this maneuver should help bring the nerve into the field of view (Figure 4). The nerve should now be clearly visible. Careful dissection should be performed, as it should be teased away from surrounding structures (Figure 5).

The nerve is now placed within a nerve wrap (supplied by various companies including Axogen or Integra). 7.0 Nylon or prolene is used to suture the nerve wrap in a tubular fashion. It should be noted that the appropriate nerve wrap should be used as not to strangulate the nerve. Furthermore, great care should be taken not to pass the suture through the nerve itself. Loupe magnification is very helpful during this part of the surgery. The nerve wrap may have a lot of recoil and thus it is easier to begin suturing at one end of the nerve wrap. The nerve wrap will usually uncoil itself as you continue along the length of the nerve wrap (Figures 6 & 7).

Once the nerve is fully encased within the nerve wrap, the entire construct is now transposed dorsally just slightly above the adjacent metatarsals. The nerve wrap (with the encased nerve) is now sutured to the adjacent muscle fascia. Subcutaneous tissue is now re-approximated with absorbable suture and skin with non-absorbable suture (Figures 8 &9).

Discussion

The above patient was seen one week following the surgical procedure where she was assessed for any signs of dehiscence or post operative infection. Wound edges were well coapted. Normal post operative incisional pain and edema was noted. Patient followed up two weeks later (third week post op) where sutures were removed. On the third post operative visit (fifth week post op), patient denied any pain or tenderness to the plantar aspect of her left foot and indicated that she felt comfortable enough to the point where she actually ran on a treadmill. Again, her neuroma is 12mm in size. Though use of treadmill was not recommended or encouraged, this patient’s result may indicate that this technique may be a superior approach to current surgical methods.

One accepted approach is decompression of the nerve. One study [21], "fourteen decompression procedures were performed. Eleven of the 14 patients had absence of the neuroma symptoms after the decompressions. Two patients had recurrence of symptoms; the third sustained a crush injury to the operative foot. Both patients with recurrences required revision surgery because the initial procedure failed to relieve symptoms. One patient noted lack of relief in the immediate postoperative period (2 weeks), the other was symptom free for approximately 1 year. Only one of these individuals responded to resection of the intermetatarsal nerve, while the other continue to have pain."

Other options include neurolysis or neurectomy. A study in 2008 found that 50 patients (69 feet) underwent surgery for treatment of neuroma. Author’s in this study chose between a neurolysis or neurectomy. The decision to perform either procedure was decided intra operatively. If there was macroscopic thickening or pseudoneuroma, the neuroma was resected. If there were no macroscopic findings, neurolysis was performed. In the end, 46 of these cases resulted in resection and 23 cases resulted in preservation of the nerve. Total relief was obtained except for one patient in each group which was later operated on 6 months later. In the case where the nerve was previously resected, a further more proximal resection of the nerve was performed. Author indicates that patient had complete pain relief [22].

Kyung Tai Lee et al. reviewed long term studies of neurectomy in the treatment of Morton’s neuroma. This study extended over a 10-year period. Seven different studies between 1991-2008 were reviewed by this group. Dr. Lee and his group said that aside from expected numbness, they found that long lasting pain was found in many patients after surgery. Many had difficulty wearing shoes comfortably after surgery [23]. In another study author states that 51% of the patients felt they had good outcome while 40% had poor results [24]. Colgrove et al. [19] compared transposition versus resection in a randomized trial. During the nerve transposition, the nerve was transposed and positioned between the adductor halluces and the interossei muscles. At the 36- to 48-month follow-up, they found the resection group to have 86% excellent and 14% fair results; meanwhile, the transposition group had 96% excellent and 4% good results [19]. The pain level was reported on a numerical rating scale of 0 to 100. They found that the pain in the resection group was lower during the first six months but higher at the 12-month review. They concluded that resection is unnecessary for symptom relief. However, to date, another repeat study has not been conducted to confirm their results. In addition, it should be noted that their study did not use a nerve wrap.

Conclusion

The technique discussed in this article involving neurolysis, followed by application of nerve wrap with dorsal transposition serves as a primary treatment for this condition rather than resection. This technique also did not involve a plantar approach which helped to avoid risk of painful plantar scarring. It should be noted that because a nerve wrap was used, it is plausible that the risk of scarring would be decreased. It is possible the mechanical shear forces from the adjacent metatarsal heads on the nerve would also be decreased. Our technique does avoid direct suturing of the nerve to adjacent tissues. The likelihood of a stump neuroma is decreased. The surgical technique discussed in this article should be considered as a primary procedure for any patient with a common digital neuroma of the foot.