Assay and Dissolution Methods Development and Validation for Simultaneous Determination of Sofosbuvir and Ledipasvir by RP-HPLC Method in Tablet Dosage Forms
Mohamed El-Kassem M Hassouna1*, Maha Mohammed Abdelrahman2 and Mahmoud Abdelfatah Mohamed3
1Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Egypt
2Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Egypt
3HIKMA group, Pharmaceutical Company, Beni-Suef, Egypt
Submission: December 05, 2016; Published: January 03, 2017
*Corresponding author: Mohamed El-Kassem M Hassouna, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, 62514, Egypt, Tel: +2-01223861504; Email: mhassouna47@hotmail.com; Mohamed.hossona@science.bsu.edu.eg
How to cite this article: Hassouna M E M, Abdelrahman M M, Mohamed M A. Assay and Dissolution Methods Development and Validation for Simultaneous Determination of Sofosbuvir and Ledipasvir by RP-HPLC Method in Tablet Dosage Forms. J Forensic Sci & Criminal Inves. 2017; 1(3): 555562. DOI: 10.19080/JFSCI.2017.01.555562
Abstract
Specific, accurate, simple, selective and stability-indicating RP-HPLC method is developed and validated for simultaneous determination of Sofosbuvir and Ledipasvir in tablet dosage form for assay and dissolution methods. RP-HPLC method was performed on the Eclipse XDB C18 column (250 mm X 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size, using buffer solution of pH 3.0 containing 0.02 M potassium dihydrogen phosphate and 5.7 mM hexane sulfonate:acetonitrile (50:50 v/v) as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min, injection volume 10 μL and UV detection at 254 nm. This method is validated according to BP, USP and ICH requirements for new methods, which include accuracy, precision, selectivity, robustness, ruggedness, LOD, LOQ, linearity and range. Linear relationships were obtained in the ranges of 40-500 μg/mL and 30-300 μg/ mL with correlation coefficients of 0.9998, 0.9996, 0.9996 and 0.9993 at RT value of 2.429 min and 4.529 min for Sofosbuvir and Ledipasvir respectively for assay content and dissolution rate. The forced degradation studies as acidity, alkalinity, oxidation, heat, thermal, humidity and photo degradation were performed according to ICH guidelines. The accurate determination of both drugs is very important for Forensic and Criminal Investigations from the point of view of Forensic pharmacy.
Keywords: Sofosbuvir; Ledipasvir; Forced degradation; Tablet dosage form; Assay; Dissolution; HPLC; Forensic pharmacy
Abbreviations: EDHS: Egyptian Demographic Health Survey; SOF: Sofosbuvir; FDC: Fixed-Dose Combination; LDV: Ledipasvir; IS: Internal Standard; DAC: Daclatasvir; AD: Alcohol Dependence; HCV: Hepatitis C virus; HIV: Human Immuno deficiency Virus; EPCI :Egyptian Pharmaceutical and Chemical Industry
Introduction
Globally, between 130-150 millions of people have chronic hepatitis C infection. A significant number of those who are chronically infected will develop liver cirrhosis or liver cancer. Approximately 700 000 people die each year from hepatitis C-related liver diseases [1]. Egypt has the largest epidemic of HCV in the world according to the released Egyptian Demographic Health Survey [EDHS] and the overall prevalence (percentage of people) positive for antibody to HCV in Egypt was 14.7% [2]. The current population in Egypt is about 90 millions, thus ≈ 13, 2millions of persons who have been infected with this virus. Gilead Sciences overcome most common related liver diseases by its Great invention (Harvoni). Harvoni (90 mg ledipasvir/400 mg sofosbuvir) approved by United States FDA. It is indicated for the treatment of chronic HCV genotypes 1, 4, 5, and 6 in adults and also indicated for the treatment of chronic HCV in patients co-infected with HIV. Sofosbuvir (SOF); is chemically known as (S)-Isopropyl 2-((S)-(((2R,3R,4R,5R)-5-(2,4-dioxo-3,4-dihydropyrimidin-1(2H]-yl]-4-fluoro-3- hydroxy-4-methyl tetrahydrofuran-2-yl) methoxy) -(phenoxy) phosphorylamino)propanoate. It has a molecular formula of C22H29FN3O9P and a molecular weight of 529.45 (Figure 1).
Sofosbuvir is a white to off-white powder with a solubility of ≥ 2 mg/mL across the pH range of 2-7.7 at 37°C. The partition coefficient (log P) for Sofosbuvir is 1.62 and the pKa is 9.3 [3]. Sofosbuvir is a pangenotypic inhibitor of the HCV NS5B RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, which is essential for viral replication [4]. Sofosbuvir is a nucleotide prodrug that undergoes intracellular activation to form GS-461203 (active triphosphate, not detected in plasma), and ultimately the inactive, renally eliminated metabolite GS-331007 [5]. The pharmacologically active uridine analog triphosphate (GS-461203) can be incorporated by HCV NS5B and acts as a chain terminator. In a biochemical assay, GS-461203 inhibits the polymerase activity of the recombinant NS5B from HCV genotype 1b, 2a, 3a and 4a with an IC50 value ranging from 0.7 to 2.6 μM. GS-461203 is neither an inhibitor of human DNA and RNA polymerases nor an inhibitor of mitochondrial RNA polymerase [6]. Sofosbuvir/ Ledipasvir is a fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet containing Sofosbuvir (a previously approved NS5B polymerase inhibitor) and ledipasvir, a new NS5A-inhibitor [3]. Ledipasvir (LDV); is chemically known as Methyl [(2S]-1-{(6S]-6-[5-(9,9-difluoro-7- {2-[(1R,3S,4S)-2-{ (2S)-2-[(methoxycarbonyl)amino]-3- methylbutanoyl}-2-azabicyclo[2.2.1]hept-3-yl]-1H-benzimidazol-6-yl}-9H-fluoren-2-yl]-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-azaspiro[2.4] hept-5-yl}-3-methyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl]carbamate.
It has a molecular formula of C49H54F2N8O6 and a molecular weight of 889.00 (Figure 2). Ledipasvir is a white to tinted (off- white, tan, yellow, orange, or pink), slightly hygroscopic crystalline solid. Ledipasvir is practically insoluble (<0.1 mg/mL) across the pH range of 3.0-7.5 and is slightly soluble below pH 2.3 (1.1 mg/mL). The partition coefficient (log P) for ledipasvir is 3.8 and the pKa1 is 4.0 and pKa2 is 5.0 [3]. Ledipasvir is an HCV inhibitor targeting the HCV NS5A protein, which is essential for both RNA replication and the assembly of HCV virions. Biochemical confirmation of NS5A inhibition of ledipasvir is not currently possible as NS5A has no enzymatic function. In vitro resistance selection and cross-resistance studies indicate ledipasvir targets NS5A as its mode of action [6]. The combination of these two drugs is not official in any pharmacopoeia [7, 8]. Very recently, a limited number of methods have been developed for the individual and simultaneous determination of both drugs. The degradation products of SOF under several stress conditions have been determined by HPLC [9,10]. SOF's disposition was characterized into various in vivo cell types [11].
Sofosbuvir in human plasma was determined by UPLC-MS/ MS method [12]. Quantification of Sofosbuvir and its metabolite, GS-331007, in human plasma has been determined by UPLC-ESI- MS/MS method [13]. Simultaneous quantification of ribavirin, sofosbuvir and its metabolite in rat plasma by UPLC-MS/MS has been reported [14]. SOF in pure form [15], in bulk and tablet dosage form was determined by RP-HPLC [16]. Finally, sofosbuvir (SOF) was used as an internal standard (IS) in an UPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of daclatasvir (DAC) in human plasma [17]. While for LDV, only two methods have been published for its individual determination in bulk drug form by simple UV spectrophotometry [18] and by RP-HPLC [19]. Both sofosbuvir and ledipasvir in human plasma were determined by UPLC-MS/MS method [20] and besides some antiviral agents [21]. Ledipasvir, sofosbuvir and its metabolite in rat plasma were also, determined by UPLC-MS/MS [22].
According to the best of our knowledge, only one HPLC method [23] has been published, during the preparation of the present work for publishing. The present study aims to develop a simple, sensitive, short retention time and accurate RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of both SOF and LDV together in pure and tablet dosage forms with high sensitivity, selectivity that are required to forensic pharmacy which is an application of the sciences of drugs to legal issues. Forensic pharmacists engage in work relating to litigation, the regulatory process, and the criminal justice system. Forensic pharmacy overlaps with many other forensic fields. A forensic pharmacist can be a valuable resource in legal cases relating to malpractice, adverse drug reactions, drunk and drugged driving, health care fraud, poisoning, and numerous other types of civil and criminal cases [24]. Forensic science can e.g., reveal old alcohol dependence (AD), the internal comorbidities and the presence of any psychiatric comorbidity. Liver problems are one of the most common causes of alcohol-related liver damage. 45% of deaths from cirrhosis are alcohol-related [25]. Validation of the developed methods was performed according to ICH guidelines [26].
Experimental
Chemicals and reagents
- Pure samples: Pure samples of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir were kindly supplied by the Egyptian Pharmaceutical and Chemical Industry ( EPCI ); EPCI pharmaceutical company which is a part of Hikma group, Beni-Suef, Egypt with claimed purity of 99.8% according to manufacturer certificates of analysis.
- Pharmaceutical dosage form: Heterosofir Plus (Harvoni®) 400 mg/90 mg 28 FCT (Batch No. 141610A) were manufactured by Pharmed Healthcare, 7th industrial zone, Al Sadat city, Al Menufia-Egypt. Each tablet is claimed to contain 400 mg of sofosbuvir & 90 mg ledipasvir.
- Chemicals: Acetonitrile, Methanol, water HPLC-grades, potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate analytical grade and 1-sodium hexane sulfonate were procured from (scharlau, Spain).
Instrumentation
- HPLC system (Agilent 1260 Infinity, Germany) instrument was equipped with an Agilent 1260 Infinity preparative pump (G1361A), Agilent 1260 Infinity DAD detector VL (G131SD), Agilent 1260 Infinity Thermostated column compartment (G1316A) and Agilent 1260 Infinity preparative Auto sampler (G2260A). Separation and quantitation was performed on Agilent Eclipse XDB- C18 (250 X 4.6 mm i.d, 5 μm particle size).
- HPLC system (Shimadzu LC SPD 20 A) with a detector (dual wavelength), equipped with a binary pump, Auto sampler, oven CTO-20A/20AC with temperature range (10- 85°C), LC Solution software.
- The UV- 1800 double beam UV-Visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu-Japan) with highest resolution which spectral bandwidth is (1 nm from 1901100 nm range) was used for all absorbance measurements. Matched with 1cm quartz cells. Perform data analysis by software (UV-Probe 2.5.2).
- Dissolution apparatus (DIS 6000).
- Stability chamber (VOSTCH VP 1300, Germany).
A. Mobile phase preparation: Buffer: Acetonitrile (50:50): Phosphate buffer was prepared by dissolving 2.72 gm of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and 1.167 gm of Hexanesulphonic acid of sodium salt monohydrate in 700 ml HPLC grade water and sonicated to dissolve, adjust pH to 3.0 by orthophosphoric acid solution. Make up to 1000 ml with HPLC grade water, filtered and degassed mixtures of buffer and acetonitrile (50:50) through 0.45 μ membrane filter under vacuum pump.
i. Diluent: Methanol HPLC-grade
B. HPLC Chromatographic Conditions: Chromatographic separation was performed on column Agilent Eclipse XDB- C8 (250 X 4.6 mm i.d, 5 μm particle size). Using a mobile phase mixture of phosphate buffer and acetonitrile in the ratio of 50:50% v/v at ambient temperature, flow rate of 1.5 mL/min, UV detection was performed at 254 nm, injection volume was 10 μL and run time was 8.0 min.
i. Preparation of Standard Solution and Test solution for Assay: Stock standard solutions of Sofosbuvir and Ledipasvir: 40 mg of SOF and 9.0 mg of LDV working standards were weighed accurately, transferred into 20 ml volumetric flask, add 10 ml of diluent and sonicate to dissolve. Make up to the mark with the same diluent and mix (Conc. of SOF 2000 μg/mL and LDV 450 μg /mL).
ii. Authentic Prepared Mixture: Accurately transfer 1.0 ml of each of SOF and LDV from their stock solutions into 10 ml volumetric flask, add diluent and sonicate to dissolve. Make up to the mark with the same diluent and mix. Inject into the chromatographic system (Conc. of SOF 200 μg/mL and LDV 45 μg/mL). The chromatogram obtained was shown in (Figure 3).
iii. Application to pharmaceutical formulation (Heterosofir Plus 400 mg/90 mg 28 FCT): Weigh not less than 10 tablets and determine the average weight of one tablet. Grind to fine powder. Transfer an accurately weighed weight from powdered tablets equivalent to the average weight of one tablet into a 200-ml volumetric flask. Add about 100 ml diluent, sonicate till dissolve and complete to volume with the same diluent and mix well. Take, from the prepared flask, 10 ml into 100 ml volumetric flask and complete volume with diluent. Filter through 0.45 μm syringe filter and inject into the chromatographic system. The chromatogram obtained was shown in (Figure 4). Also the standard addition technique has been carried out to assess the validity of the method by spiking the pharmaceutical formulation with known amount of standard solution of SOF and LDV. The recovery of the added standards was then calculated after applying the proposed methods.
iv. Preparation of dissolution media, standard solution and test solution
a) Dissolution parameters
a. Medium: Phosphate buffer pH 6.8, Volume: 1000 ml, Apparatus: USP Type-II (Paddle), RPM: 75 at temperature 37°C ± 0.5°C
b. Time: 10, 15, 25, 35, 45 minutes
b) Dissolution media: Weigh 6.8 g of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and 0.89 g of sodium hydroxide into 1000 ml volumetric flask then adjust the pH to 6.8 ± 0.1 using phosphoric acid or sodium hydroxide solutions.
v. Stock standard solution of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir: 40 mg of SOF and 9.0 mg of LDV working standards were weighed accurately, transferred into 20 ml volumetric flask, add 10 ml of diluent and sonicate to dissolve. Make up to the mark with the same diluent and mix (Conc. of SOF 2000 μ.g/mL and LDV 450 μg /mL).
vi. Lab prepared mixture: From the stock solution, transfer 1.0 ml into 10 ml volumetric flask then complete to volume using dissolution medium and inject into the chromatographic system. The obtained chromatogram was shown in (Figure 5).
vii. Test solutions: Fill the vessels with 1000 ml dissolution medium at 37±0.5°C. Place one tablet in each vessel, apply the conditions specified. After the specified time withdraw a portion of 50 ml of the dissolution medium, cool to ambient temperature. Filter through 0.45 μm syringe filter, discard the first 25 ml of filtrate and transfer 10 ml of filtrate into 20 ml volumetric flask then complete to volume using the dissolution medium and inject into the chromatographic system. The obtained chromatogram was shown in (Figure 5).
viii. Construction of calibration curves: Different concentrations of SOF and LDV equivalent to (40-500) μg/ mL and (30-300) μg/mL for SOF and LDV, respectively, were separately weighed from their respective working standards into separate series of 100 mL volumetric flasks, and the volumes were made up to volume with the diluent. Duplicate 10 μL injections were made for each concentration maintaining the flow rate at 1.5 mL/min and the effluent was UV- scanned at 254 nm. The chromatographic separation was performed following the procedure under chromatographic conditions. The chromatograms were recorded, peak areas of SOF and LDV were determined and the calibration curves relating the obtained integrated peak areas to the corresponding concentrations were constructed and the regression equations were performed.
Results
Chromatograms were obtained at retention times 2.429 min for SOF and 4.529 min for LDV. No occurrences of interfering peaks have been recorded.
Discussion
Very recently, while our work is in the course of publication, a publication [23] that related the simultaneous determination of both SOF and LDV by RP-HPLC method in Tablet dosage form has been published in 29/09/2016; this was performed on Luna analytical column octyl silica packing (Si-[CH2]7- CH3) C8, using ammonium acetate buffer solution at pH 7.0 and acetonitrile 35:65% v/v as mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.7 mL min-1 for isocratic elution using a UV detector at 245 nm. The retention times of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir were 4.468 ± 0.013 min and 8.242 ± 0.012 min, respectively, and the total run time was 20min. The present method has been performed on Eclipse XDB C8 column (250 mm X 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size, using buffer solution of pH 3.0 containing 0.02 M potassium dihydrogen phosphate and 5.7 mM hexane sulfonate:acetonitrile (50:50 v/v) as the mobile phase at a much slower flow rate of 1.5 ml/min, injection volume 10 μL and UV detection at 254 nm.
Advantages of the present method is that less time is consumed for analysis, where the retention times of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir were 2.429 min and 4.529 min, respectively, and the total run time was 8.0 min. compared with 20min. for the contemporaneous method. The conditions of the present method succeeded in achieving linear relationships in the ranges of 40-500 μg/mL and 30-300 μg/mL, respectively, compared with corresponding ranges of 8.0-96.0 μg/ml for SOF and 1.8 -21.6 μg/ml for LDV [23]. The dynamic range of LDV is quite limited [23]. Also, significantly different and short Rt values of 2.429 min and 4.529 min. for SOF and LDV were achieved with correlation coefficients of 0.9999 and 0.9997, respectively compared to corresponding Rt values of 4.468 and 8.242 min with correlation coefficients of 0.9999 and 0.9999, respectively [23]. In the present work, heat stress studies and photo degradation have been performed. A comparison between the two methods was recorded in (Table 1).
Methods development and optimization
Different developing systems of different compositions and ratios were tried including: methanol: water (70:30, v/v), Acetonitrile: water (70:30, v/v). Sodium Acetate pH (5.0): ACN (50:50, v/v) and Sodium dihydrogen phosphate pH (4.0): ACN (50:50, v/v) no peak was observed for LDV, phosphate buffer pH (3.0) + hexane sulfonate: ACN (50:45, v/v). It was found that presence of hexane sulfonate in the developing system is essential for separation and improving tailing of peaks, but still eluted late. Finally, using mixture of buffer phosphate pH (3.0):ACN (50:50), it was found that this mixture is the best for the separation of both drugs and their degradation products. Different flow rates were tried (0.8, 1.2, 1.4 and 1.5 ml/min), scanning wavelengths (200-400 nm) were also tried for both drugs in pure form (Conc. of SOF 40 μg/mL and LDV 9 μg/mL), laboratory prepared mixture and dosage form, 254 nm was the best suitable absorbance for both drugs (Figure 3). Preliminary studies involved trying C18, C8 reversed-phase columns. The best developing system was phosphate buffer pH (3.0) + hexane sulfonate: ACN (50:50, v/v) at flow rate of 1.5 ml/min and at wavelength of 254.0 nm using column Agilent Eclipse XDB- C8 (250 mm X 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μm). This selected developing system allows good separation between the drug and its degradation with good Rt values without tailing of the separated bands and good theoretical plates.
Method validation
The method was validated, in accordance with ICH guidelines (ICH Q2R1), for system suitability, precision, accuracy, linearity, specificity, ruggedness, robustness, LOD and LOQ [26].
Linearity and range
The linearity of the proposed methods was obtained in the concentration range (40.0 to 500.0 μg/ml) for sofosbuvir and (30.0 to 300.0 μg/ml) for ledipasvir for assay content and dissolution rate. Calibration graphs were plotted on the basis of analysis of each calibration solution. The coefficient of regression obtained was 0.9999 for SOF and 0.9997 for LDV for assay content and 0.9997 for SOF and 0.9996 for LDV for dissolution rate. Linearity results were shown in (Table 2).
aLimit of detection (3.3* σt /Slope) and limit of quantitation (10* σt /Slope).
bRepeatability for ≥5, RSD ≤2.
Repeatability
Repeatability of the method was evaluated by calculating the RSD of the peak areas of six replicate injections for the standard concentration (200.0 μg/ml) of SOF and (45.0 μg/ml) of LDV. Results were examined as %RSD values of the concentrations of determined drugs. Low values of %RSD(less than 2) indicate high precision of the method as shown in (Table 2).
Detection and quantitation limits
These approaches are based on the Standard Deviation of the Response and the Slope. A specific calibration curve should be studied using samples containing an analyte in the range of LOD and LOQ. The residual standard deviation of a regression line or the standard deviation of y-intercepts of regression line may be used as the standard deviation. LOD=3.3*σ /slope and LOQ =10xσ /slope, where σ = the standard deviation of the response (Table 2).
Accuracy and recovery
Accuracy of the proposed methods was calculated as the percentage recoveries of pure samples of the studied drugs. Accuracy is assessed using three different concentrations covering the specified range from (40.0 to 500.0 μg/ml) for SOF and (30.0 to 300.0 μg/ml) for LDV (i.e. three concentrations and three replicates). Concentrations were calculated from the corresponding regression equations. The mean % recoveries for SOF and LDV were between 98.0% to 102% for assay content and dissolution rate. These data are shown in (Tables 3 & 4). Accuracy was further assessed by applying the standard addition technique to Heterosofir Plus, where good recoveries were obtained revealing that there was no interference from excipients (Table 5).
Formulation assay
The validated method was applied on commercially available Heterosofir Plus. The results of the assay undertaken yielded 99.84% and 97.06% of the label claim for SOF and LDV. Results of the assay indicated that the method is selective for the analysis of Heterosofir Plus ® FCT without interference from the excipients used to formulate and produce these tablets. The results were displayed in (Tables 6 & 7).
Intermediate precision (ruggedness)
Intermediate precision expresses within-laboratories variations: different days, different analysts, different equipments, etc. Good results were obtained and presented in (Table 8).
Robustness
The robustness of the proposed methods was evaluated in the development phase where the effects of different factors on the method were studied to obtain the optimum parameters for complete separation. Robustness of the method was studied by deliberately varying parameters like flow rate (±0.1 mL/ min) and studying the effect of changing mobile phase pH by (±0.2), acetonitrile composition (±5%) and column temperature changed (35° & 25°). The low values of the %RSD, as given in (Table 9), indicate the robustness of the proposed methods.
System suitability
Tests are based on the concept that the equipment, electronics, analytical operations and samples to be analyzed constitute an integral system that can be evaluated as such. System suitability was checked by calculating tailing factor (T), column efficiency (N), resolution (Rs) factors. All calculated parameters were within the acceptable limits indicating good selectivity of the methods and ensuring system performance, (Table 10).
Stability of analytical solution
To demonstrate the stability of standard solution during analysis, solution was analyzed over a period of 24h at room temperature and refrigerator. The results showed that for all the solutions, the retention times and peak areas of SOF and LDV remained almost unchanged (RSD<2.0%) indicating that no significant degradation occurred within this period, i.e. both solutions were stable for at least 24h, which was sufficient to complete the whole analytical process. The results were displayed in (Table 11).
Specificity
- Placebo interference: Specificity was tested against standard compounds and against potential interferences in the presence of placebo. No interference was detected.
- Forced degradation: The Forced degradation of API was carried out as per ICH guidelines (ICH, Q2B) in acid, base, humidity, oxidation, photo, heat and thermal. The results were displayed in (Table 12). Also, peak purity was applied for SOF and LDV in (Figure 6) and data was shown in (Table 13).
- Acid degradation: Weigh accurately 20.0 mg of SOF and 4.5 mg of LDV into 100 mL volumetric flask, dissolve in 70 mL of diluent and 5 ml of 1.0 N aqueous HCl solution and close the volumetric flask by stopper. Keep the solution at room temperature up to 48 hr. Neutralize with 1.0 N aqueous NaOH solution and make up to the mark with the diluent, inject into the chromatographic system and calculate the percent of degradation (Table 12).
- Base degradation: Weigh accurately 20.0 mg of SOF and 4.5 mg of LDV into 100 mL volumetric flask, dissolve in 70 mL of the diluent and 5ml of 1.0N aqueous NaOH solution and close the volumetric flask by stopper. Keep the solution at room temperature up to 48 hr. Neutralize with 1.0 N aqueous HCl solution and make up to the mark with the diluent, inject into the chromatographic system and calculate the percent of degradation (Table 12).
- Peroxide degradation: Weigh accurately 20.0 mg of SOF and 4.5 mg of LDV into 100 mL volumetric flask, dissolve in 70 mL of the diluent, add 3 ml of 3.0% aqueous H2O2 solution and close the volumetric flask by stopper. Keep the solution at room temperature up to 48 hr. Inject into the chromatographic system and calculate the percent of degradation. No interference was found, although there was some degradation products appeared after H2O2 treatment due to the peak of hydrogen peroxide. And the degradation percent was calculated as shown in (Table 12).
- Photo degradation: Photo degradation is carried out by keeping the powders of SOF and LDV under sun light for 48 hours then accurately transfers 20.0 mg of SOF and 4.5 mg of LDV into 100 mL volumetric flask, dissolve in 70 mL of the diluent and dilute up to the mark with the same solvent. Inject into the chromatographic system and calculate the percent of degradation. No degradation products appeared after light degradation. But it has been noted that peak areas of SOF and LDV are affected after exposure to sunlight, data was shown in (Table 12).
- Heat degradation: Heat stress studies were carried out by keeping the powders of SOF and LDV in drying oven at 80°C for 8 hr then accurately transfers 20.0mg of SOF and 4.5 mg of LDV into 100 mL volumetric flask, dissolved in 70 mL of diluent and up to the mark. Inject into the chromatographic system and calculate the percent of degradation. No degradation products appeared after heat degradation. But it has been noted that peak areas of SOF and LDV are affected after exposure to heat, therefore, it is recommended to avoid heating during sonication; data was shown in (Table 12).
- Thermal degradation: Thermal stress studies were carried out by keeping the powders of SOF and LDV in climatic chamber at storage condition 40°C ± 2 & 75% ± 5% RH for one week then accurately transfer 20.0 mg of SOF and 4.5 mg of LDV into 100 mL volumetric flask, dissolve in 70 mL of diluent and complete to the mark with the same solvent. Inject into the chromatographic system, and calculate the percent of degradation. No degradation products appeared after thermal degradation. Data was shown in (Table 12).
Conclusion
The proposed RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir in their dosage form is simple, precise, specific, highly accurate, selective and less time consuming for analysis. The analytical method is valid, fit for use and can be used for regular routine analysis, stability studies and forensic sciences & criminal investigation.
Acknowledgement
The authors are thankful to the Publishers of the Journal of Forensic Sciences & Criminal Investigation for the publication gift provided.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
References
- (2016) WHO Hepatitis C. Fact Sheet no. 164.
- Kandeel A, Genedy M, El-Refai S, Funk AL, Fontanet A, et al. (2016) The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in Egypt 2015: implications for future policy on prevention and treatment. Liver Int.
- European Medicines Agency (2014) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) EMA/702742/2014.
- Keating GM (2014) Sofosbuvir: a review of its use in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Drugs 74(10): 1127-1146.
- Kirby BJ, Symonds WT, Kearney BP, Mathias AA (2015) Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic and Drug-Interaction Profile of the Hepatitis C Virus NS5B Polymerase Inhibitor Sofosbuvir. Clin Pharmacokinet 54(7): 677-690.
- (2014) HARVONI tablets for oral use. US Prescribing Information Gilead Sciences, Inc. Foster City, USA.
- (2014) European Pharmacopeia (8th edn).
- The United States Pharmacopoeia 38th Revision (2015) NF 33. The United States Pharmacopoeia Convention Inc.
- Swain D, Samanthula G, Bhagat S, Bharatam PV, Akula V, et al. (2016) Characterisation of forced degradation products and in silico toxicity prediction of Sofosbuvir: a novel HCV NS5B polymerase inhibitor. J Pharm Biomed Anal 120: 352-363.
- Nebsen M, Elzanfaly ES (2016) Stability-Indicating Method and LC-MS- MS Characterization of Forced Degradation Products of Sofosbuvir. J Chromatogr Sci.
- Joseph E Rower, Leah C Jimmerson, Xinhui Chen, Jia-Hua Zheng, Ariel Hodara, et al. (2015) Validation and application of an LC-MS/MS method to determine the concentrations of sofosbuvir. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 59(12): 7671-7679.
- Rezk MR, Basalious EB, Amin ME (2016) Novel and sensitive UPLC- MS/MS method for quantification of Sofosbuvir in human plasma: application to a bioequivalence study. Biomed Chromatogr 30: 13541362.
- Rezk MR, Basalious EB, Karim IA (2015) Development of a sensitive UPLC-ESI-MS/MS method for quantification of sofosbuvir and its metabolite, GS-331007, in human plasma: application to a bioequivalence study. J Pharm Biomed Anal 114: 97-104.
- Shi X, Zhu D, Lou J, Zhu B, Hu AR, et al. (2015) Evaluation of a rapid method for the simultaneous quantification of ribavirin, sofosbuvir and its metabolite in rat plasma by UPLC-MS/MS. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 1002: 353-357.
- Vikas PM, Satyanarayana T, Kumar DV, Mounika E, Sri LM, Sathish Y (2016) Development and validation of new RP-HPLC method for the determination of sofosbuvirin pure form. World Journal of pharmacy and pharmaceutical Sciences 5(5): 775-781.
- Ravikumar Vejendla, CVS Subramanyam, G Veerabhadram (2016) Estimation and validation of sofosbuvir in bulk and tablet dosage form by RP-HPLC. International Journal of Pharmacy 6(2): 121-127.
- Rezk MR, Bendas ER, Basalious EB, Karim IA (2016) Development and validation of sensitive and rapid UPLC-MS/MS method for quantitative determination of daclatasvir in human plasma: Application to a bioequivalence study. J Pharm Biomed Anal 128: 61-6.
- Ranjana S, Nitin S, Ganesh T, Gholve SB (2016) Development and Validation of Simple UV Spectrophotometric Method for the Determination of Ledipasvir in Bulk Form and Stress Degradation Studies. Inventi Rapid: Pharm Analysis & Quality Assurance 3: 1-5.
- J Devilal, B Durgaprasad, Narottam Pal, A Srinivasa Rao (2016) New method development and validation for the determination of ledipasvir in bulk drug form by using reverse phase HPLC technique. World Journal of pharmacy and pharmaceutical Sciences 5(8): 13121321.
- Rezk MR, Bendas ER, Basalious EB, Karim IA (2016) Quantification of Sofosbuvir and ledipasvir in human plasma by UPLC-MS/MS method: Application to fasting and fed bioequivalence study. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 1028: 63-70.
- Ariaudo A, Favata F, De Nicolò A, Simiele M, Paglietti L, et al. (2016) A UHPLC-MS/MS method for the quantification of direct antiviral agents simeprevir, daclatasvir, ledipasvir, sofosbuvir/GS-331007, dasabuvir, ombitasvir and paritaprevir, together with ritonavir, in human plasma. J Pharm Biomed Anal 125: 369-375.
- Pan C, Chen Y, Chen W, Zhou G, Jin L, et al. (2G16) Simultaneous determination of ledipasvir, sofosbuvir and its metabolite in rat plasma by UPLC-MS/MS and its application to a pharmacokinetic study. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 1GG8: 255-259.
- Zaman B, Siddique F, Hassan W(2016) RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Determination of Sofosbuvir and Ledipasvir in Tablet Dosage Form and Its Application to In Vitro Dissolution Studies. Chromatographia 79(23): 1605-1613.
- Anderson PD (2G12) The broad field of forensic pharmacy. J Pharm Pract 25(1): 7-12.
- Borro P, Leone S, Testino G (2G16) Liver Disease and Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Alcoholics: The Role of Anticraving Therapy. Curr Drug Targets 17(2): 239-251.
- ICH (2005) Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2(R1). ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline.