Histocompatibility Assessment in Couples Associated with Gestosis/Preeclampsia: Step by Step Focus on an Immunopathogenetical Pathway Hypothesis
Lorella Battini1*, I de Luca Brunori1, Curcio M3, Mariotti ML3, Trojano G1, Bindi C1, Colantonio A1, Locci MT2, Chifenti B2 and Salerno MG1
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pisa, Italy
2Department of Translational Research and of New Surgical and Medical Technologies, University of Pisa Medical School, Italy
3Institute of Immunohematology, University of Pisa, Italy
Submission: August 15, 2017 ; Published: August 28, 2017
*Corresponding author: Lorella Battini, Europe OGASH Chair, OGASH Honorary Academician, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology ,Unit II, Hospital-University Health Care System S. Chiara Hospital, University of Pisa, Italy, Email: lorella.battini@gmail.com
How to cite this article: Lorella B, I de Luca B, Curcio M, Mariotti ML, Trojano G, et al. THistocompatibility Assessment in Couples Associated with Gestosis/Preeclampsia: Step by Step Focus on an Immunopathogenetical Pathway Hypothesis. J Gynecol Women's Health 2017; 6(4): 555694. DOI: 10.19080/JGWH.2017.06.555694
Aim of the Study
Gestosis/Preeclampsia is still an enigmatic leading killer in the field of obstetrics, affecting up to 8% of pregnancies with a 20% rate of recurrency. The placenta acts as an immunological barrier between the mother and the fetal “graft”, allowing two antigenically different organisms to tolerate one another. The syndrome quickly disappears at pregnancy interruption, as the fetus could be the target of a maternal rejective reaction. Moving from a rejection hypothesis of the fetal graft occurring in gestosis, we undertook these studies to evaluate at placental, plasmatic and DNA molecular level, the potential ethiopatogenetical role of the MHC-HLA antigens, which are implicated in self and non self recognition and in rejective reactions.
Materials and Methods
Previously, placentae from gestosis and normal pregnancies were tested by immunohistochemical study of placental endothelium with HLA-DR monoclonal antibodies. Furtherly, a placental ultrastructural and biochemical V-CAM 1 plasmatic study followed and finally laser confocal and electron microscopy assessment was carried out both through immuno-fluorescence and Immunocytochemistry for HLA-G1 antigen and ubiquitin. Gestosic/preeclamptic women, their partners and physiological control couples were also examined for HLA-DR assessment, chronologically performed by serological Terasaki technique, low and high resolution PCR and DNA sequence-based typing.
Results
Our first immunoistochemical study of placental endothelium showed a marked and widespread expression of HLA-DR antigens not occurring in normal pregnancy [1]. Subsequently, in placentae from gestosic/preeclamptic women we demonstrated, by ultrastructural evidence, a placental barrier breakage leading to the mixing of maternal and fetal antigenically different blood. This condition could be responsible for the triggering of that maternal rejective reaction presumed to be at the basis of gestosis syndrome. Thus, we investigated the Human Leukocyte class II DR Antigens (HLA-DR), whose role in self and not self recognition is well known, in women with gestosis, their partners and in control couples using the serological Terasaky technique [2-5].
The results showed a statistically significant increase of HLA-DR homozygosity and a reduced antigenical variety in the gestosic women and their partners with respect to control. The following update, studying the 2nd exon of the human gene HLA- DR p1 on the short arm of the chromosome 6, by DNA sequence- based typing (S-BT) PCR, in gestosic and control couples, confirmed the significant excess of HLA-DR homozygosity in partners associated with gestosis versus controls [5-7].
Discussion and Conclusion
Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural evidence of immunological activation and placental barrier disruption, strenghtly support the rejective hypothesis supposed occurring in gestosis. From serotyping and genotyping results in gestosis and control couples, it emerges that HLA-DR homozygosity and the reduced antigenical variety seem to be associated to a major risk for this syndrome which furtherly appears to be a “couple's disease”. The preliminary data of an ongoing case-control study, to evaluate by immunofluorescence and confocal laser, the potential HLA-G etiopathogenetic role in defective trophoblastic implantation associated with gestosis, are still under discussion [8].
We suggest HLA-DR pre-conception diagnosis in the couples. If HLA-DR homozygosity occurs in the woman and/ or in the man and /or HLA-Antigens sharing between partners with reduced antigenic disparity, we recommend to the future mother one year or more of free intercourses to allow the mother to recognize and tolerate the partner seminal histocompatibility antigens and then to tolerate the foetal allograft [9].
In this period, an alloreactive immune response to the paternal HLA antigens could develop, allowed to the male semen exposure during free sexual intercourses, (according to Dekker and Robillard), with protective effect on future embryo implantation. HLA-DR homozygosity, by reducing the Class II MHC Antigens variety between Partners, may be the cause of the failure of the maternal immunological protective reaction, which seems to be at the basis of Preeclampsia [10,11].
Due to the demonstrated reduction of heparin activity in gestosis placentae, a prophylactic treatment with LMWH since placentation, is recommended in couples associated with HLA- DR homozygosity, to prevent the open syndrome, whose real effective therapy is only pregnancy interruption, often related to adverse neonatal outcome, depending on severity and early onset of gestosis. The clinical experience in using heparin of our obstetric department, shared in the OG and OGASH, lead us to encourage the employment of an historical drug for new prophylactic implications in this syndrome, to improve foetal maternal outcome by significantly reducing mortality and morbidity.
References
- de Luca Brunori I, Battini L, Mariotti ML, Pecori F, Urbano M, et al. (1994) Gestosis and fetal rejection: immunopathogenetic role of HLA- DR. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 21(4): 228-230.
- de Luca Brunori I, Battini L, Boldrini E Clemente F, Simonelli M, et al. (1997) Increased VCAM-1 plasma levels in EPH gestosis: A marker of fetal rejection? Prenatal and Neonatal Medicine 2(4): 325-328
- de Luca Brunori I, Battini L, Simonelli M, Clemente F, Brunori E, et al. (2000) Increased HLA-DR homozygosity associated with preeclampsia. Hum Reprod 15(8): 1807-1812.
- de Luca Brunori I, Battini L, Simonelli M, Brunori E, Valentino V, et al. (2003) HLA-DR in couples associated with preeclampsia: background and updating by DNA sequencing. J Reprod Immunol 59 (2): 235-243.
- Luca Brunori I, Battini L, Brunori E, Lenzi P, Paparelli A, et al. (2005) Placental barrier breakage in preeclampsia: ultrastractural evidence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 118(2): 182-189.
- Robillard PY, Hulsey TC, Dekker GA, Chaouat G (2003) Preeclampsia and human reproduction. An assay of long term reflection. J Reprod Immunol 59(2): 93-100.
- Brunori I, Genazzani AR, Battini L, Simonelli M, Valentino V, et al. (2006) The fetal-placental unit as an allograft: Breakage of the Fetal Maternal tolerance in Gestosis. OGASH Press, Australia.
- Lenzi P, Battini L, Locci MT, Chifenti B, Fulceri AG, et al. (2008) Expression of human leukocyte antigen-G (HLA-G) in preeclampsia. Proceedings of 62nd Meeting of The Italian Society of Anatomy and Istology 133: 161-162.
- Chifenti B, Locci MT, Trojano G, Bottone P, Salerno GM, Battini L (2016) HLA-G intracellular Expression in decidua trophoblasts in a normal term placenta: a confocal and transmission electron microscopy study, Italian J OG 28: 27-34
- Battini L, Brunori IL (2011) Breaking Down Preeclampsia: "The HLA Challenge”. Ulusal Perinatoloji Kongresi 13-16 Nisan 2011. Istanbul Perinatoloji Dergisi 19(2): 16-17.
- Battini L, Locci MT, Chifenti P, Lenzi P, Bottone B, et al. (2012) Hla and Preeclampsia: Preventive Role of Biodiversity. IJGO 119: S294.