WEE1 Inhibitor AZD1775 as a Promising Therapeutic Approach for Ovarian Cancer
Yang S1, Leslie KK2 and Meng X3*
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, USA
Submission: September 18, 2017; Published: September 27, 2017
*Corresponding author: Meng X, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Holden Comprehensive Canc Center, The University of Iowa, USA, Email:xiangbing-meng@uiowa.edu
How to cite this article: Yang S, Leslie K, Meng X. WEE1 Inhibitor AZD1775 as a Promising Therapeutic Approach for Ovarian Cancer. Int J cell Sci & mol biol. 2017; 3(3) : 555614. DOI: 10.19080/IJCSMB.2017.03.555614.
Opinion
Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most deadly ofthe gynecologic malignancies. The asymptomatic nature of the disease and a high rate of chemo resistance result in a long-term survival rate of only 30%. Despite the high response rate to initial treatments, most women diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer will eventually have a recurrence. Women with Type II ovarian cancers (e.g., HGSC) are likely to have higher rates of recurrence. Patients with cancers that are not responsive to front-line therapy are typically treated with other agents (e.g., gemcitabine or etoposide), but the overall response to these agents remains poor and the median PFS is only 3 months on average. Inadequate sensitivity to chemotherapy and in tratumoral hetero geneityisthe primary cause of therapeutic failure in ovarian cancer patients [1]. To improve patient outcomes, there is a critical need to identify more appropriate molecularly targeted agents to combine with chemotherapy to overcome drug resistance. The use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has led to the development of targeted therapies for various solid tumors, and these data may also lead to new indications for already approved cancer drugs if identical mutations exist in other cancer types. The NCI- MATCH trial represents a new method for evaluating targeted therapies, which is needed for precision medicine initiatives [2]. The molecular analysis of HGSC by TCGA revealed the presence of TP53 mutations in 96% tumors and germ line or somatic mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in 20% tumors [3]. However, HGSC patients have limited actionable mutations for targeted therapy. Varying types of p53 mutant proteins exist with different implications for chemo sensitivity. Some mutations are relatively inconsequential from the perspective of p53 function, and proteins of this type retain wild type activity. Other mutations are loss of function (LOF) or p53-null in which single amino acid changes completely inactivate or destabilize the protein. Another category is the gain of function (GOF) or "oncogenic" TP53 mutations that convert p53 from a tumor suppressor to an oncogene. Oncogenic p53 mutations predict for poor response to treatment [4]. Using stringent criteria to define oncogenic TP53 mutations, 21.2% of patients in the TCGA cohort have an oncogenic p53 mutation, whereas 18.9% are LOF [5].
In response to chemotherapy, cancer cells with wild-type p53 activate G1/S checkpoint by inducing p21 Cdkn1a /Cip1/ Waf1.Cancer cells withTP53LOF mutations or p53-null are sensitive to tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib or BIBF1120 combination with paclitaxel [6,7]. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are actionable genetic mutations in ovarian cancer. The PARP inhibitor olaparib has been approved as a mono therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer patients with BRCA1/2 mutations who have had three prior chemotherapy treatments [8]. The p53-reactivating compound APR-246 is currently investigated in ovarian cancer clinical trial (Aprea AB, 2014) [9]. Avastin (bevacizumab), a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is another recently approved targeted agent in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel for the treatment of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer resistant to platinum by the FDA [10]. Synthetic lethal studies will provide more treatment options to help circumvent acquired and de novo chemo resistance.
Overcome resistance to standard chemotherapy by targeting WEE1 is a promising therapeutic strategy. Entry into mitosis is regulated by the CDK1/cyclin B complex, whose activity is regulated by kinase WEE1 and MYT1, and phosphatase CDC25. WEE1 gene is overexpressed in cancer cells. WEE1 inhibition leads to forced CDK1 activation and inhibition to HR repair [11]. H3K36me3-deficient is identified as a potential actionable mutation biomarker for WEE1 inhibitor AZD1775 single drug treatment [12]. The target of this synthetic lethal interaction is the ribonucleotide reductase subunit RRM2. H3K36me3 facilitates RRM2 expression through transcription initiation factor recruitment and WEE1 inhibition degrades RRM2 through untimely CDK1 activation. WEE1 inhibition in H3K36me3- deficient cells results in RRM2 reduction, dNTP depletion, S-phase arrest, and apoptosis. Cancer cells with low MYT1 expression is sensitive to AZD1775, indicating that low MYT1 is another potential response marker for AZD1775 monotherapy [13].
H3K36me3-deficient or low PKMYT1 expression will be promising prediction biomarkers for Wee1 targeted therapy. Proteomic analysis for targets of AZD1775 indicates that PLK1 is another critical target for inhibiting tumor growth in addition to Wee1 [12,13]. AZD1775 canstimulate early mitotic entry in cancer cells by overriding cell cycle G2/M checkpoint, delay mitotic exit by targeting PLK1 and impair homologous recombination. AZD1775 has shown effect in ovarian cancer cells with wild type BRCA genes when combined with PARP inhibitor olaparib in preclinical study [14]. WEE1 inhibitor AZD1775 andWEEl siRNA have been confirmed to increase sensitivity to cisplatin and gemcitabine by overriding G2/M checkpoint to allow cancer cells with defect of DNA replication inappropriately entrance to mitosis and cause mitotic catastrophe [15] Novel synergistic and efficacious combination of AZD1775 with the mTOR inhibitor (ridaforolimus) was identified by a high- throughput platform [16]. AZD1775 in combination with chemotherapy is investigating in several clinical trials. Various preclinical and clinical studies showed that increasing sensitivity to chemotherapy was achieved with AZD1775 [17,18]. Promising combination schedules are currently being investigated, e.g. combining AZD1775 with Gemcitabine, Carboplatin or PARP inhibitor.
References
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Ovarian Cancers: Evolving Paradigms in Research and Care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- McNeil C (2015) NCI-MATCH launch highlights new trial design in precision-medicine era. J Natl Cancer Inst 107(7): 26142446.
- Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature 474: 609615.
- Brachova P, Mueting SR, Carlson MJ, Goodheart MJ, Button AM, et al. (2015) TP53 oncomorphic mutations predict resistance to platinum and taxanebased standard chemotherapy in patients diagnosed with advanced serous ovarian carcinoma. Int J Oncol 46(2): 607-618.
- Brachova P, Thiel KW, Leslie KK (2013) The consequence of oncomorphic TP53 mutations in ovarian cancer. Int J Mol Sci
- Meng X, Laidler LL, Kosmacek EA, Yang S, Xiong Z, et al. (2013) Induction of mitotic cell death by overriding G2/M checkpoint in endometrial cancer cells with non-functional p53. Gynecol Oncol 128(3): 461-469.
- Meng X, Dizon DS, Yang S, Wang X, Zhu D, et al.(2013) Strategies for molecularly enhanced chemotherapy to achieve synthetic lethality in endometrial tumors with mutant p53. Obstet Gynecol Int 2013:828165.
- Tewari KS, Eskander RN, Monk BJ (2015) Development of Olaparib for BRCA-Deficient Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 21(17): 3829-3835.
- Fransson Ä, Glaessgen D, Alfredsson J, Wiman KG, Bajalica LS, et al. (2016) Strong synergy with APR-246 and DNA-damaging drugs in primary cancer cells from patients with TP53 mutant High-Grade Serous ovarian cancer. J Ovarian Res 9(1): 27.
- Burger RA, Brady MF, Bookman MA, Fleming GF, Monk BJ, et al. (2011) Incorporation of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 365(26): 2473-2483.
- Krajewska M, Heijink AM, Bisselink YJ, Seinstra RI, Sillje HH, et al. (2013) Forced activation of Cdk1 via wee1 inhibition impairs homologous recombination. Oncogene 32(24): 3001-3008.
- Pfister SX, Markkanen E, Jiang Y, Sarkar S, Woodcock M, et al. (2015) Inhibiting WEE1 Selectively Kills Histone H3K36me3-Deficient Cancers by dNTP Starvation.Cancer Cell 28(5): 557-568.
- 13. Guertin AD1, Li J, Liu Y, Hurd MS, Schuller AG, et al. (2013) Preclinical evaluation of the WEE1 inhibitor MK-1775 as single-agent anticancer therapy. Mol Cancer Ther 12(8): 1442-1452.
- Karnak D, Engelke CG, Parsels LA, Kausar T, Wei D, et al. (2014) Combined inhibition of Wee1 and PARP1/2 for radiosensitization in pancreatic cancer. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 20(19): 5085-5096.
- Geenen JJJ, Schellens JHM (2017) Molecular pathways: targeting the protein kinase Wee1 in cancer. Clin Cancer Res
- O'Neil J, Benita Y, Feldman I, Chenard M, Roberts B, et al. (2016) An Unbiased Oncology Compound Screen to Identify Novel Combination Strategies. Mol Cancer Ther 15(6): 1155-1162.
- Leijen S, van Geel RM, Pavlick AC, Tibes R, Rosen L, et al. (2016) Phase I Study Evaluating WEE1 Inhibitor AZD1775 As Monotherapy and in Combination With Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, or Carboplatin in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors. J ClinOncol 34(36): 4371-4380.
- Leijen S, van Geel RM, Sonke GS, De Jong D, Rosenberg EH, et al. (2016) Phase II Study of WEE1 Inhibitor AZD1775 Plus Carboplatin in Patients With TP53-Mutated Ovarian Cancer Refractory or Resistant to First-Line Therapy Within 3 Months. J ClinOncol 34(36): 4354-4361.