Rhinological Aspects of Endonasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy
Karpishchenko SA1*, Vereshchagina OE2, Baranskaya SV3 and Karpov AA3
1Professor and Chairman of ENT Department, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg Medical State University, Russia
2Head of ENT Department, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg Medical State University, Russia
3Resident at the ENT Department, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg Medical State University, Russia
Submission: March 23, 2018; Published: April 10, 2018
*Corresponding author: Karpishchenko SA, Professor and Chairman of ENT Department, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg Medical State University, Russia, Email: email@example.com
How to cite this article: Karpishchenko S, Vereshchagina O, Baranskaya S, Karpov A. Rhinological Aspects of Endonasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy. Glob J Oto 2018; 14(4): 555895. DOI: 10.19080/GJO.2018.14.555895
The endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy is a modern and effective surgical treatment of lacrimal pathways obstruction. The leading causes of the unsuccessful outcomes of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy are deviation of nasal septum, concha bullosa and polyps of the nasal cavity.
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in primary endoscopic intervention, as well as revision surgery and the frequency of simultaneous surgery of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus during the endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of clinical data of 159 patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction, which underwent endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.
Result: In the group of primary operations endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy was effective in 148 patients (93%), in the group of revision surgery was effective in 10 cases (90%). A simultaneous operation of the nasal cavity was required in 21 patients.
Conclusion: The experience of our Department shows the high effectiveness of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in the treatment of patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction such as in the primary operation and in the revision one. The simultaneous surgery of the nasal cavity allows achieving more optimal results.
Keywords: AS: Acoustic schwannoma; ICA : Internal Auditory Canal; CPA: Cerebellopontine Angle; THS: Tinnitus and Hearing Survey; THI: Tinnitus Handicap Inventory; SOT: Sensory Organization Test; CISS: Constructive Interference Steady State; CT: Computed Tomography
The pathology of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses is one of the leading causes of inflammatory diseases of the lacrimal system . The structure of the nasolacrimal canal depends on patient's sex and anatomical features . The close anatomical features of the lacrimal sac, nasolacrimal duct and paranasal sinuses can be a predisposing cause for preventing drainage of tear fluid . When identifying the obstruction of the lacrimal pathways it is important to analyse structure of osteomeatal complex. Also it is necessary to assess the anatomical features of the inferior nasal concha inferior nasal meatus, opening of the nasolacrimal duct and the lacrimal fold (Hasner's valve), severity and location of nasal septal deviation .
The dacryocystorinostomy is used to restore the patency of the lacrimal drainage system. Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy is a modern and effective method of treatment of lacrimal pathways obstruction . Endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy has the following advantages as absence of external scars, lacrimal pumping mechanism preservation, no damage of medial canthus, less bleeding, possible in the office, may be mixed with correction of associated nasal pathology . The leading causes of the unsuccessful outcomes of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy are the deviation of nasal septum, concha bullosa (also known as middle turbinate pneumatisation) and polyps of the nasal cavity [7,8].
Preoperatively cone beam computed tomography examination with contrasts in order to detect the level of obstruction of lacrimal ducts and identify the anatomical relations between nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses and orbit was performed. We appreciate the state of lacrimal drainage system, nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses and the presence of pathological process. All these points contribute to the selection the optimal surgical approach. Also at the preoperative period endoscopy of the nasal cavity is performed to assess the deviation of nasal septal, concha bullosa, nasal polyps and other pathological changes which can be obstacle for endonasal approach to the lacrimal sac Table 1.
To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in primary endoscopic intervention,as well as revision surgery and the frequency of simultaneous surgery of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus during the endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.
Material and methods
A retrospective analysis of clinical data of 159 patients (12 male (7.5 %), 147 female (92.5%) with nasolacrimal duct obstruction, which underwent endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in ENT Department of Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University between January 2013 and January 2017.
In all cases, patients underwent ophthalmologic examination, otorhinolaryngological examination, cone beam computed tomography of the paranasal sinuses and lacrimal pathways with contrast, endoscopy of the nasal cavity that was also used for complete diagnostical examination. In most cases primary surgery was performed under local anesthesia and under general anesthesia in revision cases with stenting. At the primary surgery, the coagulation of a mucous membrane was realized with a diode laser in the contact mode at the first stage (Figure 1). The second step was the lacrimal bone in the projection of the maxillary line, which is also the site of the endonasal projection of the lacrimal sac. The bone was removed by burr. At the third step, lacrimal sac was exposed soft wall and perforated (Figure 1). In the final step, there was a formation of a stable anastomosis between the nasal cavity and the medial wall of the lacrimal sac with usage of mucosal flaps. In the postoperative period, patients were treated with the use of eye drops containing corticosteroids and antibiotics and intranasal topical corticosteroids.
For revision surgery, all patients after removal of fibrous or of the stent in the nasal cavity was carried out by applying granulation tissue and synechia, using a diode laser in contact mode, a bicanalicular silicone stent was introduced. Fixation several nodes at the ends of the silicone tubes (Figure 2). In the secondary postoperative period, it was recommended to apply the same therapy as after the primary operation. In the presence of pathological features of the nasal cavity of complicated surgical approach, their correction was performed at the same procedure. In cases with a nasal septum deviation, limited septoplasty was performed. In cases with concha bullosa (Figure 3), partial middle turbinectomy was performed. Any polyps of the nasal cavity were removed by using a microdebrider. Local anesthesia was quite satisfactory in such cases.
In the group of primary operations, endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy was effective in 148 patients (93%), the follow-up period was 5 months. In 11 (7%) patients revision surgery was necessary.
These patients underwent a revision operation with a bicanalicular silicone tube. The silicone stent was removed 3-6 months after the operation. The follow-up for this group was 3-12 months. No recurrence of stenosis of the nasolacrimal duct was observed in most patients (90%) in a follow-up. A simultaneous operation on the nasal cavity was required in 21 patients (13.2%). Septoplasty was required in 13 cases (8.2%), concotomy - in 5 cases (3.2%), polypotomy - in 3 cases (2%).
The experience of our Department shows the high effectiveness of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in the treatment of patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction such as in the primary operation and in the revision. It is important to determine the cause of stenosis in patients with an unsuccessful outcome after primary endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy and on the basis of these data, choose a revision surgical method, which can improve the final successful rate of the operation. The simultaneous surgery of the nasal cavity allows achieving more optimal results, as well as preventing the development of stenosis in anastomosis and the development of relapse of disease. Local anesthesia increases the availability of surgical procedure for many patients.
- Wong RJ, Gliklich RE, Rubin PA, Goodman M (1998) Bilateral nasolacrimal duct obstruction managed with endoscopic techniques. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124(6): 703-706.
- Shigeta K, Takegoshi H, Kikuchi S (2007) Sex and age differences in the bony nasolacrimal canal: An anatomical study. Arch Ophthalmol 125(12): 1677-1681.
- Onerci M (2002) Dacryocystorhinostomy. Diagnosis and treatment of nasolacrimal canal obstructions. Rhinology 40(2): 49-65.
- Karpishchenko SA, Beldovskaya NY, Baranskaya SV, Karpov AA (2017) Ophthalmic complications of functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Ophthalmology Journal 10(1): 87-92.
- Karpischenko SA, Baranskaya SV (2016) Our experience in intranasal laser endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy / Folia Otorhinolaryngologiae et Pathologiae Respiratoriae 22(3): 32-35.
- Sham CL, van Hasselt CA (2000) Endoscopic terminal dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope 110: 1045-1049.
- Elmorsy SM, Fayk HM (2010) Nasal endoscopic assessment of failure after external dacryocystorhinostomy. Orbit 29(4): 197-201.
- Demarco R, Strose A, Araujo M (2007) Endoscopic revision of external dacryocystorhinostomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137(4): 497-499.