Abstract

Keywords:Ploceus philippinus; dimming schedules; Retrofitting; stewardship; ecological resilience; urban wetlands

Introduction

In his book Darwin Comes to Town, Menno Schilthuizen argues that cities are hubs of accelerated evolution and significant challenges for biodiversity. This dual reality sparks a vital debate: how can we design cities that not only minimize negative impacts on ecosystems but also promote coexistence and adaptation among diverse species? The following sections explore this question through concrete examples and recent data, linking Schilthuizen’s ideas with sustainable urban design approaches.

Cities as Evolutionary Habitats

Schilthuizen identifies urban environments as unique habitats that impose specific selective pressures, which can be harnessed to support biodiversity. Features like green roofs and vertical gardens not only mitigate the urban heat island effect but also provide refuges for species adapted to cityscapes. For example, the baya weaver (Ploceus philippinus) uses synthetic fibers from urban environments to construct nests, exemplifying how species integrate artificial materials into their ecology. This underscores the potential of cities to foster adaptive traits. Ecologically designed parks can act as biological corridors, connecting fragmented populations. A study by Silva et al. [1] in Urban Forestry & Urban Greening demonstrated that linear parks in São Paulo, Brazil, increased genetic flow among urban bird populations by 25%. Similarly, Beninde et al. [2] found that green corridors across 27 European cities enhanced bird diversity by 20% compared to isolated green spaces of equivalent size. These findings highlight the importance of spatial connectivity in urban planning.

Examples of Biodiversity in Sustainable Urban Landscapes

Singapore exemplifies biodiversity-compatible urban design through its “City in a Garden” initiative, which has significantly increased populations of native birds and butterflies. Wong et al. [3] reported that Singapore supports 392 plant species and over 150 bird species, enabled by vertical gardens and interconnected water systems. This demonstrates how integrated infrastructure can harmonize urban development with ecological preservation. New York’s High Line project, a linear park on a former railway, has transformed a neglected area into a biodiversity hotspot. A 2021 study by New York University revealed a 45% increase in pollinator species richness since its opening. Similarly, Milan’s Bosco Verticals incorporates over 20,000 plants and trees into its façades. Belcher et al. [4] observed increased bird species richness in vegetated buildings compared to conventional high-density structures. Williams et al. [5] further concluded that green roofs can enhance species diversity by up to 30% when compared to urban areas devoid of vegetation.

Mitigating Negative Impacts and Maximizing Evolutionary Opportunities

Schilthuizen stresses the need to design urban landscapes that support adaptable species while minimizing harm to vulnerable ones. For instance, green bridges and wildlife tunnels effectively address habitat fragmentation. The Natuurbrug Zanderij Crailoo in the Netherlands connects two nature reserves, boosting local badger (Meles meles) populations by 30% [6]. Innovative measures also tackle noise and light pollution. Controlled-spectrum LED lighting and dimming schedules reduce disruptions to nocturnal insects like moths. Research by de Jong et al. [7] found that artificial lighting influences life-history traits and fitness in songbirds, while Van Doren et al. [8] demonstrated that bright urban lights alter nocturnal bird migration patterns. Such findings underline the need for targeted interventions to mitigate anthropogenic impacts.

Social and Economic Benefits of Biodiverse Cities

Urban biodiversity benefits humans as well as non-human species. Green spaces improve mental health, reduce stress, and foster community cohesion. The World Health Organization [9] reported that access to green areas decreases stress-related illnesses by up to 20%. Economically, ecosystem services such as pollination, pest control, and improved air quality yield substantial savings. For instance, urban trees in Melbourne are valued at AUD 500 million for their contributions to carbon sequestration and climate regulation [10].

Lessons from Schilthuizen for Urban Sustainability

Schilthuizen’s work underlines the importance of interdisciplinary approaches to designing biodiversity-compatible cities. Key strategies include:
Science-based urban planning: Prioritizing ecological corridors, buffer zones, and multifunctional habitats involves a deep understanding of ecological dynamics and the integration of these principles into urban development processes. These strategies not only enhance biodiversity but also provide critical ecosystem services, such as improved air and water quality, climate regulation, and habitat connectivity. For instance, designing buffer zones around urban wetlands can protect aquatic ecosystems from pollution while supporting diverse species. Multifunctional habitats, like green roofs combined with solar panels, exemplify how urban infrastructure can serve multiple ecological and societal purposes simultaneously, fostering sustainable urban environments [5].
Infrastructure adaptation: Retrofitting buildings and streets to support species goes beyond adding bird nests and insect shelters; it involves a systemic redesign of urban infrastructure to integrate ecological functions. For example, implementing permeable pavements can support amphibian migration while improving water infiltration, and redesigning building facades with bio-receptive materials can foster mosses, lichens, and small fauna [11]. These measures transform urban spaces into habitats that actively support biodiversity, demonstrating that infrastructure can serve dual purposes: human convenience and ecological resilience.
Community engagement: Educating residents and involving them in conservation and biodiversity monitoring is a cornerstone of fostering a sustainable urban environment. This approach ensures that local communities become active participants rather than passive observers. For instance, citizen science initiatives enable residents to collect valuable data on local flora and fauna, enhancing both public awareness and scientific research. Furthermore, community-led urban gardening projects can transform underutilized spaces into thriving biodiversity hotspots, simultaneously fostering social cohesion. By integrating education and hands-on involvement, cities can cultivate a sense of stewardship, ensuring that biodiversity conservation becomes a shared responsibility and a source of communal pride [12].

Implications for Conservation and Urban Planning

The rapid evolution of urban ecosystems, as discussed by Schilthuizen, carries significant implications for conservation and planning:
Urban biodiversity: Cities should be recognized as unique ecosystems that sustain diverse life forms. Kirkpatrick and Keesing [13] advocate shifting from preserving “pristine” habitats to enhancing urban biodiversity.
Evolutionary rescue: While some species adapt to urbanization, others face challenges. Conservation efforts must balance the needs of both adaptable and vulnerable species [14].
Green infrastructure: Integrating evolutionary insights into urban planning can create biodiversity-friendly cities. Oropeza- Sánchez et al. [15] found that green spaces with high connectivity and complex vegetation structures support greater bird species richness.

In summary, designing biodiversity-compatible cities is both an ecological necessity and an opportunity to redefine our relationship with urban environments. Schilthuizen’s [16] insights in Darwin Comes to Town illustrate that urbanization does not have to result in biodiversity loss. With thoughtful planning, cities can become sanctuaries for wildlife and sites of evolutionary innovation, paving the way for a sustainable and enriching future for all.

References

1. Silva P, Silva L, Brito L (2020) Using bird-flower interactions to select native tree resources for urban afforestation: the case of Erythrina velutina, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 51.
2. Beninde J, Veith M, Hochkirch A (2015) Biodiversity in cities needs space: A meta-analysis of factors determining intra-urban biodiversity variation. Ecology Letters 18(6): 581-592.
3. Wong NH, Tan CL, Tan P (2019) Integrating biodiversity into urban planning: Perspectives from Singapore. Landscape and Urban Planning 185: 79-92.
4. Belcher R, Spooner P, Fairman T (2018) Vegetated buildings and urban biodiversity: How green façades and green roofs contribute to bird diversity in Milan. Urban Ecology 4(1): 1-12.
5. Williams N, Lundholm J, MacIvor J (2014) Green roofs and green walls for biodiversity conservation: A review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 14(1): 45-54.
6. Nker N, Loehr V (2019) Resultaten project: ‘Dassen Onderweg’. P.13 in Van Bommel, F., S. Vreugdenhil & M. la Haye. De Das. KNNV, Zeist.
7. de Jong M, Ouyang Q, Da Silva A, Kempenaers B, Visser M, et al. (2015) Effects of nocturnal illumination on life-history decisions and fitness in two wild songbird species. Philo’s Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 370(1667): 20140128.
8. Van Doren B, Horton K, Dokter A, Klinck H, Elbin S, et al. (2017) High-intensity urban light installation dramatically alters nocturnal bird migration, Proc Natl Acad Sci 114 (42): 11175-11180.
9. World Health Organization (2018) Urban green spaces and health - A review of evidence.
10. Livesley S, McPherson E, Calfapietra C (2016) The urban forest and ecosystem services: Impacts on urban water, heat, and pollution cycles at the tree, street, and city scale. Journal of Environ Quality 45(1): 119-124.
11. Ciriminna D, Ferreri G, Noto L, Celauro C (2022) Numerical Comparison of the Hydrological Response of Different Permeable Pavements in Urban Area. Sustainability 14(9): 5704.
12. Buchel S, Frantzeskaki N (2015) Citizens’voice: A case study about perceived ecosystem services by urban park users in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Ecosystem Serv 12: 169-177.
13. Kirkpatrick J, Keesing A (2024) A new framework to address the why behind urban biodiversity inequity. Southeast Climate Adaptation Science Center (SECASC).
14. Urban M, Tingley MW (2017) Influence of adaptive capacity on the outcome of climate change impacts on species distributions. Scientific Reports 7(1): 12479.
15. Oropeza-Sánchez M, Solano-Zavaleta I, Cuandón-Hernández W, Martínez-Villegas J, Palomera-Hernández V, et al. (2025) Urban green spaces with high connectivity and complex vegetation promote occupancy and richness of birds in a tropical megacity. Urban Ecosystems 28: 1-18.
16. Schilthuizen M (2018) Darwin Comes to Town: How the Urban Jungle Drives Evolution. ISBN 9781250127846. Picador.