Accelerometry Use to Study External Load in Combat Sports: An Example from Taekwondo
Fabrício B Del Vecchio1,2*, Charles Bartel1,2, Leony M Galliano1,2 and David H Fukuda3
1Superior School of Physical Education, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
2Sports Training and Physical Performance Research Group
3Institute of Exercise Physiology and Wellness, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA
Submission: April 02, 2018; Published: April 13, 2018
*Correspondence author: Fabricio Boscolo Del Vecchio, Superior School of Physical Education, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, Tel: +55 53 32732752; Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
How to cite this article: Fabrício B D V, Charles B, Leony M G, David H F. Accelerometry Use to Study External Load in Combat Sports: An Example from Taekwondo. J Phy Fit Treatment & Sports. 2018; 3(2): 555608. DOI: 10.19080/JPFMTS.2018.03.555608
The aim of this technical report is to present accelerometry data from a taekwondo (TKD) session. Eleven practitioners wore triaxial accelerometers during a typical TKD session in an attempt to evaluate external load. Direct observation of the training activities was also conducted. Information from each axis was recorded, and vector magnitude (VM) values were transformed to metabolic equivalents (MET). The average VM during the training session was 322.7±309.5 au with an external load of 6.8±6.5 au/min. There were statistically significant differences amongst the various training activities for each of the three axes (Y: p < 0.001; X: p < 0.001; Z: F = p < 0.001) and for the VM (p < 0.001). The VM values during the greeting, pause, stretching, and upper limb exercises were lower than those observed in running, specific warm-up, lower limb exercises and combat simulation (p<0.001 for all). Exercise intensities varied during running (moderate: 71%; vigorous: 29%), the specific warm-up (light: 50%; moderate: 25%; vigorous: 25%), and the combat simulation (light: 48%; moderate: 52%). General and specific warm-up, lower body technical training, and combat simulation showed intensity higher than upper limb technical training and stretching activities. Accelerometry seems to be a possible technology to measure external load in TKD.
Martial arts and combat sports are widely practiced by athletes and non-athletes for purposes related to the improvement of health  and physical fitness [2,3]. Striking modalities, such as taekwondo (TKD)  and boxing , grappling modalities, such as wrestling and judo , or a combination of the two, such as mixed martial arts (MMA) , exhibit high energy demands during training; however, methods of monitoring training intensities through quantification of internal or external load are limited .
Internal load during physical activity is reflective of the perceptions and feelings of the individual according to the motor tasks performed. In this context, the Borg scale (rated from 6 to 20) and the CR10 or OMNI scales are often used for the description of perceived effort. The product of these rating scales and the duration of a given training session, termed the "training load", have been used previously in combat sports. Physiological responses, including heart rate (HR) and blood lactate concentration ([LAC]) [9,10], are also utilized in the evaluation of training intensities. Perceived effort seems to present low relationships with biological markers [10-12] and may be influenced by training history and the individual response of an athlete [12,13]. However, a delay in HR response occurs during successive high intensity intermittent bouts followed by rest periods , while [LAC], considered a marker of glycolytic activation, is increased during the initial efforts of a fight but may not indicative of the total work load .
Conversely, indicators of external load are primarily derived from time motion analysis variables [16,17]. Recently, Kirk et al. , proposed the use of accelerometry as a potential means of quantifying external load in mixed martial arts. However, it is not known if this type of equipment can be used in the measurement and differentiation of intensity in different combat sports activities. Thus, the objectives of this technical report are to present accelerometry data from a typical TKD training session and to examine the potential of this data to differentiate between activities of varying intensities.
The training session was completed by 11 TKD practitioners (7 male and 4 female athletes) with an average age of 17.3±7.63 years old and median of 3.25 years of TKD training. Subjects or their legal guardians signed an informed consent (project was approved by local ethics committee, protocol 445.796/2013).
This is an exploratory study examining the use of accelerometers in the quantification of external load during a 45-minute typical TKD session. The session was separated into the following activities: initial greeting (1min), running (2min), specific warm-up (3min), upper body technical training (7min), lower body technical training (technical skills, 5min, steps and displacement, 5min, and kicks on the strike shield, 3 min), sparring (10min), stretching (5min) and final greeting (1min) and pauses (3min).
Data collection was conducted with tri-axial (x: mediolateral; y: vertical; z: anteroposterior) accelerometers (wGT3X+; ActiGraph, LLC, Pensacola, FL) worn at the waist, on the medial line of the right side of the iliac crest, of the athletes throughout the previously outlined 45-minute TKD training session. Accelerometry data was collected as counts (arbitrary units: au) at a frequency of 30 Hertz over five-second epochs for each axis and 60-second epochs for calculation of metabolic equivalents (METs). Vector magnitude (VM; in au) was calculated from the individual axes as
External load was quantified as the VM over the duration of activity (au/min). Physical activity efforts were classified using cut-off points proposed previously  as sedentary (≤ 100 au), low (> 100 au), moderate (≥ 2200 au) and vigorous (≥ 4136 au) intensities. The time spent at each intensity (as a percentage of the total training time) during each training activity was also determined. METs were calculated from the equation: METs = 2.01 + 0.00171* counts per 60 s .
Data are shown as mean ± sd. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare values for each axis, VM, and METs across each of the observed training activities. When F-values were significant, post-hoc pair wise comparisons were conducted using Bonferroni adjustments. Pearson product moment correlations were used to examine the relationship between each axis and the calculated VM. The analyses were performed using Stata 12.0.
The mean of VM during the 45-minute TKD training session was of 322.7±309.5 au and an external load of 6.8±6.5 au/min was reached. Significant differences between activities were identified for the three axes (Y: F = 183.9; p < 0.001; X: F = 176.4; p < 0.001; Z: F = 164.5; p < 0.001) and VM (F = 189.4; p < 0.001) (Table 1). The VM values for greeting, pause, stretching and upper body technical training were lower than those observed for running, specific warm-up, lower body technical training and combat simulation (p < 0.001 for all). The VM values for running were higher than those observed during the specific warm-up (p = 0.89), while the VM values for the specific warm-up and combat simulation were similar to those observed during the lower body technical training (p = 0.27 and p = 0.44, respectively). High correlations were found between the X, Y and Z axis values and VM (Figure 1).
SD: Standard Deviation; CL: Confidence Limits; LL and UL: Lower and Upper Limits
MET values, calculated from 60-s epochs, significantly different between the activities (F = 34.95; p< 0.001) (Figure 2). Running was classified as moderate (71%) to vigorous (29%) intensity exercise, while the specific warm-up consisted of light (50%), moderate (25%), and vigorous (25%) intensities.
Stretching and upper body technical training was considered entirely light intensity exercise, whereas the lower body technical training was primarily moderate (80%) intensity exercise. Sparring consisted of approximately equal time devoted to light (48%) and moderate (52%) intensity exercise.
This technical report is the first to examine the use of accelerometer data in the evaluation of exercise intensity during taekwondo-related training activities. Significant differences were shown between activities for individual axes (X,Y,Z) and VM with the highest values reported for running and the lowest for upper body technical training and stretching. These findings provide support for future investigation of the use of accelerometers during striking combat sports training.
A single 15-minute MMA bout has been reported to result in an accumulated player load, a variant of VM, of 224.32 ± 26.59 au measured using a triaxial accelerometer (Minimax X3, Catapult Innovations, Australia) with a sampling rate of 100 Hz. A high correlation coefficient (r= 0.980) was found between lactate concentrations and accumulated player load during the simulated MMA bout, which provides evidence for the relationship between accelerometry data and physiological response . The accumulated player load per minute during the MMA bout was greater than the VM per unit of time in the current investigation (14.91±1.78 au•min-1 versus 6.8±6.5 au•min-1) as would be expected when considering differences in the sporting environment as well as between training activities and simulated competition.
Data from running-based team sports has demonstrated external load estimates similar to a MMA bout with soccer players having an accumulated player load per minute of 13.15 au•min-1 during a 90-minute training session , Australian football players having a value of 15.65 au•min-1 during a match . Accelerometer-derived player load has also shown to discriminate between midfielders and other positions during professional soccer match play . The potential ability to distinguish between athletes tasked with differing roles combined with the current findings, namely differences in VM between non-contact activities (e.g. specific warm-up and upper body technical training) during a TKD training session, suggests the need for more thorough investigation.
Methodological consideration should also be given to the accelerometer during physical exercise, as the placement and processing criteria, but there is no consensus about these issues . The researches need take care about these aspects, because they have an important role in the outcomes. The accelerometers in the current study were placed on the hips of the participants which may have played a role in the differences between upper and lower body measurements.
New studies examining common internal/external load control methods and accelerometry data in taekwondo should be conducted in order to evaluate the relationship amongst these approaches. Specific consideration may be given to the ability of accelerometer-derived measures to differentiate between the loads associated with contact and non-contact activities. With additional investigation, accelerometry may prove to be a useful alternative for load control in combat sports.
In conclusion, was verify that general and specific warmup, lower body technical training, and combat simulation showed intensity higher than upper limb technical training and stretching activities. Also, we consider that the accelerometry can be a method of monitoring training intensities in comba