CTOIJ.MS.ID.556288

Abstract

Objective:There is growing recognition that isolated retroperitoneal lymph node metastases (RLNMs) may be amenable to aggressive local treatments, including stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). However, success of SBRT critically depends on precise target volume definition-particularly in the retroperitoneal space, where overlapping gastrointestinal, vascular, and renal structures pose significant challenges to accurate delineation. In this study, target definition was assessed by using Computed Tomography (CT)-simulation only images vs CT-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) fusion.
Materials and Methods: Simulation involved CT acquisition in supine position with individualized immobilization devices to minimize motion. Axial images were acquired. MRI imaging was also obtained including multiple sequences.
Results: MRI fusion led to meaningful modifications in target borders, most notably, retraction of margins from adjacent vessels or bowel loops that had been erroneously included in CT simulation-alone planning. MRI integration allowed for sharper definition of nodal boundaries, particularly in cases involving perivascular or retrocrural locations, where CT contrast was inadequate.
Conclusion: CT-MRI fusion improved contouring precision and plan quality. Integration of MRI into radiotherapy planning should be considered standard practice in such anatomically complex scenarios.

Keywords:Colorectal Cancer (CRC); Retroperitoneal lymph node metastases; Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT); Target delineation; MRI fusion

Abbreviations:CT: Computed Tomography; CRC: Colorectal Cancer; SBRT: stereotactic body radiotherapy; RLNMs: retroperitoneal lymph node metastases; MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging; OAR: Organ-at-Risk

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality worldwide, with distant metastases representing a major cause of disease-related death [1]. While hepatic and pulmonary metastases have been extensively studied and frequently targeted for curative-intent local therapies, retroperitoneal lymph node metastases (RLNMs) represent a distinct and less commonly addressed pattern of spread [2-7]. However, in the era of precision oncology and oligometastatic disease management, there is growing recognition that isolated RLNMs may be amenable to aggressive local treatments, including stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

This strategy is particularly appealing to patients with well-controlled primary disease and limited systemic burden, wherein durable local control may translate to improved progression-free and even overall survival. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a transformative modality for treating small-volume, anatomically complex metastases by delivering high-dose, conformal radiation in a limited number of fractions. SBRT has been shown to achieve excellent local control rates with limited toxicity when applied judiciously. However, its success critically depends on precise target volume definition-particularly in the retroperitoneal space, where overlapping gastrointestinal, vascular, and renal structures pose significant challenges to accurate delineation.

The retroperitoneum represents a dynamic and intricate anatomical region, characterized by physiologic motion, substantial inter-patient variability, and proximity to radiosensitive structures such as the kidneys, duodenum, pancreas, ureters, and major vessels (aorta and inferior vena cava). Traditional CT-based simulation, while commonly used, often lacks sufficient soft tissue contrast to distinguish metastatic nodes from adjacent non-target tissues. In contrast, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers superior soft tissue visualization, especially in differentiating pathological lymph nodes from bowel loops, vascular landmarks, and fibrotic tissues.

Integration of MRI with CT-via rigid or deformable registrationhas been proposed as a means of enhancing contouring accuracy and treatment confidence. This study aims to assess and refine target volume definition for SBRT in patients with solitary retroperitoneal lymph node metastases from colorectal cancer. By comparing planning approaches based on CT-alone versus CTMRI fusion, we investigate the degree to which MRI contributes to improved target accuracy, dosimetric quality, and organ-atrisk (OAR) sparing. We also contextualize these findings within the broader framework of oligometastatic CRC management and emerging paradigms in image-guided adaptive radiotherapy.

Materials and Methods

This study was conducted at the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Gulhane Medical Faculty. Patients with histologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma and radiographically or biopsy-confirmed solitary retroperitoneal lymph node metastases were studied. All cases were evaluated by a multidisciplinary tumor board and deemed appropriate for SBRT due to limited metastatic burden, absence of other active sites, adequate performance status (ECOG 0–2), and lack of contraindications to ablative radiotherapy.

Simulation involved CT acquisition using a GE Lightspeed RT scanner (GE Healthcare, UK) in a supine position with individualized immobilization devices to minimize motion. Axial images were acquired. MRI imaging was also obtained including multiple sequences. Datasets were registered to facilitate precise anatomical correlation. Initial target volumes were delineated on CT images by experienced radiation oncologists. MRI datasets were then fused, and target volumes were re-contoured with MRI input, allowing for refinements based on superior soft tissue discrimination.

Treatment planning was executed on the treatment planning system available at our department, with delivery via Elekta Synergy LINAC equipped with cone-beam CT (CBCT) for daily IGRT. Plans were prescribed to achieve 95% PTV coverage, with prioritization of organ-at-risk constraints per QUANTEC and AAPM guidelines. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics were compared between CT-only and CT-MRI fusion-based plans.

Results

Patients with solitary RLNMs from colorectal cancer were studied. MRI fusion led to meaningful modifications in target borders-most notably, retraction of margins from adjacent vessels or bowel loops that had been erroneously included in CT simulation-alone planning. MRI integration allowed for sharper definition of nodal boundaries, particularly in cases involving perivascular or retrocrural locations, where CT contrast was inadequate. DVH analysis demonstrated that MRI-refined plans yielded improved dose conformality and steeper dose gradients. Our findings demonstrated that target volumes delineated using CT alone were consistently less accurate than those obtained through CT-MRI fusion. In several cases, CT-based contours either overestimated the target by including adjacent vascular structures or underestimated the true nodal extent due to limited soft tissue contrast.

The integration of MRI significantly improved the clarity of nodal boundaries, particularly in regions near the aorta and bowel, where CT imaging lacked sufficient contrast resolution. In majority, MRI-guided contouring resulted in meaningful adjustments to the target volume, influenced by anatomical complexity and motionrelated artifacts. This enhanced precision in target definition translated into improved dosimetric outcomes-yielding greater dose conformality, sharper dose gradients, and markedly reduced radiation exposure to nearby critical organs.

Discussion

CRC remains one of the most common causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with distant metastases constituting a major contributor to disease-specific death [1]. While hepatic and pulmonary metastases have been wellcharacterized and are frequently targeted with curative-intent local therapies, retroperitoneal lymph node metastases (RLNMs) represent a less common and often underrecognized pattern of disease spread [2-7]. In the context of precision oncology and evolving approaches to oligometastatic disease, there is growing interest in aggressively treating isolated RLNMs-particularly through SBRT-in patients with well-controlled primary tumors and limited systemic disease. In such cases, durable local control may contribute to prolonged progression-free and overall survival.

SBRT has emerged as a powerful modality for treating smallvolume, anatomically complex metastases by delivering highdose, conformal radiation over a limited number of fractions. When appropriately applied, SBRT achieves high local control rates with minimal toxicity. However, its efficacy relies heavily on precise target delineation-an especially challenging task in the retroperitoneum due to the proximity of critical structures such as the kidneys, duodenum, pancreas, ureters, and major vessels (e.g., the aorta and inferior vena cava), as well as the region’s dynamic anatomy and inter-patient variability.

Traditional CT-based simulation, although commonly used, often lacks sufficient soft tissue contrast to accurately distinguish metastatic nodes from adjacent normal tissues. In contrast, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers superior soft tissue resolution, particularly for differentiating lymph nodes from bowel loops, vessels, and fibrotic tissues. As such, integrating MRI with CT-via rigid or deformable registration- has been proposed to enhance contouring accuracy and improve confidence in treatment planning. Our study was aimed at evaluating and optimize target volume definition for SBRT in patients with solitary RLNMs from colorectal cancer. Specifically, we compared CT-alone versus CTMRI fusion-based planning to assess the impact of MRI on target delineation, dosimetric quality and sparing of OARs.

These findings were further contextualized within current frameworks for oligometastatic CRC and evolving concepts in image-guided adaptive radiotherapy. In the context of oligometastatic colorectal cancer, isolated RLNMs represent a clinically relevant and increasingly actionable disease state. As systemic therapies extend survival, there is growing impetus to pursue local control strategies for limited metastatic deposits. SBRT has emerged as a key modality in this space due to its ability to deliver high-dose, ablative treatments with minimal interruption of systemic regimens. However, its therapeutic ratio is intimately linked to the precision of target volume delineation-particularly in anatomically complex zones like the retroperitoneum.

Our study reinforces the critical role of MRI in improving the accuracy of SBRT for RLNMs. By enhancing visualization of soft tissue planes, MRI facilitates more accurate exclusion of non-target structures from the GTV, thereby refining the PTV and minimizing collateral dose to sensitive OARs. In addition to dosimetric advantages, this precision has implications for reducing toxicity, maintaining adjacent organ function, and increasing confidence in treatment plan quality. Our findings align with prior studies supporting MRI in pelvic and abdominal radiotherapy, including those for rectal, gynecologic, and pancreatic malignancies along with several other disease sites throughout the human body [8- 112].

MRI-based adaptive approaches are increasingly being integrated into clinical trials and routine practice, and the current results support extending these workflows to retroperitoneal metastases. Challenges remain, including the availability of high-quality MRI, the need for robust registration protocols, and resource-intensive contouring workflows. Nonetheless, the benefits observed-in terms of volume reduction, dose conformity, and OAR sparing-underscore the value of multimodal imaging in this high-stakes setting.

In conclusion, our appraisal of target volume definition for SBRT in solitary retroperitoneal lymph node metastases from colorectal cancer reveals that CT-MRI fusion significantly improves contouring precision and plan quality. Integration of MRI into radiotherapy planning should be considered standard practice in such anatomically complex scenarios. Larger studies with longer follow-up are warranted to assess long-term outcomes and further validate the integration of advanced imaging in SBRT planning for oligometastatic colorectal cancer.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest and no acknowledgements.

References

  1. Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Jemal A (2025) Cancer statistics, 2025. CA Cancer J Clin 75(1): 10-45.
  2. Hugen N, van de Velde CJH, de Wilt JHW, Nagtegaal ID (2014) Metastatic pattern in colorectal cancer is strongly influenced by histological subtype. Ann Oncol 25(3): 651-657.
  3. Riihimäki M, Hemminki A, Sundquist J, Hemminki K (2016) Patterns of metastasis in colon and rectal cancer. Sci Rep 6: 29765.
  4. Weichselbaum RR, Hellman S (2011) Oligometastases revisited. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 8(6): 378-382.
  5. Qiu M, Hu J, Yang D, Cosgrove DP, Xu R (2015) Pattern of distant metastases in colorectal cancer: a SEER based study. Oncotarget 6(36): 38658-38666.
  6. Kataoka K, Beppu N, Shiozawa M, Ikeda M, Tomita N, Kobayashi H, Sugihara K, Ceelen W (2020) Colorectal cancer treated by resection and extended lymphadenectomy: patterns of spread in left- and right-sided tumours. Br J Surg 107(8): 1070-1078.
  7. Augestad KM, Bakaki PM, Rose J, Crawshaw BP, Lindsetmo RO, et al. (2015) Metastatic spread pattern after curative colorectal cancer surgery. A retrospective, longitudinal analysis. Cancer Epidemiol 39(5): 734-744.
  8. Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Uysal B, Gamsiz H, et al. (2023) Adaptive radiation therapy (art) for patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC): A dosimetric evaluation. Indian J Cancer 60(1): 140-147.
  9. Gamsiz H, Sager O, Uysal B, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, et al. (2023) Outcomes of Sterotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for pelvic lymph node recurrences after adjuvant or primary radiotherapy for prostate cancer. J Cancer Res Ther 19(Suppl 2): S851-S856.
  10. Gamsiz H, Sager O, Uysal B, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, et al. (2022) Active breathing control guided stereotactic body ablative radiotherapy for management of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 85(3): 469-475.
  11. Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Uysal B, Gamsiz H, et al. (2022) Concise review of radiosurgery for contemporary management of pilocytic astrocytomas in children and adults. World J Exp Med 12(3): 36-43.
  12. Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Gamsiz H, Uysal B, et al. (2022) Optimal timing of thoracic irradiation for limited stage small cell lung cancer: Current evidence and future prospects. World J Clin Oncol 13(2): 116-124.
  13. Demiral S, Sager O, Dincoglan F, Uysal B, Gamsiz H, et al. (2021) Evaluation of breathing-adapted radiation therapy for right-sided early stage breast cancer patients. Indian J Cancer 58(2): 195-200.
  14. Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Uysal B, Gamsiz H, et al. (2021) Omission of Radiation Therapy (RT) for Metaplastic Breast Cancer (MBC): A Review Article. International Journal of Research Studies in Medical and Health Sciences 6: 10-15.
  15. Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Uysal B, Gamsiz H, et al. (2021) Concise review of stereotactic irradiation for pediatric glial neoplasms: Current concepts and future directions. World J Methodol 11(3): 61-74.
  16. Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Uysal B, Gamsiz H, et al. (2020) Adaptive radiation therapy of breast cancer by repeated imaging during irradiation. World J Radiol 12(5): 68-75.
  17. Sager O, Beyzadeoglu M, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Gamsiz H, et al. (2020) Multimodality management of cavernous sinus meningiomas with less extensive surgery followed by subsequent irradiation: Implications for an improved toxicity profile. J Surg Surgical Res 6: 056-061.
  18. Beyzadeoglu M, Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Uysal B, et al. (2020) Single Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) versus Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy (FSRT) for Vestibular Schwannoma (VS). J Surg Surgical Res 6: 062-066.
  19. Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M, Sager O, Demiral S, Uysal B, et al. (2020) A Concise Review of Irradiation for Temporal Bone Chemodectomas (TBC). Arch Otolaryngol Rhinol 6: 016-020.
  20. Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Uysal B, Gamsiz H, et al. (2019) Utility of Molecular Imaging with 2-Deoxy-2-[Fluorine-18] Fluoro-DGlucose Positron Emission Tomography (18F-FDG PET) for Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC): A Radiation Oncology Perspective. Curr Radiopharm 12(1): 4-10.
  21. Dincoglan F, Sager O, Demiral S, Gamsiz H, Uysal B, et al. (2019) Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for locally recurrent brain metastases after failed stereotactic radiosurgery. Indian J Cancer 56(2): 151-156.
  22. Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Uysal B, Gamsiz H, et al. (2019) Breathing adapted radiation therapy for leukemia relapse in the breast: A case report. World J Clin Oncol 10(11): 369-374.
  23. Dincoglan F, Sager O, Uysal B, Demiral S, Gamsiz H, et al. (2019) Evaluation of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) to the resection cavity after surgical resection of brain metastases: A single center experience. Indian J Cancer 56(3): 202-206.
  24. Sager O, Dincoglan F, Uysal B, Demiral S, Gamsiz H, et al. (2018) Evaluation of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) by use of replanning the tumor bed boost with repeated computed tomography (CT) simulation after whole breast irradiation (WBI) for breast cancer patients having clinically evident seroma. Jpn J Radiol 36(6): 401-406.
  25. Demiral S, Dincoglan F, Sager O, Uysal B, Gamsiz H, et al. (2018) Contemporary Management of Meningiomas with Radiosurgery. Int J Radiol Imaging Technol 80: 187-190.
  26. Sager O, Dincoglan F, Uysal B, Demiral S, Gamsiz H, et al. (2017) Splenic Irradiation: A Concise Review of the Literature. J App Hem Bl Tran 1: 101.
  27. Dincoglan F, Sager O, Demiral S, Uysal B, Gamsiz H, et al. (2017) Radiosurgery for recurrent glioblastoma: A review article. Neurol Disord Therap 1: 1-5.
  28. Demiral S, Dincoglan F, Sager O, Gamsiz H, Uysal B, et al. (2016) Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) for who grade I anterior clinoid meningiomas (ACM). Jpn J Radiol 34(11): 730-737.
  29. Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M, Sager O, Demiral S, Gamsiz H, et al. (2015) Management of patients with recurrent glioblastoma using hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Tumori 101(2): 179-184.
  30. Gamsiz H, Beyzadeoglu M, Sager O, Demiral S, Dincoglan F, et al. (2015) Evaluation of stereotactic body radiation therapy in the management of adrenal metastases from non-small cell lung cancer. Tumori 101(1): 98-103.
  31. Sager O, Beyzadeoglu M, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Uysal B, et al. (2015) Adaptive splenic radiotherapy for symptomatic splenomegaly management in myeloproliferative disorders. Tumori 101(1): 84-90.
  32. Sager O, Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M (2015) Stereotactic radiosurgery of glomus jugulare tumors: Current concepts, recent advances and future perspectives. CNS Oncol 4(2): 105-114.
  33. Sager O, Beyzadeoglu M, Dincoglan F, Uysal B, Gamsiz H, et al. (2014) Evaluation of linear accelerator (LINAC)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for cerebral cavernous malformations: A 15-year single-center experience. Ann Saudi Med 34(1): 54-58.
  34. Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M, Sager O, Dincoglan F, Gamsiz H, et al. (2014) Evaluation of Linear Accelerator (Linac)-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery (Srs) for the Treatment of Craniopharyngiomas. UHOD-Uluslararasi Hematoloji Onkoloji Dergisi 24(2): 123-129.
  35. Sager O, Beyzadeoglu M, Dincoglan F, Gamsiz H, Demiral S, et al. (2014) Evaluation of linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of glomus jugulare tumors. Tumori 100(2): 184-188.
  36. Ozsavaş EE, Telatar Z, Dirican B, Sager O, Beyzadeoğlu M (2014) Automatic segmentation of anatomical structures from CT scans of thorax for RTP. Comput Math Methods Med 2014: 472890.
  37. Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M, Sager O, Dincoglan F, Gamsiz H, et al. (2014) Evaluation of linear accelerator (linac)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (srs) for the treatment of craniopharyngiomas. UHOD - Uluslararasi Hematoloji-Onkoloji Dergisi 24: 123-129.
  38. Gamsiz H, Beyzadeoglu M, Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, et al. (2014) Management of pulmonary oligometastases by stereotactic body radiotherapy. Tumori 100(2): 179-183.
  39. Dincoglan F, Sager O, Gamsiz H, Uysal B, Demiral S, et al. (2014) Management of patients with ≥ 4 brain metastases using stereotactic radiosurgery boost after whole brain irradiation. Tumori 100(3): 302-306.
  40. Sager O, Beyzadeoglu M, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Uysal B, et al. (2013) Management of vestibular schwannomas with linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery: a single center experience. Tumori 99(5): 617-622.
  41. Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M, Sager O, Uysal B, Demiral S, et al. (2013) Evaluation of linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of meningiomas: A single center experience. J BUON 18(3): 717-722.
  42. Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M, Sager O, Oysul K, Kahya YE, et al. (2013) Dosimetric evaluation of critical organs at risk in mastectomized left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy using breath-hold technique. Tumori 99(1): 76-82.
  43. Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M, Uysal B, Oysul K, Kahya YE, et al. (2013) Evaluation of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost in the management of endometrial cancer. Neoplasma 60(3): 322-327.
  44. Sager O, Beyzadeoglu M, Dincoglan F, Oysul K, Kahya YE, et al. (2012) Evaluation of active breathing control-moderate deep inspiration breath-hold in definitive non-small cell lung cancer radiotherapy. Neoplasma 59(3): 333-340.
  45. Saǧer Ö, Dinçoǧlan F, Gamsiz H, Demiral S, Uysal B, et al. (2012) Evaluation of the impact of integrated [18f]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging on staging and radiotherapy treatment volume definition of nonsmall cell lung cancer. Gulhane Med J 54(3): 220-227.
  46. Sager O, Beyzadeoglu M, Dincoglan F, Oysul K, Kahya YE, et al. (2012) The Role of Active Breathing Control-Moderate Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold (ABC-mDIBH) Usage in non-Mastectomized Left-sided Breast Cancer Radiotherapy: A Dosimetric Evaluation UHOD - Uluslararasi Hematoloji-Onkoloji Dergisi 22(3): 147-155.
  47. Dincoglan F, Sager O, Gamsiz H, Uysal B, Demiral S, et al. (2012) Stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial tumors: A single center experience. Gulhane Med J 54(3): 190-198.
  48. Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M, Sager O, Oysul K, Sirin S et al. (2012) Image-guided positioning in intracranial non-invasive stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of brain metastasis. Tumori 98(5): 630-635.
  49. Sirin S, Oysul K, Surenkok S, Sager O, Dincoglan F, et al. (2011) Linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery in recurrent glioblastoma: A single center experience. Vojnosanit Pregl 68(11): 961-966.
  50. Demiral S, Sager O, Dincoglan F, Uysal B, Gamsiz H, et al. (2018) Evaluation of Target Volume Determination for Single Session Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) of Brain Metastases. Canc Therapy & Oncol Int J 12: 555848.
  51. Beyzadeoglu M, Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S (2019) Evaluation of Target Definition for Stereotactic Reirradiation of Recurrent Glioblastoma. Arch Can Res 7(1): 3.
  52. Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Gamsiz H, Uysal B, et al. (2019) Evaluation of the Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) on Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) Definition for Radiation Treatment Planning (RTP) of Inoperable High-Grade Gliomas (HGGs). Concepts in Magnetic Resonance.
  53. Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Gamsiz H, Uysal B, et al. (2019) Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Imaging) in Target Volume Definition for Radiosurgery of Acoustic Neuromas. Int J Cancer Clin Res 6(3): 119.
  54. Demiral S, Sager O, Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M (2019) Assessment of Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Based Radiosurgery Treatment Planning for Pituitary Adenomas. Canc Therapy & Oncol Int J 13(2): 555857.
  55. Dincoglan F, Sager O, Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M (2019) Multimodality Imaging for Radiosurgical Management of Arteriovenous Malformations. Asian Journal of Pharmacy, Nursing and Medical Sciences 7(1): 7-12.
  56. Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M (2019) Evaluation of Radiosurgery Target Volume Determination for Meningiomas Based on Computed Tomography (CT) And Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Cancer Sci Res Open Access 5(2): 1-4.
  57. Demiral S, Sager O, Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M (2019) Assessment of target definition based on Multimodality imaging for radiosurgical Management of glomus jugulare tumors (GJTs). Canc Therapy & Oncol Int J 15: 555909.
  58. Dincoglan F, Sager O, Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M (2021) Assessment of the role of multimodality imaging for treatment volume definition of intracranial ependymal tumors: An original article. Glob J Cancer Ther 7: 043-045.
  59. Beyzadeoglu M, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Sager O (2020) Target Volume Determination for Precise Radiation Therapy (RT) of Central Neurocytoma: An Original Article. International Journal of Research Studies in Medical and Health Sciences 5: 29-34.
  60. Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Sager O, Beyzadeoglu M (2020) Utility of Multimodality Imaging Based Target Volume Definition for Radiosurgery of Trigeminal Neuralgia: An Original Article. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res 26(2): 19728-19732.
  61. Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M, Dincoglan F, Sager O (2020) Assessment of Target Volume Definition for Radiosurgery of Atypical Meningiomas with Multimodality Imaging. Journal of Hematology and Oncology Research 3: 14-21.
  62. Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M, Demiral S, Sager O (2020) Assessment of Treatment Volume Definition for Irradiation of Spinal Ependymomas: an Original Article. ARC Journal of Cancer Science 6(1): 1-6.
  63. Sager O, Demiral S, Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M (2020) Target Volume Definition for Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) Of Cerebral Cavernous Malformations (CCMs). Canc Therapy & Oncol Int J 15(4): 555917.
  64. Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M (2020) Treatment Volume Determination for Irradiation of Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma with Multimodality Imaging: An Original Article. ARC Journal of Cancer Science 6(2): 18-23.
  65. Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M (2020) Assessment of Target Volume Definition for Irradiation of Hemangiopericytomas: An Original Article. Canc Therapy & Oncol Int J 17(2): 555959.
  66. Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M (2020) Evaluation of Treatment Volume Determination for Irradiation of chordoma: an Original Article. International Journal of Research Studies in Medical and Health Sciences 5(10): 3-8.
  67. Demiral S, Dincoglan F, Sager O, Beyzadeoglu M (2020) Multimodality Imaging Based Target Definition of Cervical Lymph Nodes in Precise Limited Field Radiation Therapy (Lfrt) for Nodular Lymphocyte Predominant Hodgkin Lymphoma (Nlphl). ARC Journal of Cancer Science 6(2): 06-11.
  68. Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M (2020) Radiosurgery Treatment Volume Determination for Brain Lymphomas with and without Incorporation of Multimodality Imaging. Journal of Medical Pharmaceutical and Allied Sciences 9: 2398-2404.
  69. Beyzadeoglu M, Dincoglan F, Sager O, Demiral S (2020) Determination of Radiosurgery Treatment Volume for Intracranial Germ Cell Tumors (GCTS). Asian Journal of Pharmacy, Nursing and Medical Sciences 8(3): 18-23.
  70. Dincoglan F, Sager O, Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M (2020) Target Definition of orbital Embryonal Rhabdomyosarcoma (Rms) by Multimodality Imaging: An Original Article. ARC Journal of Cancer Science 6(2): 12-17.
  71. Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M (2020) Evaluation of Target Volume Determination for Irradiatıon of Pilocytic Astrocytomas: An Original Article. ARC Journal of Cancer Science 6(1): 19-23.
  72. Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M, Dincoglan F, Sager O (2020) Evaluation of Radiosurgery Target Volume Definition for Tectal Gliomas with Incorporation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): An Original Article. Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research (BJSTR) 27: 20543-20547.
  73. Demiral S, Dincoglan F, Sager O, Beyzadeoglu M (2021) Assessment of Multimodality Imaging for Target Definition of Intracranial Chondrosarcomas. Canc Therapy Oncol Int J 18(2): 001-005.
  74. Dincoglan F, Sager O, Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M (2021) Impact of Multimodality Imaging to Improve Radiation Therapy (RT) Target Volume Definition for Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor (MPNST). Biomed J Sci Tech Res 34(3): 26734-26738.
  75. Sager O, Demiral S, Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M (2021) Multimodality Imaging Based Treatment Volume Definition for Reirradiation of Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC). Arch Can Res 9(1): 1-5.
  76. Demiral S, Sager O, Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M (2021) Radiation Therapy (RT) Target Volume Definition for Peripheral Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor (PPNET) by Use of Multimodality Imaging: An Original Article. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res 34: 26970-26974.
  77. Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Sager O, Beyzadeoglu M (2021) Evaluation of Target Definition for Management of Myxoid Liposarcoma (MLS) with Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy (RT). Biomed J Sci Tech Res 33: 26171-26174.
  78. Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M (2021) Radiation Therapy (RT) target determination for irradiation of bone metastases with soft tissue component: Impact of multimodality imaging. J Surg Surgical Res 7(1): 042-046.
  79. Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M (2021) Evaluation of Changes in Tumor Volume Following Upfront Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Glob J Cancer Ther 7: 031-034.
  80. Sager O, Demiral S, Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M (2021) Assessment of posterior fossa target definition by multimodality imaging for patients with medulloblastoma. J Surg Surgical Res 7: 037-041.
  81. Dincoglan F, Sager O, Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M (2021) Assessment of the role of multimodality imaging for treatment volume definition of intracranial ependymal tumors: An original article. Glob J Cancer Ther 7: 043-045.
  82. Beyzadeoglu M, Demiral S, Dincoglan F, Sager O (2022) Assessment of Target Definition for Extramedullary Soft Tissue Plasmacytoma: Use of Multımodalıty Imaging for Improved Targetıng Accuracy. Canc Therapy & Oncol Int J 22(4): 556095.
  83. Dincoglan F, Sager O, Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M (2022) Target Volume Determination for Recurrent Uterine Carcinosarcoma: An Original Research Article Revisiting the Utility of Multimodality Imaging. Canc Therapy & Oncol Int J 22(3): 556090.
  84. Demiral S, Sager O, Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M (2022) Reappraisal of Computed Tomography (CT) And Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Based Target Definition for Radiotherapeutic Management of Recurrent Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ASCC): An Original Article. Canc Therapy & Oncol Int J 22(2): 556085.
  85. Demiral S, Dincoglan F, Sager O, Beyzadeoglu M (2022) An Original Article for Assessment of Multimodality Imaging Based Precise Radiation Therapy (Rt) in the Management of Recurrent Pancreatic Cancers. Canc Therapy & Oncol Int J 22(1): 556078.
  86. Sager O, Demiral S, Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M (2022) Assessment of Target Volume Definition for Precise Radiotherapeutic Management of Locally Recurrent Biliary Tract Cancers: An Original Research Article. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res 46(1): 37054-37059.
  87. Sager O, Demiral S, Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M. (2022) Radiation Therapy (RT) Target Volume Determination for Locally Advanced Pyriform Sinus Carcinoma: An Original Research Article Revisiting the Role of Multimodality Imaging. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res 45(1): 36155-36160.
  88. Demiral S, Sager O, Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M (2022) Improved Target Volume Definition for Radiotherapeutic Management of Parotid Gland Cancers by use of Multimodality Imaging: An Original Article. Canc Therapy & Oncol Int J 21(3): 556062.
  89. Beyzadeoglu M, Sager O, Demiral S, Dincoglan F (2022) Reappraisal of multimodality imaging for improved Radiation Therapy (RT) target volume determination of recurrent Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC): An original article. J Surg Surgical Res 8(1): 004-008.
  90. Dincoglan F, Sager O, Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M (2022) Multimodality imaging-based treatment volume definition for recurrent Rhabdomyosarcomas of the head and neck region: An original article. J Surg Surgical Res 8(2): 013-018.
  91. Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Sager O, Beyzadeoglu M (2022) Appraisal of Target Definition for Management of Paraspinal Ewing Tumors with Modern Radiation Therapy (RT): An Original Article. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res 44(4): 35691-35696.
  92. Beyzadeoglu M, Sager O, Demiral S, Dincoglan F (2022) Assessment of Target Volume Definition for Contemporary Radiotherapeutic Management of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: An Original Article. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res 44(5): 35883-35887.
  93. Dincoglan F, Sager O, Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M (2023) Appraisal of Target Definition for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma (ATC): An Original Article Addressing the Utility of Multimodality Imaging. Canc Therapy & Oncol Int J 24(4): 556143.
  94. Demiral S, Dincoglan F, Sager O, Beyzadeoglu M (2023) Reappraisal of Treatment Volume Determination for Parametrial Boosting in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer. Canc Therapy & Oncol Int J 24(5): 556148.
  95. Demiral S, Sager O, Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M (2023) Tumor Size Changes after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Advanced Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Canc Therapy & Oncol Int J 24(5): 556147.
  96. Demiral S, Dincoglan F, Sager O, Beyzadeoglu M (2023) Assessment of Changes in Tumor Volume Following Chemotherapy for Nodular Sclerosıng Hodgkin Lymphoma (NSHL). Canc Therapy & Oncol Int J 24(5): 556146.
  97. Sager O, Demiral S, Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M (2023) Evaluation of Volumetric Changes in Transglottic Laryngeal Cancers After Induction Chemotherapy. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res 51(4): 43026-43031.
  98. Dincoglan F, Sager O, Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M (2023) An Original Research Article for Evaluation of Changes in Tumor Size After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res 52(1): 43253-43255.
  99. Sager O, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Beyzadeoglu M (2023) Assessment of Tumor Size Changes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: An Original Article. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res 52(2): 43491-43493.
  100. Beyzadeoglu M, Demiral S, Dincoglan F, Sager O (2023) Evaluation of Target Definition for Radiotherapeutic Management of Recurrent Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC). Canc Therapy & Oncol Int J 24(2): 556133.
  101. Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Sager O, Beyzadeoglu M (2023) Reappraisal of Treatment Volume Determination for Recurrent Gastroesophageal Junction Carcinoma (GJC). Biomed J Sci & Tech Res 50(5): 42061-42066.
  102. Beyzadeoglu M, Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Sager O (2023) An Original Article Revisiting the Utility of Multimodality Imaging For Refıned Target Volume Determinatıon of Recurrent Kidney Carcinoma. Canc Therapy & Oncol Int J 23(5): 556122.
  103. Beyzadeoglu M, Demiral S, Dincoglan F, Sager O (2023) Appraisal of Target Definition for Recurrent Cancers of the Supralottic Larynx. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res 50(5): 42131-42136.
  104. Beyzadeoglu M, Demiral S, Dincoglan F, Sager O (2024) Reappraisal of Target Definition for Sacrococcygeal Chordoma: Comparative Assessment with Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res 55(1): 46686-46692.
  105. Dincoglan F, Demiral S, Sager O, Beyzadeoglu M (2024) Assessment of Changes in Tumor Size After Induction Systemic Therapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma Running title: Tumor size changes in cervical carcinoma. Cancer Ther Oncol Int J 26(1): 001-007.
  106. Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M, Demiral S, Sager O (2024) Appraisal of Changes in Tumor Volume After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). Cancer Ther Oncol Int J 26(2): 001-004.
  107. Akin M, Duzova M (2022) Single fraction image guided radiation therapy for management of bone metastases during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 5(4): 961-965.
  108. Cinar D, Karadakovan A, Akin M (2022) Effects of Paper Marbling Art in the Cancer Rehabilitation Process: Descriptive Research. Journal of Traditional Medical Complementary Therapies 5: 132-142.
  109. Akin M, Duzova M (2022) Evaluatin of Treatment Volume Determination for Anaplastic Oligodendrogliomas Based on Multimodality Imaging: An Original Article. Celal Bayar Universitesi Saglik Bilimleri Enstitusu Dergisi 9(3): 414-417.
  110. Cinkaya A, Akin M, Sengul A (2016) Evaluation of treatment outcomes of triple negative breast cancer. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics 12(1): 150-154.
  111. Duzova M, Akin M (2022) Evaluation of survival outcomes and prognostic factors in acinic cell carcinomas of the parotid gland receiving adjuvant radiotherapy. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 4(3): 290-294.
  112. Akin M (2022) Tobacco and lung cancer in elderly patients located in southern marmara: epidemiological study. Celal Bayar Universitesi Saglik Bilimleri Enstitusu Dergisi 9(2): 310-313.