AJPN.MS.ID.555981

Abstract

Neonatal unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia is a highly prevalent condition in newborns, resulting from elevated levels of bilirubin, a breakdown product of hemoglobin. While often self-limited and benign, excessive bilirubin can accumulate in the central nervous system, potentially leading to kernicterus spectrum disorders and long-term neurological damage. Bilirubin levels rise due to increased red blood cell breakdown, immature hepatic conjugation, and enhanced enterohepatic circulation in neonates, particularly in preterm or at-risk infants. Clinical recognition relies on monitoring for jaundice, scleral icterus, and laboratory assessment of serum bilirubin levels, with timely intervention essential to prevent adverse outcomes. Phototherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment, effectively converting toxic bilirubin into water-soluble forms for excretion, while exchange transfusion is reserved for severe cases unresponsive to light therapy. Adjunctive pharmacological approaches, including fibrates, zinc, probiotics, metalloporphyrins, and intravenous immunoglobulin, are under investigation, though efficacy and safety remain variable. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of bilirubin metabolism, identifying infants at risk, and evaluating treatment strategies are critical to minimizing complications. This review emphasizes the importance of optimizing management of neonatal unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia, balancing therapeutic efficacy with safety, and highlights the need for ongoing research to refine current treatments research to refine current treatments and develop new interventions to improve outcomes for vulnerable neonates.

Keywords:Unconjugated Hyperbilirubinemia; Phototherapy; Kernicterus; Bilirubin Metabolism; Enterohepatic Circulation

Highlights:UHB: Unconjugated Hyperbilirubinemia; AAP: American Academy of Pediatric; μW/cm2/NM: Microwatts Per Square Centimeter Per Nanometer; BSA: Body Surface Area; PDA: Patent Ductus Arteriosus; DNA; Deoxyribonucleic Acid; RBCs: Red Blood Cells; GI: Gastrointestinal; IVIG: Intravenous Immunoglobulin

Introduction

Neonatal unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia (UHB) is an extremely prevalent condition in newborns that results from deposition of elevated levels of bilirubin (a yellow pigment derived from the breakdown of hemoglobin) within their skin [1,2]. This condition is often self-limited or benign, and often clinically presents with yellowish skin, sclerae, and mucous membranes [3-5]. However, certain infants who are exposed to high levels of bilirubin may be at risk for kernicterus spectrum disorders due to bilirubin induced brain damage [6-9]. It is thus extremely important to understand the etiology of UHB to prevent such complications by evaluating risk factors, regular examinations and obtaining screening bilirubin values. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has provided clinical practice guidelines to assist providers in the management of UHB in neonates [10]. These guidelines mainly pertain to phototherapy treatment which is the goal standard for treating neonatal UHB but other interventions may also be considered. This brief review will attempt to provide an overview and fundamental understanding of the different modalities in managing neonatal UHB.

Discussion

Phototherapy

About 80% of bilirubin is derived from heme released from senescent red blood cells with the remainder originating from various heme-containing proteins found in other tissues, notably the liver and muscles [11]. After a two-stage reaction, bilirubin’s final structure (bilirubin IX-alpha-ZZ) is essentially insoluble in aqueous solutions due to compaction from hydrogen bonding [12]. The therapeutic potential of light exposure to modify these bilirubin properties was first hypothesized in the early 1950s, following observations of decreased bilirubin concentrations in jaundiced infants exposed to sunlight. Further investigation demonstrated that light exposure triggered configurational photoisomerization, resulting in the conversion of insoluble, toxic bilirubin into water-soluble isomers and structural isomerization forming lumirubin which are efficiently eliminated through biliary and urinary excretion [13,14].

To optimize this process, phototherapy must be delivered at an effective dose, which is determined by several key factors. The first factor is spectral quality, as effective bilirubin degradation depends on light emission within the 460-490 nm wavelength range [15]. Blue, green, and turquoise wavelengths within the blue-green spectrum are regarded as optimal because of their enhanced skin penetration and maximal bilirubin absorption. Blue light phototherapy has become the standard light source for most therapeutic devices due to higher bilirubin affinity when compared with other lights in the blue-green spectrum [16,17]. The second factor, irradiance, is defined as the intensity of light energy delivered to the skin per unit surface area, typically quantified in microwatts per square centimeter per nanometer (μW/cm2/nm) [18]. Higher irradiance doses have been associated with significant declines in bilirubin values and the AAP has recommended that for intensive phototherapy, an irradiance of 30 μW/cm2/nm (range 25 to 35) of blue-green light in the range 460 to 490 nm be applied [19]. Irradiance doses greater than 35 μW/cm²/nm have not demonstrated further efficacy in lowering bilirubin concentrations and may be associated with potential adverse effects on tissues and organs [20].

Measurement of irradiance across a defined wavelength range can be performed using a radiometer or spectroradiometer. Manufacturer-recommended devices should be employed, as inter-instrument variability result in differing measurements for identical light sources. Irradiance exhibits an inverse relationship with the distance from the light source to the body surface, increasing as the light source is positioned closer to the infant [21-24]. Body surface area (BSA) exposure is also directly related to bilirubin values with greater exposure allowing for a greater decline in bilirubin [15]. Phototherapy efficacy is primarily determined by the percent of exposed BSA using the most appropriate light source rather than the number of devices [19,25]. Yet utilization of multiple devices, either placed overhead or below the infant, can improve effectiveness if it allows for greater skin surface illumination.

The type of phototherapy device utilized in managing neonatal UHB is also a crucial point to be considered. Initially, conventional phototherapy was standard of care to treat neonatal UHB and employed the use of compact fluorescent lamps or halogen lamps. However, recent research has demonstrated that Light Emitting Diode compared to conventional phototherapy reduces bilirubin faster with decreased hospital stays, emits less heat, requires less energy, is more convenient to use and has a lower risk profile [26]. Also now in wide use are fiber optic pads that is a portable device that consists of an illuminator that directly administers blue or white light directly onto an infant’s skin. Studies have demonstrated that fiber optic phototherapy is superior to conventional phototherapy with less risk of overheating infants, allows for infant and caregiver holding and bonding and avoids environmental contamination [27].

Phototherapy was initially thought to be a non-invasive and benign form of treatment yet recent data has shown that it is associated with certain adverse risks. Enacting phototherapy treatment for severe neonatal UHB often requires separating infants from their mothers and limiting breastfeeding and time away from the lights [28-30]. Studies have also demonstrated that phototherapy treatment may alter genes regulating an infant’s circadian rhythm potentially affecting their sleep wake cycles [31,32]. Dehydration and hypocalcemia are also often noted especially in preterm infants after phototherapy treatment [33,34]. Depending on the particular light modality, there may be significant water loss and increased excretion of calcium in the urine. Hypocalcemia may also be due to phototherapy’s inhibitory effect on the pineal gland decreasing melatonin and cortisol levels subsequently lowering calcium levels [35,36]. Infants undergoing treatment have also been noted to have an increase in petechiae, rash and an irregular pigmentation known as bronze baby syndrome. Phototherapy has also been linked to more severe long-term complications. One study found an increased incidence in patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in lower birth weight infants exposed to phototherapy [37]. Bender et al. observed comparable results, hypothesizing that blue light penetration through translucent skin may induce vasodilation and subsequent reopening of a constricted PDA [38]. Phototherapy has also been associated with myocardial dysfunction, with several studies reporting significant reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, stroke volume, and left ventricular output, alongside an increase in heart rate compared with pretreatment values [39]. While permanent eye damage has not been reported in children receiving phototherapy, concerns persist given evidence that blue light irradiation can impair retinal function. There is also consideration, based on recent evidence, that phototherapy can damage the Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) of neonates and induce apoptosis of peripheral blood lymphocytes by inducing the generation of free oxygen radicals and altering tumor suppressor genes. These effects may partially account for observations from recent studies suggesting a potential increase in cancer later in life among newborns treated with phototherapy [40-45]. While the majority of reported complications have involved term infants, preterm infants may experience greater prevalence and severity owing to increased susceptibility related to their immature physiological systems. Findings from a large study by Morris et al. further heighten this concern, demonstrating increased mortality specifically associated with aggressive phototherapy in preterm infants weighing less than 750 grams [46]. In light of evidence that phototherapy duration may be significantly associated with adverse effects, the AAP recently updated its bilirubin guidelines to minimize overtreatment in infants >35 weeks’ gestational age [10]. In preterm infants, intermittent or cycled phototherapy has been proposed as an alternative to continuous phototherapy to minimize treatment duration while maintaining effective bilirubin clearance. A recent study by Arnold et al. found that cycled phototherapy substantially decreased phototherapy time with little effect on bilirubin values in extremely low birth weight infants [8]. Further large-scale studies are required to assess the impact of cycled phototherapy on survival and long-term outcomes in this infant population.

Exchange Transfusion

Exchange transfusion, once the standard first-line treatment for neonatal UHB, is now limited to severe cases unresponsive to phototherapy [10,19]. The procedure involves insertion of a vascular catheter to allow the gradual withdrawal of aliquots of the infant’s blood while donor blood is simultaneously infused, thereby facilitating removal of bilirubin and antibody-coated red blood cells (RBCs). It is estimated that this procedure reduces serum bilirubin levels by 50-60%, significantly decreasing the risk of chronic bilirubin encephalopathy, or kernicterus. Yet this procedure has been associated with significant risks such as infection, thrombocytopenia, electrolyte imbalance, metabolic acidosis, hemolysis, sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, or even death [10,19]. The decision to perform this procedure should incorporate assessment of the infant’s risk factors in conjunction with guidance from AAP exchange transfusion guidelines.

Pharmacotherapy

In light of the substantial risk of encephalopathy and kernicterus and the potential adverse effects of existing therapies, pharmacological adjuvant treatments have been suggested. One such medication is fibrates, which have been proposed to induce hepatic uptake and conjugation of bilirubin. Evidence from multiple studies indicates that fenofibrate significantly lowers serum bilirubin concentrations, reduces phototherapy duration, and shortens hospitalization; however, larger randomized controlled trials are necessary prior to its integration into standard care [47-50]. Probiotics have also been suggested due to their ability to modify intestinal flora, improve gastrointestinal (GI) immunity, reduce enterohepatic circulation and degradation of conjugated bilirubin as well as improve GI mobility and stool viscosity. However, studies evaluating probiotic use for UHB have yielded inconsistent results, and concerns regarding invasive infection from contaminated products have prompted U.S. Food and Drug Administration warnings and AAP recommendations against routine use because of limited regulation and potential harm [51-57].

Zinc has also been suggested as an alternative treatment due to its potential ability to prevent lysis of RBCs and reduce enterohepatic circulation of bilirubin. Evidence from multiple studies suggests potential benefit; however, outcomes have been variable, and safety concerns related to zinc toxicity persist [58- 64]. With its ability to inhibit the activity of heme oxygenase, Metalloporphyrins have also been proposed to prevent neonatal UHB. While some studies have reported favorable outcomes, these therapies are currently being assessed in phase II clinical trials, thereby restricting their routine clinical use [65-68]. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been used in conjunction with phototherapy for alloimmune hemolytic diseases due to its ability to block RBC receptors and prevent antigen antibody interactions and hemolysis [69,70]. Although frequently used in clinical practice based on the belief that it reduces bilirubin levels, phototherapy duration, and the need for exchange transfusion, published studies have demonstrated variable efficacy. Ongoing investigation is necessary to identify the formulations and conditions under which IVIG is efficacious; until such evidence is available, its use should be limited due to the risk of multiple side effects [71-75].

Conclusion

Neonatal unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia is a common condition that is often self-limiting but can result in serious neurological complications if bilirubin levels become excessive. Effective management requires early recognition, careful monitoring, and assessment of risk factors to prevent adverse outcomes. While several treatment approaches are available, their use must balance potential benefits with associated risks. Continued research is essential to better understand the condition, refine management strategies, and ensure safe, evidence-based care. Ultimately, a thorough understanding of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and adherence to clinical guidelines are critical to safeguarding infant health and optimizing long-term outcomes.

Conflict of Interest

The authors report that they have no financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of this article.

References

  1. Mitra S, Rennie J (2017) Neonatal jaundice: Aetiology, diagnosis and treatment. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 78(12): 699‑
  2. Greco C, Arnolda G, Boo NY, Iskander IF, Okolo AA, et al. (2016) Neonatal jaundice in low‑ and middle‑income countries: Lessons and future directions from the 2015 don ostrow trieste yellow retreat. Neonatology 110(3): 172‑
  3. Zhou S, Wu X, Ma A, Zhang M, Liu Y, et al. (2019) Analysis of therapeutic effect of intermittent and continuous phototherapy on neonatal hemolytic jaundice. Exp Ther Med 17(5): 4007‑
  4. Deshmukh J, Deshmukh M, Patole S (2019) Probiotics for the management of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 32(1): 154‑
  5. Mojtahedi SY, Izadi A, Seirafi G, Khedmat L, Tavakolizadeh R, et al. (2018) Risk factors associated with neonatal jaundice: A cross‑sectional study from Iran. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 6(8): 1387‑
  6. Jiao Y, Jin Y, Meng H, Wen M (2018) An analysis on treatment effect of blue light phototherapy combined with Bifico in treating neonatal hemolytic jaundice. Exp Ther Med 16(2): 1360‑
  7. Ebbesen F, Hansen TWR, Maisels MJ (2017) Update on phototherapy in jaundiced neonates. Curr Pediatr Rev 13(3): 176‑
  8. Arnold C, Tyson JE, Pedroza C, Carlo WA, Stevenson DK, et al. (2020) Cycled phototherapy dose‑finding study for extremely low‑birth‑weight infants: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr 174(7): 649‑
  9. Roll EB, Christensen T, Gederaas OA (2005) Effects of bilirubin and phototherapy on osmotic fragility and haematoporphyrin‑induced photohaemolysis of normal erythrocytes and spherocytes. Acta Pediatric 94(10): 1443‑
  10. Bhutani VK, Wong RJ, Turkewitz D, Rauch DA, Mowitz ME, et al. (2024) Phototherapy to Prevent Severe Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia in the Newborn Infant 35 or More Weeks of Gestation: Technical Report. Pediatrics 154(3): e2024068026.
  11. Franchini M, Targher G, Lippi G (2010) Serum bilirubin levels and cardiovascular disease risk: a Janus Bifrons? Adv Clin Chem 50: 47-63.
  12. Vítek L, Schwertner HA (2007) The heme catabolic pathway and its protective effects on oxidative stress-mediated diseases. Adv Clin Chem 43: 1-57.
  13. Vítek L, Ostrow JD (2009) Bilirubin chemistry and metabolism; harmful and protective aspects. Curr Pharm Des 15(25): 2869-2883.
  14. Vreman HJ, Wong RJ, Stevenson DK (2004) Phototherapy: current methods and future directions. Semi Perinatol 28(5): 326-333.
  15. Maisels MJ, McDonagh AF (2008) Phototherapy for neonatal jaundice. N Engl J Med 358(9): 920-928.
  16. Ebbesen F, Madsen P, Støvring S, Hundborg H, Agati G, et al. (2007) Therapeutic effect of turquoise versus blue light with equal irradiance in preterm infants with jaundice. Acta Pediatric 96(6): 837-841.
  17. McDonagh AF, Agati G, Fusi F, Pratesi R (1989) Quantum yields for laser photocyclization of bilirubin in the presence of human serum albumin. Dependence of quantum yield on excitation wavelength. Photochem Photobiol 50(3): 305-319.
  18. American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia (2004) Management of hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn infant > 35 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 114(1): 297-316.
  19. Vreman HJ, Wong RJ, Murdock JR, Stevenson DK (2008) Standardized bench method for evaluating the efficacy of phototherapy devices. Acta Paediatr 97(3): 308-316.
  20. Tan KL (1997) The nature of the dose-response relationship of phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. J Pediatr 90(3): 448-452.
  21. Tan KL (1982) The pattern of bilirubin response to phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia. Pediatr Res 16(8): 670-674.
  22. Vandborg PK, Hansen BM, Greisen G, Ebbesen F (2012) Dose-response relationship of phototherapy for hyperbilirubinemia. Pediatrics 130(2): e352-e357.
  23. Slaughter JL, Kemper AR, Newman TB (2022) Technical report: diagnosis and management of hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn infant 35 or more weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 150(3): e2022058865.
  24. Vreman HJ, Wong RJ, Stevenson DK (2004) Phototherapy: current methods and future directions. Semin Perinatol 28(5): 326-333.
  25. Gutta S, Shenoy J, Kamath SP, Mithra P, Baliga BS, et al. (2019) Light emitting diode (LED) phototherapy versus conventional phototherapy in neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: a single blinded randomized control trial from coastal India. Biomed Res Int 2019: 6274719.
  26. Joel HN, Mchaile DN, Philemon RN, Mbwasi RM, Msuya L, et al. (2021) Effectiveness of FIBEROPTIC phototherapy compared to conventional phototherapy in treating HYPERBILIRUBINEMIA amongst term neonates: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pediatr 21(1): 32.
  27. Abedi F, Mirbagher Ajorpaz N, Esalatmanesh S, Rahemi Z, Gilasi HR, et al. (2018) The effect of tactile‑kinesthetic stimulation on growth indices of healthy neonates. J Bodyw Mov Ther 22(2): 308‑
  28. Dalili H, Sheikhi S, Shariat M, Haghnazarian E (2016) Effects of baby massage on neonatal jaundice in healthy Iranian infants: A pilot study. Infant Behav Dev 42: 22‑
  29. Ju SH, Lin CH (1991) The effect of moderate non‑hemolytic jaundice and phototherapy on newborn behavior. Zhonghua Min Guo Xiao Er Ke Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi 32(1): 31‑
  30. Chen A, Du L, Xu Y, Chen L, Wu Y, et al. (2005) The effect of blue light exposure on the expression of circadian genes: Bmal1 and cryptochrome 1 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of jaundiced neonates. Pediatr Res 58(6): 1180‑
  31. Tarocco A, Caroccia N, Morciano G, Wieckowski MR, Ancora G, et al. (2019) Melatonin as a master regulator of cell death and inflammation: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications for newborn care. Cell Death Dis 10(4): 317.
  32. Maayan‑Metzger A, Yosipovitch G, Hadad E, Sirota L (2001) Transepidermal water loss and skin hydration in preterm infants during phototherapy. Am J Perinatol 18(7): 393‑
  33. Kumar P, Murki S, Malik GK, Chawla D, Deorari AK, et al. (2010) Light emitting diodes versus compact fluorescent tubes for phototherapy in neonatal jaundice: A multi-center randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr 47(2): 131‑
  34. Khan M, Malik KA, Bai R (2016) Hypocalcemia in jaundiced neonates receiving phototherapy. Pak J Med Sci 32(6): 1449‑
  35. Gheshmi AN, Naderi S, Homayrani E, Safari B (2015) Prevalence of hypocalcemia after phototherapy among neonates who underwent phototherapy in Koodakan Hospital in Bandar Abbas in 2013. Electron Physician 7(6): 1387‑
  36. Mannan J, Amin SB (2017) Meta‑analysis of the effect of chest shielding on preventing patent ductus arteriosus in premature infants. Am J Perinatol 34(4): 359‑
  37. Benders MJ, Van Bel F, Van De Bor M (1999) Haemodynamic consequences of phototherapy in term infants. Eur J Pediatr 158(4): 323‑
  38. El Amrousy D, Adel R, Ayoub D (2025) Effect of phototherapy on cardiac function in full term neonates with unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia. Pediatr Res.
  39. Aycicek A, Kocyigit A, Erel O, Senturk H (2008) Phototherapy causes DNA damage in peripheral mononuclear leukocytes in term infants. J Pediatr (Rio J) 8492): 141‑
  40. Gómez‑Meda BC, Barros‑Hernández A, Guzmán‑Bárcenas J, Lemus‑Varela Mde L, Zamora‑Perez AL, et al. (2014) Effects of blue light phototherapy on DNA integrity in preterm newborns. J Photochem Photobiol B 141: 283‑
  41. Tatli MM, Minnet C, Kocyigit A, Karadag A (2008) Phototherapy increases DNA damage in lymphocytes of hyperbilirubinemic neonates. Mutat Res 654(1): 93‑
  42. Yahia S, Shabaan A, Gouida M, El‑Ghanam D, Eldegla H, et al. (2025) Influence of hyperbilirubinemia and phototherapy on markers of genotoxicity and apoptosis in full‑term infants. Eur J Pediatr 174(4): 459‑
  43. Tyson JE, Miller CC (2017) Whether neonatal phototherapy increases the risk of cancer in children is a disturbing unresolved issue. Evid Based Med 22(1): 39‑
  44. Auger N, Laverdiere C, Ayoub A, Lo E, Luu TM, et al. (2019) Neonatal phototherapy and future risk of childhood cancer. Int J Cancer 145(8): 2061‑
  45. Morris BH, Oh W, Tyson JE, Stevenson DK, Phelps DL, et al. (2008) Aggressive vs conservative phototherapy for infants with extremely low birth weight. N Engl J Med 359(18): 1885‑
  46. Khafaga KA, Alsaid LM, Salama RH, Abougabal MT (2022) Fenofibrate as an Adjuvant to Phototherapy in Term Neonates with Hyperbilirubinemia; A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Egypt J Hosp Med 89(1): 4439-4443.
  47. Eghbalian F, Hasanpour-Dehkordi A, Raeisi R (2022) The Effects of Clofibrate on Neonatal Jaundice: A Systematic Review. Int J Prev Med 13: 3.
  48. Ahmadpour-Kacho M, Zahed Pasha Y, Moghadamnia AA, Khafri S, Vafaeinezhad M, et al. (2018) The Effect of Oral Fenofibrate on Serum Bilirubin Level in Term Neonates with Hyperbilirubinemia: A Randomized Clinical Trail. Int J Pediatr 6(10): 8317-8327.
  49. Chaudhary GS, Chaudhary V, Chaurasiya OS, Chandrakant V, Kumar V, et al. (2016) Oral Fenofibrate in Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Indian J Child Health 3(1): 54-58.
  50. Nouri SAH, Mohammadi MH, Moghaddam YN, Rad AH, Zarkesh M, et al. (2022) Therapeutic effects of synbiotic on neonates with gestational age over 34 weeks admitted for jaundice. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 15(2): 327-333.
  51. Jenabi E, Eghbalian F, Sabzehei MK, Reisi R, Talesh ST (2022) The effect of probiotics and phototherapy combined application in comparison with phototherapy alone on bilirubin reduction in term neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Curr Pediatr Rev 21(1): 85-90.
  52. Ramadan Kamel T, Abd Ell Atif Afia A, Rifaat Hablas H, Al-Shorbagy MS (2019) Impact of probiotics on neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Al-Azhar Jour-nal of Pediatrics 22(46): 617-628.
  53. Tsai ML, Lin WY, Chen YT, Lin HY, Ho HH, et al. (2022) Adjuvant probiotic Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis CP-9 improve phototherapeutic treatment outcomes in neonatal jaundice among full-term newborns: A randomized double-blind clinical study. Medicine (Baltimore) 101(45): e31030.
  54. Tariq B, Shahman M, Mateen A, Taha Kamal M, Nawazish Ali A, et al. (2021) Role of Probiotics in Neonates with Hyperbilirubinemia Receiving Phototherapy. Pak J Med Health Sci 15(11): 3112-3115.
  55. Habibi M, Sanandaji H, Mojabi SH, Mohammadkhaniha F, Mohammadi N, et al. (2021) Phototherapy with probiotics supplementation therapy and phototherapy alone in neonates with jaundice: A randomized clinical trial. Immunopathol Persa 8(1):
  56. Poindexter B (2021) Use of Probiotics in Preterm Infants. Pediatrics 147(6): e2021051485.
  57. Khoshnevisasl P, Sadeghzadeh M, Kamali K, Moeinian M (2020) Effect of Zinc on Hyperbilirubinemia of Newborns, a Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial. Curr Health Sci J 46(3): 250-254.
  58. Hamed AM, Ismael AH, Ragab MS (2022) Comparison Between Oral Zinc and Agar with Phototherapy in The Treatment of Neonatal Jaundice: A Prospective Clinical Trial Study. Ann Neonatol J 4(2): 204-216.
  59. Faal G, Khatib Masjedi H, Sharifzadeh G, Kiani Z (2020) Efficacy of zinc sulfate on indirect hyperbilirubinemia in premature infants admitted to neonatal intensive care unit: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. BMC Pediatr 20(1): 130.
  60. ElRaggal NM, Ali HR, Farid YA (2022) Effect of Oral Zinc Sulfate Therapy on the Management of Neonatal Non-Hemolytic Unconjugated Hyperbi-lirubinemia: A Randomized Control Trial. Iran J Neonatol 13(3): 44-50.
  61. Kalvandi G, Shokri M, Tavan H (2020) The Therapeutic Effect of Zinc Sulfate in Iranian Neonates with Hyperbilirubinemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pediatr Rev 8(3): 145-52.
  62. Yang L, Wu D, Wang B, Bu X, Tang J, et al. (2018) The influence of zinc sulfate on neonatal jaundice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 31(10): 1311-1317.
  63. Waheed A, Shirazi IH, Mustafa A, Waheed Y (2019) Therapeutic effects of zinc sulphate in reduction of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: an experimental study. Pak J Pathol 30(2): 36-39.
  64. Wong RJ, Bhutani VK, Vreman HJ, Stevenson DK (2007) Pharmacology Review: Tin Mesoporphyrin for the Prevention of Severe Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia. Neo Reviews 8(2): e77-e84.
  65. Rosenfeld WN, Hudak ML, Ruiz N, Gautam S (2022) Jasmine Study Group. Stannsoporfin with phototherapy to treat hyperbilirubinemia in newborn hemolytic disease. J Perinatol 42(1): 110-115.
  66. Maisels MJ, Yang H (2012) Tin-mesoporphyrin in the treatment of refractory hyperbilirubinemia due to Rh incompatibility. J Perinatol 32(11): 899-900.
  67. Poudel P, Adhikari S (2022) Efficacy and Safety Concerns with Sn-Mesoporphyrin as an Adjunct Therapy in Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia: A Literature Review. Int J Pediatr 2022: 2549161.
  68. Alsaleem M (2020) Intravenous Immune Globulin Uses in the Fetus and Neonate: A Review. Antibodies (Basel) 9(4): 60.
  69. Louis D, More K, Oberoi S, Shah PS (2014) Intravenous immunoglobulin in isoimmune haemolytic disease of newborn: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 99(4): F325-F331.
  70. El Fekey SWI, El-Sharkawy HM, AhmedAAEE, Nassar MAE, ElgendyMM, et al. (2019) Effect of Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Reducing Bilirubin Levels in Hemolytic Disease of Newborn. Egypt J Hosp Med 74(5): 957-968.
  71. Vardar G, Okan MA, Karadag N, Topcuoglu S, Ozalkaya E, et al. (2022) Intravenous immunoglobulin in hemolytic disease of the newborn: A moving target in time. Niger J Clin Pract 25(8): 1262-1268.
  72. Al-Lawama M, Badran E, Elrimawi A, Bani Mustafa A, Alkhatib H, et al. (2019) Intravenous Immunoglobulins as Adjunct Treatment to Phototherapy in Isoimmune Hemolytic Disease of the Newborn: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. J Clin Med Res 11(11): 760-763.
  73. Zwiers C, Scheffer-Rath ME, Lopriore E, De Haas M, Liley HG, et al. (2018) Immunoglobulin for alloimmune hemolytic disease in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3(3): CD003313.
  74. Okulu E, Erdeve O, Kilic I, Olukman O, Calkavur S, et al. (2022) Intravenous Immunoglobulin Use in Hemolytic Disease Due to ABO Incompatibility to Prevent Exchange Transfusion. Front Pediatr 10: 864609.
  75. Smits-Wintjens VE, Walther FJ, Rath ME, Lindenburg IT, Tepas AB, et al. (2011) Intravenous immunoglobulin in neonates with rhesus hemolytic disease: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics 127(4): 680-686.