Mini Review

“The Ashkenazi Founder Event” and Exhumation of Bones in Erfurt : Genetic Revisionism with Cowboy Methodology and The Resulting Discovery of an Oviraptor Origin for Non-Hebrew Jews

Florent Pirot*

Independent researcher, Valbonne, France

Submission: December 09, 2022; Published: January 30, 2023

*Corresponding author: Florent Pirot, Independent researcher (unaffiliated), 127 route d’Antibes 06560 Valbonne, France

How to cite this article: Florent P. “The Ashkenazi Founder Event” and Exhumation of Bones in Erfurt : Genetic Revisionism with Cowboy Methodology and The Resulting Discovery of an Oviraptor Origin for Non-Hebrew Jews. Anatomy Physiol Biochem Int J: 2023; 6(2): 555681.. DOI: 10.19080/APBIJ.2023.06.555681.

Abstract

The antisemitic background of a genetic study on exhumed bones in Erfurt can be demonstrated in a few steps through careful read of the paper. The study nevertheless also includes a few more interesting results on a Khazar origin of Ashkenazi Jews – very rarely dubbed “Hebrews” - relating them clearly to a dinosaur origin, in Oviraptorausia.

Mini Review

The study by Waldman et al. [1] makes strong claims on a 14th Century bottleneck for the Jewish population that allows reader elaborating from the particular case study to later elaborate the argument that Middle Age pogroms were worse for Jews than the WW2 Shoah.

This study, made elusively by authors who can reserve themselves the right to blame the rabbi that allowed solely to pick the teeth that were already falling on skeletons (granting themselves the claim that the weak DNA of the scorbutic-afflicted skeletons explains the results, as safe exit issue), also includes a strange Z-factor in Figure S3 which seems to have been designed from earlier results of the author circulated among very few editors related to crematory oven use and the Familial Mediterranean Fever linking Sefardi Jews1 to it, to implicitly argue that Russian Jews are zyklonists, so to create a safe exit also for pogromists in Ukraine in case their Khmelnitskyi pogroms are defeated, or, alternatively, simply a political attempt at preranking support to the Z operation of Russian forces among Jews (with the clear result that it is very strong in Russia and neighboring countries, including Ukraine, and very weak in the Middle East and North Africa). Figures 2 and S2 carry the most usual Nazi trope that Jews are naturally supportive of one or another Communist party (with PC1 and PC2 used in the two axes, for French readers).

The theorem of pre-arranged results is also confirmed implicitly by some wording in the methodological detail given by the authors after presentation of their results : “We used parametric bootstrap for model selection, using simulations to generate the empirical null distribution of the increase in log-likelihood when fitting a two-population model to data simulated under a single-population model”. In other words, cowboy methodology to generate an empirically null distribution, as opposed to the meaning of empirism. The latent antisemitism can be also shown by the last reference in the article, Yardumian and Schurr’s “The Geography of Jewish Ethnogenesis”, titled as if Jewishness was a disease whose genesis had to be mapped..

The 14th Century bottleneck that the authors seem to discover, while including in their paper these antisemitic protocols, is in fact simply the effect of the Bubonic Plague, in the context of ghettoisation. The only reference related to the plague in the study deals with a 15th Century plague. There is, besides, a separate argument on absence of taking into account of life happening above the tumbs unearthed in the building in later times, explaining why new populations are found similar to Turkish Jews – in the 15th Century the advances of the Turkish Sultanate in Europe was naturally associated with Turkish immigrants going more afar in advance of their troops and these Turkish immigrants settling within the recently emptied houses could naturally absorb some of the remaining DNA from the soil and adcquire some of their characteristics, enough for later DNA testing on their own remains to rank them as Jews. The authors relate that to a common Middle Eastern origin, likely hopeful to exploit ex-post the later publication of my results on Sefardi Jews and the Familial Mediterranean Fever for multiple legitimizations of Nazi genocide2, but this is not true.

The theorem of an Eastern Ashkenazi Jew origins in Russia also elaborated by the authors3 is nevertheless worth mentioning. The theorem is fitting with Khazars in particular being the explaining origin. The authors attempt to establish that Medieval pogroms, over the period from the year 1000 to the year 1350, were worse than the Shoah, with a study based on a limited batch of individuals in a single grave, with adhoc hypotheses such as 25 years per generation. The study then develops like a manipulative Shareholders’ Meeting in which the CEO progressively indicates that ROE has been more elevated than expected, stuffed within a pontificating paragraph - “However, ROH counts in EAJ exceeded the expectation based on the model Figure 4A, in particular for short and intermediate segments” to entice through the most perverse ways a rush of money in his direction. Runs of homozygosity have been used in cattle study [2,3] in particular where they are meaningful for studying long duration genetic evolution, but the choice of using a marker used for cattle studies is more telling of the real intentions of the authors there.

Definitively there is a Khazar (Russian) non-Plesiosuchus (dinosaur) origin that is discovered by the authors of this study incidentally. The Soviet regime had accounted of it already in 1928 by founding Birobidjan. Observation of the typical Khazar hat allows relating them to Oviraptorausia, in correct confirmation of the choice allocated by the Soviet Union in 1928.

References

1. Waldman S, Backenroth D, Harney E, Flohr S, Neff NC, et al. (2022) Genome-wide data from medieval German Jews show that the Ashkenazi founder event pre-dated the 14^th century. Cell 185(25): 4703-4716.
2. Dixit SP, Singh S, Ganguly I, Bhatia AK, Sharma A, et al. (2020) Genome-Wide Runs of Homozygosity Revealed Selection Signatures in Bos indicus. Front Genet 11: 92.
3. Rodríguez-Ramilo ST, Reverter A, Legarra A (2019) Selection trace from runs of homozygosity in French dairy sheep. 70 Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science (EAAP), Gant, Belgium pp: 717.