JGWH.MS.ID.556218

Abstract

Background: Antenatal care refers to the care provided by skilled healthcare professionals to pregnant mothers, aimed at ensuring optimal health for both the mother and the baby throughout the pregnancy period. It promotes a basis for health promotion, risk identification, prevention and management of pregnancy-related illnesses to avoid health problems in both the fetus and mother. Quality ANC consists of delivering essential services to every pregnant woman and her fetus, while also providing more specialized care for those who need it. Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study was carried out from November 1 to November 30, 2024, involving 406 pregnant women who were attending ANC at a public health facility located in Dilla Town. Data collection was performed using a structured questionnaire along with an observational checklist. The study participants in the study were selected through a systematic random sampling method. Trained data collectors conducted exit interviews. The collected data were entered into EPI Data version 3.1 and subsequently analyzed using SPSS version 26. Both bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed. The results were presented as adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A p-value of less than 0.05 was used to declare statistical significance in all inferential analyses conducted in this study. Result: This study indicated that about 52% (95% CI: 51.5%–52.5%) of pregnant mothers had received quality ANC services. The frequency of ANC visits and satisfaction with the ANC services were significantly associated with the quality of the ANC service provided. Pregnant women who attended a second visit or more had 2.2 times greater odds of receiving good-quality ANC compared to those who only attended their first ANC visit (AOR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.43–3.51). Furthermore, participants who are satisfied with the ANC service had about 6.2 times higher odds of receiving quality ANC in comparison to those who were dissatisfied (AOR = 6.21, 95% CI: 3.48–11.08).

Abbreviations: ANC: Antenatal care; AOR: Adjusted odd ratio; COR: Crude odd ratio; MMR: Maternal mortality rate; STI: Sexual transmitted infection; WHO: World Health Organization.

Keywords: Quality of ANC; Pregnant women; Factors associated

Introduction

Antenatal care (ANC) refers to the care provided by skilled healthcare professionals to pregnant mothers, aimed at ensuring optimal health for both the mother and the baby throughout the pregnancy period. It promotes a basis for health promotion, risk identification, prevention and management of pregnancy-related diseases to avoid health problems in both the fetus and mother [1]. Quality ANC consists of delivering essential services to every pregnant woman and her fetus, while also providing more specialized care for who require it. It is the most important issue to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) related to maternal health [2].

The World Health Organization (WHO) introduced a standard guideline for ANC that recommends a minimum of eight ANC contact sessions. It involves documenting medical history, providing pregnancy advice, evaluating personal needs, conducting various laboratory tests (HIV testing, urine analysis, blood type and Rh factor, and stool tests), conducting physical examinations, selfcare education, and recognizing health conditions that may be harmful during pregnancy, along with initial treatment and referral services when necessary. Additionally, it advises that individuals should receive at least two tetanus toxoid vaccinations, and consume iron and folic acid supplements for at least 90 days [3].

The maternal mortality rate continued to be unreasonably high worldwide. About 95% of maternal deaths took place in low and middle-income nations, and the majority of these deaths were avoidable [4,5]. Ethiopian demographic and health survey 2016 report estimated that there were 412 maternal deaths for every 100,000 live births, 62% of women received ANC from a skilled provider and 19% made four or more ANC visits [6]. This highlights the critical need for targeted interventions to address this serious problem. Preventing maternal mortality and improving maternal health depend on the provision of quality ANC [7,s8]. About 25% of maternal deaths worldwide happen during pregnancy [9]. It is possible to prevent 28% of maternal deaths by improving the quality of ANC provided to pregnant mothers who seek care in health facilities [10]. It seems that much more work needs to be done to address maternal healthcare service [11]. The quality of services plays a crucial role in the ANC outcomes of low-quality care is affected by various factors [12].

The SDGs aim to ensure universal access to high-quality sexual and reproductive health care services and to reduce the maternal mortality ratio to below 70 per 100,000 live births by the year 2030. Provision of quality ANC services necessitates the availability of appropriate infrastructure, well-trained healthcare professionals, infection prevention measures, diagnostic tools, necessary supplies and essential drugs. Also, the quality of ANC services can be highly affected by length of waiting times, providers interactions, and approach styles. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the quality of ANC and associated factors among pregnant women visiting a public health facility in Dilla town, Southern Ethiopia, 2024.

Methods and Materials

Study area and period

The study was carried out in Dilla town, Southern Ethiopia, approximately 359 km from the capital Addis Ababa, along the route to Moyale. The town’s estimated total population was 125,067. The town equipped with 1 referral hospital, 2 public health centers, 10 private clinics, 1 government pharmacy, and 12 private pharmacies. The three public health facilities offer regular ANC services to pregnant mothers, along with other maternity services. Data collection occurred from November 1 to November 30, 2024, across the three public health facilities.

Study Design

• Facility based cross sectional study

Source and study Population Source Population

• All pregnant women who visit public health facilities for ANC services.

Study Population

• Randomly selected pregnant women who visit public health facilities for ANC services.

Eligibility Criteria Inclusion Criteria

• All pregnant women who visit public health facilities for ANC service in Dilla town during the data collection period.

Exclusion Criteria

• All pregnant women who could not give informed consent (mentally impaired and critically ill) were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculations

The sample size was calculated by using a single population proportion formula by considering the following assumptions: 41.2% of pregnant women had received good quality ANC services in public hospitals in Sidama Region [13], 5% margin of error, 95% confidence level (1.96) and 10% for possible non-response rate.

Finally, 10% was added for compensating possible non-response rate. The total sample size was estimated to be 406.

Sampling Methods

The study included the three public health facilities that offer ANC services in Dilla town. By using the previous months ANC flow of pregnant women as a baseline, there were a total of 958 pregnant women visited those public health facilities (481 Dilla University Referral Hospital, 247 Haroresa Health Center, and 230 Oddaya Health Center) who fulfilled the eligibility criteria of the study. The number of pregnant women interviewed at each health facility was determined based on proportionate allocation to size. The interval (K) was calculated by dividing 958 by the sample size of 406, resulting in 2 intervals. The lottery method was employed to select the first participant for the study at each health facility. Subsequently, every other pregnant woman was interviewed, and a file checkup was conducted.

Data collection and quality control

Data were collected using structured questionnaires which are prepared by reviewing different literatures relevant to address the study objectives. Relevant experts reviewed the data collection tool to ensure it aligned with the study objective. The data was collected through exit interviews, document reviewing and an observational checklist. The data collection tool was pre-tested on 5% of the sample at the Wonago health center one week prior to the data collection. Three nurses were appointed as data collectors, along with one health officer serving as the supervisor. One-day training was provided on the study purpose, data collection tool, and data handling and maintaining respondent’s confidentiality.

Data analysis and processing

The collected data were coded, cleaned and entered in to a computer using EPI-DATA 3.1 and exported to the SPSS version 26 windows program for further analysis. Bivariable logistic regression was employed to identify candidate variables for multivariable logistic regression with a significance level of ≤ 0.25. Variables showing a p-value of < 0.05 in the final model were considered statistically significant. Both the crude odds ratio (COR) and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) along with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess the strength of the association. The assumptions of logistic regression were checked before the final multivariable analysis.

Operational Definition

• Quality of ANC: - It is a binary variable and set as 1 if the respondents had received all six essential ANC components and 0 unless. These components included checking blood pressure, blood and urine tests, being informed about potential complications, nutritional counseling, and advice on birth preparedness plan [14].
• Maternal satisfaction: It is individual perception of service that might be interpersonal relationships, short waiting time, information and education, privacy and confidentiality, cultural sensitivity, or emotional support.

Ethical consideration

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Research Ethical Review Committee (IRERC) at Pharma College School of Graduate Studies. Permission letters were acquired from the Dilla town health department, and formal letter was written to each healthcare facilities. Informed verbal consent was obtained from each study participants to confirm their willingness to participate after explaining the objective of the study. Participants were guaranteed that their responses would remain confidential from both data collectors and supervisors. The data collected was solely used for study purposes.

Result

Socio-demographic characteristics

A total of 406 expectant mothers were planned to be interviewed; however, 402 interviews were carried out, resulting in a response rate of 99%. The mean age of the participants was 26.36 (±4.8) years. The majority, 377 (93.8%), were in a married, and approximately two-thirds, 294 (73.1%) of them lived in a large family (> 4 members). Approximately a quarter 101 (25.1%) of the respondents was housewives. Around two-thirds, 270 (67.2%), of the pregnant women had a household income more than 3000 ETB (Table 1).

Obstetric history of respondents

The majority of 296 (73.6%) respondents had a previous history of pregnancy. Regarding birth interval, 188 (64.2 %) responded that they had more than 2 years for last birth. All respondents had information on the importance of ANC follow up, with health professionals being the primary source of information on ANC for 68.9% of them. About 236 (58.7%) of the respondents initiated their initial ANC visit in the first trimester of pregnancy. Nearly two-thirds 261 (64.9%) of the study participants had two or more ANC visits (Table 2).

Healthcare facility related factors

Nearly half, 193 (48%) of the participants had to wait more than an hour to get the service. Majority, 379 (94.3%), of the respondents were treated with respect by the provider on their latest visit. About three-quarters, 301 (74.9%) of the respondents were satisfied with the service they received from the healthcare facility. All respondents were appointed for the subsequent visit. Among the study participants, 255 (63.4%) needed to improve the service delivery to get a better ANC service (Table 3).

Service provision related factors

A comprehensive physical examination was a fundamental component of quality ANC services, with assessments of blood pressure (95.5%), weight measured (96.8%), evaluation of pallor (96.3%), assessment of edema (96.5%), and ultrasound performed (33.6%) as part of the comprehensive physical examination. In the routine laboratory tests, the CBC test (particularly Hgb) was conducted (76.4%), VDRL (71.1%), blood group/RH factor (72.6%), urine analysis (68.7%), and HIV test (96.3%). About 343 (85.3%) and 382 (95%) of the study participants acknowledged receiving iron supplementation and tetanus immunization, respectively (Table 4).

Observational checklist

The observational checklist had 15 questions with 4 options to choose from (1 for very poor, 2 for poor, 3 for satisfactory, and 4 for excellent). The first two choices (very poor and poor) indicated tasks were not performed correctly, while the latter two (satisfactory and excellent) indicated tasks were carried out correctly. About 30 study participants’ service provision and care provider approaches were assessed by taking 10 study participants from each health facility. Most individuals were not greeted and called by their names appropriately upon arrival. There were no washing facilities (water, soap, and towels) were available for pregnant women at the healthcare facility. The majority of healthcare pro viders accurately measured the patients’ pulse rate, blood pressure, and temperature. It was noted that most respondents’ gestational age, expected date of delivery and progress of pregnancy were correctly recorded.

Reviewing clinical documents before starting the session and checking about previous medical and obstetric history was properly done for all respondents. Nearly all participants were informed about risks of consuming unauthorized medications during pregnancy, advised on danger sign and place of birth.

Factors associated factors with the Quality of ANC

In bivariable logistic regression analysis variables such as current number of ANC visits, waiting time, satisfaction with ANC service and respectful approach were variables associated with dependent variables at p-value ≤ 0.25. After controlling the effect of confounding factors in multivariable analysis, variables such as number of ANC visits and satisfaction with ANC service were found to be significantly associated with the quality of ANC service at p-value <0.05.

The likelihood of getting quality ANC service was 2.2 times greater for pregnant mothers with a second visit or more (AOR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.43–3.51). Those who are satisfied with the ANC service had about 6.2 times higher odds of receiving quality ANC service (AOR = 6.21, 95% CI: 3.48–11.08) (Table 5).

Discussion

Facility based cross-sectional study was carried out to assess the quality of ANC and associated factors among pregnant women visiting public health facilities in Dilla town, Southern Ethiopia. This study revealed that 52% (95% CI: 51.5%–52.5%) of pregnant women had received good-quality ANC services, which was comparable with findings presented by studies conducted in Chenchass district, Southern Ethiopia (52.4%) [15] and Bahir Dar, Ethiopia (52.3%) [16]. Several studies conducted in different parts of the world, Southern Ethiopia (41.2%) [13], Northern Ethiopia (41%) [17], Northwest Ethiopia 32.7% [18], Eastern Ethiopia (24.3%) [19], Nepal (42%) [20] and Zambia (29%) [21] reported a lower prevalence of quality ANC than the present finding. In contrast to this, studies carried out in different parts of the world, South Ethiopia (69.1%) [12], Southwest Ethiopia (60.4%) [22], Bishoftu Central Ethiopia (84.9%) [23] and Malaysia (63%) [24] reported a higher prevalence of quality ANC utilized by pregnant women. These discrepancies might be related to differences in sociodemographic characteristics study participants, ANC quality measurement methods, availability of trained health professionals, approach of healthcare provider and study setting.

The odds of getting quality ANC increased by 2.2 times among women who had two or more ANC visits as compared with their counterparts (AOR=2.24; 95% CI: 1.43-3.51). This finding was consistent with studies done in Ethiopia, Northwest Ethiopia, Southern Ethiopia [25], Southern Ethiopia and Nigeria [26]. The possible reason might be that frequent exposure to ANC services might enhance the familiarity of women with the services and encourage them to freely share information with healthcare providers. This study showed that pregnant women who are satisfied by service provision had 6.21 times higher odds of quality ANC service compared with their counterparts (AOR=6.21; 95% CI: 3.48- 11.08). This finding was consistent with studies done in Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia [27], Southern Ethiopia, Southwest Ethiopia, Northwest Ethiopia, and West Ethiopia [28]. The possible explanation might be that satisfaction with ANC services might come from healthcare providers’ approach, laboratory investigation, physical examination, and advice given service provider.

Limitation

This study was aimed at determining the quality of ANC and associated factors among pregnant women attending public health facilities. However, the study was not free from some lim itations. This study was urban health facility-based; therefore, it might not be possible to generalize the findings to the entire pregnant women of the rural health facility. The study used only quantitative methods, if it was triangulated with qualitative data strong evidence could be generated.

Conclusion

This study showed that only half of the pregnant women get quality ANC service in public health facilities, which indicate that pregnant mothers who received quality ANC is low, and more effort is required. Different factors contributed to quality of ANC services, including number ANC visit and satisfaction with ANC. This study provides valuable indications about the areas that should be focused on to promote the quality of ANC service for pregnant mothers. Also, the country is still far from achieving universal coverage of recommended ANC content.

Data sharing statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge all study participants for their voluntary participation in the study. Also, we would like to extend our appreciation to Pharma College for the opportunity that they provided for us to conduct this study.

References

  1. WHO (2016) WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience.WHO, Editor: Geneva, Swizerland.
  2. WHO (2019) World health statistics of monitoring health for the sustainable development goals.
  3. Tadesse B, Modibia ML (2020) Assessment of quality of antenatal care services and its determinant factors in public health facilities of Hossana Town, Hadiya Zone, Southern Ethiopia: A Longitudinal Study. Advances in Public Health 1-11.
  4. Tegegne T, Chojenta C, Getachew T, Roger Smith, Deborah Loxton (2019) Antenatal care use in Ethiopia: a spatial and multilevel analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 19(1): 399.
  5. Mc Dougall L, Campbell OMR, Graham W (2016) Every woman, every newborn, everywhere has the right to good quality care. The Lancet Maternal Health Series.
  6. CSA (2016) Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey Key Findings. 279-282.
  7. Brizuela V, Leslie HH, Sharma J, Langer A, Tunçalp O (2019) Measuring quality of care for all women and newborns: how do we know if we are doing it right? A review of facility assessment tools. Lancet Glob Health 7(5): 624-632.
  8. Koblinsky M, Moyer CA, Calvert C, Campbell J, Oona M R Campbell, et al., (2016) Quality maternity care for every woman, everywhere: a call to action. . Lancet Glob Health, 388(10057): 2307-2320.
  9. Fagbamigbe AF, Idemudia ES (2017) Wealth and antenatal care utilization in Nigeria: Policy implications. Health Care Women Int 38(1): 17-37.
  10. Chou VB, Walker N, Kanyangarara M (2019) Estimating the global impact of poor quality of care on maternal and neonatal outcomes in 81 low- and middle-income countries: a modeling study. PLoS Med 16(12).
  11. EMoH (2015) Health sector transformation plan. The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  12. Shudura E, Yoseph Y,Tamiso T (2020) Utilization and predictors of maternal health care services among women of reproductive age in Hawassa university health and demographic surveillance system site, South Ethiopia: Adv Public Health 4(3).
  13. Kare AP, Gujo AB, Nigussie Yohanes Y (2021) Quality of antenatal care and associated factors among pregnant women attending government hospitals in Sidama Region, Southern Ethiopia. SAGE Open Medicine.
  14. Arsenault C, Jordan K, Lee D, Dinsa G, Manzi F (2018) Equity in antenatal care quality: an analysis of 91 national household surveys. Lancet Glob Health 6(11): 1186-1195.
  15. Abebe S, Alemayehu A, Gebremariam A, Dirar A (2017) Quality of antenatal care service in public health facilities of chencha district, gamo gofa zone, southern Ethiopia. MOJ Women’s Health 4(3): 57-64.
  16. Ejigu T, Woldie M, Kifle Y (2013) Quality of antenatal care services a tpublic health facilities of Bahir Dar special zone, Advances in Public Health Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Health Services Research 13(443).
  17. Gidey G, Hailu B, NK (2017) Timing of first focused antenatal care booking and associated factors among pregnant mothers who attend antenatal care in Central Tigray, Ethiopia. BMC Research Notes 10(1): 608.
  18. Kassaw A, Debie A, Demiss Mulatu G (2020) Quality of prenatal care and associated factors among pregnant women at public health facilities of Wogera District, Northwest Ethiopia. J Pregnancy.
  19. Tekelehaymanot G (2017) Assessment of Quality of Antenatal Care Service Provision and Associated Factor at Governmental Health Facilities of Harar Town, Eastern Ethiopia. Journal of General Practice 6(4).
  20. Chaurasiya SP, Pravana NK, Khanal V, Giri D (2019) Factors affecting antenatal care utilization among the disadvantaged Dalit population of Nepal. Open Public Health 12(3): 155-163.
  21. Nicholas N A Kyei, Collins Chansa, Sabine Gabrysch (2012) Quality of antenatal care in Zambia: a national assessment. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 5(2): 151.
  22. Chemir F, Alemseged F, Workneh D (2014) Satisfaction with focused antenatal care service and associated factors among pregnant women attending focused antenatal care at health centers in Jimma town, Jimma zone, South West Ethiopia; a facility based cross-sectional study triangulated with qualitative study. BMC Research Notes 7: 164.
  23. Denu M (2017) Assessment of quality of ANC service and its association with intention to deliver in public health facilities in Bishoftu town, Oromia, Ethiopia. Ethiopian journal of Reproductive health 3(2): 267.
  24. Yeoh PL, Hornetz K, Nor Izzah Ahmad Shauki, Maznah Dahlui (2018) Evaluating the quality of antenatal care and pregnancy outcomes using content and utilization assessment. Int J Qual Health Care 30(6): 466-471.
  25. Haile D, Habte A, Bogale B (2020) Determinants of frequency and content of antenatal care in postnatal mothers in Arba Minch Zuria District, Southern Ethiopia. Int J Women Health 12: 953-964.
  26. Fagbamigbe AF, Idemudia ES (2015) Assessment of quality of antenatal care services in Nigeria: evidence from a population based survey. BMC Reprod Health 12(88).
  27. Hailu GA, Weret ZS, Adasho ZA, Eshete BM (2022) Quality of antenatal care and associated factors in public health centers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, across-sectional study. PLoS ONE 17(6).
  28. Nemomsa A, Wirtu D, Getachew M, Kejela G, Emiru Merdassa, et al., (2022) Quality of antenatal care in selected public health facilities of West Ethiopia. Contraception and Reproductive Medicine 7(1):18.